Iowa

IU basketball: Indiana at Iowa — The report card

Published

1 year ago

January 12, 2025

IU basketball: Indiana at Iowa — The report card

Can we get that two hours back?

Save for a brief first half glimmer, this one was never a contest. Iowa opened with a 21-8 run to start the game. Indiana did respond with a 20-4 run of their own to take a 28-25 lead with 6:38 left in the first. But it was all Hawkeyes from there. They closed the half on an 18-5 run, and opened the second with another 21-7 outburst. Game, set, match.

Let’s take a deeper look at how IU lost 85-60 with our latest edition of The Report Card.

Indiana (13-4, 4-2) will next host Illinois on Tuesday evening in Bloomington.

COACHING (F)

We’ve written frequently here about Indiana not starting games ready to play. And we’ve wondered if they’d be able to recover against better teams on the road. Well, Mike Woodson hasn’t figured out how to get his team off to fast starts, and we got our answer in Iowa City.

Indiana got outhustled, out-schemed, and outmaneuvered. Iowa played harder, moved with more purpose, and ran better stuff. The Hoosiers looked lost, confused, and at times even disinterested.

Woodson did appear to be trying to find a lineup that would play with sustained effort. And he got the good first half run from his bench. But no amount of tinkering with the lineup is going to help a team that isn’t prepared to compete at this level.

If this is how this 11-game stretch of NCAA NET Quad-1 games is gonna go, buckle up.

OFFENSE (F)

The Hoosiers set the tone for the entire evening with seven turnovers in the first five minutes of the game. Iowa scored 13 points off those miscues, and IU was on their heels.

Indiana didn’t appear ready for Iowa’s zone press, even though it’s been a part of Fran McCaffery’s system for years. They were careless with the basketball, and committed 12 first half turnovers and 16 for the game.

Shooting it poorly from both two and three, IU had their third lowest effective field goal percentage of the season, trailing only the Nebraska and Louisville losses. They had their lowest offensive rebounding percentage (24.3%) since Dec. 3, and IU didn’t get to the free throw line either, with just 13 attempts for the game.

The offense seemed limited to just putting the ball in the hands of Myles Rice and asking him to create something.

And the result was just .84 points per possession, Indiana’s lowest mark of the season — against a defense that was ranked outside of the top-100 in defensive efficiency.

DEFENSE (C)

Iowa has a good offense, and IU did very little to slow them down. The Hawkeyes scored 1.18 points per possession, the fourth most they’ve allowed in a game this season.

How much of this bad defense was a result of bad offense? Some of it, and that’s why we won’t go straight F’s here. A lot of IU’s offensive mistakes set up transition points before the Hoosiers could get set up. Iowa had 24 points off turnovers and 26 fast break points.

And Indiana did force eight first half turnovers. That helped fuel their lone rally. But it wasn’t nearly enough.

The Hoosiers couldn’t lose track of Iowa’s best shooters — namely Payton Sandfort and Josh Dix — who combined to make 8-of-14 from deep. Indiana helped off of them enough to give them the space they needed to get hot. As a team Iowa made 6-of-13 from three in the second half to crush any hopes of an IU rally.

And probably just as disturbing, Iowa made 60% of their shots from two. Indiana was a step slower than Iowa seemingly all night, and it really showed on this end of the floor.

MORE GAME COVERAGE

THE PLAYERS (*starters)

*Mackenzie Mgbako (F) This was a second straight dud performance from Mgbako, a player critical to Indiana’s success. And right or wrong, he’s not being allowed to play through his mistakes, including a foul on a three-pointer that got him benched. Mgbako only played 16 minutes.

*Myles Rice (C) Rice played well at times, but he was asked to do too much. With Iowa doubling Oumar Ballo and sticking to shooters, it was left to Rice to beat the Hawkeyes. But he can’t do it all. He got his shot blocked several times in the paint. But this loss was by no means on Rice.

*Trey Galloway (F) This may have been Galloway’s worst game of his college career. No points and four turnovers from a fifth-year senior? It was hard to see this coming after a run of good play. Indiana needs this to be a one-off occurrence.

*Luke Goode (F) Goode made a three, but he wasn’t a major factor. After several games with good rebounding numbers he had zero. When run off the three-point line he struggled to be an offensive threat. And Goode was part of IU’s struggle to guard Iowa’s shooters.

*Oumar Ballo (D) Ballo was a major factor in Indiana’s slow start with four turnovers in the first five minutes. Although he ended up posting respectable stats, the effort just wasn’t there early, and that played a major role in setting a negative tone for the game.

Kanaan Carlyle (C) Carlyle did look confident at times, especially his first couple shots of the first half. But it took him 12 shots to score nine points. Indiana needs this to be the start of something positive.

Bryson Tucker (C) Tucker provided some positive first half minutes and played well when Indiana went on their run. But this still wasn’t an efficient effort overall, and until he develops a rhythm from three there will be peaks and valleys.

Anthony Leal (B) Leal’s five assists highlight his effort to create something out of IU’s inept offense. Indiana’s best stretches were with Leal on the floor. That’s not the first time, probably won’t be the last.

Langdon Hatton (B-) Hatton’s contributions were generally positive. He might not be the biggest or most athletic post player, but he competes and has his moments.

Dallas James did not play, coach’s decision.

————————

Malik Reneau was out with a knee injury. Gabe Cupps and Jakai Newton are out long-term with injuries.

The Daily Hoosier –“Where Indiana fans assemble when they’re not at Assembly”

Source link

Iowa

Democrats will debate in Iowa US Senate primary shaped by outside money and big-name endorsements

Published

11 hours ago

May 14, 2026

Press Room

Democrats will debate in Iowa US Senate primary shaped by outside money and big-name endorsements

DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Two Democrats vying to be Iowa’s next U.S. senator are scheduled to debate Thursday, as each seeks to convince voters he’s better positioned to flip the Republican-held seat in a contest that has seen heavy outside spending and high-profile endorsements.

State lawmakers Zach Wahls and Josh Turek are competing in a June 2 primary. It is one of a few remaining competitive Democratic Senate primaries this year, as the party looks to find the best approach to reclaim the U.S. Senate this fall.

Iowa’s Republican Sen. Joni Ernst opted out of a reelection bid, leaving the seat open for the first time since she replaced retiring Democratic Sen. Tom Harkin in 2014. Republican Senate leaders have backed Ashley Hinson, a congresswoman representing northeast Iowa, committing $29 million for her to help keep their thin majority.

Democrats see an opportunity to flip seats in the once-competitive state, despite President Donald Trump’s double-digit win in the last presidential election and an all-Republican federal delegation. But first they need to settle which federal candidate will be at the top of the ticket. Early voting began Wednesday.

An influx of cash has shaped the final stretch

While Wahls and Turek have raised and spent similar amounts, a Democratic political organization, VoteVets, has spent about $7 million to support Turek in the final stretch of the campaign. That’s more than the two candidates have spent combined.

Turek, who is not a veteran, was born with spina bifida after his father’s exposure to chemicals while serving in the Vietnam War. The group has said Turek is uniquely positioned to advocate for veterans’ services, especially health care and military families.

Wahls has criticized the influx of cash as insiders in Washington trying to exert outsized influence, and it’s likely to come up again Thursday, as it did at an Iowa Press debate last week.

Tensions over the future of the party

Wahls has been vocal about who should — or should not — lead Senate Democrats, saying he would not vote for Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York to be the caucus leader.

“The leadership of Chuck Schumer has failed the Democratic Party, it has failed the state and it has failed this country,” Wahls said during last week’s debate. “Dark money has an agenda, and that agenda is to protect the broken status quo and the failed leadership of Sen. Schumer.”

Schumer has tried to keep the focus on Republicans.

Wahls is endorsed by U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, who joined him in Iowa for campaign events over the weekend. The progressive senator told voters the Senate needs Democrats who are willing to “get in there and stand up and fight.” Wahls also often highlights the support he’s seen from unions and local elected officials.

Turek responded to Wahls’ criticism saying he’s not a “DC insider.”

“I don’t know these folks,” he said. Turek explained his criteria for leader candidates but stopped short of saying he wouldn’t support Schumer.

“I will go up and ask whoever is deciding to run for leadership … ‘What are you going to do for Iowa? What are you going to do for Iowans? What are you going to do for the middle class?’” Turek said.

In the last week, Turek unveiled a rare endorsement from Harkin, who represented Iowa in Washington for three decades, as well as former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg. Turek also has collected endorsements from sitting U.S. senators, including Illinois’ Tammy Duckworth, New Hampshire’s Maggie Hassan and Nevada’s Catherine Cortez Masto.

Drawing greater contrast on issues

In the first debate last week, Turek and Wahls were aligned on many issues. Both said that they would not support the Republican president’s tariffs or the war in Iran and that they do support raising the minimum wage and restoring health care access with a public insurance option. They criticized corruption in Washington and proposed higher taxes on corporations and wealthy Americans.

But they also started to draw some contrasts. More of that is likely Thursday.

Wahls referenced a law Turek supported in the Iowa legislature that makes it a state crime to be in the U.S. illegally. Turek defended his vote, saying it was Biden-era legislation and stressed the importance of a secure U.S.-Mexico border. Turek said he also supports an easier path to citizenship and reforms to immigration enforcement under the Trump administration.

Turek highlighted his working-class background and contrasted his work for a nonprofit with Wahls’ work for a super PAC focused on electing young Democrats.

___

Follow the AP’s coverage of the 2026 election at https://apnews.com/projects/elections-2026/.

Source link

Iowa

Iowa State wrestling adds ex-Hawkeye Dru Ayala from transfer portal

Published

23 hours ago

May 13, 2026

Press Room

Iowa State wrestling adds ex-Hawkeye Dru Ayala from transfer portal

Iowa State wrestling has added another lightweight through the transfer portal, earning the commitment of former Hawkeye Dru Ayala on Wednesday, May 13.

Ayala has been with the Hawkeyes for two seasons, with an 11-4 record as a true freshman and not competing in 2025-26. The 125-pounder will have at least three years of eligibility remaining.

“Grateful for where I’ve been, excited for where I’m going. Go Cyclones,” Ayala said in an Instagram post.

Before his time in Iowa, Ayala was a four-time state medalist with Fort Dodge. He made the state semifinals all four years and had a 153-16 record. He is the brother of former Hawkeye wrestler Drake Ayala, who recently accepted a position as an assistant coach with the Cyclones.

Iowa State has had multiple major departures with Anthony Echemendia, Christian Castillo, Daniel Herrera and others heading to the transfer portal. As a result, the Cyclones have been busy adding to the roster, with Dru Ayala joining Ayden Smith (Rutgers), Brayden Thompson (Oklahoma State) and Rin Sakamoto (Oklahoma State).

Eli McKown covers high school sports and wrestling for the Des Moines Register. Contact him at Emckown@gannett.com. Follow him on Twitter at @EMcKown23.

Source link

Iowa

Candidates for Warren County’s Iowa House District 22 tackle issues

Published

1 day ago

May 13, 2026

Press Room

Candidates for Warren County’s Iowa House District 22 tackle issues

Two candidates are running for the Iowa House District 22 seat encompassing Norwalk, Carlisle, Cumming and Martensdale.

First-term Republican Rep. Samantha Fett faces a challenge from Democrat Rory Taylor, who she defeated in 2024 to fill the open seat.

Both candidates are unopposed for their party’s nomination.

To help voters, the Des Moines Register sent questions to all federal, statewide and Des Moines area legislative candidates running for political office this year. Their answers have been lightly edited for length and clarity.

The primary election is scheduled for June 2.

Click below to see learn more about the candidates and where they stand on key issues:

Political party: Republican.
Age: 46.
Residence: Carlisle.
Occupation: Marketing and communications director for Inspired Life Inc.
Education: Bachelor’s degree in journalism, Drake University.
Political experience: Moms for Liberty – Warren County, Carlisle School Board member 2019-2021, Warren County Central Committee member, Capitol Region Republican Women, Iowa Federation of Republican Women, National Federation of Republican Women.

Who is Rory Taylor?

Political party: Democrat.
Age: 65.
Residence: Norwalk.
Occupation: Retired.
Education: Bachelor’s degree in history, minor in political science, Iowa State University.
Political experience: Bevington City Council.

Fett (R): My top issue is strengthening Iowa’s education system. I believe parents should have a leading voice in their children’s education because families want meaningful options. I support high academic standards, safe learning environments and policies that protect children while ensuring every student has the opportunity to succeed. I will work on policies that continue to focus on all students reaching their potential through measurable, objective achievements and by expanding and enhancing the supply of creative education. Education shapes the next generation, and it remains my highest priority.

Taylor (D): Water quality in our state. We need to increase monitoring the water sources we use for our drinking water. Our nitrate levels are in direct correlation to our cancer rates in the state. We need to work with our farmers to mitigate the problem, not blame them for it!

Taylor (D): We need to restructure the voucher program. Students with financial needs could be accommodated, but not the wealthiest of our population. We need to provide more funding for our AEAs and improvement in teacher pay. Bring back our industrial arts programs.

Fett (R): I support policies that put students and families first. That includes strengthening parental rights, expanding educational options and making sure all education models — public schools, homeschool, private and public charter schools — can succeed. I also support a balanced approach to digital learning, since excessive screen time can affect attention and academic progress. I believe Iowa should set developmentally appropriate limits on digital instruction and prioritize strong foundational skills like reading, writing and real classroom connection so every student has the opportunity to thrive.

Fett (R): I support Iowa’s recent tax changes because the state was collecting far more than it needed. With full reserves, a $2 billion ending balance, and over $4 billion in the Taxpayer Relief Fund, returning money to Iowans is the responsible choice. The 3.8% rate keeps Iowa competitive, and temporary revenue dips were planned for. Looking ahead, I would support additional tax law changes that continue this philosophy: keeping government efficient, ensuring strong reserves and returning excess dollars to taxpayers.

Taylor (D): I do not support all the tax changes. I believe moving Iowa’s tax structure for both corporate and income to be more progressive. This would raise taxes on corporations, higher-income individuals and lower taxes on lower-income individuals.

Taylor (D): Water quality standards: Strengthen, enforce and monitor water quality standards to reduce carcinogens like nitrates and PFAS from agricultural runoff.

Fett (R): I support practical, targeted actions that reduce known risks and strengthen research. Iowa is a major radon hotspot, and radon exposure is a leading cause of lung cancer. House File 2297 is an important step requiring passive radon mitigation. A cost-effective protection helps ensure families aren’t unknowingly exposed to dangerous levels. I support the pediatric cancer research bill, which provides dedicated funding to advance research and improve outcomes for Iowa children. This investment and reducing environmental risks give Iowa a stronger and more effective path to lowering cancer rates. Chemical regulation: Improve monitoring of pesticides and fertilizer application, ensuring public health is central to agricultural policy. Radon mitigation: Fund widespread radon testing. Protect Medicaid expansion, which supports cancer screening and care for over 180,000 Iowans. HPV vaccine access: Protect access to human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccinations to prevent future cancer.

Fett (R): Protecting private property rights is essential. Based on that standard, I do not support using eminent domain for carbon capture pipelines, as these projects do not meet the threshold of traditional public use infrastructure and raise significant concerns for landowners. I have consistently opposed the misuse of eminent domain and will continue standing with Iowa landowners on this issue.

Taylor (D): Public projects, such as infrastructure (highways, bridges) and utilities. And as long as there is fair compensation and due process.

Taylor (D): Voucher program would be a start. And the tax cuts that have been made haven’t stimulated the economy as the Republican Party has suggested they would. I don’t see any other cuts I would suggest. The key is tax revenue, and what we have in place now isn’t working!

Fett (R): Iowa’s recent revenue dip was fully expected when income taxes were reduced. I support a disciplined, responsible approach to budgeting that ensures we fund key priorities like public schools, nursing homes and public safety while still allowing Iowans to keep more of what they earn. The Taxpayer Relief Fund was created specifically to manage temporary revenue decreases during tax reform, providing stability without jeopardizing essential services. My focus is on maintaining disciplined budgeting so Iowa continues meeting its obligations without over taxing families.

Read more about the midterm candidates at: https://www.desmoinesregister.com/news/elections/.

Marissa Payne covers the Iowa Statehouse and politics for the Register. Reach her by email at mjpayne@registermedia.com. Follow her on X at @marissajpayne.

Source link