Connect with us

Kansas

Saving a neighborhood park in this Kansas town was a necessary lesson in community — and democracy • Kansas Reflector

Published

on

Saving a neighborhood park in this Kansas town was a necessary lesson in community — and democracy • Kansas Reflector


It would be easy to overlook Quaker Park.

Located on the corner of First and Sylvan in Emporia, it’s less than an acre in size. It has trees and grass and a ball court and a weathered basketball goal, just what you’d expect of a neighborhood park in a working-class part of town. It’s a nice place to shoot hoops or play catch, but it doesn’t seem special. It’s not the oldest park in town. Others are bigger and more beautiful and have better amenities, including a zoo and several disc golf courses.

So it was no wonder that earlier this year Emporia added the park to its surplus property list, a sort of municipal equivalent of gathering up items for a garage sale. Who would really miss Quaker Park? The city could rid itself of the burden of maintenance and provide land for a modest housing development.

Then something surprising happened.

Advertisement

Residents fought back.

I am reminded of the petition drive to save Quaker Park because of recent news from Wichita that the city is considering selling some of its parks to make up a projected $3.6 million budget shortfall by 2026. At a public hearing earlier this month, Wichita Mayor Lily Wu said she wasn’t advocating to eliminate some of the city’s 146 parks, but that all options were on the table.

The future and function of municipal parks is something that cities of all sizes have long debated. Parks are both an expression, and a metaphor, for democracy; expression because they are policy made concrete-and-grass, and metaphor because they represent a community’s priorities, no matter the lofty marketing language you might find on a city’s website. If you want a glimpse of the soul of a community, look at its parks.

Although it would be reasonable to think there would be a metric for how many acres of parks a city should have given a certain population, that isn’t the case. While just about every other indicator does scale with population — road networks and crime rates, for example — it doesn’t work that way for parks and other green spaces.

“There’s no neat relationship between city population and parks per capita, or tree cover or even space that’s simply unpaved,” Emily Badger wrote in a 2013 Bloomberg article, citing the nonprofit Trust for Public Land’s study of parks in America’s 40 biggest cities.

Advertisement

We’ll return to an updated version of the Trust for Public Land study later, but first — of course! — a little history.

The first city park in America was Boston Common, founded in 1634 and initially used for cattle grazing, militia drills and public hangings. By the Civil War, it had become a place for non-lethal civic events and for free speech.

While the rich have always had private green spaces, the concept of a public park didn’t come along until the mid-1800s, with the rise of industrialization and the need for the tired and poor to, well, breathe free. The visionary who gave us municipal parks in the form we’d recognize was Frederick Law Olmsted. Known today as one of the designers of Central Park, Olmsted was more than a landscape architect. What he did best was travel and think, sometimes committing a little journalism on the way, and in 1850 he went on a six-month walking tour of England that would forever shape his — and our — way of thinking about public spaces. There, he visited Birkinhead Park, a “people’s garden” that was as open (in theory, at least) to the poorest British peasant as it was to Queen Victoria.

In parks, Olmsted imagined democracy in action.

Public spaces brought citizens together “with a common purpose,” Olmsted wrote, “not at all intellectual, competitive with none, each individual adding by his mere presence to the pleasure of all others, all helping to the great happiness of each.”

Advertisement

Central Park was opened to the public in 1858 and has gone through cycles of decline and restoration since. Like other American parks that would come later, it has reflected the sensibilities and sometimes the passions of its community, from the Victorian dinosaur craze to the massively attended free concert by Simon and Garfunkel in 1981.

Out here in the hinterland, our parks are heavy on history. You can scarcely visit any older city park here in Kansas that doesn’t have a monument to the Civil War or some later conflict. In Emporia, I like to walk Peter Pan Park, a 52-acre space that for about 40 years had monkeys on display in a WPA-built stone house in the middle of a lake. Most people around here know about monkey island, but the park still has some surprises. My route through the park takes me through a wooded area where stands a lonely, pylon-shaped monument to the Spanish American War.

“Monkey Island” in August 2024 at Peter Pan Park in Emporia. From the 1930s to the 1970s, rhesus monkeys were captive at the site. It is now part of a disc golf course. (Max McCoy / Kansas Reflector)

While many parks started as memorials — and originally had the look and feel of cemeteries — in later decades the emphasis has been on recreation, from ball fields to splash pads to pickleball courts. This reflects conventional municipal wisdom that parks should be useful in some way, that public spaces should offer utility in addition to, or perhaps instead of, reflection.

But public parks offer more benefits than just playing or thinking.

In addition to being essential for our health, according to the Trust for Public Land, access to green spaces conserves nature, fights climate change, reduces crime, and strengthens communities. The trust’s original ranking of the nation’s 40 largest cities has expanded and offers insight into how equitable communities are, based on what percentage of its residents are within a 10-minute walk of a park.

Advertisement

Called ParkScore, the project has now expanded to the 100 largest cities and many smaller ones, and on its website you can look up metrics for just about any urban area. ParkScore uses five metrics: acreage, access, investment, amenities, and equity. Washington, D.C., is ranked the best among America’s large cities.

Wichita is ranked 66. It scores below average on acreage, access and investment, and about average in amenities and equity. Only 4% of Wichita’s land is used for parks and recreation, compared with a national median of 15%.

For acreage, Emporia fares even worse.

Only 3% of the land is used for parks and recreation. Emporia is above average for access, however, because 74% of its residents are within a 10-minute walk of a park.

Hahrie Han, a political science professor at Johns Hopkins, was quoted in a recent Trust for Public Land study that over the past 50 years, American society has seen a “withering” of common spaces for people to gather. But, she said, that trend can be combatted by investing in parks and other green spaces.

Advertisement

“The audacious, beautiful, and exciting promise at the heart of democracy is the idea that putting people into community with each other creates opportunities to learn the capacities, skills, and motivations needed to forge a common life together,” Han said.

Sound like wishful thinking?

It sounded like it to me at first. Then I remembered the petition drive to save Quaker Park.

In March, the Emporia City Commission voted 3-1 to designate the park as surplus property and authorize its sale. The plan called for three houses to be built on the property, two by private developers and one by the local Habitat for Humanity. Some saw it as a step toward providing housing for the community, but others questioned whether the city should be shedding a park in a part of the city that didn’t have many to being with.

The park was acquired by the city in 1952 from the Conservative Friends of Galena. It was an empty lot then and had been for years. An original Quaker meeting house had been built on the site in 1881, but as the number of Quakers in Emporia dwindled, the building had been sold to another denomination and moved.

Advertisement

The grassroots effort to save the park had to be done in a hurry. The goal was to gather, within a 30-day window, the required 462 signatures on a petition to halt the sale. The signatures had to be from registered voters and the number was equal to 10% of those who had voted in the previous city election.

The organizers held a barbecue, talked to reporters and community members, and established a website. In the end, they came up with more than 800 signatures. The city commission rescinded its previous action to declare Quaker Park surplus and for sale.

“We talked to so many people in this process and the vast majority of people we met were eager to sign the petition,” the five organizers said on the website. “Those few who didn’t were always respectful and we didn’t have a single contentious interaction. … Parks are a precious asset in our town, and we want to preserve them — even when they aren’t necessarily ‘our’ neighborhood park.”

There are at least a couple of lessons here for Wu, the Wichita mayor.

The first is that people will fight for their city parks.

Advertisement

The second is that they will do so in ways that are confoundingly civil.

I use the word confounding because in this day and age just about any political activity is likely to get you into a shouting match with your neighbor over the backyard fence. But not this. Not a single “contentious interaction.” That has to be some kind of civic miracle in 2024.

Because Wu is a registered Libertarian, I’m guessing she wouldn’t be particularly troubled by the transfer of public land to private ownership. Libertarians are notorious in their belief that free markets and private interests can better manage assets than can government. But Wu should take notice of a community coming together to save a city park in a neglected neighborhood.

So, let’s hear it for “Save Quaker Park!”

It may be just the lesson we need in how to save democracy. Or at least it might make opportunistic politicians think twice before sizing up the office furniture for a municipal garage sale.

Advertisement

Max McCoy is an award-winning author and journalist. Through its opinion section, the Kansas Reflector works to amplify the voices of people who are affected by public policies or excluded from public debate. Find information, including how to submit your own commentary, here.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Kansas

Lions Rookie Report: Vaki, Williams, Ukwu Shine

Published

on

Lions Rookie Report: Vaki, Williams, Ukwu Shine


The Lions notched their first win of the preseason Saturday night – in come-from-behind fashion – behind the leg of kicker Jake Bates. Bates nailed a 43-yarder as time expired to beat the Kansas City Chiefs, 24-23. 

The game featured multiple rookies that stepped up in a big fashion. Most notably, running back Sione Vaki and wide receiver Isaiah Williams, an undrafted free agent, came through with solid performances.

Vaki helped spearhead a Lions scoring drive to close the first half, while Williams made an impact both as a receiver and on special teams. He led the team in receiving for a second straight week (six catches for 71 yards), and also fielded three punts for 41 yards.

With each passing week, Williams – a product of the University of Illinois – is looking more and more like he’s going to claim a spot on Detroit’s season-opening 53-man roster.

Advertisement

Let’s take a look now at how Vaki and the rest of the Lions’ six 2024 draft picks fared against the reigning Super Bowl champion Chiefs.

CB Terrion Arnold 

Arnold did not suit up on Saturday. He sat out the contest with a pectoral injury, which he suffered during practice this past Monday. He’s not, however, expected to miss any time during the regular season due to the ailment. 

CB Ennis Rakestraw 

Just like Arnold, Rakestraw sat out Saturday’s exhibition tilt with an injury. Rakestraw, just like Arnold once again, suffered the injury – his of the ankle variety – during this past Monday’s practice. 

Advertisement

Regarding the ailment, the Missouri product said on Instagram Live earlier this week, “We are perfectly fine.” Subsequently, at this present moment, it’s believed that the injury isn’t serious for the second-rounder.

OL Giovanni Manu 

Lining up at left tackle, the third-round pick logged 40 reps on offense and another five on special teams Saturday. That was good for 52 percent of Detroit’s offensive snaps and 16 percent of the team’s special teams snaps. 

There wasn’t much positive or negative to take away from Manu’s performance. 

Positively, though, the University of British Columbia product didn’t account for any penalties, which is of significance for an offensive lineman.

Advertisement

From the Lions’ perspective, the hope is that Manu continues to log solid reps as the regular season nears. 

RB Sione Vaki 

Vaki had a solid performance for a second straight week. 

Most notably, on the final drive of the opening half, the Utah product had four catches for 60 yards, as well as a carry that went for three yards. He further displayed his versatility by fielding a kick return and combining with special teams ace Jalen Reeves-Maybin for a tackle on a kick return in the second quarter.

Vaki totaled six carries for 22 yards, and contributed another 60 yards as a receiver. It was a strong display from the fourth-round pick, likely further strengthening his chances to win the No. 3 running back job.

Advertisement

DL Mekhi Wingo 

Wingo didn’t make a huge impact on Saturday. The 2024 sixth-round pick logged 35 total snaps (30 on defense and five on special teams), and secured just one tackle. Overall wise, the LSU product had a quiet day against the Chiefs.

OL Christian Mahogany 

Mahogany, the final pick of Detroit’s 2024 draft class, remains on the team’s non-football illness list. 

He has missed all of training camp with an undisclosed sickness. He recently returned to the team after being away since minicamp in June. Mahogany has yet to return to practice, and has been working with the training staff to prepare for action.

Advertisement

At minicamp, the sixth-round pick received the majority of his reps at right guard and with the second-team offense.

UDFA stock watch

The aforementioned Williams is starting to prove doubters wrong, along with defensive end Isaac Ukwu.

Ukwu received the starting nod against Kansas City and fared well. Most notably, he recorded a sack of Chiefs reserve quarterback Chris Oladokun in the third quarter.

Ukwu has impressed Lions defensive coordinator Aaron Glenn with his ability to get after the passer so far in training camp.

Advertisement

“We’re trying to figure that out, and that’s what training camp is about. But, I’ll tell you, he’s been a pleasant surprise as far as his ability to rush off the edge,” Glenn said of the undrafted rookie. “But, the thing is a lot different, we have to stack back and then read that triangle. So, we’re trying to get all to be able to do some things like that.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Kansas

Kansas school employee locked teen with Down syndrome in closet, storage cage: lawsuit

Published

on

Kansas school employee locked teen with Down syndrome in closet, storage cage: lawsuit


An employee of a rural Kansas school district repeatedly shoved a teenager with Down syndrome into a utility closet, hit the boy and once photographed him locked in a cage used to store athletic equipment, a lawsuit claims.

The suit filed Friday in federal court said the paraprofessional assigned to the 15-year-old sent the photo to staff in the Kaw Valley district, comparing the teen to an animal and “making light of his serious, demeaning and discriminatory conduct.”

The teen’s parents alleged in the suit that the paraprofessional did not have a key to the cage and had to enlist help from other district staff to open the door and release their son, who is identified in the complaint only by his initials.

The suit, which includes the photo, said it was not clear how long the teen was locked in the cage.

Advertisement
The suit filed in federal court said the paraprofessional assigned to the 15-year-old sent the photo to staff in the Kaw Valley district, comparing the teen to an animal and “making light of his serious, demeaning and discriminatory conduct.” NataliaAlkema

The lawsuit names the paraprofessional, other special education staff and the district, which enrolls around 1,100 and is based in St. Marys, about 30 miles (48 kilometers) northwest of Topeka.

No attorneys are listed for the district in online court records and phone messages and emails left with district staff were not immediately returned.

The suit said the teen’s placement in the closet and cage stemmed from “no behaviors whatsoever, or for minor behaviors” that stemmed from his disability.

The paraprofessional also is accused in the suit of yelling derogatory words within inches of the teen’s face on a daily basis and pulling and yanking the teen by the shirt collar around the school at least once a week.

At least once, the paraprofessional struck the teen in the neck and face, the suit said.

Advertisement

The teen who speaks in short, abbreviated sentences, described the incident using the words “hit,” “closet” and the paraprofessional’s first name.

The suit said the paraprofessional also made the teen stay in soiled clothing for long periods and denied him food during lunchtime.

The suit said some staff expressed concerns to the special education teacher who oversaw the paraprofessional, as well as the district’s special education director.

But the suit said neither of them intervened, even though there had been other complaints about the paraprofessional’s treatment of disabled students in the past.

The suit said the defendants described their treatment of the teen as “tough love” and “how you have to handle him.”

Advertisement

The suit said the director instructed subordinates not to report their concerns to the state child welfare agency.

However, when the parents raised concerns, a district employee reported them to the agency, citing abuse and neglect concerns, the suit said.

No criminal charges are listed in online court records for the paraprofessional or any of the employees named in the suit.

And no disciplinary actions are listed for staff in a state education department database.

The suit said the teen’s behavior deteriorated.

Advertisement

The suit said he refuses to leave his home out of fear, quit using his words and increasingly punches himself in the head.



Source link

Continue Reading

Kansas

Kansas school employee locked teen with Down syndrome in closet, storage cage, lawsuit says

Published

on

Kansas school employee locked teen with Down syndrome in closet, storage cage, lawsuit says


A paraeducator of a rural Kansas school district repeatedly shoved a teenager with Down syndrome into a utility closet, hit the boy and once photographed him locked in a cage used to store athletic equipment, a lawsuit claims.

The suit filed Friday in federal court said the paraprofessional assigned to the 15-year-old sent the photo to staff in the Kaw Valley district, comparing the teen to an animal and “making light of his serious, demeaning and discriminatory conduct.”

The teen’s parents alleged in the suit that the paraprofessional did not have a key to the cage where sports equipment was kept and had to enlist help from other district staff to open the door and release their son, who is identified in the complaint only by his initials. The suit, which includes the photo, said it was not clear how long the teen was locked in the cage.

The lawsuit names the paraprofessional, other special education staff and the district, which enrolls around 1,100 and is based in St. Marys, about 30 miles northwest of Topeka.

Advertisement

No attorneys are listed for the district in online court records and phone messages and emails left with district staff were not immediately returned.

Placed in a closet and cage

The suit said the teen’s placement in the closet and cage stemmed from “no behaviors whatsoever, or for minor behaviors” that stemmed from his disability.

The paraprofessional also is accused in the suit of yelling derogatory words within inches of the teen’s face on a daily basis and pulling and yanking the teen by the shirt collar around the school at least once a week.

At least once, the paraprofessional struck the teen in the neck and face, the suit said. The teen who speaks in short, abbreviated sentences, described the incident using the words “hit,” “closet” and the paraprofessional’s first name.

The suit said the paraprofessional also made the teen stay in soiled clothing for long periods and denied him food during lunchtime.

Advertisement

The suit said some staff expressed concerns to the special education teacher who oversaw the paraprofessional, as well as the district’s special education director. But the suit said neither of them intervened, even though there had been other complaints about the paraprofessional’s treatment of disabled students in the past.

The suit said the defendants described their treatment of the teen as “tough love” and “how you have to handle him.”

The suit said the director instructed subordinates not to report their concerns to the state child welfare agency. However, when the parents raised concerns, a district employee reported them to the agency, citing abuse and neglect concerns, the suit said.

No criminal charges are listed in online court records for the paraprofessional or any of the employees named in the suit. And no disciplinary actions are listed for staff in a state education department database.

The suit said the teen’s behavior deteriorated. The suit said he refuses to leave his home out of fear, quit using his words and increasingly punches himself in the head.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending