Connect with us

Minnesota

8,000-year-old skull found in Minnesota River goes home to its Native American descendants

Published

on

8,000-year-old skull found in Minnesota River goes home to its Native American descendants


When information broke this week {that a} partial cranium discovered alongside the Minnesota River may very well be 8,000 years outdated, Samantha Odegard and others within the Higher Sioux Neighborhood could not assist however really feel anger and frustration. The stays clearly belonged to one among their ancestors.

Odegard and others from the group, Pezihutazizi Oyate, first realized in regards to the cranium in a Fb put up by the Renville County Sheriff’s Workplace. The put up included a photograph of the bone.

The put up was disrespectful, she stated, and the intrusive carbon-14 testing carried out to find out the bone’s age was a violation of Native American tradition.

“It ought to have been dealt with in another way,” Odegard stated. “I do know there’s a number of curiosity. However curiosity about Native People has been on the root of some immeasurable and horrific actions all through historical past, whether or not via good intentions or dangerous.”

Advertisement

The cranium was turned over Thursday to the Higher Sioux Neighborhood. “Our relative will likely be cared for with respect and with reverence,” she stated.

The story started innocently sufficient. Two individuals discovered it in September whereas kayaking on the Minnesota River south of Sacred Coronary heart, about 115 miles west of Minneapolis, in accordance with the Fb put up.

The bone was despatched to the Midwest Medical Examiner’s Workplace, which decided that it was human, the sheriff’s workplace stated. It was then despatched to the FBI, the place a forensic anthropologist decided it had belonged to a younger grownup male. A depressed space within the cranium was in keeping with blunt pressure trauma, the sheriff’s put up stated.

Though Renville County did not have an lively lacking individual case, Sheriff Scott Hable informed the Washington Submit that the cranium may assist clear up a case in a neighboring county from a couple of years in the past.

However it was the sheriff’s Fb put up that broke the information that the carbon-14 evaluation had estimated the cranium to be nearly 8,000 years outdated.

Advertisement

“The accessible science and expertise are actually unimaginable, and we’re lucky to have the companions that we do to help us on this investigation and to have come throughout this little piece of historical past,” the sheriff’s put up concluded.

Whereas the social media put up generated headlines and pleasure for these marveling {that a} bone 1000’s of years outdated was present in Minnesota, Dylan Goetsch, discipline investigator with the Minnesota Indian Affairs Council, was offended {that a} state regulation established to safeguard Native American stays wasn’t adopted.

Goetsch stated that after regulation enforcement officers had decided that the cranium was not associated to against the law or a lacking individual case, his workplace together with the state archeologist and the tribal communities ought to have been notified and consulted in regards to the discover, lengthy earlier than it was posted on the Sheriff’s Workplace Fb web page. The put up, together with a photograph of the cranium, may be traumatic to modern Native People, he stated.

“We’re not a relic of historical past. We’re nonetheless dwelling individuals,” he stated. “That is one among our ancestors.” However this additionally could also be a instructing second, he added. “I do not need this to occur once more.”

So Goetsch, together with Minnesota State Archaeologist Amanda Gronhovd, will ship letters to the state’s sheriffs and county attorneys reminding them of the regulation that gives a course of to safeguard Native American stays.

Advertisement

“Plenty of regulation enforcement people will not be conscious of those legal guidelines,” Gronhovd stated. “Ninety-nine p.c of the time once they discover human stays, it is a crime scene.”

When it was decided that the Renville County stays gave the impression to be 1000’s of years outdated, Gronhovd stated, the sheriff informed her that he left messages with the Minnesota Historic Society and the Higher Sioux Neighborhood. “I believe he was making an attempt to do the appropriate factor,” she stated.

However Hable additionally posted the information on his Fb web page earlier than speaking to Gronhovd or members of the Native American group.

Many years in the past, archaeologists would eagerly have carried out assessments and evaluation on a bone that gave the impression to be centuries outdated, Gronhovd stated. They do not do this anymore out of respect for Native People, she stated.

For that cause, it is troublesome to match this latest discover to the age of different bones discovered over the many years in Minnesota. And the carbon-14 evaluation of the cranium may not be correct as a result of the bone could have absorbed historical carbon from the water or fish eaten by the person, Gronhovd stated.

Advertisement

“Should you took a fish out of a lake yesterday, the take a look at may present it was considerably older than it really is due to historical carbon absorbed from what it eats and from being within the water,” she stated.

Even so, the cranium is nearly assuredly 1000’s of years outdated, Gronhovd stated.

“We normally do not discover human stays this outdated as a result of stays do not normally final that lengthy,” she stated.

She acknowledged that the cranium was “an attention-grabbing discover, however stated it was extra essential that the stays have been returned to his descendants.

“It is good to carry this individual again residence,” Gronhovd stated.

Advertisement

Employees author Paul Walsh contributed to this report.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Minnesota

Bizarre Minnesota laws, including penalties for driving a filthy car, that will shock you

Published

on

Bizarre Minnesota laws, including penalties for driving a filthy car, that will shock you


Each state has its own set of laws that seem quite strange, and Minnesota is not exempt. 

Many bizarre laws that come out of states are fictional rumors that somehow spread with no evidence backing them. In Minnesota, this includes it being illegal to cross state lines with a duck on your head or parking an elephant on Main Street. Though, there are certain laws that are surprisingly true. 

Among Minnesota’s strangest laws include not being allowed to drive with dirty tires and the inability to be charged with drunkenness. 

Among Minnesota’s strangest laws include penalties for driving with dirty tires and trouble for mosquitoes. (iStock)

Advertisement

6 WEIRD BEACH LAWS AROUND THE UNITED STATES THAT MAY SURPRISE YOU

Below are more details about these strange laws and more that are on the books in the state of Minnesota. 

  1. You cannot be charged with drunkenness
  2. It’s against the law to drive with sticky, dirty tires
  3. Mosquitoes are a public nuisance
  4. Think twice before hitchhiking

1. You cannot be charged with drunkenness

In Minnesota, public intoxication alone is not a crime. 

This is according to Section 340A.902 of Minnesota law. 

The law states that “no person may be charged with or convicted of the offense of drunkenness or public drunkenness.”

50 BIZARRE LAWS THAT HAVE EXISTED OR STILL EXIST IN AMERICA

Advertisement

That said, a person could still be convicted of other offenses, like if injuring another or damaging property occurs. 

“Nothing herein prevents the prosecution and conviction of an intoxicated person for offenses other than drunkenness or public drunkenness nor does this section relieve a person from civil liability for an injury to persons or property caused by the person while intoxicated,” the written statute goes on to state. 

People clinking glasses

In the state of Minnesota, you cannot be charged with drunkenness. (iStock)

Minnesota is not the only state which does not consider public intoxication a crime.

BIZARRE LAWS IN CALIFORNIA THAT COULD GET YOU INTO TROUBLE

Montana, Nevada and Wisconsin are other states that don’t criminalize drunkenness in public, according to FindLaw.com. 

Advertisement

2. It’s against the law to drive with sticky, dirty tires

If you have dirty tires that are spreading filth in the road, be wary before driving down a road in Minnesota. More specifically, in Minnetonka, where driving with dirty tires could lead to legal trouble. 

Under Section 845.010, “Public Nuisances Affecting Peace, Safety and General Welfare” in Minnetonka, Minnesota’s Code of Ordinances, drivers are not allowed to drive “a truck or other vehicle whose wheels or tires deposit mud, dirt, sticky substances, litter or other material on any street or highway.” 

“A violation of this ordinance is subject to the penalties and provisions of Chapter XIII of the city code,” the law states. 

Muddy tires on a truck

Make sure you give your tires a scrub before driving through Minnetonka, Minnesota. (iStock)

BIZARRE MICHIGAN LAWS THAT WOULD PUZZLE JUST ABOUT ANYONE, INCLUDING CONSEQUENCES FOR SEDUCING UNMARRIED WOMEN

3. Mosquitoes are a public nuisance

Minnesota is home to lots of mosquitoes, so much so that there is actually a law written about the insects. 

Advertisement

The law refers to areas where mosquitoes are in abundance. 

Section 18G.14 in part states that “areas where mosquitoes incubate or hatch are declared to be public nuisances and may be abated under this section. Mosquito abatement may be undertaken under this section anywhere in the state by any governmental unit.”

Swarm of mosquitos

Areas full of mosquitoes are considered a public nuisance in Minnesota. (iStock)

WEIRD SOUTH CAROLINA LAWS THAT WILL SURPRISE YOU, INCLUDING THE RAMIFICATION OF BUYING SILVERWARE ON SUNDAYS

4. Think twice before hitchhiking

Think twice before trying to catch a ride by waiting on the side of the road in Minnesota. 

State statute 169.22 describes the act of hitchhiking as unlawful. 

Advertisement

“No person shall stand in a roadway for the purpose of soliciting a ride from the driver of any private vehicle,” the statute states. 

A man hitchhiker

Minnesota is one state where hitchhiking is not allowed. (iStock)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

Another section of this statute applies to solicitation of business. 

“No person shall stand on a roadway for the purpose of soliciting employment, business, or contributions from the occupant of any vehicle,” the statute states. 

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Minnesota

What six independent voters in Minnesota think about the presidential election

Published

on

What six independent voters in Minnesota think about the presidential election


This time around, Vraa said he’s “probably ready” to vote for Harris. “Trump lies so much it’s crazy,” he said. “The cats and dogs pronouncement during the debate. It’s crazy. He bounces around on so many things. It would be OK if he just admitted he made a mistake, but then he doubles down..”

Bird, who works in finance, grew up in a conservative Minnesota household and has voted for Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians and independents. Bird voted for Libertarian Gary Johnson in 2016 and for Biden in 2020. “I really try to take it person by person, year over year,” he said.

Bird’s top issues this election include the burgeoning national debt — which now stands at more than $35 trillion. “They need to curb spending, both candidates should be talking about it,” he said. “Nobody cares about the deficit, and running the government in a way that makes sense.”

Bird is also concerned about the economy, but notes, “as a white-collar worker, in general the economy has been favorable to me.” And he supports abortion rights: “People should have the freedom to do what they want.”

Advertisement

Bird said he’s voting for Harris. “I don’t mind her, I think she’s a good person. She’s a standard Democrat.”

Freyholtz is a Vietnam veteran and retired teacher who runs a family farm in the northwestern Minnesota town of about 250 people.



Source link

Continue Reading

Minnesota

NEXT Weather: 10 p.m. report for Minnesota on Oct. 3, 2024

Published

on

NEXT Weather: 10 p.m. report for Minnesota on Oct. 3, 2024


NEXT Weather: 10 p.m. report for Minnesota on Oct. 3, 2024 – CBS Minnesota

Watch CBS News


WCCO meteorologist Chris Shaffer says a chilly night is on the way with frost advisories to the north and west of the metro.

Advertisement

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending