Connect with us

North Dakota

North Dakota used car prices higher than the national average: survey

Published

on


Posted:

Up to date:

Advertisement

(iSeeCars) Used automotive costs have reached report highs with the common one- to five-year-old used automotive costing $34,852. 

How a lot have used automotive costs risen in current months? In keeping with iSeeCars.com’s newest evaluation of over 1.8 million used automotive gross sales in January, used automotive costs elevated 36.9 p.c, or $9,409, in comparison with the identical interval the earlier yr.  

Common Used Automobile Value Will increase by State

Are used automotive value will increase constant throughout the nation? Listed below are the common used automotive value will increase by state in ascending order:

Used Automobile Value Will increase by State: January 2022- iSeeCars
Rank  State 12 months-Over-12 months % Value Change
1 Delaware 28.8%
2 Idaho 28.9%
3 Vermont 30.2%
4 Oregon 30.4%
5 Michigan 30.8%
6 Texas 32.3%
7 Rhode Island 32.4%
8 Wyoming 32.4%
9 New Mexico 32.6%
10 Wisconsin 32.6%
11 New Hampshire 33.0%
12 Minnesota 33.1%
13 Nebraska 33.2%
14 Maine 33.4%
15 West Virginia 34.1%
16 South Carolina 34.4%
17 Washington 34.8%
18 Mississippi 35.1%
19 Colorado 35.1%
20 Missouri 35.1%
21 Massachusetts 35.4%
22 New Jersey 35.9%
23 Tennessee 35.9%
24 Utah 35.9%
25 Oklahoma 36.0%
26 South Dakota 36.1%
27 Alabama 36.2%
28 Pennsylvania 36.2%
29 Illinois 36.5%
30 Indiana 36.7%
31 Iowa 36.8%
32 Connecticut 36.8%
33 Virginia 36.9%
34 North Carolina 36.9%
Nationwide Common 36.9%
35 Ohio 37.1%
36 Alaska 37.2%
37 Arkansas 37.3%
38 Georgia 37.3%
39 Arizona 37.6%
40 Maryland 38.1%
41 Hawaii 38.3%
42 Florida 38.4%
43 Kansas 38.9%
44 California 39.7%
45 Louisiana 40.0%
46 Nevada 40.2%
47 New York 40.4%
48 Kentucky 40.8%
49 Montana 42.9%
50 North Dakota 43.5%
  • North Dakota is the state with the best used automotive value improve in 2022 in comparison with 2021 at 43.5 p.c, which quantities to $11,413.
  • Delaware has the smallest used automotive value improve at 28.8 p.c, which quantities to $7,714.

Common Used Automobile Costs by State

Some states pay greater than others for used automobiles. Here’s a rating of the common used automotive value by state by ascending order:

Common Used Automobile Value by State – iSeeCars
Rank State Common Used Automobile Value
1 Connecticut $30,652
2 Idaho $31,226
3 Ohio $31,227
4 Indiana $32,159
5 Michigan $32,209
6 Arizona $32,422
7 Oklahoma $32,574
8 South Carolina $32,591
9 Nevada $32,606
10 Maryland $32,634
11 Wisconsin $32,834
12 Hawaii $32,908
13 Kentucky $32,916
14 Tennessee $32,930
15 Pennsylvania $32,950
16 Massachusetts $32,953
17 Alabama $32,970
18 Minnesota $32,999
19 Virginia $33,004
20 New Jersey $33,063
21 Oregon $33,071
22 Missouri $33,121
23 Utah $33,242
24 Mississippi $33,327
25 Louisiana $33,412
26 New York $33,699
27 North Carolina $33,774
28 New Hampshire $33,820
29 Rhode Island $33,906
30 Texas $34,006
31 New Mexico $34,104
32 Florida $34,104
33 Colorado $34,273
34 Iowa $34,318
35 Illinois $34,326
36 Delaware $34,473
37 Georgia $34,580
38 Vermont $34,610
39 Kansas $34,826
Nationwide Common $34,852
40 Washington $35,111
41 Arkansas $35,358
42 California $35,417
43 Nebraska $35,682
44 South Dakota $36,369
45 North Dakota $36,711
46 Maine $36,856
47 Alaska $37,714
48 West Virginia $38,396
49 Wyoming $39,195
50 Montana $42,417
  • Connecticut is the state with the bottom common used automotive value of $30,652.
  • Montana is the state with the very best common used automotive value of $42,417.

What does this imply for shoppers? The present state of the used automotive market presents a profitable trade-in alternative for shoppers who’ve a used automobile to promote. Whereas shoppers had been beforehand suggested to attend to buy a used automotive in the event that they had been in a position to take action, the microchip scarcity is predicted to persist for many of 2022. The easiest way to keep away from extreme value hikes for the foreseeable future is to buy a used automobile that isn’t in very excessive demand, comparable to a sedan, and if potential, buy it from a state or area with lower cost will increase.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

North Dakota

Burgum, a potential Trump VP pick, backs a controversial CO2 pipeline favored by the Biden White House

Published

on

Burgum, a potential Trump VP pick, backs a controversial CO2 pipeline favored by the Biden White House


BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum is one of Donald Trump’s most visible and vocal backers, sprinting around the country to drum up support for the former president’s comeback bid while auditioning to be his running mate.

Far from the glare of the campaign trail, however, Burgum is wrestling with a mammoth carbon dioxide pipeline project in his home state. The $5.5 billion venture has split North Dakota and left him straddling an awkward political divide as Trump and President Joe Biden offer voters starkly different visions about how to deal with climate change.

A Republican little known outside North Dakota, Burgum is a serious contender to be Trump’s vice-presidential choice. The two-term governor has stood out in the narrowing field of choices due to his executive experience and business savvy. And Burgum has close ties to deep-pocketed energy industry CEOs whose money Trump wants to help bankroll his third run for the White House.

Burgum is championing the pipeline project, which would gather planet-warming CO2 from ethanol plants across the Midwest and deposit the gas a mile underground. The pipeline aligns with Biden’s push to tackle global climate change, a position that could put him at odds with Trump.

Advertisement

In backing the pipeline, Burgum is navigating the tricky issue of land ownership in deep-red North Dakota and the politics of climate change inside the GOP.

While Burgum has outlined plans to make North Dakota carbon neutral by 2030, he’s steered clear of describing the pipeline or other carbon capture initiatives as environmentally friendly. Instead, he touts them as a lucrative business opportunity for North Dakota that might ultimately assist the fossil fuel industry.

“This has nothing to do with climate change,” Burgum said in early March on a North Dakota radio program. “This has to do with markets.”

The pipeline

The CO2 pipeline, known as the Midwest Carbon Express, is financed by hundreds of investors and will be built by Summit Carbon Solutions of Ames, Iowa. The 2,500-mile pipeline route snakes through Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska and South Dakota before ending in west central North Dakota, where up to 18 million metric tons of CO2 would be entombed each year in underground rock formations.

The North Dakota Industrial Commission, which Burgum chairs, is expected to decide in the coming months whether to approve Summit’s application for a permit to store all the CO2 it collects. Regulators in nearby states are also weighing approval of the pipeline.

Advertisement

As part of Biden’s investment in combating climate change, companies may receive $85 from the federal government for every metric ton of CO2 collected from industrial facilities and permanently sequestered. They can also get $60 for each ton stored and later used to produce more oil, a process that involves injecting carbon dioxide into oilfields to keep them productive.

Summit stands to receive as much as $1.5 billion annually from the tax credits. The company said it has no plans to use CO2 in oil drilling, which is known as enhanced oil recovery, or EOR. But a carbon dioxide storage permit application drafted by Summit appears to leave open the potential for the CO2 to be used for that purpose.

“Our business model is for 100% sequestration,” the company said in an emailed response to questions. “No customers have ever approached us to move their CO2 for EOR.”

For several environmental and public interest groups, providing tax credits for more climate-polluting oil is a handout to oil drillers that upends the goal of weaning corporations and consumers off fossil fuels.

“It’s just not the right answer,” said Brett Hartl, government affairs director at the nonprofit Center for Biological Diversity. “You’re incentivizing the extension of the use of fossil fuels for many more years or decades to come.”

Advertisement

Burgum’s office declined a request to interview the governor for this story. He has hailed his state’s underground CO2 storage capacity as a “geologic jackpot.” North Dakota, according to Burgum, has the capacity to store 250 billion tons of carbon dioxide underground.

That message has been amplified by North Dakota’s mineral resources department, which has estimated CO2 can help extract billions more barrels of oil from the rich Bakken shale formation. The Bakken is a 200,000-square-mile deposit that spans North Dakota, Montana and southern Canada.

Pipeline blowback

In North Dakota, the blowback to the Summit project has been intense, with Burgum caught in the crossfire.

There are fears a pipeline rupture would unleash a lethal cloud of CO2. In 2020, a pipeline carrying compressed carbon dioxide ruptured in Satartia, Mississippi. At least 45 people required hospital treatment and 200 more had to be evacuated from the area, according to the federal agency that oversees pipeline safety.

Summit said the CO2 line in Mississippi may have contained high amounts of hydrogen sulfide, a toxic gas. Its system will transport nearly pure carbon dioxide, the company said, and any hydrogen sulfide or other elements in the stream “will not be considered impactful.”

Advertisement

Landowners also worry their property values will plummet if the pipeline passes under their property. And they’re outraged over what they allege are hardball tactics employed by Summit to secure easements for the project.

Burgum has largely avoided the dicey subject of eminent domain. If landowners don’t want the pipeline on their property, he’s said, the route can be shifted, and someone else can get the “big check.”

Julia Stramer, whose family owns cropland in Emmons County and opposes the pipeline, said the amount of money Summit offered her for a 99-year easement was insulting.

“I have informed Gov. Burgum that we have not received an offer of ‘the big check,’” she told North Dakota’s Public Service Commission earlier this month.

Stramer scoffed at the safety measures Summit says it is taking, telling the commission the pipeline is to be buried only 4 feet deep.

Advertisement

“We bury people deeper than that,” Stramer said.

Kurt Swenson and his family own or have an interest in 1,750 acres at or near the proposed CO2 storage site. At a public hearing earlier this month on Summit’s storage permit application, Swenson said he had a warning for anyone who attempts to take his land without his consent.

“It seems like everybody wants what isn’t theirs,” Swenson said. “You’re going to end up taking it from my cold, dead hands. And you’re going to see how that works out for you.”

Summit said it has signed easement deals with landowners along 82% of the pipeline’s route in North Dakota and obtained 92% of the lease agreements needed at the storage site. The company added that the project also is supported by state lawmakers and emergency managers.

Concerns over Summit’s project in North Dakota’s second most populous county, Burleigh, led the county commission to approve an ordinance restricting the pipeline from running too close to residential areas, churches and schools.

Advertisement

“I have not gotten one single contact from anybody that’s not affiliated with Summit asking me to support this pipeline,” said Brian Bitner, the Burleigh County Commission chairman. “Every contact has asked me to oppose it.”

Gaylen Dewing, who has worked as a farmer and rancher near Bismarck for more than 50 years, criticized Burgum for what he sees as the governor’s tilt to the left. Burgum’s embrace of carbon neutrality has put the governor in cahoots with the “Green New Deal people,” he said.

“Although he professes to be a conservative, he is anything but when it comes to environmental issues,” Dewing said.

Not a climate warrior

When he’s out stumping for Trump, Burgum doesn’t sound at all like a climate warrior.

Speaking at the North Carolina Republican Party Convention last month, Burgum accused the Biden administration of trying to shut down the oil and gas industries and declared that Trump would reverse the federal rules and mandates that he said are stifling energy companies.

Advertisement

Trump has long criticized federal and state efforts to regulate greenhouse gas emissions and has been backed by the oil and gas industry in his three presidential bids. The former president, who in the past called global warming a “hoax,” claims on his campaign website that Biden has surrendered to the “crazed climate crusaders.”

Oil and gas interests have already donated nearly $8 million to Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign, according to the political money website Open Secrets.

Burgum, with his close ties to his state’s dominant industry, is the type of running mate who could help boost such donations.

If Burgum is not selected to be the GOP’s vice-presidential nominee and does not take a job in a second Trump administration, he can always return to North Dakota to finish out his last term, with key decisions looming for the pipeline.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

ND canvassing board meets to certify primary election results

Published

on

ND canvassing board meets to certify primary election results


BISMARCK, N.D. (KFYR) – The state canvassing board met on Wednesday at the Secretary of State’s office to certify the results of the 2024 North Dakota Primary Election for the state, judicial and legislative races.

The Secretary of State’s office says election results were submitted by the 53 county canvassing boards responsible for reviewing the election results from each precinct within their county.

They say the Republican nomination for the State House of Representatives in District 26 met the threshold for a demand recount. In that district, Kelby Timmons can request a recount within four days of the state canvassing board meeting.

120,358 people voted on June 11, a turnout of 20.26%. The release also says of the 42,652 Vote-by-Mail ballots sent out, 36,544 were returned. 12,208 people cast ballots in early voting.

Advertisement

For more information on the certified results, you can visit the Secretary of State’s website.



Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

Primary Election Results Certified In North Dakota, One House Race Recount Possible – KVRR Local News

Published

on

Primary Election Results Certified In North Dakota, One House Race Recount Possible – KVRR Local News


BISMARCK, N.D. (KVRR) — The State Canvassing Board has certified the 2024 Primary Election results in North Dakota.

The Republican nomination for state house in District 26 in western North Dakota meets the threshold for a demand recount.

Kelby Timmons can request a recount within four days.

The election saw around 120 thousand voters cast ballots for a statewide turnout of around 20 percent.

Advertisement

Secretary of State Michael Howe says in at least five counties, absentee ballots were not postmarked.

He calls it “completely unacceptable for the United States Postal Service.”

Absentee voting starts Friday for the August 13 primary election in Minnesota.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending