Connect with us

North Dakota

Airline capacity remains a concern in North Dakota; airport infrastructure grants total $8.5M

Published

on

Airline capacity remains a concern in North Dakota; airport infrastructure grants total .5M


Demand for airline service in North Dakota stays sturdy, however the trade continues to battle so as to add flights, based on the North Dakota Aeronautics Fee.

In the meantime, dozens of airports within the state are getting a complete of $8.5 million in infrastructure grants. 

Business service airports in Bismarck, Fargo, Grand Forks, Minot, Devils Lake, Jamestown, Dickinson and Williston had a complete of 84,474 airline passenger boardings in Could, up 22% from Could 2021 however down 13% from Could 2019’s pre-coronavirus pandemic rely.

Advertisement

Accessible flights and seats in North Dakota stay under pre-pandemic ranges, based on the fee.

“Although demand for air service is robust, we acknowledge that challenges exist for the flexibility for airways so as to add extra capability into the system, because the trade at the moment struggles with inflationary pressures from workforce shortages and elevated gasoline prices,” Aeronautics Commissioner Kyle Wanner stated in an announcement. “Because of these challenges, greater fares for the touring public are additionally being skilled, which presents one other headwind for sustained passenger development.”

Persons are additionally studying…

Advertisement

All eight airports noticed passenger will increase in Could over the earlier 12 months, starting from 1% in Jamestown to 78% in Williston. Bismarck’s improve was about 16%; Dickinson’s was 23%. Hector Worldwide in Fargo, the state’s largest airport, noticed a rise of 21%.

Jamestown was the one airport to see a rise from earlier than the coronavirus pandemic in Could 2019. Bismarck’s drop from three years in the past was 22%. The general state drop was 13%.

The pandemic started in March 2020. Statewide boardings in April 2020 nosedived to a historic low of about 5,000 — or 5% of the conventional anticipated visitors. Bismarck’s passenger rely that month was 1,213. It rose to 4,222 in Could of that 12 months. In Could of this 12 months, it was 20,418.

Yr-to-date boardings statewide are up almost 39% from 2021. The determine for Bismarck is 28%, for Williston 70% and for Dickinson 74%.

Advertisement

Airport grants

The infrastructure grants are funded by $5 million by way of the federal American Rescue Plan Act and the remainder from state tax collections on aviation gasoline and plane gross sales.

The cash will fund 165 initiatives at 68 public airports, based on the fee.






Advertisement

Kyle Wanner




“These state airport grant allocations will assist to leverage federal funding for high-priority airport initiatives inside North Dakota whereas on the identical time making certain that our statewide aviation system is being maintained,” Wanner stated.

Advertisement

The Bismarck Airport is getting a complete of $1.15 million for varied work, starting from drainage enhancements to pavement work to terminal safety digicam upgrades.

The Mandan Airport is getting a complete of about $85,500 for a number of initiatives, together with taxiway work and parking zone paving.

Individually, the Federal Aviation Administration has awarded a complete of greater than $7.4 million to a number of North Dakota airports for runway and different work, based on U.S. Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D. The Mott airport is getting $40,000, the Bowman and Mandan airports $159,000 apiece, the Parshall airport $230,000 and the Glen Ullin airport $1.7 million.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

North Dakota

North Dakota Supreme Court Considers Motion to Reinstate Abortion Ban While Appeal is Pending

Published

on

North Dakota Supreme Court Considers Motion to Reinstate Abortion Ban While Appeal is Pending


 The North Dakota Supreme Court hears arguments involving abortion via Zoom on Nov. 21, 2024. (Screenshot Bismarck Tribune via the North Dakota Monitor)

 

 

 

Advertisement

(North Dakota Monitor) – North Dakota’s solicitor general called on the North Dakota Supreme Court to reinstate an abortion law struck down by a lower court until a final decision in the case is made, arguing that the ban must remain in effect because the state has a compelling interest in protecting unborn life.

“We say that not to be dramatic, but because the district court seems to have lost sight of that,” Phil Axt told justices Thursday.

The ban, signed into law by Gov. Doug Burgum in April 2023, made abortion illegal in all cases except rape or incest if the mother has been pregnant for less than six weeks, or when the pregnancy poses a serious physical health threat.

South Central Judicial District Court Judge Bruce Romanick vacated the law in September, declaring it unconstitutionally vague and an infringement on medical freedom.

He further wrote that “pregnant women in North Dakota have a fundamental right to choose abortion before viability exists.”

Advertisement

The law went into effect just weeks after the North Dakota Supreme Court ruled the state’s previous abortion ban unconstitutional and found that women have a right to seek an abortion for health reasons.

Axt argued Thursday that Romanick’s judgment striking down the 2023 law conflicts with the Supreme Court’s prior ruling, and that Romanick’s legal analysis contains “glaring errors.” Axt claimed there’s nothing in the state constitution that supports a right to abortion until the point of viability.

“It’s been clear since our territorial days that in order to justify killing another human being, there must be a threat of death or serious bodily injury,” Axt said.

Meetra Mehdizadeh, an attorney representing the plaintiffs, said to reverse Romanick’s decision even temporarily would be to disregard many serious problems he identified with the statute.

Advertisement

The ban does not sufficiently explain to doctors when they may legally provide abortions — which chills their ability to provide necessary health care for fear of prosecution, she said.

“The district court correctly held that the ban violates the rights of both physicians and patients, and staying the judgment and allowing the state to continue to enforce an unconstitutional law would be nonsensical,” Mehdizadeh said.

Axt countered that the law is not vague, and that doctors are incorrect to assume they would face criminal penalties for good-faith medical decisions.

If doctors are confused about the ban, said Axt, “the solution is not striking down the law — it is providing some professional education.”

In briefs filed with the court, the state also argued that Romanick’s judgment vacating the law seems to conflict with his original order declaring the law unconstitutional.

Advertisement

While the order identifies a right to abortion until the point of fetal viability, Romanick’s judgment does not include any reference to viability. The state is now confused as to whether it can now enforce any restrictions on abortion, Axt said.

North Dakota still must observe abortion regulations established under other laws not challenged in the lawsuit, Mehdizadeh said.

Axt further claimed that Romanick’s judgment should be put on hold because it addresses a “novel” area of law, and because it takes a supermajority of the Supreme Court to declare a statute unconstitutional.

“Statutes should not be presumed unconstitutional until this court has had an opportunity to weigh in on the matter, and a super majority of this court is of that opinion,” Axt said.

Justice Daniel Crothers said he questioned Axt’s logic.

Advertisement

“Any novel issue where the district court declares something unconstitutional, it’s sounding like you’re suggesting that we should presume that it’s wrong,” Crothers said to Axt.

The appeal is the latest step in a lawsuit brought against the state by a group of reproductive health care doctors and a Moorhead, Minnesota-based abortion provider, Red River Women’s Clinic. The clinic previously operated in Fargo, but moved across the state line after Roe v. Wade was overturned in 2022.

The ban, passed with overwhelming support by both chambers of the Republican-dominated Legislature, set penalties of up to five years in prison and a maximum fine of $10,000 for any health care professionals found in violation of the law.

The arguments were only on whether Romanick’s decision should be put on hold during the appeal, not on the merits of the case itself, which the Supreme Court will consider separately. The justices took the matter under advisement.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

Four western North Dakota volleyball teams punch a ticket to state semifinals

Published

on

Four western North Dakota volleyball teams punch a ticket to state semifinals


BISMARCK, N.D. (KFYR) – The quarterfinal round of the NDHSAA State Volleyball tournament played out in the Fargodome Thursday with four teams from the west side of the state advancing to the semifinals.

In Class A, Century avenged a quarterfinal loss from a year ago to advance to the semifinals. Meanwhile, Legacy upended West Fargo Horace in an upset.

The two teams will face off in the semifinals, which guarantees that a team from the west will make the Class A State Championship game. The Patriots are 2-0 against the Sabers this season.

2024 NDHSAA Volleyball semifinal bracket(KFYR)

In Class B, South Prairie-Max and Medina-Pingree-Buchanan both advanced to the semifinals in their first ever state tournament appearance.

Advertisement

The Royals defeated Kenmare-Bowbells 3-0. The Thunder defeated Central McLean 3-0. That guarantees that a team from the west will also make the Class B State Championship game as the Royals and Thunder will face off in the semifinals.

Class B NDHSAA Volleyball semifinals bracket
Class B NDHSAA Volleyball semifinals bracket(KFYR)



Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

Cass County Deputy being investigated by the ND BCI resigns

Published

on

Cass County Deputy being investigated by the ND BCI resigns


FARGO, N.D. (Valley News Live) – A Cass County Sheriff’s Deputy who is under investigation by the the North Dakota Bureau of Criminal Investigation (BCI) has resigned from the department.

Cass County Sheriff Jesse Jahner says he was contacted by the BCI in September saying they were initiating an investigation into Deputy Carson Quam for alleged criminal activity. Jahner says the Sheriff’s Office was unaware of any criminal activity Quam was potentially involved with.

On November 21, the Sheriff’s office announced that Quam is no longer an employee of the Cass County Sheriff’s Office.

Jahner says the information was not released in September because it was an active and ongoing investigation from another agency.

Advertisement

“Any time criminal allegations are made against one of my employees, my Office will always collaborate with the investigating and prosecuting agencies to assist throughout the investigation and potential prosecution, working to ensure the integrity of the case. If criminal activity is substantiated, it will not be tolerated. My Office will always strive through rigorous background checks, department training, and accountability to put the best deputies in our communities to protect and serve our citizens,” said Sheriff Jahner.

The Cass County Sheriff’s Office says it is unable to comment further pending investigation and review by the Grand Forks and Cass County States Attorney’s Offices. Valley News Live will continue to follow this situation as it develops.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending