Connect with us

Iowa

Should Iowa move on from Kirk Ferentz as football coach?

Published

on

Should Iowa move on from Kirk Ferentz as football coach?


IOWA CITY, Iowa — There have been so many questions we needed to cut up the mailbag into two elements. This one is football-centric, so right here is the second batch of questions. (Try the primary half right here.)

Observe: Submitted questions have been edited for readability.

Why are folks speaking about presumably changing Fran McCaffery, however by some means Kirk Ferentz’s title not often is talked about as a candidate for alternative? — J.M.

This debate will depend on your perspective. Clearly, J.M. — a frequent commenter on Iowa soccer posts — desires Ferentz out. Many others don’t. Let’s make this response about Ferentz fairly than evaluating him with McCaffery.

Advertisement

In neither sport is Iowa going to dominate the Huge Ten. Iowa is mid-level in price range and barely upper-level in income era. To that, Ferentz and Hayden Fry exceeded their weight class. With divisional play, the requirements have modified since Fry claimed three Huge Ten titles, together with two by means of ties. Ferentz has received two West titles and got here two factors from profitable a 3rd (2019) and a landing from a fourth (2022). No West group has overwhelmed the East within the Huge Ten title recreation. If that’s your normal of success at Iowa, then you definitely’re going to run by means of coaches like … insert your favourite crude analogy.

Ferentz has received 10 video games seven occasions with 5 top-10 finishes. He has 10 top-25 finishes, and in the course of the previous 5 years, Iowa ranks third amongst Huge Ten groups in general and convention wins. The Hawkeyes are 4-1 of their previous 5 bowl video games. Ferentz is tied for third with Amos Alonzo Stagg in Huge Ten-only wins (115), behind solely Woody Hayes (153) and Bo Schembechler (143). Ferentz is fourth in general wins by a Huge Ten coach (186) behind Hayes (205), Stagg (199) and Schembechler (194). Ferentz is also tied for essentially the most Huge Ten bowl victories with 10.

Now, Iowa may do higher in a ton of areas. The racial bias investigation was troublesome and painful. In discussing the state of affairs with greater than 100 mother and father, gamers and former gamers of coloration, most (not all) have been in favor of Ferentz remaining in place to attempt to construct a greater tradition.

Contemplating Iowa had the fewest switch portal departures after 2021 and tied for the second-fewest after the 2022 marketing campaign, I’d say the vast majority of gamers have purchased in. Once more, not everybody feels that means.

Followers have each proper to be upset concerning the offensive woes and the shortage of staffing modifications. It’s powerful to roll that emotional rock up the hill yr after yr and watch the offense fizzle. Final yr was a collapse in each space. However Iowa did common 31.8 factors per recreation in 2020 and had a quarterback throw 68 touchdowns from 2017-19. NFL tight ends T.J. Hockenson and Noah Fant mixed for 28 landing catches in 2017-18.

Advertisement

Iowa quarterbacks have mixed to throw 28 touchdowns previously three seasons. The Hawkeyes ran for 4.6 yards per carry in 2020 and simply 2.9 final yr. Gamers make a distinction, too. Likewise, if Ferentz will get the entire blame for the offensive woes, he ought to obtain a lot of the credit score for the defensive success. Phil Parker does an impressive job, however Ferentz oversees all of it.

There have been years when it felt like Iowa left some meat on the bone, particularly in 2018. However there have been years the Hawkeyes overachieved, too. Such is life within the Huge Ten. Everyone seems to be justified in complaining, and I could also be on an island of 1, however Ferentz is without doubt one of the finest to ever do it within the Huge Ten. I’m not on the similar place with McCaffery.


Fran McCaffery’s Iowa basketball group misplaced to Auburn within the first spherical of the NCAA Event. (Matthew Holst/Getty Photos)

Ferentz got here throughout (at his information convention) as unapologetic. He’s perhaps essentially the most defensive man in soccer, however he continues to point out that he doesn’t care about followers. Brian’s again and I don’t care about stats. Do you suppose that he will get motivation from proving he’s proper? Given his defensiveness, it needs to be exhausting for assistants to boost questions relating to his or Brian’s views. Do you get the sense of that while you speak to assistants? — Kyle Ok.

Do you foresee KF persevering with to be prickly with the media this season? — Jarrod S.

I’ve sat in 1000’s of reports conferences for practically 30 years, and I didn’t suppose Ferentz was out of line or overly defensive. He’s nonetheless offended concerning the state forcing by means of the settlement for the racial discrimination lawsuit; it’s solely his status that’s at stake. The state of affairs involving athletic director Gary Barta trimming Brian Ferentz’s wage and instituting metrics to make sure his employment was the primary time Kirk Ferentz has been overruled on personnel by his athletic director. He knew reporters would ask about each matters, and he answered these questions in restricted trend. No shock from me. You realize who can be a lot worse? McCaffery or wrestling coach Tom Manufacturers.

Advertisement

All coaches are cussed and need to be confirmed proper. Completely Ferentz would like to shove a fantastic offensive season in everybody’s ear — media, directors, unfavourable followers, you title it. I may see him using a bunker mentality after the pressure of final season. We’ll roll with it both means.

As for the assistants, none of them are going to name out the best way Ferentz shapes his employees, even when they vent from time to time. They like their jobs, too. The defensive coaches have restricted autonomy in order that they take care of points amongst themselves.

Do you may have a way of the standard of the No. 2 QB and general depth at that place? — Tom W.

Joey Labas proved he was as much as the problem within the Music Metropolis Bowl, so I consider he’s forward of the place Alex Padilla was a yr in the past. I haven’t watched Deacon Hill throw but so I’ll reserve judgment on how he matches. I wouldn’t overlook incoming freshman Marco Lainez III making a push to change into the backup in preseason camp, both. The employees has preferred him for a very long time, and Iowa isn’t afraid of leaping a real freshman into the No. 2 slot if vital.

In what stands out as the final yr of the B1G West Division, how do you see it shaking out high to backside this fall? It looks as if a continuity-vs.-flashy rent divide among the many members now. — Matthew W.

Advertisement

It’s an intriguing ultimate season. Minnesota and Illinois misplaced a ton of contributors. Illini defensive coordinator Ryan Walters left to change into the top coach at Purdue, which additionally seems to be rebuilding with new quarterback Hudson Card. Northwestern misplaced its 4 finest gamers to the NFL Draft, however I’ve seen Pat Fitzgerald work his miracles sufficient occasions to by no means rule out a bounce-back season.

I obtained in bother beforehand after I wrote Nebraska was “ranging from scratch” and Huge Pink Nation ripped me. Then new coach Matt Rhule used the very same phrase, and the state of affairs was defused. I don’t know what’s going to occur in Lincoln.

So, it’s all the way down to Iowa and Wisconsin. The Badgers are a wild card with the best infrastructure however a ton of newcomers for a very totally different scheme. Iowa tripled-down on its offense, which needs to be higher by default. The Hawkeyes’ protection is also the division’s finest unit. So, I’ll take Iowa to win, Wisconsin for second after which flip cash for 3 by means of seven.

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

How does Gary Barta stay employed? Ought to Iowa transfer on from Fran McCaffery?

Do you may have any most closely fits for the Hawks within the upcoming NFL Draft? Whether or not it’s for scheme, want or simply your individual private “like to see him right here?” — Jordan H.

Advertisement

I put collectively one in all these a number of weeks in the past, and I’ll once more when the draft will get nearer. Defensive finish Lukas Van Ness is finest served as a 4-3 finish with the potential to hurry from the inside or the sting. Chicago, Houston, Philadelphia or Seattle can be his most closely fits. New Texans coach DeMeco Ryans would get essentially the most out of Van Ness.

Most mocks have Jack Campbell within the 40s or 50s, however I consider he will get pushed as much as the excessive second spherical. He has all of it. He’d be good for Detroit and take that group to a different stage. I additionally may see Pittsburgh, Washington and Atlanta in play.

Tight finish Sam LaPorta has comparable intangibles as Campbell and in addition may find yourself within the second spherical. A couple of good places embody Cincinnati, Tennessee, Inexperienced Bay, Dallas and Miami. I’d prefer to see how LaPorta works with Joe Burrow and alongside that receiver unit.

Cornerback Riley Moss does his finest work in zone protection along with his eyes on the quarterback. He has good ball expertise and a burst as soon as the quarterback releases the ball. Pittsburgh’s zone protection can be a fantastic match for him. He may see taking part in time immediately in sub-packages and on particular groups.

Kaevon Merriweather is a conventional security who may match nearly anyplace. One of the best spot for Merriweather is a cash-strapped group with few draft picks. Minnesota sums that up, plus a necessity within the secondary. If the circumstances are proper, Merriweather could make a group and maybe play immediately.

Advertisement

As for seemingly free brokers Seth Benson, John Waggoner and Monte Pottebaum, it’s all about alternative. Benson will get plucked immediately, and if it’s in a 3-4, he has a shot. Once more, I’ll go along with Pittsburgh. For a slimmed-down Waggoner, Minnesota gives an honest shot with a brand new scheme and the chance of some undrafted free brokers making the roster. With solely half the groups using a fullback, Pottebaum faces a tricky highway. Chicago is constructing a brand new tradition with a defensive-minded coach, and Pottebaum may change into an impression particular teamer and occasional fullback.

How carefully ought to B1G followers monitor the Pac-12 media rights take care of regard to additional B1G enlargement? Since B1G soccer divisional play, which East groups has Iowa performed the least? — Tri Ok.

I believe everybody ought to take note of the Pac-12 since you’re speaking concerning the potential collapse of an influence convention and a companion since 1947. If a number of colleges bolt for the Huge 12, the Huge Ten has a call. The college presidents largely should not in favor of additional enlargement, but when the Pac-12 breaks aside, it have to be thought-about.

Iowa has performed Ohio State simply 3 times since divisional play started in 2011. They have been supposed to fulfill in 2011-12, however Legends and Leaders altered these schedules. They have been purported to play in 2014 at Kinnick, however flipping to East-West canceled that recreation, too. Then in 2020, they have been scheduled to play in Columbus, however that was canceled when the schedule modified.

If the 3-6-6 alignment will get authorized, Iowa would face three groups yearly and the others twice each 4 years.

Advertisement

(Prime picture: Steven Branscombe / Getty Photos)





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Iowa

How To Watch Pop Tarts Bowl: Iowa State vs. Miami, Bowl Game TV Schedule

Published

on

How To Watch Pop Tarts Bowl: Iowa State vs. Miami, Bowl Game TV Schedule


The Miami Hurricanes are back in action for the final time this season as they look to prove that they were one of the best teams in the league this season as they face the Iowa State Cyclones in the Pop-Tarts Bowl in Orlando.

What is better for the Canes is that most of their starting player from this previous season will be participating instead of opting out.

That means the No. 1 offense in the country will be on full display with Heisman finalist and the Davey O’Brien National Quarterback Award Winner Cam Ward taking the field with All-American Xavier Restrepo and the rest of the electric offense for the Hurricanes.

This will be the final game of a great, yet disappointing season for the Hurricanes but the morale is high as year three of the Mario Cristobal Era comes to a close.

Advertisement

Who: Miami vs. Iowa State

When: 3:30 p.m. on ABC

Where: Camping World Stadium, Orlando, FL

Series: First contest between the two teams.

Last time out, Miami: Miami came up short of reaching the ACC Championship Game after failing to stop the electric offense of the Syracuse Orange and losing 42-38 in the final game of the regular season.

Advertisement

Last time out, Iowa State: The Cyclones got blown out in the Big 12 Championship game against winners Arizona State 45-19 as they struggled to find offense all game long.

Mon., Dec. 23

Myrtle Beach Bowl
Coastal Carolina vs. UTSA
11 a.m. on ESPN

Famous Idaho Potato Bowl
Northern Illinois vs. Fresno State
2:30 p.m. on ESPN

Tues., Dec. 24

Hawai’i Bowl
South Florida vs. San Jose State
8 p.m. on ESPN

Thurs., Dec. 26

GameAbove Sports Bowl
Pittsburgh vs. Toledo
2 p.m. on ESPN

Advertisement

Rate Bowl
Rutgers vs. Kansas State
5:30 p.m. on ESPN

68 Ventures Bowl
Arkansas State vs. Bowling Green
9 p.m. on ESPN

Fri., Dec. 27

Armed Forces Bowl
Navy vs. Oklahoma
12 p.m. on ESPN

Birmingham Bowl
Vanderbilt vs. Georgia Tech
3:30 p.m. on ESPN

Liberty Bowl
Arkansas vs. Texas Tech
7 p.m. on ESPN

Advertisement

Holiday Bowl
Syracuse vs. Washington State
8 p.m. on Fox

Las Vegas Bowl
Texas A&M vs. USC
10:30 p.m. on ESPN

Sat., Dec. 28

Fenway Bowl
North Carolina vs. UConn
11 a.m. on ESPN

Pinstripe Bowl
Nebraska vs. Boston College
12 p.m. on ABC

New Mexico Bowl
TCU vs. Louisiana
2:15 p.m. on ESPN

Advertisement

Pop-Tarts Bowl
Miami vs. Iowa State
3:30 p.m. on ABC

Snoop Dogg Arizona Bowl
Colorado State vs. Miami (OH)
4:30 p.m. on CW Network

Military Bowl
NC State vs. East Carolina
5:45 p.m. on ESPN

Alamo Bowl
Colorado vs. BYU
7:30 p.m. on ABC

Independence Bowl
Army vs. Louisiana Tech
9:15 p.m. on ESPN

Advertisement

Mon., Dec. 30

Music City Bowl
Missouri vs. Iowa
2:30 p.m. on ESPN

Tues., Dec. 31

ReliaQuest Bowl
Alabama vs. Michigan
12 p.m. on ESPN

Sun Bowl
Louisville vs. Washington
2 p.m. on CBS

Citrus Bowl
South Carolina vs. Illinois
3 p.m. on ABC

Texas Bowl
LSU vs. Baylor
3:30 p.m. on ESPN

Advertisement

Thurs., Jan. 2

Gator Bowl
Ole Miss vs. Duke
7:30 p.m. on ESPN

Fri., Jan. 3

First Responder Bowl
North Texas vs. Texas State
4 p.m. on ESPN

Duke’s Mayo Bowl
Minnesota vs. Virginia Tech
7:30 p.m. on ESPN

Sat., Jan. 4

Bahamas Bowl
Buffalo vs. Liberty
11 a.m. on ESPN2

Advertisement

READ MORE FROM MIAMI HURRICANES ON SI:

2025 Miami Hurricanes Football Offseason Tracker: Coming and Going

Everything Miami Head Coach Mario Cristobal Said After Pop-Tart Bowl Announcement

Welcome to the ACC Bill Belichick, Mario Cristobal Time is Ticking: Just a Minute

Follow all social media platforms to stay up to date with everything Miami Hurricanes- TwitterFacebookInstagramYoutube, and BlueSky.





Source link

Continue Reading

Iowa

Iowa Republicans set up a shell game to mask the costs of tax cuts | Opinion

Published

on

Iowa Republicans set up a shell game to mask the costs of tax cuts | Opinion



It is not “taxpayer relief” to use previously paid taxes to pay help pay for budget shortfalls caused by a “tax cut.”

This month, the state Revenue Estimating Conference reported new estimates showing Iowa revenue will drop by $602 million (6.2%) compared with fiscal year 2024. Further, state revenue is expected to drop by a further $428 million (4.7%) in fiscal year 2026, which begins July 1, 2025. Republicans attribute the fall in estimated revenue to the start of their 3.8% flat income tax rate next year. Republicans have promoted reducing the state income tax — which Sen. Jack Whitver derisively calls a “confiscation” — down to zero.

But Republicans have amassed a $2 billion budget surplus, $961 million in its reserve accounts, and $3.75 billion in the Taxpayer Relief Fund, which was supposed to be used to reduce taxes. All told, about $6.75 billion. One good question is: Why?

Advertisement

Republicans enacted a long-term commitment to reduced revenues due to the flax tax at an extremely volatile time during and after the COVID-19 epidemic. The federal government’s $5.2 trillion infusion into states and their economies was the largest fiscal stimulus package ever. One-time federal financial supports reduced state costs and artificially bolstered revenues. Recently, Pew Charitable Trusts observed: “The combination of temporary funds propping up budgets and the adoption of new recurring expenditures or tax cuts has left many states in a precarious position. Policymakers now must grapple with the possibility that their states’ finances are structurally imbalanced and vulnerable to deficits as one-time funds dry up but new commitments remain.”

Not wanting to “waste a good crisis,” as they say, Republicans rushed to enact a flat tax during an extremely uncertain economic time when the level of likely future tax revenues was cloudy at best.

As the COVID economic booster begins to fade, several states have experienced significant decreases in tax revenue as compared to their 15-year trend. Iowa was among states experiencing a negative difference in the fourth quarter of 2023 — mind you, before the flat income tax kicked in. Iowa experienced a 6% decrease in revenue from its historical trend, the fourth-highest difference among states that went negative, according to Pew.

Advertisement

Researchers explained: “State tax collections have been on a downward trajectory since their mid-2022 peak, reflecting, in large part, a decline from the unexpected highs of the pandemic revenue wave. … One question is whether states will be able to afford the budgetary commitments they made in the past three years — such as tax relief and pay raises for public employees — over the long term.”

Yet, Iowa Republicans want to enshrine their COVID-fueled tax cut into the Iowa Constitution. Last session, Republicans passed a constitutional amendment to require a two-thirds vote of both chambers of the state Legislature to pass a bill that would increase the individual or corporate income tax rate. They are expected to pass the legislation a second time this session, which would likely put it on the ballot for voters in November 2026. What a way to saddle future Iowans with a hasty tax cut enacted during a most abnormal period of artificially high revenue and reduced state expenses.

It is a sure thing Republicans will hoard Iowa’s surpluses and use it to cover predicted revenue gaps before the November 2026 vote on the constitutional amendment to mask from the voting public the true and lasting impacts of their opportunistic push for a flat tax.

In fact, Republicans and Gov. Kim Reynolds passed Senate File 2442 this year, which, among other things, changed the law regarding how the Taxpayer Relief Fund could be used. Tucked away in the second-to-last division of a 35-page bill is a section that provides that, if the actual net revenue is less than budgeted expenses “there is transferred from the taxpayer relief fund to the general fund of the state an amount equal to fifty percent of the difference or the remaining balance of the taxpayer relief fund, whichever is lower.” That is a preemptive coverup of the probable result of the Republican flat tax as conceded by Republicans, themselves.

Iowa Republicans are not using the Taxpayer Relief Fund as it was originally intended. It is not “taxpayer relief” to use previously paid taxes to pay help pay for budget shortfalls caused by a “tax cut.” Most would call that a shell game. It is like giving yourself a “raise” by moving a dollar from one pocket to another. Why not just give those “confiscated” funds back to Iowans directly via refunds? Ah, but that would spoil the game, wouldn’t it?

Advertisement

Unmet needs and underfunded state accounts exist now. That will get worse.

Governor Reynolds states Republicans have a “commitment to shrinking the size and scope of government.” However, should not elected officials be committed first to ensuring that our government is the “right size,” before deciding it should be shrunk? That is, the right size to fully accomplish basic functions that individuals cannot meet themselves —no matter how much of their own money they have in their pockets — such as prevention and mitigation of natural disasters, ensuring safe bridges and roads, making sure promised pensions are not underfunded, cleaning up Iowa’s fouled waters, and helping public schools at least meet their costs of operation.

Tom Walton is an Iowa lawyer.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Iowa

Iowa 95, Utah 88: A Balanced Comeback

Published

on

Iowa 95, Utah 88: A Balanced Comeback


Iowa 95, Utah 88: A Balanced Comeback

Nine months ago, Utah ended Iowa’s 2023-24 season in the second round of the NIT. Saturday night, Iowa faced off with Utah again at the Sanford Pentagon in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, and came away with a very solid 95-88 win over the Utes. The Hawkeyes used a dominant second half and a balanced scoring effort from the starting lineup to earn the victory.

Advertisement

Here are three takeaways from the game.

1. The Big Finish

Finishing strong hasn’t always been a strength for this particular Iowa team. The Hawkeyes couldn’t make enough shots (or get enough stops) in their neutral-site loss to Utah State last month and ran out of steam after playing very well against Iowa State for 35 minutes a few weeks ago.

Saturday, Iowa trailed 40-36 at halftime and was down 11 early in the second half after conceding a 9-2 run to the Utes out of the break. The Hawkeyes caught fire after that, rattling off 25 points in the next seven minutes of game action to tie the score at 63-all.

Down the stretch, it was the Hawkeyes who were making shots and getting stops. Iowa outscored Utah 20-13 after the game was tied at 75 with 6:59 to play. Iowa scored 59 points in the second half (to 48 from Utah), led by 16 points from Payton Sandfort, who shot 5-of-8 from the floor and was perfect at the free throw line (6-of-6).

Advertisement

Notably, Iowa scored 59 points in the second half despite shooting just 4-of-6 from 3-point range. After attempting 14 three-pointers in the opening 20 minutes (and making five of them), Iowa adjusted on offense in the second half, attacking the rim more and getting higher-percentage shots — and more trips to the free throw line, where the Hawkeyes went 17-of-24 after the break.

“We were moving the ball and driving the ball [in the second half],” Iowa head coach Fran McCaffery said after the win. “We settled too much in the first half. Payton said it [and] he was right, we hit a couple early and started settling.”

“[Then] they don’t have to play defense, they don’t get tired, they come down and they carve you up, they run good stuff. So we kept the ball moving the ball side to side, driving the ball, intelligent screening, back-cuts, that was the difference in the game.”

The sellout crowd at the Pentagon had a noticeable (and unsurprising) Hawkeye flavor, which helped fuel Iowa’s second half comeback. That, as well as the veteran core of this Iowa roster that’s had plenty of experience in these situations — both good and bad — at this point.

Advertisement

“Veteran guys,” said McCaffery on how Iowa was able to turn the game around in the second half. “We’ve got good players, we’ve got good ball-handlers, guys who’ve been through it, [the] crowd was great. I think [it was] a combination of all those things.”

2. Drew Thelwell’s Spark

One player who provided a notable spark in Iowa’s comeback effort was senior guard Drew Thelwell, making his third consecutive start. Thelwell didn’t make a basket in the second half — didn’t even attempt one, in fact — but he scored seven points on 7-of-8 shooting at the free throw line.

Thelwell drew five fouls (more than anyone else on the Iowa roster in the second half), although a few of those came late when the Utes were attempting to extend the game. Still, Thelwell’s ability to attack the defense and the energy he brought were key factors in Iowa’s comeback win.

“[His energy] is infectious,” McCaffery said after the game. “Everyone else goes with him, Brock [Harding]’s kind of that way as well. The energy in the building was phenomenal. Drew was right in the middle of that. His defense, drawing six fouls, those are stats that are critical to a team’s ability to win. You do that by driving the ball and drawing fouls and that’s what he did.”

Advertisement

McCaffery also expanded on what he was looking for when he was pursuing Thelwell out of the transfer portal earlier this year and what he’s brought to this Iowa team. “I was looking for a veteran point guard, who could run a team, who could play off the ball and score, guard his man,” he explained.

“I noticed immediately that this kid could play defense, and wants to play defense and wants to play at both ends, that he understands how to engineer a victory,” McCaffery said. “Drew Thelwell is a winner, that’s what I was looking for and that’s what we got.”

The man that Thelwell displaced in the starting lineup — Ladji Dembele — also had some key plays to spark Iowa’s comeback bid. After scoring zero points and grabbing just one rebound in the first half, Dembele had five points, three rebounds, and a steal after intermission. His two baskets came during Iowa’s surge after falling behind by 11 and helped cut a 7-point deficit to just two.

More importantly, he helped keep Iowa afloat in the second half, with Owen Freeman bolted to the bench with foul trouble (Freeman picked up three fouls in the second half and played under five minutes total after halftime). Dembele played 14:10 in the second half and he finished with a +13 plus-minus rating in those minutes, the highest of any Iowa player in the second half.

Advertisement

McCaffery praised the effort from Dembele and fellow sub Pryce Sandfort. “They’re just rock solid, both of them. All they care about is winning. Pryce, defensively, was tremendous. Ladji, boy was he great. [He] had his two big hoops. But then defensively, on the glass, [he had a] big time offensive rebound late, [a] couple in-traffic rebounds, just his awareness defensively was great.”

3. Balance Carries The Day

Recent years have seen multiple standout individual players that served as the focal points for their respective Iowa teams — Luka Garza, followed by Keegan Murray, and then Kris Murray. Those players were superstars at the college level, racking up All-Big Ten honors, winning Big Ten Player of the Year awards, and vying (or winning, in Garza’s case) for national honors as well.

There isn’t a player quite like that on this Iowa roster — but at its best, this is a team that has a lot of depth and scoring balance, with multiple players that can score and pass and put pressure on a defense. Saturday night saw them at something pretty close to their best, especially in the furious second half comeback effort.

All five Iowa starters finished in double figures in scoring, led by Payton Sandfort with 24 points and a game-high 8 rebounds. Freeman finished second on the team with 16 points, despite missing 75% of the second half with foul trouble. “Owen was really on his way to a big-time game, I felt bad when he got in foul trouble like that,” McCaffery said after the game. Freeman finished with 16 points and 6 rebounds.

Advertisement

Josh Dix and Drew Thelwell each added 15 points, with 10 of Dix’s points coming in the second half. Dix did his damage inside the arc in this game, going 7-of-9 on two-point shots and attempting just one three.

Finally, Brock Harding finished with 12 points, all in the second half. After going 0-for-5 in the first half, Harding went 4-of-8 in the second half, including 2-of-2 from deep. His first three gave Iowa its first lead of the second half at 68-67 and his second triple pushed Iowa’s lead to 88-80 with three minutes to play.

When Iowa is moving the ball well, setting screens, and attacking the rim like the offense was in the second half, this becomes a very difficult team to defend because there’s no one player that defenses can key on and try to slow down. Maintaining that focus and that aggressive mindset on the offensive end was key to Iowa’s win on Saturday — maintaining those same things over the next two-and-a-half months will be key to Iowa’s success in the Big Ten.

NEXT: Iowa finishes off non-conference play with a home game against New Hampshire on December 30 (6 PM CT, BTN).

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending