Connect with us

North Dakota

Bill sponsors ask North Dakota House to restore rural funding after Senate slashes $45 million

Published

on

Bill sponsors ask North Dakota House to restore rural funding after Senate slashes  million


BISMARCK — Communities in North Dakota with 1,000 people or fewer could benefit from a proposed $5 million permanent investment fund that would create grants for making infrastructure improvements.

Repurposing vacant buildings for housing, fixing roads and bolstering local economic development are the kind of projects that would be funded by the Rural Community Endowment Fund, which

Senate Bill 2097

aims to establish.

Advertisement

The fund would be overseen by the State Investment Board and use its annual interest to fund competitive grant-making while preserving its principal amount.

Those grants would be awarded by a committee that also evaluates how they’re used.

The committee would consist of one commissioner who appoints nine people from rural North Dakota and a representative of a nonprofit organization that supports rural communities.

The original proposal sought to use $50 million of the projected $6.5 billion general fund,

but that was reduced by 90% to $5 million before advancing through the Senate.

Advertisement

In a House Political Subdivisions Committee hearing Friday, March 7, each of the three bill sponsors said the funding reduction should be reconsidered.

Rep. Mike Brandenburg, R-Edgeley.

Contributed / North Dakota Legislative Assembly

“I personally don’t think it’s enough,” Rep. Mike Brandenburg, R-Edgeley, said.

Advertisement

Primary sponsor Sen. Tim Mathern, D-Fargo, said the price tag should be returned to $50 million while the state is in the “best position” it’s ever been in financially.

020625.TimMathern

Sen. Tim Mathern, D-Fargo.

Contributed / North Dakota Legislative Assembly

“The viability of rural communities is important economically, but it is more important to preserve the base of our value system,” Mathern said. “Hard work, self resiliency and cooperation are values grown in rural North Dakota. We need more of this in our country.”

Advertisement

Sen. Terry Wanzek, R-Jamestown, also sponsored the bill.

Senator

Sen. Terry Wanzek, R-Jamestown.

Contributed / North Dakota Legislative Assembly

Strengthen ND, a rural community development nonprofit, called the legislation the “rural trust” bill.

Advertisement

“It’s the product of over a decade worth of conversations with rural community leaders across North Dakota” said Megan Langley, executive director of Strengthen ND.

“Time and time again, I have received calls from rural communities in need of funding for projects,” she continued. “Time and time again, there was nowhere to refer them. The resource they needed simply did not exist.”

Nine people testified in favor of the bill during the hearing, and none stood in opposition.

In addition to the three legislators who sponsored the bill, those in support included the North Dakota Farmers Union, Strengthen ND, the League of Cities, Rolla Job Development Authority and the Roosevelt Custer and Red River regional councils.

Of the more than 40 testimony entries online, one opposed the bill.

Advertisement

The effort is duplicative, wrote Alexander Public Schools Superintendent Leslie Bieber, who added she supports more state funding going to rural communities.

A House floor vote has not been scheduled.

Peyton Haug

Peyton Haug joined The Forum as the Bismarck correspondent in June 2024. Reach Peyton at phaug@forumcomm.com.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

North Dakota

Armstrong opens application period for Governor’s Band/Orchestra and Choral programs

Published

on

Armstrong opens application period for Governor’s Band/Orchestra and Choral programs


BISMARCK, N.D. – Gov. Kelly Armstrong today announced the opening of the application period for school, community and church bands, orchestras and choirs across North Dakota to apply to serve as the Governor’s Official State Band/Orchestra Program and Choral Program for the 2026-2027 school year. 

The Governor and First Lady will select the two groups from the applications received based on musical talent, achievement and community involvement. The governor may invite the groups to perform at official state functions held throughout the 2026-2027 school year, including the State of the State Address in January 2027 at the Capitol in Bismarck. 

Interested groups should submit an application with a musical recording to the Governor’s Office by 5 p.m. Monday, May 4. The Governor’s Band/Orchestra Program and Governor’s Choral Program will be announced in May. Please complete the application and provide materials at https://www.governor.nd.gov/governors-chorus-and-bandorchestra-program-application. 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

North Dakota

Greenpeace seeks new trial, claiming jury pool biased in case over Dakota Access Pipeline

Published

on


Greenpeace has asked for a second trial after a judge entered a $345 million judgment against the organization in a landmark case brought by the developer of the Dakota Access Pipeline.

The case “threatens to result in one of the largest miscarriages of justice in North Dakota’s history,” attorneys for the environmental group wrote in a brief filed last week.

After a three-week trial roughly a year ago, a Morton County jury directed Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer about $667 million, finding the environmental group at fault for inciting illegal acts against the company during anti-pipeline protests in North Dakota in 2016 and 2017 and for publishing false statements that harmed Energy Transfer’s reputation.

Greenpeace denies Energy Transfer’s claims and maintains that it brought the lawsuit to hurt the environmental movement.

Advertisement

Southwest Judicial District Judge James Gion in October slashed the jury’s award to $345 million, though he didn’t finalize the award until late February.

Greenpeace is now taking steps to fight the judgment, which includes its motion for a new trial.

The environmental group’s reasons for the request include claims that the jury instructions and verdict form contained errors, and that Energy Transfer was allowed to present unfair and irrelevant evidence to jurors. The group also alleges the jury pool was biased.

Greenpeace says the jury’s award assumes that Greenpeace was entirely responsible for any injury Energy Transfer sustained related to the protests. Jurors were not given the opportunity to consider whether Greenpeace was only at fault for a portion of the damages, the organization wrote in its brief.

Attorneys for Greenpeace also referenced the mailers and other media circulated to Mandan and Bismarck residents before the trial that contained anti-Dakota Access Pipeline protest and pro-energy industry content.

Advertisement

The environmental group seeks a new trial in Cass County, arguing in part that the jury pool in the Fargo area would be more fair because its residents did not directly experience the Dakota Access Pipeline protests and because the local economy is less dependent on the energy industry.

If Greenpeace’s request for a new trial is denied, it plans to appeal the case to the North Dakota Supreme Court, the organization has said.

Greenpeace previously asked for the trial to be moved from Morton County to Cass County in early 2025, which Gion and the North Dakota Supreme Court denied.

The lawsuit is against three separate Greenpeace organizations — Greenpeace USA, Greenpeace International and Greenpeace Fund.

Energy Transfer as of Wednesday morning had not submitted a response to Greenpeace’s motion for a new trial. Previously, the company has defended the jury’s verdict and disputed Greenpeace’s claims that the court proceedings were not fair.

Advertisement

Energy Transfer has indicated it may appeal Gion’s decision to reduce the award to $345 million.

Greenpeace will not have to pay any of the $345 million judgment for at least a couple of months, Gion ruled Tuesday.

Court documents indicate that the organization could have to pay a bond of up to $25 million while appeals proceed, though the environmental group has asked the judge to waive or reduce this amount. Gion has not decided on this motion.

He noted that obtaining such a large bond will be challenging.

“The magnitude of this matter defies simple decisions,” Gion wrote.

Advertisement

Energy Transfer in court filings urged the judge to require Greenpeace to post the full $25 million.

Any bond money Greenpeace provides would be held by a third party while the appeals proceed, according to Greenpeace USA.

Greenpeace International has filed a separate lawsuit in the Netherlands that accuses Energy Transfer of weaponizing the U.S. legal system against the environmental group. Energy Transfer asked Gion to order that the overseas suit be paused while the North Dakota case is still active, which Gion denied. The company appealed his ruling to the North Dakota Supreme Court, which has yet to make a decision on the matter.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

North Dakota

Minnkota Says Cost of Data Center Power Project Rises Won’t Affect Customers

Published

on

Minnkota Says Cost of Data Center Power Project Rises Won’t Affect Customers


(Photo by Jeff Beach/North Dakota Monitor)

 

(North Dakota Monitor) – The cost of the power line and substation needed by a data center north of Fargo has risen from $75 million to $110 million, but developers say the data center company will still cover the entire cost of the project.

Applied Digital needs the project to power its data center being built between Fargo and Harwood. The data center requires 280 megawatts of power at peak demand.

Advertisement

Applied Digital will pay for the project but it will be owned by Grand Forks based, Minnkota Power Cooperative.

The North Dakota Public Service Commission held a hearing in Fargo on what is known as the Agassiz Transmission Line and Substation.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending