Michigan
Grading Michigan football at midseason: Will Wolverines improve in second half?
ANN ARBOR, Mich. — The expanded Big Ten means more cross-country flights and, for teams that lose on the road, more time to sit in an airplane and ruminate.
Michigan had one of those somber flights after losing at Washington. With six games remaining, the Wolverines have two regular-season losses for the first time since 2020 and face a daunting schedule in the second half. For a program that’s accustomed to being on top, adjusting to that new reality was like a nasty case of jet lag.
“It wasn’t a moment where we all had to sit back and weep or overthink what was going on,” safety Quinten Johnson said. “We took it all in, and after 24 hours, we flushed it. We got better from it.”
With an extra week to prepare for Saturday’s game at No. 22 Illinois, the No. 24 Wolverines (4-2, 2-1 Big Ten) dusted off the playbook for avoiding back-to-back losses. Coach Sherrone Moore told the players not to let one game beat them twice. The Wolverines talked about relying on their team leaders, taking things one day at a time, not getting caught up in the outside noise. These are familiar sentiments for a team coming off a disappointing loss, but it’s been a long time since anybody had to use them at Michigan.
“Guys on this team, some of them have never lost before, especially in the regular season,” edge rusher Josaiah Stewart said. “It’s kind of hard for them to stomach that. You’ve just got to push through. Some guys have lost on this team, so it’s just showing them how to respond.”
As the second half of the season begins, here’s a midseason report card for each of Michigan’s position groups.
Quarterbacks: D
It’s tough to find many positives for Michigan’s quarterbacks in the first half of the season. Davis Warren, Alex Orji and Jack Tuttle have thrown eight interceptions, and Michigan’s interception rate of 6 percent ranks 133rd out of 134 FBS teams, per TruMedia. The Wolverines are averaging 115 passing yards per game, last among all Power 4 teams. In some ways, Michigan is fortunate to be 4-2 after getting such dismal production from its passing game.
Tuttle will be taking over as Michigan’s starter against Illinois after missing the first five games with an injury. He came off the bench against Washington and gave the offense a spark, despite having limited reps with the first unit in practice. If Tuttle can give Michigan C-plus quarterback play in the second half of the season, it would be a noticeable improvement and might be enough to stabilize Michigan’s offense.
GO DEEPER
What Michigan’s QB flip-flopping says about 2024 and beyond
Offensive line: C
Michigan’s offensive line has improved since Week 1, but not quickly enough. The quarterbacks have been pressured way too often — the Wolverines rank 116th in pressure rate allowed, according to TruMedia — which has contributed to Michigan’s turnover problems. The run blocking, though solid at times, hasn’t been dominant. Redshirt freshman Evan Link has been up and down after beating out more experienced players for the right tackle job, and the center position has been a grab bag between Dominick Giudice and Greg Crippen. Injuries have also become an issue, as Giudice and left tackle Myles Hinton both missed the Washington game.
Some teams can get by with average O-line play, but Michigan isn’t one of them. The Wolverines need to get back to being dominant up front if they want to be successful.
Running backs: B+
Where would Michigan be without Kalel Mullings?
His performances against USC and Minnesota helped the Wolverines win two games that easily could have gone the other way, and he’s continued to be the most consistent option for Michigan’s offense. Michigan fans know what to expect from Donovan Edwards by now: He’s going to break some big plays, as he did against Washington and USC, but he’s also going to have some droughts. The biggest issue is that Michigan hasn’t been able to get both running backs going at the same time.
| Running back | Att | Yds | TDs | Avg | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kalel Mullings |
91 |
589 |
6 |
6.5 |
174 |
|
Donovan Edwards |
73 |
353 |
3 |
4.8 |
180 |
Wide receivers: D
Through six games, Michigan’s wide receivers have 31 receptions for 280 yards. There are 187(!) players in the FBS with at least that many receiving yards. Whether you call that a quarterback problem or a wide receiver problem, the reality is that it’s both.
Michigan hasn’t been able to get the ball to Semaj Morgan and Tyler Morris when they’re open, and the wide receivers haven’t been open frequently enough when quarterbacks have had time to throw. Michigan’s transfer portal additions, C.J. Charleston and Amorion Walker, have one reception each for 22 yards, and no wide receiver has a reception of longer than 31 yards. The explosive plays just haven’t been there for this unit, and that’s on everybody.
Tight ends: A
If there’s one position group that escapes blame for Michigan’s offensive struggles, it’s this one. Colston Loveland has consistently gotten open despite being the clear No. 1 option, and Marlin Klein was a capable replacement when Loveland was injured. Max Bredeson is an old-school tight end/fullback who’s led the way for a lot of Michigan’s biggest plays on the ground. It’s a shame that the offense has been held back by so many other issues, because this tight end group is fun to watch.
Colston Loveland has a team-high 29 catches for 261 yards. (Gregory Shamus / Getty Images)
Edge/defensive line: B+
Michigan’s front four has been pretty much as advertised. Josaiah Stewart is on pace for double-digit sacks and has 8.5 tackles for loss. Mason Graham has had flashes of dominance that show why he’s a potential top-10 pick, and TJ Guy has backed up the offseason buzz with disruptive plays off the edge. Though the defense has taken a step back in some areas, Michigan still has a top-10 run defense, with opponents averaging 2.9 yards per rush. Perhaps the only knock on this unit is that it hasn’t been dominant enough to cover up issues on the back end.
Linebacker: C
In hindsight, Michigan’s coaches should have been a bit more measured in their praise for Jaishawn Barham. The Maryland transfer was described as a game-wrecker in practice, but against offenses other than Michigan’s, he hasn’t delivered the same level of disruption. The new starters at linebacker, Barham and Ernest Hausmann, had a rough start to the season, though they’ve cleaned up some of their mistakes in recent weeks. This is still a talented unit, but it’s surprising that Barham has gone six games without getting a sack or forcing a turnover.
Secondary: C
This secondary is too good to be allowing this many explosive plays. It’s tough to run on Michigan, so the Wolverines are defending more downfield passes than a lot of other teams. Still, it’s alarming that teams have been able to find vulnerabilities in Michigan’s secondary with such frequency.
The Wolverines clearly miss Rod Moore, who always seemed to be in the right place at the right time. The new starters, including Zeke Berry at nickel and Jyaire Hill at corner, have been in the right place a lot of the time, but when they’re not, teams have found ways to exploit it. Will Johnson is still doing Will Johnson things, but even his two pick sixes haven’t been enough to outweigh the inconsistencies elsewhere in the secondary.
Special teams: B
If everybody on the team had Dominic Zvada’s consistency, the Wolverines would be in a much better place. Zvada is 8-for-8 on field goal attempts and 4-for-4 from 50-plus. Punter Tommy Doman hasn’t been as consistent, and this year it actually matters. If Michigan wants to play the field position game — and at this point, the Wolverines don’t have much of a choice — the punting unit needs to execute at a higher level.
GO DEEPER
Michigan mailbag: How does Sherrone Moore need to change? Can O-line be fixed?
Coaching: C
Last year, Sherrone Moore and Jesse Minter could trust their players to execute almost anything on the call sheet. That’s not the case this year for Kirk Campbell and Wink Martindale. Players are responsible for executing what’s called, and when that’s not happening, it’s up to the coaches to adjust. Nothing’s working? That’s a roster problem, a coaching problem, or both.
Ultimately, it’s up to Moore to build a team that’s capable of contending in the Big Ten and advancing in the College Football Playoff. Over the final six games, the Wolverines are going to find out exactly how they match up with Oregon, Indiana and Ohio State, three CFP contenders. If they don’t like the answer, it’s up to them to change it.
Michigan schedule
| Date | Team | Site | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Aug. 31 |
Home |
W 30-10 |
|
|
Sept. 7 |
Home |
L 31-12 |
|
|
Sept. 14 |
Home |
W 28-18 |
|
|
Sept. 21 |
Home |
W 27-24 |
|
|
Sept. 28 |
Home |
W 27-24 |
|
|
Oct. 5 |
Away |
L 27-17 |
|
|
Oct. 19 |
Away |
||
|
Oct. 26 |
Home |
||
|
Nov. 2 |
Home |
||
|
Nov. 9 |
Away |
||
|
Nov. 23 |
Home |
||
|
Nov. 30 |
Away |
(Top photo of Kalel Mullings: Gregory Shamus / Getty Images)
Michigan
Indiana extends Big Ten streak to five as the Michigan women win for the first time since 2018
The Indiana men didn’t just win, they secured a fifth straight conference championship, continuing a swimming and diving dynasty in Bloomington. Michigan’s women surged to the top of the league, capturing the title with authority and balance across the lineup.
Records fell left and right throughout the week as this year’s Big 10 championships featured some of the best performances in conference history in the pool.
Advertisement
Here are the main takeaways from this year’s Big 10 swimming and diving championships:
Indiana breaks away from Michigan to win fifth straight title
The Indiana men continued their dominance in the pool in 2026, extending their Big 10 dynasty.
From start to finish, the Hoosiers demonstrated experience and elite talent. Indiana won ten different events, including two relays and eight individual wins from six different athletes.
Indiana dominated the distance events this week, winning the 400-yd IM, the 500-yd freestyle, and 1,650-yd freestyle. Senior Zalan Sarkany won both distance freestyle events while freshman Josh Bey started off his Big 10 career with a win in the 400-yard IM.
Advertisement
Owen McDonald was the second highest scorer in the meet behind Michigan senior Tyler Ray, who was named Big 10 Swimmer of the Championships. The senior won the Big 10 title in the 100-yd backstroke and 200-yd IM.
Senior Kai Van Westering and junior Dylan Smiley closed on the week with wins on the last night of competition for the Hoosiers. Van Westering grabbed the win in the 200-yd backstroke and Dylan Smiley won the 100-yd freestyle before leading Indiana to a win in the 400-yd freestyle relay to close out the meet.
Beyond individual stars, the Hoosiers stacked swims in the top eight of each event, showcasing balance across not only distance, but sprint and mid-distance events as well. Indiana’s performance combined consistency and poise, placing swimmers in the establishing control from the first event individual event to the final relay.
The win marks Indiana’s 32nd Big 10 title overall, which is second all time behind Michigan. Head coach Ray Looze won his ninth men’s Big Ten title, moving him into the top five all time in conference history.
The Hoosiers have once again positioned themselves as one of the nation’s elite teams, ready to challenge for another top-three finish at the NCAA Championships in March.
Advertisement
Michigan women continue building momentum
The Michigan women left Minneapolis with its first Big 10 title since 2018 and the Wolverines’ 18th all-time, the most in conference history.
The Michigan women started the season ranked tenth in the CSCAA Top 25, one spot behind Big 10 rival Indiana. Since December they’ve moved into the top four and have cemented themselves as one of the best teams in the country.
“We had a really great team this year,” senior Devon Kitchel told Yahoo Sports. “Throughout the season we consistently worked hard and continually improved. By the time B1Gs came we were ready to go.”
Advertisement
As a team Michigan won eight individual events, took first in four of the five relays and medaled in five additional events.
Bella Sims lead the charge for the Wolverines. The junior transfer won two out of her three individual swims and was named Swimmer of the Championships, the first for Michigan since Maggie MacNeil won it three times between 2020-22.
As a team, Michigan put eight athletes of a possible 17 on the All-Big 10 First Team. Along with Sims, eight-time Big 10 champion Stephanie Balduccini, eight-time Big 10 champion Brady Kendall, five-time Big 10 champion Letitia Sim, and five-time Big 10 champion Hannah Bellard led the way for the Wolverines.
Michigan will now turn its focus to the NCAA Championships in March, where the team will attempt to improve on its ninth-place finish in 2025.
Welcome to the Big 10, Bella Sims
Bella Sims is finding her groove in Ann Arbor.
Advertisement
Sims swam in seven Big Ten finals, which included the 200-yd and 400-yd IM’s, the 100-yd backstroke, and four relays. She finished the meet with five gold medals and two silvers.
In her first two years of collegiate swimming Sims was a three-time NCAA champion, thirteen time All-American, and nine time SEC champion. However, all three of her NCAA titles came during her freshman season at Florida.
The Las Vegas native has represented the United States at the Olympics and World Championships and transferred to Michigan to finish her collegiate career.
Now approaching her third NCAA championship meet, Sims has momentum on her side. Although she is yet to go a personal best this season, Sims is leading the Michigan women to new heights in 2026.
“Bella Sims is an amazing swimmer and an even better person,” Kitchel said. “Obviously she helped our team with points, but she is such a light on deck and such a joy to train with everyday.”
Advertisement
Sims barely had a lowlight during her week in Minneapolis. Her lowest finish was second in the 100-yard backstroke, where she was upset by Wisconsin’s Maggie Wanezek by 0.03 seconds.
There is little doubt Sims will go down as one of the best in Big Ten history when she finishes her career as a Wolverine.
Big 10 records come crashing down
Across the men’s and women’s meets, six Big Ten conference records were set in 2026. In addition, 16 meet records fell over the two championship weeks.
On the women’s side Michigan set two conference records in the 200-yd and 800-yd freestyle relays. Kendall and Bellard added to the total with their marks in the 50-yd free and 200-yd butterfly, respectively.
Advertisement
Six additional meet records were broken including Michigan’s 200-yd and 400-yd medley relays, Sims’ 400-yd IM. Indiana’s Liberty Clark broke the meet record in the 100-yd freestyle, and Wanezek added one in the 200-yd backstroke. Indiana finished the week with a meet record in the 400-yd freestyle relay.
Nine total records fell in the men’s meet, including two conference records and seven additional meet records.
Ray broke 44 seconds in the 100-yd fly to set the Big 10 record in 43.83, which moves him up as the tenth fastest performer in history. The Michigan senior also broke the meet record in the 200-yd butterfly in his last Big 10 swim.
Bey cut over seven seconds in the 400-yd IM to win the title and break the conference record. The IU freshman came into the meet seeded with a 3:43.34 stopped the clock in a blistering 3:34.90.
Advertisement
The other four meet records came from Michigan freshman Luka Mladenovic in the 200-yd breaststroke, Indiana senior Zalan Sarkany in the 500-yd and 1,650-yd freestyle, and Ohio State in the men’s 800-yd freestyle relay.
After a fast two weeks, it seems the top athletes from the Big 10 will be ready to roll at the NCAA championships in March.
Full Team Results
Men
Women
Michigan
Woman accused of driving at the bottom of an Oakland County ski hill near guests
A 58-year-old woman is accused of driving a vehicle at the bottom of a ski hill near skiers and snowboarders in White Lake Township, Michigan, the Oakland County Prosecutor’s Office said Saturday.
Prosecutors allege the Bingham Farms, Michigan, woman drove near guests of Alpine Valley Ski Area, including children, on Tuesday.
According to the prosecutor’s office, witnesses said they saw the woman smoking what appeared to be marijuana before the incident and wearing ski boots while driving. Officers attempting to perform sobriety tests reported that she “exhibited poor balance, slurred speech, and open hostility.”
Online court records show the woman is charged with operating while impaired for the third time. If convicted, she faces up to five years in prison, a maximum fine of $5,000 and “mandatory vehicle immobilization” for one to three years, the prosecutor’s office said.
“This defendant endangered children with her irresponsible actions,” Oakland County Prosecutor Karen McDonald said in a written statement. “There is no excuse to drive impaired, even once. If you’ve had too much to drink or are under the influence of marijuana or other drugs, call a friend, call an Uber, just don’t drive.”
The woman is scheduled to appear at a probable cause conference on March 12.
Michigan
First Film to Depict a Robot Discovered in Michigan
A long-lost silent film that’s believed to be the first depiction of a robot in motion pictures was rediscovered in Michigan. And it’s a great reminder for film history fans that you shouldn’t give up hope just because a film has been deemed lost.
The film, titled “Gugusse and the Automaton,” is just 45 seconds long and was created in 1897 by French film pioneer Georges Méliès. It shows a magician named Gugusse turning a large crank to control Pierrot Automate, a child-sized robot. The robot grows bigger and bigger until it’s an adult.
Once full size, the robot does a little dance before hitting Gugusse over the head with a stick. Gugusse brings the robot down from his pedestal and then shows him what’s what.
Gugusse hits the robot over the head with a gigantic mallet, each swing making the mechanical man a little smaller until he’s back to his child-like size. Another swing makes the robot a small doll and then it’s just one more mallet slap before the robot disappears completely.
With that, the film is over.
It’s a short film with a goofy, slapstick premise. But it’s also an artifact that can be interpreted similarly to so much robot-focused media that would come later in the 20th century. The robot harms a human, the human needs to destroy the robot.
We see anti-robot stories pop up especially during difficult economic times, like the 1930s and 1970s, something I’ve written about before at length. And if you’re wondering whether there were hard economic times in France during the 1890s, there certainly were—in the form of a double dip recession, no less.
But putting aside the potential message of the film (and the risk of taking it too seriously as a sign of broader social frustrations), the story of how this film was rediscovered is fascinating.
Bill McFarland of Grand Rapids, Michigan, drove a box of films that belonged to his great-grandfather to the Library of Congress’s National Audio-Visual Conservation Center in Culpeper, Virginia so that experts could take a look at what he had.
McFarland’s great-grandfather was a man named William Delisle Frisbee who had worked jobs as a school teacher and a potato farmer in Pennsylvania, according to a blog post from the Library of Congress. But he also worked nights as a “traveling showman,” according to the Library.
“He drove his horse and buggy from town to town to dazzle the locals with a projector and some of the world’s first moving pictures,” the Library explains. “He set up shop in a local schoolroom, church, lodge or civic auditorium and showed magic lantern slides and short films with music from a newfangled phonograph. It was shocking.”
Frisbee died in 1937 and two trunks of his possessions were passed on through generations until they made their way to McFarland, who was unable to screen the movies from himself because of their condition.
The Library posted a video to Instagram talking about their acquisition of the film and how remarkable it is that such an old film was found. It’s estimated that as much as 90% of films made before 1930 are lost to history.
Other films in the trunks included another Méliès film from 1900 titled “The Fat and Lean Wrestling Match,” fragments of a Thomas Edison movie called “The Burning Stable.” Library technicians scanned the films in 4K to preserve them for future generations.
The word “robot” wasn’t coined until 1920 for the Czech play R.U.R. by Karel Capek. But visions of artificial men date back centuries. And it’s incredible to see a robot from the 1890s depicted on film for the first time. Even if it’s just 45 seconds long.
Don’t give up hope if you’re longing to watch some movie that’s believed to be completely lost. You never know what someone may have in a dusty old trunk in Michigan.
-
World4 days agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Massachusetts4 days agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Montana1 week ago2026 MHSA Montana Wrestling State Championship Brackets And Results – FloWrestling
-
Denver, CO4 days ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Louisiana7 days agoWildfire near Gum Swamp Road in Livingston Parish now under control; more than 200 acres burned
-
Technology1 week agoYouTube TV billing scam emails are hitting inboxes
-
Politics1 week agoOpenAI didn’t contact police despite employees flagging mass shooter’s concerning chatbot interactions: REPORT
-
Technology1 week agoStellantis is in a crisis of its own making