Connect with us

Nebraska

Don Walton: It’s time for Lincoln to think big again

Published

on

Don Walton: It’s time for Lincoln to think big again


Phrase that the Lincoln Chamber of Commerce is embarking on a brand new neighborhood effort to suppose huge and proceed to assist construct and form Lincoln’s future is welcome information.

It is good to see the Pershing mural being rigorously dismantled now, lastly clearing the way in which for removing of the storied previous auditorium that has been sitting there empty like a ghost for eight years.

An array of neighborhood improvement tasks, together with reasonably priced housing, a wellness middle, a toddler care middle and neighborhood inexperienced house are already deliberate and ready for a inexperienced gentle.

Advertisement

And a brand new downtown library ought to get in line now.

A multipurpose downtown recreation middle — consider all the school college students who’re going to be residing downtown now — with actions for all ages? 

A downtown park?  With a stage? 

Massive Ten hockey and bushes within the Haymarket? 

Or one thing actually huge, Pinnacle Financial institution Enviornment huge, from the minds of the actually huge thinkers?

Advertisement

And let’s hear from that younger workforce that is already right here and nonetheless must be attracted. What would they suggest?

Time for one more jolt of power. 

Should you stand nonetheless, you fall behind. 

                                                *   *   *

The coup in Kearney that upended Nebraska Republican Social gathering management could have been a comparatively tame rebellion in comparison with what apparently occurred in Idaho.

Advertisement

The change in Idaho’s Republican Social gathering management achieved on the social gathering’s state conference in Twin Falls prompted an Idaho Statesman editorial final week declaring that “essentially the most excessive parts of the Republican Social gathering are totally in management.”

“If the brand new GOP management have been merely loopy, that would not be the most important change on the planet,” the editorial acknowledged.

“In any case, the social gathering’s present platform holds that you simply should not be allowed to vote in U.S. Senate races.

“However the brand new GOP has signaled it additionally intends to be merciless.  ‘Our weapons are loaded,’ (new social gathering chair Dorothy) Moon cried in her victory speech.”

                                          *   *   *

Advertisement

* The variations between Republican Rep. Mike Flood and Democratic challenger Patty Pansing Brooks are piling up nearly day by day with Flood’s early Home votes and that is most likely hardening supporters on either side. It will be a battle centered on turning out voters in November.

* Legislative redistricting final September offered Republican Rep. Don Bacon with what presently is a 8,420 GOP-voter registration benefit in his November contest with Democratic nominee Tony Vargas. Metropolitan Omaha’s 2nd Congressional District has 153,601 registered Republicans and 145,181 registered Democrats, in response to July figures.  

* Politico studies that Gov. Pete Ricketts made a $250,000 contribution to a brilliant PAC that is centered on “torpedoing Missouri Republican Eric Greitens’ Senate marketing campaign.”  Greitens stepped down from the governorship in 2018 within the midst of a scandal centered on allegations about sexual relations together with his former hairdresser.

* So, even the Secret Service? 

* A present Washington Submit story on Republican marketing campaign rhetoric ends with quotations from Republican gubernatorial nominee Jim Pillen lifted from a TV marketing campaign advert: “Should you love America, they hate you.  Should you assist the police, they name you racist.”

Advertisement

* Liz Cheney, talking Sunday throughout a CNN “State of the Union” interview: “It is a harmful second. … I imagine our nation stands on the sting of an abyss.”

* A glance forward would forecast a extra conservative Legislature in 2023. However who is aware of? That may have been the identical forecast eight years in the past when nobody knew that 5 new senators who have been Republicans would grow to be so independently average. 

* Fox Sports activities turned the baseball all-star recreation into its plaything.

* Final week moved world warming into world warmed — accompanied by alarm bells.  



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Nebraska

Report: Nebraska Football Player Arrested for Suspected DUI

Published

on

Report: Nebraska Football Player Arrested for Suspected DUI


KALEB HENRY

Kaleb Henry is an award-winning sports reporter, covering collegiate athletics since 2014 via radio, podcasting, and digital journalism. His experience with Big Ten Conference teams goes back more than a decade, including time covering programs such as the Nebraska Cornhuskers, Oregon Ducks, and USC Trojans. He has contributed to Sports Illustrated since 2021. Kaleb has won multiple awards for his sports coverage from the Nebraska Broadcasters Association and Midwest Broadcast Journalists Association. Prior to working in sports journalism, Kaleb was a Division I athlete on the Southern Illinois University-Edwardsville Track and Field team where he discussed NCAA legislation as SIUE’s representative to the Ohio Valley Conference Student-Athlete Advisory Committee. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Nebraska

Opinion | How an independent candidate put Nebraska Republicans on the ropes

Published

on

Opinion | How an independent candidate put Nebraska Republicans on the ropes


As voters in Nebraska head to the polls, Dan Osborn, an upstart independent challenger to Republican Sen. Deb Fischer, has a chance to pull off the most shocking upset of the 2024 campaign. According to a recent New York Times poll, he is a mere 2 points behind Fischer, and other surveys show him within striking distance.

If he wins, he could help keep the Senate out of Republican control. Yet national Democrats want nothing to do with Osborn — and that’s just fine with him. In what might be the most fascinating race this year, Osborn has run a truly independent campaign against a Republican incumbent — and steadfastly distanced himself from the Democratic Party.

The reason isn’t hard to figure out. As Ari Kohen, a political science professor at the University of Nebraska, told me, “If Dan were a Democrat, he’d be losing by 20 points.”

Barry Rubin, president of Heartland Strategy Group and former executive director of the Nebraska Democratic Party, shares Kohen’s view. A “D” next to the candidate’s name is a “Scarlet Letter in the western part of the state,” where Republicans traditionally dominate, says Rubin.

Advertisement

Osborn’s remarkable campaign in a consistently Republican state offers a tantalizing possibility for Democrats.

Osborn has steadfastly refused to say which party he would caucus with if elected. But if the Senate is 50 Republicans to 49 Democrats after Election Day (and Democrats win the White House), Osborn could be the deciding vote on Senate control — and, in short measure, the most powerful politician in Washington. 

Due to the state’s GOP lean and the presence of former President Donald Trump at the top of the ticket, the smart money is on Fischer to pull out a win. But Osborn’s remarkable campaign in a consistently Republican state offers a tantalizing possibility for Democrats: Has he cracked the code for how a progressive candidate can run a competitive race in red-state America?

Because while Osborn has eschewed Democratic support, he is running on a progressive policy platform heavy on economic populism. In September, Trump endorsed Fischer and called Osborn “a Bernie Sanders Democrat” — a claim that, in many respects, isn’t far off.  

On his campaign website, Osborn attacks “private equity companies,” calls for ending “subsidies to super-profitable pharmaceutical companies” and vows to protect Social Security. He rails against the “millionaire and billionaire class that are inoculated from the very laws that they make” and recently told The New York Times, “We’re at the apex of a corporate-run government.’’

Advertisement

He also supports raising the minimum wage and corporate taxes and has made passing the PRO Act, a top priority of labor unions, a centerpiece of his policy agenda. 

The latter priority is no surprise given Osborn’s biography. Before entering politics, he was an industrial mechanic at Kellogg’s cereal company, where he led a 2021 strike against the corporate conglomerate (he was fired in 2023 in a move that he has called retaliation).

Osborn regularly portrays Fischer as a tool of her corporate donors, calling her a “creature of the D.C. swamp.” The incumbent “has taken so much corporate cash,” says one Osborn ad, that “she should wear patches, like NASCAR.”

But looking under the hood of his campaign, it’s hard to find a single issue on which Osborn openly sides with Republicans.

Since he’s running in a state that Trump won by 19 points in 2020, Osborn isn’t shy about appealing to the former president’s voters. He’s run an ad in which ordinary Nebraskans say they are voting for Donald Trump “with one finger” and Dan Osborn with the other. In the same ad, he says Fischer has more in common with Hillary Clinton than Donald Trump. He even accuses Fischer of “stabbing Trump in the back” after she called for him to exit the 2016 race after the release of the “Access Hollywood” tape.

Advertisement

But looking under the hood of his campaign, it’s hard to find a single issue on which Osborn openly sides with Republicans. For example, he’s called for strengthening border security and is even running an ad that says his background as an industrial welder could come in handy in building Trump’s border wall. However, like Vice President Kamala Harris, he has criticized his Republican rival for failing to support the immigration deal negotiated by Republican Sen. James Lankford. 

On abortion, he says he opposes the procedure but believes it should be legal and has called for codifying Roe v. Wade in federal law. 

In a statement that would warm the heart of a social libertarian, Osborn recently said at a campaign event, “I don’t believe it’s my place or the government’s place to tell people when they should or shouldn’t start families, and that includes I.V.F. and contraceptives.” Even on the issue of guns, which usually trips up Democrats in red states like Nebraska, Osborn has said he supports the Second Amendment but also backs “reasonable gun safety measures.”

While Osborn’s unique style of politics has paid dividends, he has also benefited from Fischer’s missteps. Even after two terms in the Senate, she isn’t particularly well-known in the state and is one of the most unpopular senators in the country. For most of the campaign, Fischer ignored Osborn, a decision that backfired badly. “The Osborn campaign has basically been campaigning for a year unchecked by Fischer,” says Rubin. “He’s held hundreds of public events, and he was able to define himself before Fischer could.” When she finally started running ads against him, it had the perverse effect of raising Osborn’s profile further.

While her fellow Republican Pete Ricketts (running to complete former Sen. Ben Sasse’s term) is nearly 20 points ahead of his Democratic rival, national Republicans have been forced to plunge money into the state to rescue Fischer.

Advertisement

Osborn’s success is a direct result of his running as a true independent.

Osborn has also benefited from the quirkiness of Nebraska’s politics. Though the state is currently considered solidly Republican, Nebraska has a long tradition of nonpartisanship. Its unicameral state Legislature (the only one in the country) is nonpartisan, as candidates don’t run for office under party monikers. And it wasn’t long ago that Democrats were competitive in the Cornhusker State. As recently as 2012 the state was represented in the Senate by Democrat Ben Nelson — and he succeeded Democrat Bob Kerrey, who served two terms as senator. 

But like much of red-state America, the election of Barack Obama in 2008 and the GOP’s takeover by more extreme voices (first the tea party and then Trump’s MAGA), Democrats were simply unable to compete in states dominated by Republicans. 

Osborn’s success is a direct result of his running as a true independent — and separating himself from the cultural and social baggage of being a Democrat in a red state like Nebraska. Not surprisingly, Fischer has tried to paint him as a secret Democrat, but it’s a hard sell when Osborn has never been a member of the Democratic Party. “He’s an honest to God non-partisan,” says Kohen. “You can’t pin him down on being a party person. That makes him very unique.” 

Democrats have done their part to respect Osborn’s independence. Sen. Gary Peters of Michigan, the head of the Senate Democrats’ campaign committee, recently said Democrats aren’t engaging in Nebraska “in any shape or form,” and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., hasn’t spoken to the upstart candidate. The state’s Democratic Party chairwoman even criticized Osborn as “inauthentic” and compared him to Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, I-Ariz.

Advertisement

Nonetheless, Osborn’s potential path to victory can give Democrats hope. “The message of this race is that their policy agenda can have resonance in red-state America,” says Kohen. “If you disconnect issues from party, this is what you end up getting.” 

Rubin agrees that while Osborn’s success is a bit of a “perfect storm,” his success in making this race competitive “can be a model for other states.” 

“There are a lot of people in the middle” who aren’t represented by either party,” says Rubin. “For any non-MAGA Republican, Osborn is a good fit.” We’ll have to see whether it’s enough to prevail on Tuesday night, but if Osborn somehow wins, the political earthquake could reshape American politics. 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Nebraska

Doc’s Diagnosis: UCLA’s Anemic Run Game Springs to Life Against Nebraska

Published

on

Doc’s Diagnosis: UCLA’s Anemic Run Game Springs to Life Against Nebraska


Dr. Rob Zatechka analyzes a couple of UCLA’s rushing plays from Nebraska’s loss Saturday to the Bruins in Lincoln. Final score, 27-20.

Last week, Rob predicted the Huskers might have some trouble stopping the UCLA running game and O-line, and sure enough the Doc knew his stuff. The Bruins are dead last in the FBS in rushing offense, and yet the Huskers gave up 139 yards on the ground, more than double UCLA’s average coming into the game.

Hit the play button above to watch Dr. Rob’s analysis.

MORE: Nebraska Feels Further Away Than Ever After Loss to UCLA

MORE: QB Grade: Nebraska’s Dylan Raiola vs. UCLA

MORE: Huskers Today: November 4, 2024

MORE: Nebraska-USC Game Gets 3 p.m. CST Kickoff

MORE: Coach Tim Miles Stops by SMQ to Talk Bob & Jay Off the Ledge After Nebraska Football’s UCLA Debacle

Stay up to date on all things Huskers by bookmarking Nebraska Cornhuskers On SI, subscribing to HuskerMax on YouTube, and visiting HuskerMax.com daily.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending