Connect with us

Culture

At Brickyard 400, restart rule leaves Ryan Blaney wondering what could've been

Published

on

At Brickyard 400, restart rule leaves Ryan Blaney wondering what could've been

SPEEDWAY, Ind. — Losing the Brickyard 400 is tough to digest regardless. When you feel like circumstances beyond your control took away a victory in what is a NASCAR crown-jewel race, it’s even more difficult.

It’s understandable then that Ryan Blaney was mad following a third-place finish in Sunday’s race at Indianapolis Motor Speedway. The defending Cup Series champion’s problem, though, was that he was uncertain where his anger should be directed.

He suffered a tough beat on a track at which every driver wants to kiss the bricks in celebration. To win here is a significant accomplishment. And Blaney had come oh so close.

“I’m ticked off, but I don’t know who to be ticked off at. Like there’s no one to be ticked off at,” Blaney said. “It’s just racing luck.

“I’m just pissed off. Just sucks, man.”

Advertisement

The sequence that initiated Blaney’s frustration began when Kyle Busch spun and crashed underneath Denny Hamlin as they entered Turn 3, sending the race into overtime while also further pushing limits on fuel mileage that many were already up against.

Among those in danger of running out was leader Brad Keselowski, who opted for an improbable Hail Mary, hoping he could make it to the finish, so he opted not to pit for fuel during the caution period. Sure enough, just as Keselowski was coming to the start-finish line with the race about to resume, his fuel tank ran dry, prompting him to dart into the pits just as the field came off Turn 4.

This moved Blaney into the lead, with Kyle Larson sliding into second. But Blaney had already chosen the less favorable outside lane while Larson now was positioned on the inside. NASCAR prohibits drivers from getting a do-over on lane selection, thereby giving Larson the advantage because, had he been able to re-choose, Blaney would’ve picked the inside lane.

Instead, even though Blaney was the race leader, he felt like he was effectively a sitting duck.

“I can easily say, if the leader runs out coming to the restart, wave off the green, re-choose because you’re promoting the third-place guy now to where I get screwed,” Blaney said. “I’m the one getting screwed. So the third-place guy is benefitting, the guy behind me is benefitting.

Advertisement

“If it was any other place, it’s not going to be as bad because the second lane, you can kind of at all the other places, you can maintain. Here, it’s just a death sentence. You’re not maintaining the lead from the top on the front row.”

As Blaney anticipated, Larson capitalized and got the lead as they sped into Turn 1. It was a lead he wouldn’t relinquish. Larson later noted he specifically chose to restart directly behind Keselowski with the hope that he’d move up to the front should Keselowski run out of fuel.

“We had a lot of communication on our radio about (how) Brad was going to be really close on fuel, he may run out of fuel under these cautions,” Larson said. “I was going to choose behind him no matter what lane he took just in hopes that he would run out before we got to the restart zone.

“Yeah, he just ducked off onto pit road. I was like, ‘Wow, I can’t believe this is going exactly how we had kind of hoped and had thought about.’”


Brad Keselowski, Ryan Blaney and Kyle Larson were 1-2-3 when Keselowski ran out of fuel and pitted. Larson then slid to the inside and ended up the winner. (Sean Gardner / Getty Images)

Some wondered post-race whether NASCAR should allow a re-choose in those situations. It’s not a question with a straightforward solution.

Advertisement

A notable hurdle on a 2.5-mile track like Indianapolis is the amount of time it might take to permit the field to reselect which lanes. The circumstances that arose Sunday are also not common enough to necessitate NASCAR reevaluating the rule.

“I understand it being highlighted because of it being this race, the situation, because it was front row,” said Cliff Daniels, Larson’s crew chief. “There’s been so many times in Cup races where we’ve seen that from fifth, 10th, 20th. (Today is no different.) Everybody knows that’s the rule.

“Every other racing series, you fill the row, you take the green flag and move on. I just don’t see it as that big of a concern.”

On Sunday, though, Blaney was impacted to some degree. That is indisputable. Even Larson acknowledged after the race that he benefited from Keselowski’s misfortune.

“With the way the strategy was working out, Brad running out of fuel, me inheriting the front row, a lot had to fall into place,” Larson said. “Thankfully it did.”

Advertisement

The victory was Larson’s first at Indianapolis, setting off a euphoric celebration that saw himself, Daniels, team owner Rick Hendrick and team executive Jeff Gordon go into the frontstretch grandstands to celebrate with fans. Larson now has won three of NASCAR’s crown-jewel races.

Meanwhile, down pit road, things were decidedly less festive. After getting out of his car, Blaney needed a moment to decompress, opting to go sit on the pit wall to gather himself.

“We should’ve won the race,” he said. “… Just disappointed. That just stinks. That’s just dumb luck. We did everything right to win and he got a break, pretty good.”

(Top photo of Kyle Larson and Ryan Blaney during Sunday’s Brickyard 400: Justin Casterline / Getty Images)

Advertisement

Culture

Book Review: ‘America, U.S.A.,’ by Eddie S. Glaude Jr.

Published

on

Book Review: ‘America, U.S.A.,’ by Eddie S. Glaude Jr.

AMERICA, U.S.A.: How Race Shadows the Nation’s Anniversaries, by Eddie S. Glaude Jr.


For those of us in the national memory-keeping business, anniversaries hold near-totemic power. Satisfyingly round units of time, ideally bearing fancy, Latin-derived names, serve as the overburdened pegs on which to hang think pieces and museum exhibits, revisionist documentaries and maudlin public ceremonies. The arbitrary nature of such occasions is precisely what gives them their charge, inviting us to set aside complacency and submit to a comprehensive check-in.

In his new book, “America, U.S.A.,” Eddie S. Glaude Jr. presents an intriguing variation on the genre, seeing the country’s 250th birthday as an anniversary of anniversaries: 50 years since the malaise-ridden, schlock-heavy Bicentennial. A century since the subdued Prohibition-era Sesquicentennial. A century and a half since telegraphed reports of George Armstrong Custer’s defeat by the Lakota and Cheyenne at Little Bighorn rudely interrupted the Gilded Age Republic’s 100th birthday party.

If an anniversary offers a snapshot of a moment, the core of Glaude’s book is an old-timey photo album, a collection of notable episodes from earlier national reckonings, long-ago glances in the mirror. An estimable scholar of Black history, politics and religion at Princeton — best known for “Begin Again,” his 2020 meditation on James Baldwin’s relevance for our times — Glaude focuses, as his subtitle puts it, on “how race shadows the nation’s anniversaries.”

Such celebrations, he contends, have never really been the moments for honest self-reflection they are often advertised to be. Instead, the nation usually shatters the mirror, refusing to accept what it prefers not to see. “American anniversaries are often moments to turn a blind eye to the evils of the past and the present,” Glaude writes, “to suppress the fact of America’s divided soul.”

Advertisement

It’s a clever concept, and, needless to say, perfectly timed. Last year, Glaude notes, the Trump administration executed a hostile takeover of the government’s studiously bipartisan 250th anniversary planning. It is now preparing a program that is certain to conceal more than it reveals about the country ostensibly being celebrated.

Glaude, in no mood for celebration, argues that such omissions and evasions also defined commemorations in the past. In 1875, Frederick Douglass predicted “one grand Centennial hosannah of peace and good will to all the white race of this country.” He was right: The nation reached 100 years old at a crucial moment in the post-Civil War fight over racial equality, with white Northerners ready to give up on Southern Reconstruction. The occasion would help the once-warring sections to reunite around a shared commitment to white supremacy. On May 10, 1876, at the opening of the Centennial Exposition in Philadelphia, the police tried to bar Douglass from the grandstand, until a white politician vouched for him.

The 150th anniversary came soon after a resurgent Ku Klux Klan successfully pushed for a restrictive immigration law aimed at keeping America a “Nordic” nation. At the lavishly funded, lightly attended celebrations in Philadelphia, Black veterans of World War I were excluded from marching in the opening parade. A writer with The Associated Negro Press wondered “what was in the breast of those black men who fought to make America safe for Democracy and on Monday stood on the sidelines, forgotten, as the Nordic strode by in all his vain pride.”

By 1976, when the nation marked its Bicentennial, the violence of the ’60s had destroyed any semblance of consensus. Vietnam and Watergate had eroded trust in the government. The commission initially tasked with organizing the anniversary was disbanded amid reports of corruption. Corporations filled the vacuum, Glaude explains, with “star-spangled whoopee cushions; patriotic toilet seats; Liberty hamburgers; red, white and blue beer cans.” The author, around 8 years old at the time, dimly remembers donning a pair of tricolor trousers.

A half-century later, Glaude is refreshingly honest about the depths of his despair. “I do not love America, and never have, especially now,” he writes in one of the more startling opening sentences I’ve read in some time. He dismisses this year’s Semiquincentennial as reaching back “to a storybook America that requires either the banishment of Black people from view or the reduction of our role in the country’s history, so as to affirm America’s ongoing quest to be a more perfect union.”

Advertisement

Undoubtedly true. But Trump doesn’t own the country, at least not yet, nor the 250th anniversary of one of the most radically liberatory and confusingly contradictory events in world history — an inspiration, as Glaude shows, even to critical observers of the American experiment, like Douglass. Far from the revanchist MAGA-palooza in Washington, I suspect this summer’s unasked-for invitation to national soul-searching may surprise us yet.

Despite his despair, Glaude concludes that “the past still offers resources for us to freedom-dream.” So, too, does this book.


AMERICA, U.S.A.: How Race Shadows the Nation’s Anniversaries | By Eddie S. Glaude Jr. | Crown | 270 pp. | $31

Continue Reading

Culture

Summer’s Best Beach Reads

Published

on

Summer’s Best Beach Reads

Moore is a dependable ingredient in any summer reading soufflé. Her airy novels accomplish what they came to do: entertain and transport, without the pyrotechnics of, say, books that eschew quotation marks. In “Down With the Shipmans,” three sisters, laden with baggage, converge on their late mother’s beach cottage, only to learn that their father and his much younger wife are planning to sell the place.

The stakes are high, the drama is juicy and the views are sublime. Moore even provides two beach dogs — Leo (an unruly pit bull mix) and Cinnamon (“golden retriever, red bandanna, long pink tongue”) — to keep things lively. (Comes out June 2)

Continue Reading

Culture

Video: The A.I. threat to audiobooks

Published

on

Video: The A.I. threat to audiobooks

new video loaded: The A.I. threat to audiobooks

Artificial intelligence has made pirated audiobooks faster to make and harder to detect. Our reporter Alexandra Alter tells us about the latest threat to the publishing industry.

By Alexandra Alter, Léo Hamelin and Laura Salaberry

May 20, 2026

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending