Connect with us

North Dakota

During Chamber forum, Grand Forks legislative candidates disagree on North Dakota abortion ban

Published

on

During Chamber forum, Grand Forks legislative candidates disagree on North Dakota abortion ban


GRAND FORKS – During legislative forums Tuesday evening, Grand Forks candidates in Districts 42 and 18 disagreed on North Dakota’s abortion ban but did agree the Legislature needs to address property taxes.

The forum was sponsored by the Grand Forks-East Grand Forks Chamber of Commerce and was moderated by Garth Rydland and Chamber CEO and President Barry Wilfahrt. The evening included one forum for District 42 House and Senate candidates and another for District 18 House and Senate candidates. Each forum included a similar set of questions about topics like the state’s abortion ban, ballot Measure 4 (regarding a proposal to end the state’s current property tax system) and legislation they would like to support.

Candidates in District 42

had the first forum and included Senate candidates Claire Cory, Republican; and Rodney Gigstad, Democrat; and House candidates Sarah Grossbauer, Democrat; Carol Hagen, Democrat; Emily O’Brien, Republican; and Doug Osowski, Republican.

Advertisement

Candidates in District 18

had the second forum and included Senate candidates Scott Meyer, Republican; and Kyle Thorson, Democrat; and House candidates Mary Adams, Democrat; Nels Christianson, Republican; Scott Nelson, Democrat; and Steve Vetter, Republican.

On abortion, all of the Democratic-NPL candidates were against the ban.

“I believe that the Legislature of North Dakota has no business in my doctor’s office or anyone else’s,” Grossbauer said. “How are we supposed to expect a 12-year-old who was raped to know that she was pregnant if she’s not menstruating? I think it was a slap in the face to every woman across this state.”

A judge recently

Advertisement

found the ban violates the state’s Constitution.

“I don’t believe in passing legislation that’s unconstitutional,” said Thorson. “We’re spending millions defending this bill in court along with many other constitutional bills that we passed before. My opinion is government should not be in these decisions.”

Most of the Republican candidates said that they are pro-life and for the ban, with the exception of O’Brien, who did not outright say she is against the ban.

“I’m not sure which specific bill that is being discussed. … In my own opinion I believe that it is between the individual and the doctor to have those conversations and make those decisions best for them,” O’Brien said.

Christianson said “I am unapologetically pro-life. The consensus pro-life statute passed by the Legislature protects the dignity of the life of the mother and the child.”

Advertisement

On Measure 4, which seeks to

eliminate the vast majority of property taxes in the state, many agreed the state needs to do something about rising taxes. Many are against the measure.

“Having just had some of our property north of Bismarck burned and having the fire department and the National Guard, it’s kind of a big thing for the first responders,” Hagen said. “We need to be able to have first responders and other resources, and Measure 4 would deflate or defeat a lot of those products.”

Other candidates said voters will make the right decision this November.

“I trust that voters will make the right decision for what they think is best for the state,” said Cory. “I support all forms of tax relief for District 42 residents, but I also encourage people to be informed on the measure before they go and vote.”

Advertisement

Osowski said the measure would provide a fix for the clear appetite for property tax reform.

“This would be the quickest way to release some financial burden on citizens that own homes and are subject to property taxes or unfair tax burdens,” said Osowski.

Meyer said that if reelected, property tax reform would be at the top of his agenda.

“I will be sitting at the table on property tax reform,” Meyer said. “I don’t want to start with the investment properties or centrally assessed things. No matter what, your Legislature will be working on this in 2025.”

If approved, the responsibility of paying property tax would no longer be on the property owner. Instead, the state would cover the current rate going forward, with local entities being responsible for any increases beyond the current rate. Adams and many of the other candidates at Tuesday’s forums noted that the plan has no set solution on where the funds — billions of dollars — will come from to pay for essential services.

Advertisement

“Whoever came forward with the (measure) said ‘Oh the Legislature will fix it’ but they can’t just fix it because property tax encompasses so many things,” Adams said. “Take away the tax, and then you’re going to get ‘fees’ because one way or the other, we have to pay for our infrastructure, our police department, our fire department; all those things that you don’t always use, but you’re glad that they’re there.”

On proposed legislation, many of the representatives that aren’t currently serving in office said they would focus on co-sponsoring legislation instead of crafting their own bills from scratch. But they did provide ideas of topics that the Legislature should tackle, like education funding or leave policy.

“We need to pass a school lunch bill so that kids can go to school and be able to concentrate on their studies (instead of being hungry), because that’s going to help everybody,” said Gigstad. “I think we need to explore a paid family leave bill (or) at least study the family leave situation.”

Tackling school meal funding and ensuring North Dakota students have access to nutritious food was a key issue for the Dem-NPL candidates.

“Any little thing we can do to help improve school performance will improve the society as a whole,” said Nelson. “We need to make sure we fortify our public schools, and by doing that, we start with the nutrition and the well-being of the students.”

Advertisement

More experienced candidates said that they don’t need the time to hit the ground running, unlike many of the less politically experienced candidates.

“Will you need on-the-job training with me? I’m ready to go, day one,” said Vetter. “I have a history of passing bills, getting things done, and solving problems.”

O’Brien also defended herself against an allegation

that she does not ilive in District 42.

“There have been several conversations. Four years ago it was the same conversation because my boyfriend and I have two children together,” O’Brien said. “I work very hard to still have my own house where all my mail goes; my children have a safe and comfortable place to go that mom has and dad has.”

Advertisement

The forums will be rebroadcast on the local cable channel prior to election day and available on the city of Grand Forks’ Facebook page. More information on the upcoming North Dakota general election on Nov. 5 can be found at

www.vote.nd.gov

.





Source link

Advertisement

North Dakota

Richard D. Langowski Obituary April 16, 2026 – Tollefson Funeral Home

Published

on

Richard D. Langowski Obituary April 16, 2026 – Tollefson Funeral Home


Richard D. “Rick” Langowski, age 78 of Minto, North Dakota passed away on Thursday, April 16, 2026 at his home in Minto.

Rick was born March 10, 1948 in Grafton, North Dakota, the son of the late Julian and Catherine (Wysocki) Langowski. In 1967, he volunteered for the military bringing him to Germany as a Motor Sargent. After an Honorable Discharge he took a job at the International Airport in Grand Forks, ND. His duties included: refueling planes and jets as well as maintaining the grounds. He had the opportunity to meet the famous singer Mr. James Brown.

Rick was united in marriage to Alice Odegard on June 17, 1982 in Minto, North Dakota. The family made their home in Minto where they raised Jason and Angela. Rick was very proud of his children and loved them more than anything. He told everyone and bragged about the children he raised. He cherished his grandchildren and loved to be present in every aspect of their lives.

His career changed to semi driving where he drove for Cenex Transportation for four years and ten years for Valley Transports. His love for the open road directed him into the used car business. He opened Minto Auto Sales and Services in 1987, proudly operating for 39 years. He had the privilege to meet many people and travel to many places. He enjoyed riding his many Harley Davidson Motorcycles. In 2025, he sold the business to his longtime mechanic and friend, Aaron Anderson. In Rick’s opinion, “Minto Auto is one of the best mechanical shops in the area.”

Advertisement

He was a member of the Sacred Heart Catholic Church, Minto, ND. He loved hunting with Jason, watching sports, especially the Yankees and Twins. In 2017, Rick was able to enjoy a father/son trip of a lifetime to Alaska. He thoroughly enjoyed every aspect of the trip and thought was the best time of his life.

Rick is survived by his children: Jason Odegard, Reynolds, ND; Angela (Nick) Eppert, Goshen, IN; grandchildren: Ashlyn, Kaia, Annika, Boden and Caelan; sisters: Carol King, Grand Forks, ND; Connie Jones, Argyle, MN; seven nieces and nephews. He is also survived by his very close friend and confidant, Yvette Estep, Grafton, ND. He was preceded in death by his parents and siblings: Robert and Ronald.

Rick’s family would like to extend a very special thank you to Yvette Estep, an employee of Rick’s, affectionately known as “hotrod.” She was there for Rick, along with Aaron for doctor’s appointments, treatments and helped comfort him throughout his battle. Jason and Angela will be forever indebted to her and consider her family.

Mass of Christian Burial will be Wednesday, April 22, 2026 at 10:30 A.M. at the Sacred Heart Catholic Church of Minto. Visitation will be for one hour prior to the service at the church. Interment will be at the Sacred Heart Catholic Cemetery, Minto, ND. Military Rites will be provided by the Minto American Legion Post and the North Dakota National Guard Honor Guard.

Advertisement

or send flowers to the family in memory of Richard D. Langowski, please visit our

.



Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

Tesla Sues North Dakota Over Direct Sales Ban

Published

on

Tesla Sues North Dakota Over Direct Sales Ban


By Nehal Malik

Tesla is heading to court to challenge one of the final frontiers of the traditional car dealership model. The automaker has officially filed a lawsuit against the state of North Dakota, seeking the right to open its first two showrooms and service centers in Bismarck and Fargo.

Advertisement

For years, North Dakota law has required vehicle manufacturers to sell their products through independent, third-party franchised dealerships. Tesla, which famously avoids the middleman to sell directly to consumers, argues that these decades-old rules are an unnecessary barrier. According to a report by the Minot Daily News, the case is now in the hands of District Judge Bonnie Storbakken.

A Battle Over Definitions

The core of Tesla’s legal argument relies on a specific reading of state law. Currently, North Dakota defines a “manufacturer” as a person who assembles or imports a vehicle and sells it to dealers in the state for resale. Tesla argues that because it sells directly to its customers and does not use third-party dealers at all, it technically doesn’t fall under that legal definition.

“Tesla just wants to be able to sell its vehicles in North Dakota, and not force customers who would wish to purchase a Tesla vehicle to have to drive to Minnesota or another state to do it,” said Ari Holtzblatt, one of Tesla’s attorneys. Currently, the more than 800 Tesla owners in North Dakota have to leave the state just to take delivery of their cars or receive first-party service.

The state’s Assistant Attorney General, Michael Pitcher, isn’t buying it. He argued during a recent hearing that “Tesla can operate in North Dakota the same way that every other manufacturer does. They can appoint dealers, they can enter into franchise agreements, and they can sell through that.” From the state’s perspective, the law isn’t stopping Tesla from doing business; it’s just regulating how the company’s cars get into owners’ hands.

Challenging the Franchise Model

Tesla has a long history of fighting these “protectionist” franchise laws across the U.S. In many cases, Tesla’s legal victories have paved the way for other EV startups like Rivian and Lucid to secure their own direct-sales exceptions. In some of the more restrictive states, Tesla has even found innovative workarounds by partnering with Native American tribes to open stores on sovereign tribal land.

Advertisement

The direct-to-consumer model is vital for Tesla because it allows the company to control the entire customer experience and maintain higher margins by cutting out dealer markups. For the customer, this often translates to a more transparent buying process without the high-pressure sales tactics or hidden fees associated with traditional dealerships.

The Road Ahead for North Dakota

North Dakota has historically lagged behind in EV infrastructure, though the state is slowly catching up with a growing number of Supercharger locations and charging ports along the I-94 corridor. Tesla’s attempt to establish a physical presence in the state is a clear sign that the company sees untapped potential in the region.

If the court rules in Tesla’s favor, it won’t mean instant licenses, but it will give the company the green light to reapply with the Department of Transportation. As the automotive world shifts toward an electric future, these legal battles in North Dakota will likely determine how much choice consumers actually have when it comes to how they buy their next car.

By Nehal Malik

Tesla is gearing up for its first major financial check-in of the year. The company has officially scheduled its Q1 2026 earnings call for after the bell on Wednesday, April 22, 2026. Ahead of the event, Tesla has shared its company-compiled earnings consensus for the quarter, which aggregates estimates from 20 top sell-side analysts, including Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and Wedbush.

According to the data, analysts are expecting average total revenues of approximately $21.4 billion for the quarter. On the profitability side, the consensus for GAAP Earnings Per Share (EPS) sits at $0.16, with an adjusted non-GAAP figure of $0.33. While the company noted it “does not endorse any information, recommendations or conclusions made by the analysts,” these numbers provide a clear benchmark for what Wall Street expects from Elon Musk and his team.

Advertisement

Setting the Stage for Q1 Results

This earnings report follows a quarter in which Tesla’s delivery numbers came in slightly below analyst projections. The company delivered 358,023 vehicles, just missing the initial analyst consensus of 365,645. Even with the slight miss, deliveries grew about 6.3% compared to the first quarter of last year.

To put these new earnings estimates in perspective, we can look back at Q1 2025. In that first quarter of last year, Tesla reported an adjusted EPS of $0.27 and revenue of $19.34 billion. While the Q1 estimates show a healthy gain in earnings that aligns with the year-over-year growth in deliveries, the focus during the call will likely be on margins and future growth rather than just the raw revenue numbers.

A Roadmap Beyond the Model S and X

The Q&A session with executives is expected to be one of the most eventful in years, especially since Model S and Model X production has officially ended. Tesla is currently offering its final Signature Edition units as a tribute to its flagship legacy, leaving a “premium-shaped” hole in the lineup that many investors hope will be filled by a new high-end SUV (CyberSUV, anyone?) or the long-awaited next-gen Roadster.

We also expect significant updates on Tesla’s AI and robotics divisions. Musk recently confirmed that the AI5 chip design is complete, with work already beginning on AI6 and Dojo 3. Additionally, the Cybercab robotaxi is slated to enter mass production this month, and investors will be looking for a firm timeline on the first unsupervised autonomous rides.

What to Watch For

Beyond the balance sheet, the call will likely touch on the Optimus humanoid robot. Tesla is rumored to be close to unveiling a production-ready prototype later this year, and any mention of “Optimus in the factory” will surely move the needle.

Advertisement

As Tesla transitions from a traditional car manufacturer to an AI and robotics powerhouse, this earnings call will serve as a pulse check for that transformation. We’ll be covering the call on April 22 to see if Tesla can beat expectations and provide a clear vision for its hardware-heavy roadmap through 2027.

By Nehal Malik

Tesla’s Spring 2026 Software Update (version 2026.14 and later) is officially here, and while the “flashy” features like the new “Hey Grok” wake word are getting most of the attention, the vehicle’s user interface is also getting a massive glow-up. Tesla has updated the parked vehicle visualizations, bringing improved vehicle models to the center touchscreen.

Installed on 0.9% of fleet

Advertisement

Last updated: Apr 18, 2:05 pm UTC

The new look was first showcased by Tesla enthusiast @sergiumogan on X, who posted a direct comparison between the old and new interfaces. The difference is immediately apparent, with improved lighting and the car model and the surrounding scene looking significantly more realistic.

Higher Fidelity via Unreal Engine

The jump in quality is thanks to Tesla’s integration of Unreal Engine into its software stack. This technology was previously used on the flagship Model S and Model X, but it is now trickling down to the rest of the fleet. The car model itself is higher quality, with improved lighting effects that make reflections on the paint and glass far more noticeable.

Advertisement

The environment around the car has also been completely redesigned. Instead of a simple gray void, the “park scene” now features a professional, studio-like atmosphere. There is a cool fog-like effect over the windscreen, with spotlight-style lighting shining down on the car, creating a sense of depth that was missing in previous versions. This level of polish makes the car feel like a premium piece of tech even when it is just sitting in your garage.

Hardware Requirements and Compatibility

Currently, this high-fidelity visualization is only showing up for the new “Highland” Model 3 (2024+) and the 2025+ Model Y (Juniper). However, there are plenty of reasons for owners of older vehicles to be optimistic. This feature will likely become available for some other models in a future update, such as the Cybertruck, roughly 2022+ Model 3, and 2022+ Model Y, provided they are equipped with the AMD Ryzen-powered MCU 3 infotainment unit.

The processing power required for these lighting effects and high-res textures means that older Intel Atom-based cars (MCU 2) will likely be left out of this specific visual upgrade. While this might not be the most “exciting” functional feature, it proves that Tesla is working on all aspects of the user experience. The company isn’t just pushing its self-driving software to the limits; it is making sure the car looks and feels modern every time you step inside.

It’s not just the parked screen; these improved models are also used on the vehicle visualizations.

A Strong Start to the Spring Update

The Spring 2026 Software Update has delivered on its promises in spades. Between interactive maps for the rear screen and the rebranding of Dog Mode to Pet Mode, not to mention a brand new Self-Driving App that brings subscriptions, tutorials, and usage stats under one umbrella, Tesla is keeping its fleet feeling fresh.

As the Spring Update continues to roll out to more owners globally, we expect to see even more hidden UI tweaks discovered. Tesla has successfully turned its cars into evolving platforms where a simple over-the-air update can make your three-year-old vehicle feel like a brand-new model.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

Memorial to honor late Secret Service agent Clint Hill in the works

Published

on

Memorial to honor late Secret Service agent Clint Hill in the works


BISMARCK, N.D. (KFYR) – A new streaming series about the late John F. Kennedy Junior, along with a congressional campaign by John F. Kennedy’s grandson, has once again put the Kennedy family back in the headlines. This summer, a former bodyguard of Jackie Kennedy will be in the spotlight. He’s originally from North Dakota and recently passed away.

Clint Hill came from a small town in North Dakota but landed on the world’s stage after he protected First Lady Jackie Kennedy after her husband, the President of the United States, was assassinated.

And now, decades later, members of the Washburn American Legion revere Clint Hill for his heroic service to five Presidents.

“He was involved in that infamous assassination in Dallas, which certainly affected his life, but he came out of it. And his support of God and country never wavered through all of this,” said John Schulz, monument organizer and member of Washburn American Legion Victor B Wallin Post #12.

Advertisement

To honor this North Dakota son, Schulz and others have spent the past year organizing a grand dedication and monument for Hill.

“We’ll have a nice carved-in flag on the left side of the monument,” said Shulz.

The monument will be made of polished granite and weigh 12,000 pounds.

It will be six feet tall and five feet wide, and will include a bronze plaque of the Zapruder photo of Hill covering Jackie Kennedy during the JFK assassination.

Shulz worked alongside Hill’s widow, Lisa McCubbin Hill, to design sections of the monument.

Advertisement

Shulz believes this dedication is long overdue.

“I think it’s important to honor someone who served his country well. He served under five Presidents and did a wonderful job taking care of them,” said Shulz.

There will also be multiple plaques summarizing important points of Hill’s life on the back side of the monument.

The dedication will happen on Aug. 1 at Washburn’s Veterans Memorial Park.

Three to four hundred people will be in attendance, including Hill’s widow, past and present state governors and various Hill relatives.

Advertisement

So far, the legion post has raised $60,000 of its $100,000 goal, but feels it will have no problem reaching that fundraising number.

Copyright 2026 KFYR. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending