Minnesota
Giving birth in rural Minnesota? Be prepared for a long drive – Minnesota Reformer
Essentia Health Services recently announced that it plans to end labor and delivery services at its hospital in Fosston, a town of 1,400 people in northwest Minnesota.
The closure of the delivery ward means that mothers in Fosston and surrounding towns will now have to travel 45 minutes west to Crookston or east to Bemidji to find an obstetric unit that delivers babies.
It’s the latest in a longstanding trend of rural hospitals shuttering their obstetrics departments in the face of staffing and other challenges. Twenty years ago, more than 110 hospitals in the state offered birth services, according to the Minnesota Department of Health. Today that number stands at 76, with the closures hitting especially hard in communities in the rural northern reaches of the state.
In Grand Marais, on the North Shore, women face a two-hour drive to get to the nearest birthing center in Duluth. Mothers in Ely (pop. 3,200) need to drive an hour to get to Virginia after the local hospital ended delivery services in 2014. Virginia is also the nearest delivery hospital for residents of International Falls, a city on the Canadian border with a population of more than 5,000 people. It’s one hour and 45 minutes away by car.
Minnesotans living on reservations and tribal lands are especially likely to face difficulties in finding a nearby birthing hospital, as the map above shows. Infant mortality rates for Indigenous Minnesotans are more than double what they are for white babies, according to state data, and the maternal mortality rate is nearly 8 times higher.
Chartis, a private health care consulting firm, recently found that Minnesota had the nation’s highest number of rural obstetrics closures from 2011 through 2021, although this is partly because it has more rural hospitals than other states. A March of Dimes report found that 14% of Minnesota moms have to drive a half hour or more to reach a birthing hospital, compared to 10% nationwide.
When rural delivery wards close, “our research has shown increased risks of emergency room births as well as preterm births, especially in the more remote rural communities which are not adjacent to urban areas,” said Katy Kozhimannil, a University of Minnesota health policy professor. “We have also found that rural communities that lose obstetrics are less likely to offer other evidence-based services and supports for families, like childbirth education or lactation support.”
Rural hospitals in Minnesota have often cited staffing challenges as a driver of maternity ward closures. It can be expensive to keep staff and supplies on hand for procedures that happen infrequently.
“For obstetric services the fixed costs of staffing, equipment, and facilities are difficult to cover with volume based revenues when facilities and clinicians have few pregnant patients,” Kozhimanill explained in an opinion published in BMJ last year. “This leads to workforce shortages and unit closures in more remote, less populated areas.”
Essentia Health in Fosston, for instance, only delivered 38 babies in the 12-month period ending in June of 2022, according to state data. The hospitals in the communities of Olivia and Granite Falls saw fewer than 20 deliveries in their most recently reported years. Both have since ceased offering those services.
Kozhimanill also noted that nearly half of American births are financed by Medicaid, which “reimburses at substantially lower rates than private insurers, so facilities and clinicians caring for lower income patients in remote rural areas face exceptional challenges in generating revenue for obstetric services.”
The closure of an obstetrics unit can become part of a self-perpetuating cycle of rural decline. Young families in need of maternal and infant care may decide to move elsewhere, shrinking the local economy and making it harder for the community to fund services for those who remain.
The March of Dimes recommends expanding Medicaid eligibility and coverage as a way to reverse these trends, but Kozhimanill says policymakers should think bigger and consider ambitious investments in community public health.
“Policy solutions need to focus squarely on the structural injustices and systemic failures that have created and reproduced the statistics that alarm us,” she wrote last year. “As the closest place to give birth becomes further and further away for many people, these facts should no longer be surprising.”
Minnesota
Stanford Cardinal play the Minnesota Golden Gophers
Minnesota Golden Gophers (4-2) vs. Stanford Cardinal (4-1)
Palm Desert, California; Thursday, 9:30 p.m. EST
BETMGM SPORTSBOOK LINE: Cardinal -1.5; over/under is 142.5
BOTTOM LINE: Stanford takes on Minnesota at Acrisure Arena in Palm Desert, California.
The Cardinal have a 4-1 record in non-conference games. Stanford scores 83.8 points while outscoring opponents by 12.2 points per game.
The Golden Gophers have a 4-2 record against non-conference oppponents. Minnesota ranks seventh in the Big Ten with 11.3 offensive rebounds per game led by Jaylen Crocker-Johnson averaging 3.3.
Stanford averages 7.8 made 3-pointers per game, 1.0 more made shot than the 6.8 per game Minnesota gives up. Minnesota averages 74.2 points per game, 2.6 more than the 71.6 Stanford gives up.
TOP PERFORMERS: Ebuka Okorie is shooting 52.1% and averaging 23.8 points for the Cardinal. Benny Gealer is averaging 2.4 made 3-pointers.
Cade Tyson is scoring 21.8 points per game and averaging 4.3 rebounds for the Golden Gophers. Crocker-Johnson is averaging 11.7 points.
___
The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar.
Minnesota
Minnesota and Wisconsin’s battle for Paul Bunyan’s Axe will always matter
Minnesota hosts Wisconsin on Saturday in the 134th meeting between the longtime rivals. The Gophers enter the showdown at 6-5 and the Badgers are 4-7. A neutral observer might question the importance of this year’s game. No matter how much the sport of college football changes, the battle for Paul Bunyan’s Axe will always be one of the most important games on the calendar.
When P.J. Fleck was hired by the Gophers in 2017, they had lost 13 straight games to the Badgers. He’s now 4-4 against Minnesota’s biggest rival, and he’s aiming to do something that hasn’t been in the series since the 1980s. The last time Minnesota beat Wisconsin four times within a five-year stretch was 1986 to 1990. A win this Saturday would mark the Gophers’ most success in the rivalry since Barry Alvarez was hired by Wisconsin in 1990.
Subscribe: Sign up to receive the free Gophers On SI newsletter
The Gophers entered the Iowa game on October 25 with a 5-2 record. After getting blown out 41-3, they’ve lost three out of their last four games, and they’re limping into the final week of the season. If they add a loss to Wisconsin to their 2025 resume, it would be hard to view this season as a success.
Gophers’ 2025 (with a loss to Wisconsin)
You never want to put the cart before the horse, but this game feels huge for Minnesota. A loss would make it hard for even the most optimistic Gophers fan to put a positive spin on this season.
When the Badgers started their season 2-6, there were serious questions about head coach Luke Fickell’s future with the program. Wisconsin’s AD Chris McIntosh announced on Nov. 6 that the school would retain him for another season, and they’ve quietly turned around their season.
Over the last three weeks, Wisconsin has home wins over No. 23 Washington and No. 21 Illinois, and it played a relatively competitive first half against No. 2 Indiana. Fickell was tasked with the hardest schedule in the country, according to ESPN’s FPI, and his team has steadily improved throughout the season.
Someone who doesn’t follow college football closely, or doesn’t consider themselves a fan of Wisconsin or Minnesota, might question the importance of this game. A 6-5 team playing a 4-7 team, why does it matter?
A win for the Gophers would give Fleck and his staff something to hang their hat on. A season that has fallen a bit off the rails could be saved by their most success against their biggest rival in nearly 30 years. A loss would give Fickell a winning record against Minnesota and provide Wisconsin with some serious momentum heading into the offseason, despite a disastrous start to 2025.
There’s always a storyline or narrative that will make this game interesting. As corporate executives continue to try and change college football in the worst ways possible, I can only plead that rivalries remain a core tenet of this great sport.
Minnesota
‘Whiteness Pandemic’: University of Minnesota project urging White parents to ‘re-educate’ kids sparks row
A controversial initiative from the University of Minnesota’s Culture and Family Lab has sparked a debate after it described “Whiteness” as a “pandemic” and urged White parents to actively re-educate their children.
The webpage has drawn intense criticism from conservative groups and is fueling polarised discussions on race, family and education in the U.S.
Also read: Oklahoma University professor with valid H-1B visa arrested by ICE, details here
Whiteness is not a biological category- University of Minnesota
The webpage titled “Whiteness Pandemic: Resources for Parents, Educators, and other Caregivers” defines whiteness not as a biological category but as a cultural system rooted in “color-blindness, passivity and White fragility.”
The informative article argues that children born into White families are socialized into this system from birth, making family structures among the most influential in perpetuating systemic racism.
According to the lab’s materials, while racism is widely acknowledged as an epidemic, whiteness represents a deeper, underlying pandemic driving that racism. “If you were born or raised in the United States, you have grown up in the Whiteness Pandemic…because of the power and privilege you hold in this racialized society,” the site states, urging White adults to embark on ongoing self-reflection and antiracist parenting.
The study also cited a case study done after the police homicide of Minneapolis resident George Floyd, and concluded that white mothers in Minneapolis were more apathetic or overwhelmed around discussions of his mother. The paper is dedicated to this study and written in the memory of George Floyd.
The resources include guides for White parents on how to develop a “healthy positive White racial identity”, talk to children about race and privilege, and engage in “courageous antiracist parenting/caregiving.”
Backlash and institutional response
The framing of whiteness as a pandemic has caused significant backlash.
The Fox News article reports that Parents Defending Education, a conservative “parents’ rights” watchdog group, strongly criticized the University of Minnesota’s “Whiteness Pandemic” project. They said it amounted to “far-left programming”.
Rhyen Staley, research director at Parents Defending Education, is quoted as calling “absurd ideas like ‘whiteness’” gaining academic legitimacy.
The Daily Wire published an article condemning the “Whiteness Pandemic” as unscientific and broadly accusatory. They argue that the initiative effectively paints a large swath of White Americans as perpetuating systemic racism by virtue of birth. They say this is a form of generating collective guilt.
The article notes that the original academic study behind the project surveyed a very narrow, unrepresentative demographic, which is mostly liberal, well-educated White mothers. The report questions the “generalizability of the conclusions.”
The university, however, defended the work as part of academic freedom. A spokesperson said the institution supports discussing embedded cultural structures and welcomed debate, the Washington Examiner reported.
Also read: F-1 students to face major changes as US eyes to repeal ‘Intent to Leave’ rule
Defending Education’s report on the report
According to Defending Education’s own report, the University of Minnesota’s “Whiteness Pandemic” project received funding from the National Institute of Mental Health and encourages White parents to adopt “anti-racist parenting/caregiving” tools.
The report also details that the underlying 2021 study from the American Psychologist and concludes that “family socialization” into what the authors call a “culture of Whiteness” drives systemic racism.
The original report from the University says this claim shifts the narrative from individual acts of racism to condemning an entire racial identity.
-
World1 week agoFrance and Germany support simplification push for digital rules
-
News1 week agoCourt documents shed light on Indiana shooting that sparked stand-your-ground debate
-
World1 week agoSinclair Snaps Up 8% Stake in Scripps in Advance of Potential Merger
-
Science5 days agoWashington state resident dies of new H5N5 form of bird flu
-
World1 week agoCalls for answers grow over Canada’s interrogation of Israel critic
-
Culture1 week agoDo You Recognize These Past Winners of the National Book Award?
-
Politics1 week agoDuckworth fires staffer who claimed to be attorney for detained illegal immigrant with criminal history
-
Technology1 week agoFake flight cancellation texts target travelers