Connect with us

Missouri

Pushing for Change: Exploring state of Kansas, Missouri gun laws

Published

on

Pushing for Change: Exploring state of Kansas, Missouri gun laws


Advertisement

Pushing for Change: Exploring state of Kansas, Missouri gun legal guidelines

How have gun legal guidelines modified in each our states? Will they modify once more?



Advertisement

HEART OF THE MATTER. FOR JOINGNI US TODAY. ’I’M CODY HOLYOKE. WE START OUR BROADCAST WITH A STORY ABOUT A YOUNG GIRLHO W JUST FINISHED THE SCHOOL YEAR WITH A LESSON. SHE WILL LIKELY SPENDER H ENTIRE LIFE RELIVING OVER AND OVER AGAIN. HER NAME’S MIA. SHE’S 11 YEARS OLDND A INSTEAD OF BEING ABLE TO SPEND THE SUMMER WITH HER FRIENDS. S’E’S MOURNING THEM. YOU SEE MIA WAS IN THE CLASSROOM AT ROB ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, NEW VALLEY TEXAS LAST MONTH THE DAY A TEENAGE GUNMAN MURDERED 19 OF HER FRIENDS AND TWO TEACHERS MIA FEARING FOR HER LIFE TOLD REPORTERS. SHEER H DEAD TEACHER’S PHONE TO CALL 911 COVERING HERSE WITH A FRIEND’S BLOOD PRETENDING TO BE DEAD WHILE WAITING FOR HELP TO ARVERI MIA WENT TO WASHINGTON THIS PAST WEEK TO URGE CONGRESSIONAL LAWMAKERS TO WORK TOGETHER TO SAVE LIVES. IF YOU FEEL SAFE AT SCHOOL. WHY NOT? YOU THINK IT’S GONNA HAPPEN AGAIN? MIA AND HER DAD ALSO FAMILY MEMBERS OF SOME OF THE UVALDE VICTIMS IMPLORED LAWMAKERS TO ACT SOME HEAV LISTENED WORKING WITH POLITICIANS ACROSS THE AISLE TO STRIKE A DEAL ON COMMON SENSE GUN CONTROL MEASUS ATRE THE URGING OF THE PRIDESENT. LET’S MEETHE MOMENT. LET US FINALLY DO SOMETHING. EARLIER THIS MONTH PRESIDENT AND BIDEN LAID OUT A LIST OF MEASURES HE’D LIKE TO SEE TO CURB GUN VIOLEENC FOCUSING ON ASSAULT WEAPONS BACKGROUND CHECKS RED FLAG LAWS AND ADDRESSINGHE T MENTALEA HLTH CRISIS THE HOUSE MADE SOME OF THOSE MOVES THIS PAST WEEK PASSING A BILL THAT RAISES THE AGE LIMIT FOR PURCHASING A SEMI-AUTOMATIC RIFLE FROM 18 TO 21. IT ALSO BANS THE SALE OF HIGH CAPACITY MAGAZINES CAPABLE OF HOLDING MORE THAN 15 ROUNDS OF AMMO BUT THE MEASURE PASSED LARGELY ALONG PARTY LINES AND NOW HEADS TO THE US SENATE WHERE IT IS EXPECTED TO FAIL. WE’LL BE WATCHING FOR ANY MAJOR MOVEMENT FROM CAPITOL HILL. BUT YOU KNOW, WE’VE DONE THAT BEFORE HAVEN’T WE WATCHED AFTER SANDY HOOK AFTER PARKLAND AND NOW AFTER YOU VALLEY SO WITH FEDERAL CHANGES STILL BEING HAMMERED OUT WHAT’S HAPPENING HEE AT HOME, YOU KNOW, THERE AREN’T REALLY TOO MANY RESTRICTIONS ON FIREASRMN I OUR TWO STATES IN MISSOURI A FAIRLY NEW LAW CALLED THE SECOND AMENDMENT PRESERVATION ACT ACTUALLY PUNISH HIS LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS FOR ENFORCING FEDERAL GUN LAWS WHIT HEFTY FINES OR EVEN JAIL TIME. IT’S A MOVE SEVERAL GROUPS ARE CHALLENGING RIGHT NOW. THERE ARE NO SET. WAITING PERIODS FOR GUN PURCHASES IN MISSOURI, AND ANYONE 19 OR OLDER CAN CARRY A CONCEALED FIREARM WITHOUT A PERMIT IN KANSAS. YOU HAVE TO BE 21 TO DO THAT, BUT THERE’S NO WAITING PERIOD FOR PURCHASES AND MINORS IN KANSAS CAN BUY GUNS WITH BARRELS LONGER THAN 12 INCHES GOVERNOR LAURA KLYEL DEMOCRAT DOESN’T WANT GUN BANDS, BUT DOES ECHO SOME OF THE PRESIDENT’S PROPOSALS? I THINK HAS BECOME VERY CLEAR THAT SOME VERY COMMON SENSE THOUGHTFUL GUN SENSE OF REGULATIONS NEED TO BE IN PLACE. THE QSTIONUE IS WLIL STATE LEGISLATURES IN KANSAS AND MISSOURI TWO RED STATES MAKE ANY CHGESAN TO TITAN GUN RESTRICTIONS HISTORY SPEAKS TO THE CONTRARY HERE TO EXPLAIN AND GET TOHE T HEART OF THIS MATTER AS ALAN ROSTER IN LAW PROFESSOR WITH UMKC ALAN. WELCOME BACK. WE KWNO A LOT OF THIS HAS TO DO WITH POLITICS, WHICH WE’LL DISCUSS LATER ON IN OUR BROADCAST,UT B SUFFICE IT TO SAY REPUBLICAN LEGISLATURES RUN THE SHOW IN JEFF CITY AND TOPAEK MISSOURI HAS A REPUBLICAN GOVERNOR WHO BOASTED ON TWITTER A COUPLE YEARS BACK THAT HE WAS PROUD TO HAVE THE HIGHEST RATING FROM THE NRA’S POLITICAL VICTORY FUND LAWMAKERS. BOTH STASTE SEEM TO BE FAIRLY SUPPORTIVE OF GUN ACCESS AND AVERSE TO RESTRICONTIS. IS THAT FAIR TO SAY? YES, THAT’S CORRECT. OBVIOUSLY GUNS ARE AN ISSUE THAT HAS DIVIDED THE COUNTRY FOR QUITE A LONG TIME DAN IT RUNS VERY MUCH ALONG POLITICAL LINES AND ALSO OTHERS URBAN VERSUS RURAL PEOPLE ARE GONNA HAVE DIFFERENT ATTITUDES TOWARD IT, BUT MISSOUR AIND KANSAS ARE BOTH STATES WHERE YOU HAVE, YOUNO KW, PRETTY SIGNICAFINT POLITICAL MAJORITIES, THAT WOULD FAVOR THE GUN RIGHT SIDE OF THE ISSUE MORE ANTH THE GUN CONTROL SIDE OF IT AND THE LEGISLATIVE ACTIVITY IN RECENT DECADES WOULD REFLECT THAT VERY MUCH AS OF RIGHT NOW. WE KNOW NO SPECIAL SESSIONS HAVE BEEN CALLED IN EITRHE STATE TO TACKLE THE ISSUE. I HAVE THERE BEEN ANY EFFORTS TO TIGHNTE GUN RESTRICTIONS IN OUR TWO STATES. IF NOT, WHY DO YOU THINK THAT IS? THERE ARE BILL. PROPOSED FROM TIME TO TIME ON BOTH SIDES OFHE T ISSUE. SO SOME SOME BILLS ARE INTRODUCED THAT WOULD TIGHTEN GUN LAWS IN SEOM WAYS, BUT THEY DON’T REALLY HAVE A CHANCOFE BEING ENACTED, YOU KNOW, THE SIGNIFICANT CHANGES HAVE OCCURRED, YOU KNOW IN EACH STATE OVERHE T YEARS OVER THE LAST COUPLE DECADES, YOU KNOW ONE TO ALLOW PEOEPL TO CARRY GUNS CONCEALED IN A WAY THAT WASN’T PREVIOUSLY LEGAL THE ENACTED STAND YOUR GROUND LAWS TO LET PEOPLE DEFEND THEMSELVESN ISOME SITUATIONS WHERE THEY PREVIOUSLY COULDN’T AND TY BOTH ENACTED SECOND AMENDMENT PRESERVATION OR PROTECTION ACTS. BUT SO THOSE ARE THE KIND OF LEGISLATION THAT GET ENACTED. THEY’RE THINGS THAT ARE ON THE GUN RIGHT SIDE OF THE ISSUE ISSUE RATHER THAN THINGS THAT WOUL D BE TIGHTENING OR ADDING NEW RESTRICTISON THAT DIDN’T PREVIOUSLY EXIST. SURE. DO YOU THINK YOU VALIDITY CHANGES THIS AT ALL? AND WE JUST HEARD FROM GOVERNOR LAURA KELLY WHO SAYS SHE’S IN FAVOR OF SOME MEASURES LIKE STRONGER BACKGROUND CHECKS RED FLAG LAWS THAT SORT OF THING. I DON’T TNKHI IT CNGESHA ITS SIGNIFICANTLY AT THE EITHER THE STATE LEVEL HERE IN OUR AREA OR AT THE NATIONAL LEVEL. THERE ARE CERTAINLY BRING A NEW ROUND OF DISCUSSION OF THESE ISSUES AND IT’S AT LEAST POSSIBLE THEY CAN EITHER FROM CONGRESS OR PERHAPS FROM ONE OF THE STATE LEGISLATURES. THERE COULD BE SOME LIMIT. ACTION TAKEN CONGRESS FOR EXAMPLE IS TALKING ABOUT THESE RED FLAG LAWS THE IDEA OF TRYING TO BETTELIR MIT ACCESS TO GUNS FOR PEOPLE WHO’VE BEEN SHOWN TO HAVE A MENTAL IUESSND A PERHAPS BE DANGEROUS, BUT YOU KNOW, IT’LL BE LIMITED WHATEVER GETS ENACTEDT A THE NATIONAL LEVEL AND I JUST DON’T REALLY FORESEE ANYTHING CHANGING. AT THETA STE LEVEL HERE IN MISSOURI OR KANSAS SURE, YOU KNOW ONE QUESTION WE GET A LOT AND I KWNO YOU’VE HEARD TOO WHY CAN’T LOCAL GOVERNMENTS DO SOMETHING. WE KNOW KANSAS CITY HAS SUED GUN MANUFACTURERS BEFORE BUT CAN LEADERS LOCAL LEADERS ENACTEW N MEASURES TO BAN CERTAIN WEAPONS PEOPLE OFTEN MENTION THAT BECAUSE YOU KNOW, THERE ARE DIFFERENCES OF OPINION, YOU KNOW IN KANSAS CITY FOR EXAMPLE OR IN SAINT LISOU. THESE ARE CITIES WHERE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS ANDHE T PUBLIC WOULD STRONGLY FAVOR STRICTER GUN LAWS. AND THE REASON TYHET I DO ANYTHING. IS THAT SEVERAL DECADES AGO? THERE WAS A WAVE OF LEGISLATION ENACTED IN MANY STATES INCLUDING MISSOURI AND KANSAS THAT PREEMPTED LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FROM REGULATING GUNS IN ANY WAY. SO IN OTHER WORDS, THEY SAID THIS IS GOING TO BE SOMETHING THAT THE STATE WILL HANDLET A THE STATE LEGISLATIVE LEVEL AND IT’S NOT SOMETHING THAT LOCAL GOVERNMENTS CAN DO ANYTHING ABOUT ITAS W A RECOGNITION OF THE FACT THAT THE ISSUE DOES. THERERE A LOT OF STATES WHERE OPINIONS MIGHT DIFFER IN THE BIG CITIES LE IKATLANTA WOULD ELFE DIFFERENTLY ABOUT GUNS THAN THE STATE OF GEORGIA AS A WLEHO OR NEW ORLEANS WOULD FEEL DIFFERENTLY THAN THE STATE OF LOUISIANA AS A WHOLE ANDO S THE STATE OFFICIALS DON’T WANT LOCAL OFFICIALS TO BE ABLE TO REALLY IN WEIGH IN ON THESE ISSUES SURE. IT’S IMPORTANT TO NOTE. WE COULD HEAV A US SUPREME COURT DECISION COMING DOWN SOON THAT MAY AFFECT DECISIONS MADE ON GUN RESTRICTIONS AND WHO CAN CARRY FIREARMS IN TELL US ABOUT THAT. ETH SUPREME COURT HAS A CASE FROM NEW YORK NEW YORK IS OBVIOUSLY A STATE THAT’S SORT OF UNLIKE MISSOURIAN KANSAS. IT’S IN THE OTHER DIRECTION. IT HAS MORE SOMEWHAT MORE RESTRICTEIV GUN LAWS AND SO THERE IN NEW YORK YOU CAN GET A LICENSER O PERMIT TO CARRY A CONCEALED FIREARM, BUT YOU HAVE TO SHOW SEOM PARTICULAR REASON. IT CAN’T JUST BE LIKE IN MISSOURI AND KANSAS WHERE IF YOU’R’ IF YOU’RE LEGALLY ALQUIFIED THEN IT’S UP TO YOU IN NEW YORK. THEY SAY YOU MUST HAVE SOME REASON OERTH THAN JUST THE GENERAL REASONS THAT ANYONE MIGHT HAVE YOU HAVE TO SHOW SOME SPECIAL PARTICULAR REASON AND THAT’S BEEN CHALLENGED AS A VIOLATION OF THE RIGHT TO KEEP BEARRM AS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION AND SUPREME COURT SEEMS VERY LILYKE JTUS GIVEN ITS CURRENT MAKEUP TO RULE IN FAVOR OF THE CHALLENGERS AND THE STRIKE DNOW ISTH NEW YORK LAW. SO THE BIG QUESTION IS HOW FAR WILL THEY GO? WILL THEY MAKET JUS A SOROFT A NARROW RULING ON THAT PARTICULAR ISSUE? WILL THEY SAY THINGS THAT REALLY SIGNAL THAT OTHER GUN LAWS MIGHT BE LIKELY TO BE STRUCK DOWN IN THE FUTURE LIKE TO THINK ABOUT ALAN ROSSTROM WITH UMKC. THANKS FOR YOUR TIME TODAY TO STAY ON TOP OF THE DEBATE OVER GUN SAFETY AND ANY NEW CHANGES OR RESTRICTIONS LKOO F

Advertisement

Pushing for Change: Exploring state of Kansas, Missouri gun legal guidelines

How have gun legal guidelines modified in each our states? Will they modify once more?

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Missouri

Missouri governor's plan for new Kansas City stadiums is meeting resistance

Published

on

Missouri governor's plan for new Kansas City stadiums is meeting resistance


The Missouri legislature will conduct a special session next week, with one of the goals being action of bills aimed at keeping the Chiefs and Royals from crossing the border to Kansas.

It won’t be easy. The Missouri Independent explores the political issues that complicate the effort to get public money for a renovated football stadium and a new baseball stadium.

From the right, Missouri governor Mike Kehoe faces demands for tax cuts. From the left, he’s getting demands for more than $25 million in disaster relief after tornadoes recently ripped through St. Louis.

Making the situation even more delicate is gamesmanship regarding the manner in which the regular concluded. That culminated in a Thursday session punctuated by shouting.

Advertisement

The special session will focus on the stadium projects, with the state footing up to half the bill. Last year, Jackson County voters overwhelmingly rejected the continuation of an existing sales tax to fund the efforts. Soon, we’ll find out whether the political machinery in Missouri can accomplish indirectly that which the people refused to directly do.





Source link

Continue Reading

Missouri

Missouri veterans homes struggle year after year without consistent funding

Published

on

Missouri veterans homes struggle year after year without consistent funding


ST. LOUIS, Mo. (First Alert 4) — Missouri is constantly on the brink of losing a veterans home because funding can vary from year to year.

One lawmaker is sounding the alarm on funding for Missouri’s veterans homes, saying the taxes the states rely on for these specialized care facilities are not dependable. The Missouri Veterans Commission relies on marijuana tax revenue and casino admission fees but has no set line in the state budget if these two avenues falter.

Before he represented Jefferson City in the Missouri House, Dave Griffith was a Green Beret.

Now he’s fighting a different battle: to keep Missouri’s veterans homes open and operational.

Advertisement

“These are veterans that we made a promise to,” Griffith said. “When we raise our hands as veterans, we make a pledge to our country to protect and serve. At the same time, the country made a pledge to us. That when you get to this point in your life, when you need skilled nursing services, we’re going to be there for you. And we’re failing them.”

Missouri’s seven veterans homes are currently serving 848 veterans, and almost all of them have waitlists. They offer specialized services, from haircuts to physical therapy, at a partially subsidized rate for veterans who can no longer care for themselves.

“Age is not a determining factor, we have everything from 40s up to, we’ve got a veteran who was in the Battle of the Bulge, so I think he’s 103 years old right now,” said Missouri Veterans Commissioner Director Ret. Col. Paul Kirchhoff.

It’s a fight every year to ensure funding since there is no permanent line item in the state budget for veterans homes. Kirchhoff said before the funds were secured this year, the commission had been deferring critical maintenance on some of the homes and even discussing which one they could afford to close.

“A lot of businesses have a 5-year plan, 10-year plan, I can’t do it because I don’t know what kind of funding I’m going to get year to year,” Kirchhoff said.

Advertisement

A portion of the tax revenue from both medical and recreational marijuana goes to the Missouri Veterans Commission. Missouri Cannabis Trade Association Spokesperson Erin Schrimpf said marijuana has been selling at three times the rate expected before legalization. She said the industry expects it will continue to thrive and provide the state with ample sales tax.

“Missouri’s regulated market is thriving and has a lot of support,” Schrimpf said.

The Veterans Commission received nearly $34 million from marijuana taxes this fiscal year, but that’s not the bonus people thought it would be. It’s just enough to maintain veterans homes.

“A lot of people think that with the marijuana funding that there could be additional programs that we could start, that’s just not the case,” Kirchhoff said.

The amount veterans homes receive from casino admissions has been decreasing steadily, from $30 million in 2013, to $11 million in 2023, which is the last full fiscal year the Missouri Gaming Commission has reported. Although casinos in Missouri are reporting increased revenue, they’re getting less foot traffic and the admissions fees stay the same.

Advertisement

Griffith wants to get a new line item in the budget, $50 million in general revenue for veterans homes. He only has one year left in office, but expects his colleagues to carry on the battle after he’s gone.

“It’s a battle that I’m not afraid to fight, and I will continue that battle until I have to walk out of this building,” Griffith said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Missouri

Abortion providers send patients out of Missouri after ban effectively reinstated

Published

on

Abortion providers send patients out of Missouri after ban effectively reinstated


KANSAS CITY, Mo. (KFVS) – Missourians seeking abortions are fleeing to Kansas or Illinois after a court judgement essentially reinstated the state’s abortion ban.

Since the Missouri Supreme Court decided a Jackson County judge’s ruling was not efficient, abortions are effectively banned in Missouri again unless the lower court can rule again. Abortions providers in and out of Missouri have noted that patients are going out of the state to receive care just one day later.

After the Dobbs decision, Missouri was the first state to ban abortion. In November 2024, Missouri voters legalized abortion in November when 52% of them voted “yes” on Amendment Three.

Amendment Three was put on the ballot by initiative petition, having to receive thousands of signatures from people all over Missouri. It faced several legal challenges along the way, going all the way to the state’s Supreme Court before the matter was settled.

Advertisement

A Jackson County Judge stopped Missouri’s licensing requirements for abortion providers, saying they were unfairly restrictive and singled out abortion providers in February. Shortly after, Planned Parenthood started offering abortions at several locations.

Tuesday, the Missouri Supreme Court ruled that the legal reasoning behind the Jackson County ruling was not sufficient, which puts all the abortion regulations back into effect.

When abortion was banned in Missouri after the Dobbs decision but before Amendment Three, data from the Guttmacher Institute shows about 10,000 Missourians traveled to Kansas or Illinois each year to receive abortions.

Rianne Hawkins with Planned Parenthood Great Rivers said the clinic is determined to continue providing abortions, even if it can’t do so in Missouri.

“We’re working really hard to make sure that all the patients that need that care are able to receive that abortion care, whether they have to go to Kansas or Illinois,” Hawkins said.

Advertisement

Hope Clinic in southern Illinois said about 40% of its out-of-state patients since Roe v. Wade was overturned are from Missouri. Co-owner Julie Burkhart said she will continue to work with Missouri abortion clinics during this uncertain time.

“We’ve seen firsthand how they struggle to deal with rising travel costs and logistical barriers like taking time off work and finding childcare. Beyond making it harder for people to access abortion, restrictions also create fear and stigma around this safe, common form of reproductive health care.”

The Jackson County judge can reverse the decision with another ruling. Planned Parenthood said its legal team has already filed a response to Tuesday’s ruling.

Meanwhile, anti-abortion advocates have already turned their attention to the next battle. Another vote on abortion will take place after lawmakers passed a bill to put abortion back on the ballot. Anti-abortion advocates like Brian Westbrook with Coalition Life said Amendment Three was misleading and this new measure will clear things up.

“There’s a lot of work being done behind the scenes,” Westbrook said. “Rallying the troops, getting synergy around this ballot initiative.”

Advertisement

Under the bill passed by the Missouri general assembly, abortion will be on the ballot again in November 2026.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending