Kansas
Kansas lawmakers campaigned on property tax relief. What did they deliver?
Will property tax relief come to Kansans in 2025?
What do Kansas Republican and Democratic leaders say about tax relief in 2025?
As they left Topeka for the year, Kansas lawmakers expressed disappointment that they didn’t do more to accomplish a top campaign promise: property tax relief.
Republicans especially and at least some Democrats made property tax relief a focal point of their 2024 election campaigns, and the GOP credited the message with helping secure victories and expand their supermajorities. Despite the campaign promises, lawmakers delivered little relief in 2025.
“We came here with a mandate to do something about property tax,” said Sen. Mike Thompson, R-Shawnee, on the last day of session. “Not that we haven’t, here in the Senate. We’ve done our job. I really think we’ve done a very good job in trying to push that. I’m just disappointed that we end up at the end of this session with no real relief for those homeowners who are facing selling their home or paying their property tax.”
Thompson suggested that members of the House “didn’t hear the message.”
“We’re going to have to go home, we’re going to have to explain to people what we didn’t get done and why,” Thompson said. “It’s going to be a hard sell. But I’m hopeful that in 2026 we can push the ball forward.”
Republicans were unified on message, but not on plans
While Republican leadership entered the 2025 session with a unified message of property tax relief, it quickly became apparent that House and Senate leadership were not unified on how to accomplish it.
“Well, we really haven’t worked on it yet,” House Speaker Dan Hawkins, R-Wichita, said in January when asked by The Capital-Journal whether Republicans were united on how to cut property taxes. “I can guarantee you we will have property tax relief this year, and we will have some type of a response to the increase in property values.”
“We’re unified on the end goal,” added Senate President Ty Masterson, R-Andover, as leadership spoke with reporters following the governor’s State of the State address.
He added, “We’re still working through the details of what that looks like.”
What were the biggest ideas for property tax relief in 2025?
The most significant idea — and the most controversial — was a Republican proposal to amend the Kansas Constitution to cap the growth in appraisals.
Senate Republicans have been pushing the idea for at least a few years, which supporters argue would address the rising property valuations that result in property tax increases. In 2025, the Senate’s Republican supermajority passed a 3% cap and a 4% cap.
But it faced stiff opposition from House Republicans, including from Hawkins, who said it has “a lot of problems” and “unintended consequences.” House Republicans rejected the cap and instead proposed an averaging system, which Senate Republicans rejected.
The idea that appeared from the start to be the most likely to have bipartisan support was reducing the state mill levy. The two main proposals to accomplish that were a House GOP plan to reduce the levy used to fund schools by 1.5 mills and a Senate GOP plan to eliminate 1.5 mills used to fund state buildings.
The Senate version was passed with bipartisan support and signed into law by Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
Another idea proposed later in the session was a House Republican plan to send state money to local governments as an incentive to not raise taxes, similar to a program that House Republicans pushed to eliminate last year. The new plan also incorporated a protest petition to block local tax increases and an elimination of the current revenue neutral process.
Despite negotiations during veto session, Senate Republicans were not intrigued enough by the idea to put it to a vote before leaving town.
Meanwhile, Democrats had no proposals for significant property tax relief at the start of session. Later, Senate Democrats proposed a committee to study the issue.
How much will mill levy cut save homeowners?
Lawmakers did deliver some property tax relief with Senate Bill 35, starting in 2026. That new law, which had bipartisan support and was signed by Kelly, eliminates 1.5 mills of the 21.5 total state portion of the property tax levy.
Statewide, that equates to a $81 million tax cut in fiscal year 2027. But for individual homeowners, the relief is limited.
For owners of a $100,000 home, eliminating 1.5 mills equates to an annual savings of about $17. For a $250,000 home, the savings are about $43. For a $400,000 home, the savings are $69.
What politicians say about property tax relief
“We took action in Topeka this year to eliminate the state portion of the property tax,” Hawkins said in an after-session Facebook post. “You’ll continue paying property taxes for county and city governments, schools, libraries, etc., but you’ll no longer see ‘State of Kansas’ on your bill!
“I encourage everyone to reach out to their local officials and hold them accountable for their portion of your property taxes!”
But Scott Schwab, the Republican secretary of state who is running for governor in 2026, was critical of legislative leadership.
“A year ago, following a special session to address taxation, legislative leaders vowed to focus on providing Kansans with real property tax relief,” Schwab said in a statement via his campaign. “There were campaign slogans and roadshows around the state to build support for cuts. Voters did their part, letting candidates and legislators know in no uncertain terms that property taxes were too high, valuations were rising faster than paychecks, and Kansans who had worked all their lives to have a home to call their own were being forced out.”
The resulting tax relief was “paltry,” Schwab said.
“This year, our main focus was supposed to be on reducing and/or reforming property taxes,” Rep. Brett Fairchild, R-St. John, said in an April 4 post on Facebook. “However, we were unable to pass a major property tax bill.”
The cut of 1.5 mills, he said, “isn’t a significant tax cut and isn’t a huge deal.”
“Most people in our state won’t notice the tax cut, since most local governments will likely increase property taxes by more than this state property tax cut,” Fairchild said. “However, it’s better than doing nothing at all, and I’m glad we were at least able to pass one bill through the legislature to reduce property taxes.”
Sen. Ethan Corson, D-Fairway, said that lawmakers did not pass “any meaningful property tax relief,” and he’s been hearing from constituents about it.
“The Legislature, they campaigned on that they were going to reduce our property taxes,” Corson said. “They said it at the beginning of session that they were going to reduce our property taxes. And we still don’t yet have any significant property tax relief that we can bring to our constituents.
“I continue to disagree with the continued focus on the income tax piece of our tax equation when what we both promised to our constituents — and what our constituents have shared with us that they would like to see — is robust, meaningful property tax relief.”
Sen. Caryn Tyson, R-Parker and chair of the Senate tax committee, described the cut of 1.5 mills as “actual property tax relief.”
“They’re going to say it’s minimal, but you know what? It’s a step in the right direction,” Tyson said.
She was also critical of Democrats for not having significant ideas of their own.
“What was their idea this year? Oh, let’s propose a committee that studies property taxes,” Tyson said.
Sen. Virgil Peck, R-Havana and vice chair of the Senate tax committee, said he was proud of the Legislature’s work on tax cuts, especially a plan to gradually move to a flat income tax as well as the elimination of the 1.5 mills.
“I would like to see us do more — a lot more — as it relates to property taxes,” Peck said. “We’re limited at the state level. Most property taxes are assessed at the local (level). … I think we could do better when it comes to property tax reductions.”
Sen. Renee Erickson, R-Wichita, shared a similar sentiment.
“I’m very disappointed we did not do more for our constituents back home on property tax, and I hope that we seriously are able to do something next session,” she said.
Tyson said tax policy changes often take years to make it through the legislative process.
“We are not going to stop fighting for our constituents and to fix a broken property tax (system) while we continue to stop growing the beast that we keep feeding, and that is government,” Tyson said. “Income taxes, sales taxes, property taxes — Kansas has some of the highest in the nation, and we need to do what we can to reduce that.”
Kansas
Kansas law revoked their right to drive and threatens their right to exist, transgender residents say
Some 1,700 Kansans had their driver’s licenses invalidated last month. It wasn’t for racking up speeding tickets or a DUI charge, but because they are transgender.
Kansas is one of five states to prohibit trans people from changing the gender marker on their licenses, but it is the first to pass a law that retroactively cancels licenses that were already changed. The law also invalidated birth certificates for those who updated their gender markers.
Hundreds of trans drivers already received letters from the state informing them their documents were “invalid immediately” and they “may be subject to additional penalties” if they continue to drive, unless they surrender the license to the Kansas Division of Vehicles and receive a new one with their birth sex.
“I’m pretty heartbroken,” said Jaelynn Abegg, a 41-year-old trans woman living in Wichita who received a letter. She said she will not turn in her license and plans to move this month to another state.
“It is a continuation of the message that the Legislature has been sending out for years now, and that is that transgender people are not welcome in Kansas,” she said.
Two anonymous trans residents sued Kansas last month, arguing that the law violates state protections for personal autonomy, privacy, equality, due process and freedom of speech. On Tuesday, Douglas County District Judge James McCabria declined to grant a temporary restraining order against the law while the case proceeds.
McCabria wrote in his decision that there isn’t enough evidence to show that trans people will face harassment and discrimination if they have to use bathrooms or show IDs that conflict with their gender identities.
Kansas law was years in the making
Kansas had allowed trans people to update the gender markers on their IDs since 2007. Then in 2023, it changed its legal definition of sex to be male or female and assigned at birth.
Fifteen other states have made a similar change in the past few years — and President Donald Trump issued an executive order declaring that there are only two unchangeable sexes. The State Department now prohibits trans people from changing the gender markers on their passports.
Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach sued the state, arguing that allowing people to update their gender markers violated the 2023 law. Last year, the Kansas Supreme Court affirmed an appeals court decision and allowed gender marker changes to resume.
In January, Kobach backed the new bill he said would “correct an error” by the courts. The state Senate added a provision prohibiting trans people from using bathrooms that align with their gender identities in government-owned buildings. It was passed without public comment. The penalties for violating the provision can be $1,000 for individuals and up to $125,000 for government entities with more than one infraction.
Last month, Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly vetoed the bill, saying the Legislature “should stay out of the business of telling Kansans how to go to the bathroom and instead stay focused on how to make life more affordable for Kansans.” Days later, the Republican-held state Legislature overrode her veto.
Kansas House Speaker Daniel Hawkins, a Republican, said in a statement at the time that the law’s purpose was to protect women. “This isn’t about scoring political points, but doing what’s right for women and girls across our communities,” he said, according to the Kansas Reflector. Hawkins did not respond to NBC News’ request for comment.
State Rep. Mark Schreiber, the only Republican to vote against the bill, told NBC News he agreed with the appeals court that Kobach could not show how allowing trans people to change the gender markers on their licenses caused harm to the state.
“I don’t have any trans folks in my family, but I know trans people,” he said, adding that they aren’t looking for special privileges and just want to live their lives. “And we seem to keep passing laws that keep getting in the way of that.”
Harper Seldin, one of the ACLU attorneys involved in the lawsuit, said during court arguments Friday that the Kansas Legislature singled out trans Kansans “for unique social stigma.”
“They were suddenly required, with no notice or opportunity to be heard, to present themselves to the DMV to obtain driver’s licenses that announced to everyone — the teller at the bank, the clerk at the hotel, the poll worker on election day — that they are transgender,” Seldin said.
Trans people have long reported facing more harassment and discrimination while using IDs that don’t align with their gender identity or expression, and many trans Kansans said they fear that their daily risk of facing such harassment would only increase as a result of the law.
‘There was no plan whatsoever’
Over the last five years, dozens of states have considered bills targeting transgender people, but the majority of those have targeted people’s ability to play on school sports teams that align with their gender identities and minors’ access to transition-related care. In the last few years, state and federal policies have shifted to focus on changing legal definitions of sex and restricting access to updated identity documents.
Logan Casey, director of policy research at the Movement Advancement Project, an LGBTQ think tank that tracks legislation, described these broader laws as “gender regulation laws” that attack the fundamental rights and identity of trans people.
“The point all along for the people pushing these bills and these attacks has been to single out transgender people and create a license to discriminate against transgender people and remove them from public life,” he said. “In effect, trying to get them to stop being transgender.”
Kansas’ law took effect immediately after it was published in the register Feb. 26. A spokesperson for the Kansas Department of Revenue told the Kansas Reflector that the law invalidated about 1,700 licenses. The department did not respond to a request for comment. During the court hearing Friday, Kobach said the department had so far sent letters to 275 Kansans and 138 had received new licenses.
Andrea Ellis, a 34-year-old trans woman living in Wellington, said she received a letter Wednesday even though she never changed the gender marker on her license — she only legally changed her name on it in December. She drove to the DMV the next day, where she said staff were confused about what to do and said her license had a “flag” on it.
They cut the corner off her license and gave her a temporary one. But later that day, they called her and said she had to return to the DMV because they made an error. When she went back, she said they gave her another temporary license that looked the same as the first.
“They claim that it was thought out, and everything else, but there was no grace period unlike any other kind of rollout program,” Ellis said. “There was no plan whatsoever.”
Some trans residents, like Matthew Neumann, said they still haven’t received any notification regarding their licenses. Neumann, who is the executive director of the LGBTQ Foundation of Kansas, said he’s been checking the validity of his license every day on the Kansas Department of Revenue website, and it’s still valid as of Friday.
Neumann said his organization has raised funds to help trans Kansans pay to update their licenses. Getting a license with an updated gender marker costs $8.75, while receiving a new ID is $26.
Neumann has lived in Larned, Kansas, for 20 years and said he will never leave. He said he’s been threatened over his restroom use, and he fears he could face more harassment under the new law.
“I’m just disappointed and frustrated,” he said. “I’m just hoping that maybe this is the wake up call we need,” he said.
Kansas
Farmer receives support from community after Kansas wildfire destroys home
KISMET, Kan. (KWCH) – Last month, wildfires in southern Kansas raged, destroying farmer Randall Thorp’s property, tools and 960 acres of land.
As he handles the massive cleanup project, he knows he is not alone.
“It’s about the greatest show of love I’ve ever seen,” Thorpe said. “I didn’t realize that I would have all this support in my greatest time of need.”
The two main contributors to Thorp’s optimism are the community around him and his faith.
“I’ve seen a lot of darkness that, because of my faith in Jesus, I can see the light in my heart,” Thorp said. “And that’s what keeps me going.”
Throughout the past few weeks, friends, family and neighbors have come to his property to help sort out and clean up the debris.
“I come out here and I’m by myself and I find it hard to do anything, but when a group of people all shows up and they’re wanting to work, then I’m ready to get to work with them, and they’re all ready to help me,” Thorp said.
Even with all the uncertainty following the fire, Thorp has been able to feed the 150 cattle he has, a number that is now growing since it is calving season. Friendly helpers are providing free hay for his animals to eat.
There’s a long way until things will be back to normal, but Thorp is determined to get there.
“You know, I can see some light at the end of the tunnel, but I’ve got to stay strong and keep it going and make it through,” Thorp said.
The powerful show of dependability from fellow Kansans is something he will never forget.
“I’ve been shown lots of love,” Thorp said.
You can still donate to Thorp’s GoFundMe here.
Copyright 2026 KWCH. All rights reserved. To report a correction or typo, please email news@kwch.com
Kansas
Kansas City International Airport reopens after ‘threat’ prompts FBI, cops to swarm terminal
Kansas City International Airport in Missouri was partly evacuated over a “threat” Sunday afternoon but has since resumed “normal operations,” officials said.
“The security incident at [Kansas City International Airport] is now clear and normal operations are resuming,” Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy wrote on X.
“I want to thank law enforcement including the FBI for their timely response. The safety of our passengers, airport staff, and crew members is always our number one priority.”
Airport representative Jackson Overstreet told The Associated Press in an email that the threat was reported at 11:50 a.m. local time, at which point an entire terminal was evacuated.
He said planes that landed after the threat were being held on the taxiway until it could be fully investigated.
FBI rep Dixon Land said the bureau was “aware of the incident” and worked with “law enforcement officials to determine the credibility of a threat.”
Passenger Logan Hawley, 29, told the outlet he was getting ready to board a flight to Texas when he saw police and K-9 units swarming the terminal.
“Suddenly there was an airport worker saying ‘immediately evacuate,’ people got up fast and rushed out of there,” Hawley said.
Roughly 2,000 people were ushered out of the terminal and onto the tarmac, he said.
Photos and video from the airport circulating online show large groups of passengers being led onto the tarmac or funneling out of the terminal.
With Post Wires
-
Wisconsin1 week agoSetting sail on iceboats across a frozen lake in Wisconsin
-
Massachusetts1 week agoMassachusetts man awaits word from family in Iran after attacks
-
Pennsylvania6 days agoPa. man found guilty of raping teen girl who he took to Mexico
-
Detroit, MI5 days agoU.S. Postal Service could run out of money within a year
-
Miami, FL7 days agoCity of Miami celebrates reopening of Flagler Street as part of beautification project
-
Sports6 days agoKeith Olbermann under fire for calling Lou Holtz a ‘scumbag’ after legendary coach’s death
-
Virginia7 days agoGiants will hold 2026 training camp in West Virginia
-
Culture1 week agoTry This Quiz on the Real Locations in These Magical and Mysterious Novels
