Connect with us

North Dakota

North Dakota House passes bill to shorten time for educators to attain lifetime licensure

Published

on

North Dakota House passes bill to shorten time for educators to attain lifetime licensure


BISMARCK — A bill that would reduce the time it takes for a North Dakota teacher to earn a lifetime educator license passed through the House by a substantial margin Friday, Jan. 24.

Representatives voted 79-12 to advance

House Bill 1238,

sponsored in part by Rep. Zachary Ista, D-Grand Forks.

Advertisement

The House Education Committee unanimously recommended the bill for passage Thursday, though the bill received mixed reviews among education circles during a hearing Tuesday.

The bill would make a teacher eligible for a lifetime license when reaching 20 years in their career, instead of the current 30-year mark.

Anyone with a lifetime license who intends to keep teaching shall report to the state’s licensing agency, the Education Standards and Practices Board, at least once every five years, the bill states.

Reporting could include any crime a teacher committed or other behavior that could lead to license revocation or suspension.

Nothing in the bill would prevent the board from taking its own action against a teacher’s lifetime license, if warranted.

Advertisement

The bill is a holdover from the last legislative session, Ista said, during which it received widespread support in the House but failed on a tie vote in the Senate, with one member absent.

One thing that is different this time is the reporting element, he said, which was a sticking point last time with ESPB.

Much of the support for HB 1238 comes in the name of improving recruitment and retention of teachers.

Ista said the bill would reduce continuing education expenses for teachers, estimating the average educator could save up to $1,000 in out-of-pocket expenses.

Advertisement
Rep. Zac Ista, D-Grand Forks.

Contributed / Zac Ista

Also testifying in support Tuesday was Nick Archuleta, president of North Dakota United, the union representing public education and public services employees in the state.

Archuleta said some opponents maintain the bill would cause teachers to stop taking educational credits they might otherwise have earned.

“Not only is that argument a slight to the professionalism of teachers, it also discounts entirely the fact that teachers … have to take coursework to make lane changes and advance on the salary schedule,” he said.

Advertisement

Testifying in opposition of House Bill 1238 were representatives from the state Education Standards and Practices Board.

Executive Director Rebecca Pitkin said most states require continuing education for license renewal.

“Teachers are the model of lifelong learning. Ongoing education, potentially until almost the end of a career, is critical,” she said.

Pitkin also said reducing ongoing education requirements for teachers would not promote the profession.

Cory Steiner, ESPB chair and superintendent of the Northern Cass School District, agreed.

Advertisement

“There could be unintended consequences, seeing education as ‘less than’ other fields, where it should be equal to or more than,” he said.

Pitkin said there are currently around 18,000 licensed educators in the state system, with around 10,000 of them currently working.

Providing neutral testimony was Ann Ellefson, director of academic support at the North Dakota Department of Public Instruction.

Ellefson said the state’s teachers have easy access to an online educational hub offering professional development, training opportunities and educator resources.

Many of the courses are no cost or low cost across all North Dakota zip codes, she said, while some do charge a nominal $40 fee at registration.

Advertisement

There are 557 active users taking part in 68 courses that include child nutrition, North Dakota Native American studies, science of reading, mathematics and educator ethics, Ellefson said.

On the House floor Friday, Rep. LaurieBeth Hager, a Fargo Democrat and cosponsor of the bill, said the legislation would reduce red tape for teachers.

Rep. Pat Heinert, R-Bismarck, said Friday the goal of the bill is to keep teachers in the profession.

Further action on the bill was not scheduled as of Friday.





Source link

Advertisement

North Dakota

Armstrong opens application period for Governor’s Band/Orchestra and Choral programs

Published

on

Armstrong opens application period for Governor’s Band/Orchestra and Choral programs


BISMARCK, N.D. – Gov. Kelly Armstrong today announced the opening of the application period for school, community and church bands, orchestras and choirs across North Dakota to apply to serve as the Governor’s Official State Band/Orchestra Program and Choral Program for the 2026-2027 school year. 

The Governor and First Lady will select the two groups from the applications received based on musical talent, achievement and community involvement. The governor may invite the groups to perform at official state functions held throughout the 2026-2027 school year, including the State of the State Address in January 2027 at the Capitol in Bismarck. 

Interested groups should submit an application with a musical recording to the Governor’s Office by 5 p.m. Monday, May 4. The Governor’s Band/Orchestra Program and Governor’s Choral Program will be announced in May. Please complete the application and provide materials at https://www.governor.nd.gov/governors-chorus-and-bandorchestra-program-application. 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

North Dakota

Greenpeace seeks new trial, claiming jury pool biased in case over Dakota Access Pipeline

Published

on


Greenpeace has asked for a second trial after a judge entered a $345 million judgment against the organization in a landmark case brought by the developer of the Dakota Access Pipeline.

The case “threatens to result in one of the largest miscarriages of justice in North Dakota’s history,” attorneys for the environmental group wrote in a brief filed last week.

After a three-week trial roughly a year ago, a Morton County jury directed Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer about $667 million, finding the environmental group at fault for inciting illegal acts against the company during anti-pipeline protests in North Dakota in 2016 and 2017 and for publishing false statements that harmed Energy Transfer’s reputation.

Greenpeace denies Energy Transfer’s claims and maintains that it brought the lawsuit to hurt the environmental movement.

Advertisement

Southwest Judicial District Judge James Gion in October slashed the jury’s award to $345 million, though he didn’t finalize the award until late February.

Greenpeace is now taking steps to fight the judgment, which includes its motion for a new trial.

The environmental group’s reasons for the request include claims that the jury instructions and verdict form contained errors, and that Energy Transfer was allowed to present unfair and irrelevant evidence to jurors. The group also alleges the jury pool was biased.

Greenpeace says the jury’s award assumes that Greenpeace was entirely responsible for any injury Energy Transfer sustained related to the protests. Jurors were not given the opportunity to consider whether Greenpeace was only at fault for a portion of the damages, the organization wrote in its brief.

Attorneys for Greenpeace also referenced the mailers and other media circulated to Mandan and Bismarck residents before the trial that contained anti-Dakota Access Pipeline protest and pro-energy industry content.

Advertisement

The environmental group seeks a new trial in Cass County, arguing in part that the jury pool in the Fargo area would be more fair because its residents did not directly experience the Dakota Access Pipeline protests and because the local economy is less dependent on the energy industry.

If Greenpeace’s request for a new trial is denied, it plans to appeal the case to the North Dakota Supreme Court, the organization has said.

Greenpeace previously asked for the trial to be moved from Morton County to Cass County in early 2025, which Gion and the North Dakota Supreme Court denied.

The lawsuit is against three separate Greenpeace organizations — Greenpeace USA, Greenpeace International and Greenpeace Fund.

Energy Transfer as of Wednesday morning had not submitted a response to Greenpeace’s motion for a new trial. Previously, the company has defended the jury’s verdict and disputed Greenpeace’s claims that the court proceedings were not fair.

Advertisement

Energy Transfer has indicated it may appeal Gion’s decision to reduce the award to $345 million.

Greenpeace will not have to pay any of the $345 million judgment for at least a couple of months, Gion ruled Tuesday.

Court documents indicate that the organization could have to pay a bond of up to $25 million while appeals proceed, though the environmental group has asked the judge to waive or reduce this amount. Gion has not decided on this motion.

He noted that obtaining such a large bond will be challenging.

“The magnitude of this matter defies simple decisions,” Gion wrote.

Advertisement

Energy Transfer in court filings urged the judge to require Greenpeace to post the full $25 million.

Any bond money Greenpeace provides would be held by a third party while the appeals proceed, according to Greenpeace USA.

Greenpeace International has filed a separate lawsuit in the Netherlands that accuses Energy Transfer of weaponizing the U.S. legal system against the environmental group. Energy Transfer asked Gion to order that the overseas suit be paused while the North Dakota case is still active, which Gion denied. The company appealed his ruling to the North Dakota Supreme Court, which has yet to make a decision on the matter.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

North Dakota

Minnkota Says Cost of Data Center Power Project Rises Won’t Affect Customers

Published

on

Minnkota Says Cost of Data Center Power Project Rises Won’t Affect Customers


(Photo by Jeff Beach/North Dakota Monitor)

 

(North Dakota Monitor) – The cost of the power line and substation needed by a data center north of Fargo has risen from $75 million to $110 million, but developers say the data center company will still cover the entire cost of the project.

Applied Digital needs the project to power its data center being built between Fargo and Harwood. The data center requires 280 megawatts of power at peak demand.

Advertisement

Applied Digital will pay for the project but it will be owned by Grand Forks based, Minnkota Power Cooperative.

The North Dakota Public Service Commission held a hearing in Fargo on what is known as the Agassiz Transmission Line and Substation.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending