Connect with us

Missouri

U.S. Senate GOP blocks bill proclaiming congressional support for abortion access • Missouri Independent

Published

on

U.S. Senate GOP blocks bill proclaiming congressional support for abortion access • Missouri Independent


WASHINGTON — The U.S. Senate gridlocked over reproductive rights on Wednesday, when Republicans blocked Democrats from advancing a measure that would have expressed support for abortion access.

The failed 49-44 procedural vote was just one in a string of votes Senate Democrats are holding this summer to highlight the differences between the two political parties on contraception, in vitro fertilization and abortion ahead of the November elections.

Maine Sen. Susan Collins and Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski were the only Republicans to vote to move the bill toward final passage.

“This is a plain, up-or-down vote on whether you support women being able to make their own reproductive health care decisions,” Washington Democratic Sen. Patty Murray said during floor debate. “It doesn’t enforce anything. It doesn’t cost anything. It’s actually just a half-page bill, simply saying that women should have the basic freedom to make their own decisions about their health care.”

Advertisement

Minnesota Democratic Sen. Amy Klobuchar said that women and their doctors, not politicians, should make decisions about abortion and other reproductive health choices.

“This is our current reality, but it doesn’t have to be our future,” Klobuchar said. “This is a pivotal moment for America: Are we going to move forward and protect freedom, which has long been a hallmark of our nation, or are we going to go further backwards in history — not just to the 1950s but to the 1850s.”

Michigan Democratic Sen. Debbie Stabenow urged support for the legislation, saying women should be able to make decisions about their own health care, lives and futures.

“That’s what this vote is about and we’re not going to give up until we have those freedoms fully protected,” Stabenow said.

No Republican senators spoke during debate on the bill ahead of the vote.

Advertisement

The two-page bill would not have actually changed or provided any nationwide protections for abortion access.

The legislation, if enacted, would have expressed a “sense of Congress” that abortion rights “should be supported” and that the nationwide, constitutional protections for abortion established by Roe v. Wade “should be restored and built upon, moving towards a future where there is reproductive freedom for all.”

The Biden administration released a Statement of Administration Policy earlier in the week, backing the bill.

“Today, more than 20 states have dangerous and extreme abortion bans in effect, some without exceptions for rape or incest,” the statement said. “Women are being denied essential medical care, including during an emergency, or forced to travel thousands of miles out of state for care that would have been available if Roe were still the law of the land. Doctors and nurses are being threatened with jail time.”

Advertisement

Trio of bills offered, blocked

The blocked procedural vote on Wednesday came just one day after Democrats went to the floor in an attempt to pass three other bills on reproductive rights through the fast-track unanimous consent process.

That involves one senator asking “unanimous consent” to pass legislation. Any one senator can then object, blocking passage of the bill. If no one objects, the bill is passed.

The maneuver is typically used to approve broadly bipartisan measures or for lawmakers to bring attention to legislation without moving it through the time-consuming cloture process that can take weeks in the Senate.

Nevada Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto on Tuesday tried unsuccessfully to pass her bill, which would have barred the government from preventing travel “to another state to receive or provide reproductive health care that is legal in that state.”

Advertisement

Forty Democratic or independent senators co-sponsored the legislation.

During brief floor debate, Cortez Masto said the bill “reaffirms that women have a fundamental right to interstate travel and makes it crystal clear that states cannot prosecute women — or anyone who helps them — for going to another state to get the critical reproductive care that they need.”

“Elected officials in states like Tennessee and Texas and Alabama are trying to punish women for leaving their state for reproductive care, as well as anyone who helps them, including their doctors or even their employers,” Cortez Masto said. “Why? Because for these anti-choice politicians, this is about controlling women.”

Mississippi Republican Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith objected to the unanimous consent request, saying that while members of the anti-abortion movement “most certainly do not oppose any individual’s freedom to travel across this great country,” they do have concerns the measure would hinder prosecution of crimes, like human trafficking.

Advertisement

Bill would ‘take us backward,” Budd says

Republicans blocked a second bill, sponsored by Murray, that would have blocked state governments from preventing, restricting, impeding, or disadvantaging health care providers from providing “reproductive health care services lawful in the state in which the services are to be provided.”

The bill was co-sponsored by 30 Democratic or independent senators.

“When I talk to abortion providers in Spokane, where they see a lot of patients fleeing restrictive abortion bans from states like Idaho, they are terrified that they could face a lawsuit that will threaten their practice and their livelihood, just for doing their jobs, just for providing care their patients need — care that is, once again, completely legal in my state,” Murray said. “We are talking about people who are following the law and simply want to provide care to their patients. This should be cut-and-dried.”

North Carolina GOP Sen. Ted Budd objected to the request, arguing the bill “would make it easier for unborn life to be ended.”

Advertisement

“The Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision brought renewed hope to Americans who believe in the sanctity of each and every life, including life in the womb,” Budd said. “But this bill would take us backward.”

Following Budd’s objection to passing the bill, Murray said his actions “made clear” that GOP lawmakers “have no problem whatsoever with politicians targeting doctors in states like mine, where abortion is legal.”

“I think that pretty much gives the game away,” Murray added.

Grant program

Advertisement

Democrats also tried to pass legislation from Wisconsin Democratic Sen. Tammy Baldwin that would have established a federal grant program to bolster the number of health care providers who receive “comprehensive training in abortion care.”

That bill had seven Democratic or independent co-sponsors in the Senate.

“For our top-ranked medical schools, a post-Roe reality sowed chaos as students and their instructors wondered how future doctors in our state would have access to the full slate of training necessary to safely practice obstetrics and gynecology,” Baldwin said.

Kansas Republican Sen. Roger Marshall, an OB-GYN, blocked the request, saying that the federal government “should not be spending taxpayer dollars to encourage medical students and clinicians to take life when their principal duty, their sacred oath, is to protect life and to do no harm from conception to natural death.”

Advertisement

Repeated attempts throughout 2024

Democrats sought to advance legislation on access to contraception and in vitro fertilization despite the 60-vote legislative filibuster earlier this year, and failed to get the necessary Republican support each time.

In early June, Democrats tried to advance legislation that would have protected “an individual’s ability to access contraceptives” and “a health care provider’s ability to provide contraceptives, contraception, and information related to contraception.”

A week later, Democrats tried again, this time with legislation that would have provided a right for people to access IVF and for doctors to provide that health care without the state or federal government “enacting harmful or unwarranted limitations or requirements.”

Collins and Murkowski were the only Republicans to vote to move the bills toward a final passage vote.

Advertisement

Alabama GOP Sen. Katie Britt attempted to pass an IVF access bill through the unanimous consent process in mid-June, but was unsuccessful.

That measure, which she co-sponsored with Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz, would have blocked a state from receiving Medicaid funding if it prevented IVF.

The legislation, which had three co-sponsors as of Wednesday, didn’t say what would happen to a state’s Medicaid funding if lawmakers or a state court defined life as starting at conception.

That’s what led IVF clinics in Alabama to temporarily shut down earlier this year after the state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos at IVF clinics constitute children under state law.

The Alabama state legislature has since provided civil and criminal protections for IVF clinics.

Advertisement



Source link

Missouri

Here’s how Missouri football’s cornerbacks shape up heading into fall camp

Published

on

Here’s how Missouri football’s cornerbacks shape up heading into fall camp


play

It’s a new era at cornerback for Missouri football.

Ennis Rakestraw Jr., who was MU coach Eli Drinkwitz’s first recruit in Columbia, became a second-round NFL Draft pick this offseason and is now a Detroit Lion. His starting cornerback partner Kris Abrams-Draine, who led the Southeastern Conference in pass breakups last season, followed Rakestraw to the league when the Denver Broncos took him with a fifth-round pick.

Advertisement

Now, Mizzou has the task of finding their replacements.

One of the Tigers’ highlight transfer portal acquisitions came at the position, and the coaches have spoken highly of another key returner. Still, a number of questions linger at the position, mostly pertaining to depth and experience.

Here is how Missouri’s cornerback room looks heading into fall camp. Every scholarship player and any notable walk-on is mentioned:

The options for Missouri football at cornerback

Starters: Drey Norwood, jr.; Toriano Pride, jr.

Reserves: Marcus Clarke, sr.; Ja’Mariyon Wayne, so.; Nicholas DeLoach, r-fr.; Shamar McNeil, r-fr.; Cameron Keys, fr.; Jaren Sensabaugh, fr.

Advertisement

Drey Norwood filled in admirably when Rakestraw spent time on the sideline with an injury and has drawn the plaudits of MU cornerbacks coach Al Pogue for his offseason development and performances in spring camp. As it stands, he is due to start when Missouri begins its season on Aug. 29 against Murray State on Faurot Field.

Early indications suggest Toriano Pride Jr., an East St. Louis High alum and Clemson transfer, will make up the other half of the starters at corner.

Pogue has been high on both Nicholas DeLoach and Ja’Mariyon Wayne over the offseason, but neither has played significant reps in their young Missouri careers. Marcus Clarke has been a role player since transferring to Mizzou in 2022, and figures to keep that role heading into the new season.

Cameron Keys and Jaren Sensabaugh were big-time recruits for the Tigers’ Class of 2024.

Advertisement

The upside

When Norwood was called upon at times last season, he almost always answered the bell.

Stepping in for Rakestraw or Abrams-Draine was no small feat, but more often than not the Tigers’ secondary didn’t suffer too much with the key reserve on the field. Norwood started in the Cotton Bowl as Mizzou held Ohio State to just three points and 106 passing yards.

And among all of Missouri’s players in spring camp, few earned praise at the level that Norwood did.

“He’s been really attentive,” Pogue said in March. “You can tell he’s in his playbook, he’s getting really comfortable with the scheme. And he’s just letting his natural ability come through and make plays. I think the biggest thing for him is, you know, you can see the confidence. He has the confidence that he can compete in this league.”

Advertisement

Pride, similarly, was one of Missouri’s marquee grabs in the transfer portal. He played 26 games over two seasons for Clemson, hauling in an interception, registering a sack and two tackles for loss and being credited for nine passes defended.

One question or concern

When you look at the options listed above for players available to play the position, you’ll notice a lot of underclassmen.

That’s a legitimate concern — Missouri does not have a lot of high-level experience at cornerback. Pride might go down as one of Missouri’s most important portal additions, as it gave the Tigers at least some elite college football experience.

Mizzou is now relying on one or more of its in-house talents to prove that they’re ready for the rigors of an SEC slate. If injuries do occur, Mizzou can turn to Clarke for a senior option, or it can go to an underclassman.

The good news on this front is that Missouri has done a stellar job developing corners under Pogue. Rakestraw was a three-star recruit out of high school and ended up as an early second-round NFL Draft pick. Abrams-Draine was originally recruited to play wide receiver and was one of the leading corners in the league last year.

Advertisement

Breakout candidate

Pogue said he’s waiting to drop the leash on Warne and let the youngster loose, and he might be forced into just that this season.

Wayne has moved around quite a bit in his Missouri career. Now at corner, and seemingly settled, the coaches seem to like the fit.

“He’s ideal, prototypical from a size-wise,” Pogue said. “You know, big, he’s strong, he’s physical. He’s athletic, man, and more importantly, his competitive character is really high.”

More: Missouri football preseason preview: What Oklahoma will bring when old foes reunite

More: Three transfers who could help define Missouri football’s success in 2024 season

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Missouri

Missouri Democrats react to VP Harris campaign

Published

on

Missouri Democrats react to VP Harris campaign


SPRINGFIELD, Mo. (WGEM) – Democrats in Missouri are celebrating President Joe Biden’s decision to decline his party’s nomination for 2024.

After a robust message of appreciation to Biden for his unprecedented term, Missouri’s Democratic Party chair Russ Carnahan said discussions about where the state’s organization goes from here is the subject of immediate discussion.

“We have barely over 100 days left to the election, so we don’t have a lot of time to sit around and debate this, “Carnahan said. “[Kamala Harris] literally is in the poll position to do this. She said she wants to earn it.”

In terms of election messaging, gone are the complaints and worries about the Democratic candidate’s age – concerns that now rest solely on the shoulders of former president Donald Trump, who turned 78 last month. Trump will be the oldest presidential nominee in the republic’s history.

Advertisement

“It totally shatters that narrative, and is just a lightning bolt of energy,” Carnahan said.

On Monday, Missouri Democratic Party leaders held a meeting to discuss the organization’s position.

“It’s the first time we formally had a chance to get together as a delegation to talk about it,” Carnahan said prior to the meeting. “There’s been a lot of, you know, individual and small group conversations, but we wanted to get people together right away to have this conversation about how our delegation moves forward – and I’m pretty confident they’re going to want to do just that.”

Down-ballot candidates hope the national shakeup has an impact on voter turnout, even in states which have a strong voting record for Republicans.

“I think it’s a good move,” said Stephen Webber, a former state party chair and candidate for a state senate seat in Boone County. “I think that [Harris] running, is going to bring a lot of excitement and energy to the ticket. 105 days out, we needed some more excitement and energy. I think it’s gonna be a good thing for the Democratic party.”

Advertisement

Other Missouri Democrats weighed in, mostly throwing support behind the presumptive nominee, Harris.

“I think it’s the opportunity to bring a lot of younger voters, excite younger voters,” Seth Jarboe, Acting Chair, Boone County Democratic Party. “I think people are interested in seeing a different type of candidate, not what we’ve seen for the last four or eight years, but somebody different that has the ability to reach out to a wider range of individuals.”

Missouri’s Senate Democratic Leader, Sen. Doug Beck, D-St. Louis, endorsed Harris in a statement posted to social media.

“As a delegate to the Democratic National Convention, I am proud to endorse Vice President Kamala Harris to be our nominee,” Beck wrote. “Let’s go win!”

Gubernatorial candidate and House Minority Leader Crystal Quade, D-Springfield, released a statement Monday.

Advertisement

“The stakes of this election could not be higher- for Missouri and our nation,” Quade said. “I’m focused on running a race for Governor that focuses on investing in Missourians, restoring abortion rights, protecting access to birth control and IVF, and making Missouri a place that will thrive. I look forward to sharing the ticket with VP Harris who not only shares those values, but, like myself, has been on the front lines fighting for them.”

Voters decide the next president of the United States on Nov. 5.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Missouri

How Much Salary to Be Middle-Class in St. Louis, Missouri? Plenty

Published

on

How Much Salary to Be Middle-Class in St. Louis, Missouri? Plenty


It’s really difficult to make a statement about what’s a good salary versus what would be considered a bad salary. Everyone has their own idea, but I’d bet that your guess about how much money you’d need to make to be considered middle-class in St. Louis, Missouri would be less than reality.

I saw this report by CNBC which showed the minimum salary you need to be considered middle-class in the 25 largest cities. I was surprised to see St. Louis, Missouri on their list, but not Kansas City. KC does have more population than St. Louis, right? Oh, well…I digress.

They say the minimum salary to be a middle-class citizen in St. Louis, Missouri is $50,000 and the maximum is $149,000. I suppose if you make more than $149,000, you’re rich? Does that allow you to mow yards in Ladue?

St. Louis is a fortunate area compared to the west coast. For example, you’re not middle-class in San Francisco until you’re making $250,000. That’s right. A quarter of a million dollars to be a middle-income earner there. That’s insane.

Advertisement

Back to my original point. Salary and income in general is a very subjective thing. I know many who would LOVE to earn $50,000 per year. That’s rich people money to them. For others, that would be a huge downgrade. It’s all a matter of perspective.

Missouri’s Most Epic Wedding Venue Can Suddenly Be Yours

Gallery Credit: Gregg Williamson with Keller Williams Realty STL, Realtor.com





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending