Connect with us

Iowa

Inside a rural Iowa school district’s fight to save public education • Iowa Capital Dispatch

Published

on

Inside a rural Iowa school district’s fight to save public education • Iowa Capital Dispatch


When Kevin Hosbond was teaching English and coaching speech in the rural southeast Iowa school district of Fairfield, his position was on the chopping block three separate times. Each time, students and parents convinced the school board to save his position.

Kevin Hosbond, an English teacher and speech coach at Grinnell-Newburg High School, left his last teaching position to escape looming budget cuts. Now, the district he thought would be more stable is being forced to lay off many staff. (Photo by Zach Spindler-Krage)

But in 2017, amidst financial crisis in the district, the Fairfield school board eliminated dozens of positions, including an elementary art position held by Hosbond’s wife. Tired of the disrespect, as Hosbond called it, the two uprooted and moved to Grinnell, a rural town of 10,000 in central Iowa home to Grinnell College.

Hosbond and his wife both took teaching positions at Grinnell-Newburg High School (GHS), hoping to escape the constant threat of budget cuts that loomed over them in Fairfield.

And yet, the budget cuts followed them across 90 miles of cornfields.

Advertisement

Last month, the Grinnell-Newburg school board voted to reduce the district’s budget by $974,331 for next school year. The district serves 1,600 students across five schools.

The cuts include the elimination of 17 staff positions, including cutting a third grade section and two middle-school English teachers. The cuts will also eliminate middle school summer school and reduce bus routes.

Chris Starrett, who has served as school board president since November, predicts next year’s cuts could be even larger. The year after — larger yet.

“I’m not surprised,” Hosbond said of the cuts. “It’s happening in districts across the state.”

Across Iowa, the financing of public education has been in crisis. Des Moines Public Schools is cutting $14 million ahead of next year. Iowa City Community School District approved a $5.5 million reduction. Linn-Mar Community School District slashed $2.5 million and plans to lay off 50 staff members in the process. Cedar Rapids and Ames are the only large districts seeing moderate growth in their budgets.

Advertisement

With the budget challenges statewide, Hosbond said his next move wouldn’t be out of the district — it would likely be out of education.

Backpacks line the walls of Grinnell-Newburg High School. The district has a large percentage (36.5%) of students who qualify for free or reduced lunch, but there is also a wealthier student population, particularly with many children from families who work at Grinnell College. (Photo by Zach Spindler-Krage)

Grinnell-Newburg public schools face low enrollment, low morale and low certainty about future

Between forced position eliminations and voluntary staff resignations — since January, at least five high school staff members have publicly shared they will not be returning after this school year — the Grinnell-Newburg district is rapidly losing staff members. Among those who are choosing to remain in the district, many said morale is at an all-time low.

At the meeting on March 13 in which the proposed budget for the 2024-25 school year was set to be discussed, the board spent the majority of the meeting discussing the implementation of an unrelated physical education standard before turning to the proposed budget in the final 15 minutes.

Before the board voted on the budget, Hosbond spoke up from the audience, where he was sitting with his wife. “Sometimes things look really good on paper, but in reality, they’re really ugly,” he said.

Chris Grundler, a first-term school board member, replied, “None of this looks good. None of it.”

Advertisement

“Well, we’re making it sound good so we can vote on it,” Hosbond said.

Kevin Hosbond, an English teacher and speech coach at Grinnell-Newburg High School, left his last teaching position to escape looming budget cuts. Now, the district he thought would be more stable is being forced to lay off many staff. (Photo by Zach Spindler-Krage)

The board approved the budget unanimously. Two of the seven members spoke only when it came time to vote. As the audience trickled out, a few teachers embraced as they cried, some having just learned they would not be returning to their positions next school year.

Directly outside of the GHS library, where the school board meets, colorful banners stand out proudly against the brick wall. One identifies GHS as one of “America’s Best High Schools” in 2020 as found by U.S. News and World Report. Another recognizes GHS for being on CollegeBoard’s AP District Honor Roll in 2017. The walls leading to the gymnasium are lined with row after row of accomplishments in forensics, music and athletics.

Hosbond said GHS is now at an inflection point, stuck at a crossroads between a storied history of success and an uncertain — if not gloomy — future.

Iowa consistently ranked in the top five states nationwide for the quality of its public education as recently as the 90s. Now, U.S. News and World Report currently ranks Iowa’s K-12 education at 13th.

“I love having been a professional teacher in Iowa for all these years, but it’s getting harder and harder for people to come to work every day,” Kent Mick said. Mick has been a public educator for 37 years and has taught history at GHS for nine years.

Advertisement

A video of him urging against the elimination of instructional leaders at the March school board meeting quickly gained over 150,000 views on social media, prompting a handful of state legislators to repost the video with captions regretful of the state of public education in Iowa.

As he taught his history of music class on April 18, Mick scrawled names of famous bands from the 1960s on the whiteboard as he “nerded out” on artists like Led Zeppelin and Jimi Hendrix. “I had to earn my stripes to teach this course,” Mick said. But Mick said he plans to retire soon, and when he does, he expects that his position will not be replaced, a common example of  school districts cutting costs through attrition.

Roger Henderson, who was the vocal director at GHS for 30 years before becoming the liaison between the district and the education department at Grinnell College, said the number of electives offered at GHS — like Mick’s history of music — is disproportionate compared to other schools of GHS’s size. Henderson said he remembers a time in the 1990s when a handful of classes were being taught in temporary mobile trailer classrooms parked next to the main building because course offerings were so high.

Kent Mick, history teacher at Grinnell-Newburg High School and public educator of 37 years, writes music genres on the whiteboard as he prepares to teach his history of music class. (Photo by Zach Spindler-Krage)

In 2005, when the district collected $9 million in funding through a bond issue vote and community donations, GHS significantly expanded its facilities, adding eight classrooms, an auditorium, a gymnasium and athletic facilities. Since then, the community investment in education has been low.

Mick expressed frustration that the severity of the financial situation within the district was not disclosed earlier. “Why is this such an enormous surprise to our staff that we are in this situation?” Mick said. “It should have been public knowledge that we were burning up our spending authority.”

Advertisement

The spending authority formula, which is a concept unique to Iowa public schools, was designed to regulate public school spending and ensure equity across the state. Spending authority limits by statute the maximum amount of money a school district can spend in the general operating fund. The largest component of the budget is based on pupil count and composed of a blend of state aid and local property tax.

According to data provided by Lisa Briggs, chief financial officer for Grinnell-Newburg schools, the district’s estimated annual authorized budget for fiscal year 2023 was $26,782,722. For fiscal year 2024, it is projected to drop to $20,769,967.

Historically, roughly 53% of the district’s funding comes from state aid, with 43% coming from the local tax levy and 4% from federal funds. In Iowa school districts with higher property taxes, state aid makes up a much smaller percentage of the formula, often as a result of higher tax levies or more frequent bond votes. But for Grinnell-Newburg, where 36.5% of students qualify for free or reduced lunch, there hasn’t been a successful bond vote in over a decade. The last attempt in 2018, when the district proposed a $60 million bond, failed with just 43% of the vote.

Grinnell-Newburg school district’s estimated annual authorized budget for fiscal year 2023 was $26,782,722. For fiscal year 2024, it is projected to drop to $20,769,967. (Photo by Zach Spindler-Krage)

“Our general fund balance was heading in the wrong direction, and we needed to cut expenditures,” Steven Barber said. Barber is the interim superintendent serving a one-year role that expires July 1.

The school board recently had to settle on selecting another one-year interim superintendent after all three finalists for the permanent position declined their offers. Chris Starrett, school board president, said the district is offering competitive pay, but he hypothesizes finalists have turned the position down because instituting cuts of this magnitude can “be the end of someone’s career.”

“You think I really wanted to go down this road?” interim superintendent Barber said, explaining the difficult situation he was hired into. “But they hired me to do what’s best for Grinnell-Newburg, so I had to take it upon myself to identify a process that was gonna be least painful.”

Advertisement

Barber said he first ensured the budget protected all accreditation requirements stipulated by Iowa administrative code. Then, he looked at counseling, social workers, transportation, custodians and food service to see where he could authorize cuts.

The biggest portion, though, came from reaching out to the principals at each of the district’s five schools — one high school, one middle school and three elementary schools — and asking the principals to identify which positions could be eliminated. Barber said staffing is the typical place to make cuts, since 80-85% of the general fund goes directly toward salaries and benefits.

A few years back, there started to be a very undemocratic…way of doing things on the school board. Things are done ahead of time.

– Suzanne Castello, mom of a Grinnell-Newburg High School student

Advertisement

The administrators used two standards to determine which cuts to recommend, according to Barber. First, what would be least effective to students, and second, what would allow as many current employees to find alternative ways to stay within the district if their current position was eliminated. Barber said he created 50 different budget packages based on the recommendations from principals. He ultimately selected one package to recommend to the school board.

Barber and Starrett, school board president, both acknowledged there was limited public input involved in the decision-making process.

“The majority of our cuts were based off of numbers,” Starrett said. “We, as a board, we really don’t have the time. I don’t get paid to do this. So I’m not going to lie to you that I’ve probably put more time into this than most would, but we really leaned on our superintendent and administration because that’s their job to put together a good solid number of what needs to be done.”

Advertisement

“I was vastly disappointed,” Suzanne Castello, the mom of a GHS student, said, referring to how the school board determined budget cuts and informed the public. “A few years back, there started to be a very undemocratic…way of doing things on the school board. Things are done ahead of time. Public comment is window dressing. There is no back and forth.”

Castello said she has seen the Grinnell-Newburg community regularly mobilize to unseat members of the school board by voting for challengers they think will create a “more responsive board.” The school board has seen particularly high turnover lately. In 2021, three challengers won over the incumbent candidates. In 2023, another new member was elected.

Starrett said the board and school district can improve transparency. “I don’t hold back anymore. You’re going to see all the spreadsheets, I don’t care.”

“And if you have an idea on how to fix those numbers on that spreadsheet, come talk to me,” he said.

Within Grinnell-Newburg, one idea swirling is the potential to build a new school, likely K-5 or K-8. Some teachers and local residents say the new building could dramatically reduce staffing and utilities costs and attract more families into the district, therefore increasing enrollment and funding. On the other hand, some said they worry a new school would require too risky an investment with no promise of it paying off.

Advertisement

Regardless, local residents have not approved recent proposed increases to property taxes, something that would almost certainly be required to build a new school.

Davis Elementary School serves students grades 3-4 in Grinnell. The Grinnell-Newburg school district has been forced to put significant money into building maintenance after an attempted bond issue failed in 2018 that would have provided $60 million toward a new PK-5 school and renovations at the middle school. (Photo by Zach Spindler-Krage)

State education aid not enough for many public schools across Iowa

The budget crisis affecting Grinnell-Newburg is not exclusive to this district — school boards across Iowa are making similar cuts.

As districts attempt to move forward, many are realizing the problems are largely out of their control.

Because state aid is distributed on a per pupil basis, any drop in enrollment causes a drop in funding. According to documents provided by Briggs, certified enrollment across the Grinnell-Newburg school district fell by 48 students between 2021 and 2022. The following year — between 2022 and 2023 — enrollment fell an additional 50 students. By next year, projections indicate the district could lose another 24 students.

Over the past two years, the state funding rate was approximately $7,600 per student. In that same period, the decline in enrollment of nearly 100 students has caused a nearly $760,000 decrease in state aid for the district.

Advertisement

In an email, Kollin Crompton, deputy communications director for Gov. Kim Reynolds, emphasized that for Grinnell-Newburg, budget cuts are driven by this decreased enrollment and “not because of decreased funding from the Legislature and the Governor.”

Mick said although this is technically true, it is not the full truth. Even though the state is not decreasing funding, Mick said that because the Legislature is increasing supplementary aid at a rate below the rising cost of education, budget cuts are being forced to take place across the state. This is particularly true in recent years when high inflation is driving the cost of education to increase more rapidly than usual.

After missing their deadline and forcing some school districts to determine their budgets without knowing the amount of state funding they would receive, Republicans under the advice of  Reynolds approved a 2.5% increase in per-pupil funding this legislative session. The Iowa State Education Association recommended a 4% minimum increase. Mick said 10% would be more sufficient.

Between 1973 and 1993, the supplementary aid increased by an average of 6.42% annually, according to documents provided by Iowa Senate Democratic staff. Over the next 25 years, the annual increase was a mere 2.59% on average, with numerous years of a 1% increase or no increase at all.

“You can disguise it whatever way you want,” Mick said. “But you cannot underfund your public education year after year after year in regards to the cost of public education, versus the amount of money you’re willing to put into it, and then act as if it’s a surprise that schools are in trouble.”

Advertisement

In 2023, Reynolds also diverted an estimated $46 million away from public schools by signing a “school choice” bill that allows parents to take the sum of their child’s per-pupil allotment — now roughly $7,800 after the latest increase — and apply it to private school tuition. According to an Iowa Poll conducted in 2023, just 34% of Iowans favored the law. Iowa Starting Line reported last week that the Legislature committed nearly $180 million in taxpayer funds to support private school tuition next year, almost $50 million more than initially projected.

Barber, who said he opposed the voucher bill, said the effect of school choice has already begun to hit Grinnell-Newburg.

Central Iowa Christian School (CICS), the only private school within the district, enrolls roughly 55 students K-8.

“Typically, they [CICS] had about four or five individuals that started each year,” Barber said. “This year, there are eight kindergarteners that started out there.”

Two parents push their kids on the swings outside of Bailey Park Elementary School. Some parents have argued consolidating the elementary schools into a new building would increase enrollment in the district, which has fallen nearly 100 students in the past two years. (Photo by Zach Spindler-Krage)

In March, Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement filed an ethics complaint against Rep. Dean Fisher, who represents the Iowa House district that covers Grinnell-Newburg schools, alleging he is attempting to “cash in” on the private school vouchers as a founder and board president of the newly created Tama-Toledo Christian School. The House Ethics Committee dismissed the complaint. Fisher did not respond to a request for comment.

Beyond the impact of state underfunding, Mick pointed out that the state has simultaneously been increasing demands on teachers.

Advertisement

“Every time the state introduces a new mandate and then underfunds, it puts more and more burdens,” Mick said.

“You cannot underfund your public education year after year after year in regards to the cost of public education, versus the amount of money you’re willing to put into it, and then act as if it’s a surprise that schools are in trouble,” said Kent Mick, a teacher of 37 years. (Photo by Zach Spindler-Krage)

Within the last two legislative sessions, Reynolds has signed laws restricting curriculum related to LGBTQ+, social studies, race and sex education. Most recently, Reynolds shifted funding away from Area Education Agencies (AEAs), which, among other services, provide support for families and children with disabilities and special needs from birth through age 21. Reynolds signed the bill despite the majority of Iowans having a favorable view of AEAs.

Just weeks ago, the Legislature voted to allow school employees to obtain permits to carry guns at school.

In a recent move to offer support for educators,  Reynolds raised the minimum salary to $50,000 for starting teachers and $60,000 for teachers with at least 12 years of experience, prompting statewide praise. The move may help districts begin filling some of the 1,000 vacant full-time education positions across the state.

Starrett said although he supports the bill, he is worried the state will stop funding the pay increase after a few years.

“I know how the state works,” Starrett said. “They’re going to give us that money to fix our problem for a couple years and then they’re going to go ‘well, good luck. You’re on your own now.’ And then we’re gonna sit here and go — ‘now what the hell do I do?’”

Advertisement

A challenging path ahead for Grinnell-Newburg school district

In the immediate future, the Grinnell-Newburg district faces a difficult situation with low morale, a reduction in staff and more cuts coming down the line. In all likelihood, the district will need to decrease elective offerings and increase class sizes, forcing staff to perform more roles, according to Hosbond.

And for staff members who are being cut, the future may be uncertain. Some are likely to find other positions within the district, Barber said, but others will be forced to leave.

Brianna Maschman, whose director of curriculum position was eliminated as part of the budget cuts, said she is taking a new position as director of secondary education with Davenport Community Schools because Grinnell-Newburg didn’t have other administrative positions for her. She also said she hasn’t been involved in discussions about how curriculum or diversity, equity and inclusion matters will be handled next year without her position in place, so she’s unsure how the district plans to absorb it.

“A budget crisis like this is so much more than the cuts made. It weakens the whole system, kills morale, sows mistrust and leaves people feeling vulnerable,” Maschman said. “I don’t believe the quality of education will decrease because we have an outstanding staff. It will just be much more difficult and the load will be much heavier for those that remain.”

In an email sent to high school choir parents and guardians this month, Michael Gookin, current vocal director at the high school, informed the choir community that he will be resigning at the end of the year. In the email, Gookin wrote he would be remiss if he didn’t mention the “current state of public education in Iowa” as a factor in his decision. He also wrote that “public trust in public education has waned in communities … which is disheartening to me as I look ahead to the future of my career.”

Advertisement
The budget cuts in the Grinnell-Newburg school district have left some teachers scrambling to find other positions after their current positions were eliminated. Other staff have decided to leave the district, or education altogether, in fear of their position being cut in the coming years. (Photo by Zach Spindler-Krage)

As teachers flee the district, or flee education altogether, Hosbond said filling positions will not be easy.

“There are positions in this district and nearby districts where only one candidate applied,” Hosbond said. “When you have only one candidate, is that your best bet? Not in some cases. It used to be you’d have 20-30.”

The district’s average teacher salary is $56,068, well below the state average of $62,292, potentially making hiring more difficult.

Despite the trying times for public education in Grinnell-Newburg, Mick said he thinks it’s important to realize this issue is not exclusive to any one district.

Iowa ended fiscal year 2023 with a surplus of $1.83 billion in its general fund. Despite the surplus, the state is not increasing education funding. For Reynolds, the surplus indicates state taxes can be further reduced. “Some see a surplus as government not spending enough, but I view it as an over collection from the hard-working men and women of Iowa,” Reynolds said.

“I don’t think you can look at the history of what’s going on in the last 15 years and not think that this is an organized plan to eliminate public education in the state of Iowa,” Mick said, explaining that as long as the state refuses to raise taxes or spend its surplus, education will continue to suffer.

Advertisement

“Public schools are the shining example of what we’re supposed to be as a republican system of democracy. We’re supposed to take care of everyone and take care of everyone’s future in regards to opportunity.”

According to Mick, the once shining example of public education is becoming more tarnished each time policymakers prioritize politics over people. Until that trend is reversed, Mick said, school districts like Grinnell-Newburg face a challenging road — determining how to preserve public education in a state that “doesn’t value it.”

Kent Mick works with a student before the bell rings to start the day. “I love having been a professional teacher in Iowa for all these years, but it’s getting harder and harder for people to come to work every day,” Mick said. (Photo by Zach Spindler-Krage)
This story was originally published by the Scarlet & Black, the student newspaper at Grinnell College.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Iowa

Iowa law on police appeals ‘constitutionally vacuous,’ prosecutor says

Published

on

Iowa law on police appeals ‘constitutionally vacuous,’ prosecutor says


play

  • The Iowa Supreme Court is reviewing a 2024 law that allows law enforcement officers to appeal their placement on a Brady-Giglio list.
  • A dispute between Jefferson County’s attorney and sheriff led to the sheriff being placed on the list, which identifies officers with credibility issues.
  • The county attorney argues the law is unconstitutional because it lets judges interfere with a prosecutor’s duty to disclose evidence to defendants.

A feud between two Jefferson County officials has landed before the Iowa Supreme Court, which must decide if a 2024 addition to Iowa’s Rights of Peace Officers law is unconstitutional.

Jefferson County Attorney Chauncey Moulding is asking the state’s high court to overturn what he calls the “constitutionally vacuous” law, which allows officers to petition the courts to be removed from their county’s Brady-Giglio list.

Advertisement

Named for two U.S. Supreme Court decisions, the lists compiled by prosecutors identify law enforcement officers and others whose credibility is in question, and it can provide grounds for questioning their testimony in court.

After a dispute over a case involving a sheriff’s deputy’s use of force, Moulding in 2024 notified Jefferson County Sheriff Bart Richmond he was placing him on the Brady-Giglio list. Richmond petitioned a court to reverse Moulding’s decision, and a district judge did, finding Richmond’s actions in connection with the case, while unprofessional, did not bring his honesty or credibility into question.

In his appeal, Moulding argues that’s not up to the court to decide, and that the law lets judges improperly intrude on prosecutors’ professional judgment and, ultimately, defendants’ rights.

“The practical real application of (the 2024 law) is to create a Kafkaesque scenario where a criminal defendant could face the prospect of criminal charges involving a State witness who is so lacking in credibility that the State’s attorney has qualms about even calling him to testify, but is prevented from disclosure,” Moulding wrote. “Such a situation is unconscionable, and underlines the constitutional vacuousness of the statute itself.”

Advertisement

The court has not yet scheduled arguments for the case, which could have impacts far beyond Jefferson County. Attorney Charles Gribble, representing Richmond, said this is just one of three Iowa Brady-Giglio appeals he personally is involved in.

What is a Brady-Giglio list?

Under the Fifth Amendment, criminal defendants are entitled to due process of law. In Brady v. Maryland in 1963 and in subsequent cases the U.S. Supreme Court held that due process requires a prosecutor to disclose any known exculpatory evidence to the defense. That includes anything giving rise to doubts about the credibility of the prosecution’s witnesses, including law enforcement officers.

In 2022, Iowa formalized that process by mandating prosecuting agencies maintain a Brady-Giglio list of officers whose credibility can be questioned due to past dishonesty or other misconduct. The law requires agencies to notify officers when they are being put on a list and allows them to seek reconsideration.

Advertisement

Being placed on a list can damage or destroy an officer’s career, as prosecutors generally will decline to call them as witnesses or to bring charges that would depend on their testimony.

2024 law gives courts a role in Brady-Giglio lists

Iowa’s 2024 law went beyond requiring officers be notified of their placement on a Brady-Giglio list by giving them the right to appeal to a district court if their prosecuting agency refuses to take them off a list. The law requires judges to confidentially review evidence and allows them to affirm, modify or reverse an officer’s Brady-Giglio listing “as justice may require.”

In less than two years, courts have reversed local prosecutors on several Brady-Giglio placements, including a messy Henry County dispute in which prosecutors accused a sheriff’s deputy of making misleading statements on a search warrant application.

What happened in Jefferson County?

The lawsuit before the Iowa Supreme Court involves an April 2024 traffic stop by a Jefferson County deputy. As laid out in a subsequent memo by Moulding, video recordings show the deputy handling the driver roughly and, when the man complains, telling him “I can do whatever I want” and, “You’re not going to tell me what I can and can’t do. … You’re going to learn what respect is, young man.”

After learning about the incident, Moulding wrote, he repeatedly emailed Richmond, asking if the deputy’s actions had violated any county policies. Richmond did not respond. Concerned about possible litigation against the county, Moulding then asked another county to conduct an investigation. While the details are disputed, Moulding accuses Richmond of stonewalling both his office and the outside investigators and instructing his subordinates also not to cooperate.

Advertisement

“A county sheriff ordering deputies not to cooperate with an inquiry into a deputy’s use of force represents a fundamental lapse in judgment and raised serious concerns regarding the Sheriff’s honesty, candor and ethics as a law enforcement official,” Moulding wrote.

He scheduled a meeting that Richmond did not attend and then placed him on the county’s Brady-Giglio list. In an emailed statement, Moulding called the entire matter “unfortunate.”

“Frankly, I am shocked that instead of attempting to address this matter with my office cooperatively, the Sheriff instead decided to stonewall an investigation, stonewall the Brady-Giglio investigation, and then take this matter to court instead of sitting down and addressing the matter like an adult and an elected official,” he said.

In a letter, Moulding warned Richmond that he would no longer be called as a law enforcement witness and advised him to limit his involvement with criminal investigations, as “your engagement in such activities could likely negatively impact the outcomes in court.”

Judge disagrees with sheriff’s placement on list

After Moulding denied Richmond’s request for reconsideration, Richmond filed suit. In February 2025, Judge Jeffrey Farrell ruled Richmond should be removed from the list.

Advertisement

Farrell’s order criticized both parties, finding that Moulding had failed to comply with some procedural elements of the law but that Richmond could have avoided the whole situation with “basic and professional” responses to Moulding’s emails. Nonetheless, he found Richmond’s actions did not demonstrate dishonesty or deceit that would justify placement on a Brady list.

“This is not a case in which an officer lied to a court, was convicted of a crime, manufactured or destroyed evidence, or committed some other act that would serve as the basis for impeachment in any criminal case,” Farrell wrote. “Game-playing the county attorney is not the standard of professionalism that Iowans expect of our elected county sheriffs,” he added, but does not constitute grounds for a Brady-Giglio listing.

Prosecutor appeals, argues law is unconstitutional

In his appeal, Moulding does not address Farrell’s factual findings, instead asking the court only to decide whether the law is constitutional.

“The most glaring constitutional defect in (the 2024 law) is that it impedes a criminal Defendant’s substantive and procedural due processes of law, and right to a fair trial,” the appeal says. “These fundamental rights constitute the bedrock raisons d’être for the entire body of Brady-Giglio jurisprudence in the first place.”

Iowa appears to be the only state with a law allowing officers to sue to be removed from a Brad-Giglio list, but Moulding cites a recent federal lawsuit where a judge rejected a South Dakota officer’s attempt to get removed from a list, finding the request “in essence, asks this Court to require a State’s Attorney to violate the constitution.” He further argues that the law violates the constitutional separation of powers and is “so poorly drafted as to be unenforceable and void for vagueness.”

Advertisement

Sheriff’s attorney says single lapse of judgment is not grounds for listing

Gribble, Richmond’s attorney, argued in his Supreme Court brief that the law is constitutional and that the sheriff’s actions fall well short of Brady-Giglio standards.

“Under (the 2024 law), placement on the Brady-Giglio list results not from a single lapse of judgment but rather from repeated, sustained, intentional and egregious acts over a period of time,” he wrote. “Thus, while a singular act of bad judgement may undermine a police officer’s credibility in a particular case, placement on the Brady-Giglio list places a permanent and unreviewable scarlet letter on the officer that he/she is unlikely to be able to ever overcome.”

He also suggests that a court order removing an officer from a list “does not in any way alter the prosecuting attorney’s duty to provide exculpatory evidence in all cases.” In an interview, he argued there should be a legal distinction between prosecutors disclosing concerns about an officer’s conduct in the case in which it occurred, and doing so in every future case involving them.

“To me, that’s what Brady-Giglio is for, not for occasional or first-time wrongs, even if established of a police officer, but those that have a history of that sort of thing,” he said.

The Supreme Court has not yet set a date for arguments in the case.

Advertisement

William Morris covers courts for the Des Moines Register. He can be contacted at wrmorris2@registermedia.com or 715-573-8166.



Source link

Continue Reading

Iowa

Univ. of Iowa students practice life-saving skills through realistic medical simulations

Published

on

Univ. of Iowa students practice life-saving skills through realistic medical simulations


IOWA CITY, Iowa (KCRG) – Some students at the University of Iowa are getting hands-on medical experience before the spring semester officially begins — and they’re doing it inside a mobile simulation lab.

Wednesday, Simulation in Motion-Iowa (SIM-IA) brought its high-tech training truck to the university’s main hospital campus during what’s known as “transitions week,” just days before physician assistant students head out on clinical rotations.

Instead of practicing on classmates, students worked through simulated emergency scenarios using lifelike mannequins designed to closely mimic real patients. The mannequins can breathe, blink, sweat, and even go into cardiac arrest — giving students a realistic first taste of what they’ll soon face in hospitals and clinics.

“So they have pulses like you and I, they have lung sounds, breath tones, so they get to practice their patient assessments — their head-to-toes, what they think is wrong with that patient, determine what treatments they’re going to offer and do,” said Lisa Lenz, a Simulation in Motion-Iowa instructor.

Advertisement

Lenz controls the mannequins’ movements and symptoms behind the scenes, adjusting each scenario based on how students respond in real time.

“We can kind of assess and watch and make sure they’re doing the skills that we would expect them to do, we then get to change and flow through our scenario,” Lenz said. “So we start out with a healthy patient, maybe something like chest pains and continue through states of either progression or decline.”

Faculty members say the goal is to help students bridge the gap between classroom learning and real patient care — especially with clinical rotations beginning soon.

“This is now putting book work to the clinical practice,” said Jeremy Nelson, a clinical assistant professor in the university’s Department of PA Studies and Services. “We’re getting them ready to go out to various scenarios.”

Nelson says repetition is key, especially since some medical emergencies are rare while others are unpredictable.

Advertisement

“They may see them 10 times on rotation, they may see them once,” Nelson said. “This gives them that ‘first touch’ so when they do see it they have a better chance of learning more and being engaged and practicing.”

The spring semester at the University of Iowa officially begins January 20 for those students. Faculty say experiences like this help boost confidence and reduce anxiety before students ever step into a real emergency situation.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Iowa

To Save An Endangered Prairie Fish, Dried-up Iowa Wetlands Get New Life – Inside Climate News

Published

on

To Save An Endangered Prairie Fish, Dried-up Iowa Wetlands Get New Life – Inside Climate News


The minnow U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ecologists pulled from the shallow moat was a puny thing, with a flare of orange rimming its fins and a dark band of scales running the full length of its inch-and-a-half body. 

“Finally,” thought Kathy Law, as she peered at the little fish. In the summer sun, it glinted metallic.

Topeka shiners once thrived in small and medium streams across the Great Plains. But for several decades, the fish have been hard to find. 

For three summers, Law, a farmer and attorney, had watched expectantly as water, native plants and then wildlife returned to five restored oxbow wetlands on her family farm in Iowa’s Carroll County.

Advertisement

In 2021, the Fish and Wildlife Service and the Iowa Soybean Association excavated the U-shaped ponds on the property, former river meanders cut off from the main channel of Purgatory Creek and filled in with decades of soil erosion. 

The project cost tens of thousands of dollars, paid for by federal, state and private grants. It had all been for the silver minnow she now held.

The expansion of agriculture across the Midwest has blotted out many of the slow-moving, off-channel prairie streams that Topeka shiners favor. In their place, manually drained cropland and artificially straightened rivers have taken over.

In 1998, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service listed the Topeka shiner as a federally endangered species, threatened by “habitat destruction, degradation, modification, and fragmentation.” 

A Fish and Wildlife Service biologist holds a handful of endangered Topeka shiners. Credit: Kimberly Emerson/USFWS
A Fish and Wildlife Service biologist holds a handful of endangered Topeka shiners. Credit: Kimberly Emerson/USFWS

But concerted efforts to restore habitats where the endangered minnow might once again thrive have led to the restoration of hundreds of oxbow lakes across Iowa.

A network of federal, state, non-profit, and agricultural trade agencies has teamed up to excavate the former wetlands at little-to-no cost to landowners. Nearly two decades since beginning restoration efforts, they’ve learned that the abandoned river meanders don’t just create habitats for a recovering Topeka shiner population, they also effectively wash out the agricultural pollutants that plague Iowa’s waterways. 

Advertisement

“It really is a success story,” said Karen Wilke, associate director of freshwater at The Nature Conservancy in Iowa. “Now we’re not just doing it for Topeka shiner, but we’re doing it for water quality as well.” 

Over centuries, meandering rivers and streams fold in on themselves like ribbon candy. Insistent currents erode their banks, redrawing riverbeds into ever-tighter sinusoidal waves. 

Chasing the path of least resistance, the current eventually cuts off U-shaped oxbow channels, leaving curving lakes where water flows more slowly, if at all. 

Oxbows are naturally occurring features in the Iowa landscape, but they became more abundant as agriculture brought drastic, manmade transformations to the state’s hydrology, explained Clay Pierce, a former scientist in the U.S. Geological Survey’s Iowa Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit at Iowa State University. He spent the last decade of his career studying Topeka shiner habitats and recovery efforts.

Before European settlement, wetlands covered approximately 11 percent of Iowa. Their still or slow-moving waters provided habitats for a variety of fish, reptiles and amphibians, including the diminutive, silvery Topeka Shiner. Today, over 95 percent of those wetlands have been drained and converted to farmable land. 

“It’s like one of the wonders of the world, how they changed the Iowa landscape,” said Pierce.

Advertisement

Tile lines, underground drainage systems used to lower the water table in and around fields, transformed the state’s slow-moving wetlands into faster, fuller streams that intensified natural riverbank erosion and the creation of oxbow lakes, Pierce explained.

And as industrialized agriculture rerouted the state’s waters and accelerated oxbow formation, farming practices also exacerbated soil erosion, leading to the drying out of those oxbows.

Tillage, a soil management practice that reached peak popularity in the mid-20th century, left fertile topsoil exposed to the elements and readily carried off fields. Trillions of tons of U.S. topsoil are estimated to have been lost to erosion to date, settling in nearby waterways.

Erosion-mitigating farming strategies, including no-till or low-till agriculture and the planting of cover crops, have become more widely adopted, but many former oxbows in Iowa are still filled with sediment.

The former oxbows look like apostrophe-shaped scars in the earth, said Wilke, at The Nature Conservancy in Iowa. Her team has mapped out tens of thousands of oxbows across the state that are candidates for restoration. 

Advertisement

In rainy years, these patches of land are prone to flooding, as though remembering a past life. Those on farmland are largely unusable—too concave and wet to support a decent yield.

As the slow-moving and standing waters favored by the Topeka shiner all but disappeared from Iowa, so did the fish.

Once common across Minnesota, South Dakota, Iowa, Nebraska, Missouri, and Kansas, documented populations of the fish were reduced to an estimated 20 percent of their original geographic range by the turn of the 21st century, said Pierce. 

Before the onset of industrial agriculture, shiners were found in streams that flowed out of large, slow-moving wetland areas. But those wetland complexes are gone, converted to millions of acres of cropland.

Despite their endangered status, the tiny minnows are shockingly rugged, able to withstand both the broiling summers and frigid winters of the Great Plains, said Pierce. They’re also better equipped to survive in the low-oxygen conditions of shallow waters where few other fish can thrive. That resilience bodes well for their survival in restored wetland habitats.

Advertisement

“We can’t replace all the large, expansive wetland complexes that were here. It wouldn’t be economically or even politically possible to do that. But we can build more oxbows or encourage the ones that are there to function as habitats,” said Pierce.

Following the Topeka shiner’s federal endangerment listing, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) focused its efforts on preserving remnant populations in the North Raccoon River watershed, which runs through intensely cultivated cropland in western Iowa.

Though the Service initially attempted to engineer habitats within creeks, diverting currents with boulders and excavating deeper pools, they more often than not found shiners in oxbow lakes set back from the main channel and occupying private property. 

Oxbow lakes became, and remain, central to the Topeka shiner recovery plan.

In the early 2000s, USFWS worked with The Nature Conservancy of Iowa, which served as “boots on the ground,” finding funding sources, connecting with landowners, and overseeing the restorations, said Wilke. By 2008, the agencies had restored nearly twenty former oxbows in the Racoon River watershed.

Advertisement

The impact of restorations on local wildlife populations was immediately evident, said Wilke. Topeka shiners began returning to the landscape, but so did countless other species.

Research conducted by The Nature Conservancy documented 57 fish species and 81 bird species using the newly restored oxbow habitats. “Turtles, mussels, frogs, river otters, beavers, you name it,” said Wilke. “I think all the species are hungry to have this habitat come back, hungry to have more water on the landscape.”

In 2011, the Iowa Soybean Association came on board, joining forces to restore more oxbows in the Boone River watershed in north-central Iowa. With its connections to farmers across Iowa, the trade association for soybean producers brought new momentum to the project, said Wilkes.

Unlike other states with vast swaths of public land, over 97 percent of Iowa’s land is privately owned. This means that the majority of former oxbows are on private land where restoration hinges on buy-in from the owners. The Iowa Soybean Association held powerful sway with those property owners.

The organizations collaborating with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service make up the Iowa Topeka Shiner Recovery Partnership and provide both technical support and a diverse array of private funding, in addition to the suite of state and federal grants used to cover restoration costs. 

Advertisement

Though each acre of wetland costs approximately $20,000 to excavate, not a single cent comes from landowners, said Wilke.

For Kathy Law, that was a huge selling point in her decision to restore the five oxbows on her family farm. “We didn’t have to spend any money on it. And they took care of everything,” she said. “I think that’s the neat part of it. It shows we can do things that don’t cost us any money, and try to make a difference.”

This story is funded by readers like you.

Our nonprofit newsroom provides award-winning climate coverage free of charge and advertising. We rely on donations from readers like you to keep going. Please donate now to support our work.

Donate Now

Advertisement

To date, more than 200 oxbows have been restored in the state of Iowa. Though far from a complete comeback, Topeka shiner populations seem to be on the rise.

In 2016 and 2017, Pierce and his students at Iowa State University collected the endangered minnows in 60 percent of the Iowa watersheds they’d historically inhabited, a significant rebound from only 32 percent in 2010 and 2011.

In 2019, Pierce published an article documenting the status of Topeka shiners in Iowa.

“I think the picture is brighter, and I firmly believe that oxbows are part of that story,” said Pierce. “It’s an ‘if you build it, they will come’ sort of thing.”

Sampling by the Nature Conservancy in Iowa has also turned up Topeka shiners in the majority of restored oxbows. 

Advertisement

In fact, the minnows may not be classified as “endangered” for much longer. In the 5-year status review for the Topeka shiner, completed by USFWS in 2021, federal wildlife officials recommended that the fish be downlisted to “threatened.”

The surge in oxbow restorations hasn’t only served the Topeka shiner, participants in the recovery partnership are quick to point out.

Fish biologists from the La Crosse Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office survey for endangered Topeka shiners using a seine net in a recently restored oxbow in Iowa. Credit: Cristina Dahl/USFWSFish biologists from the La Crosse Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office survey for endangered Topeka shiners using a seine net in a recently restored oxbow in Iowa. Credit: Cristina Dahl/USFWS
Fish biologists from the La Crosse Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office survey for endangered Topeka shiners using a seine net in a recently restored oxbow in Iowa. Credit: Cristina Dahl/USFWS

The restored wetlands are also powerful water-quality tools, helping remove nitrogen runoff from tile lines that drain much of Iowa’s farmland before it can pollute major waterways.

“We’re able to intercept that tile into these wetlands before that water gets into the river, and we’re finding that it removes 62 percent, on average, of the farm chemicals, the nitrate, that comes in from that tile,” said Wilke.

Based on those findings, Iowa’s Nutrient Reduction Strategy added oxbow restorations as a nutrient-reducing practice in 2019. Introduced in 2014 to address the high volume of agricultural nutrients exiting Iowa’s waterways, the strategy promotes voluntary conservation measures for farmers looking to minimize nutrient loss from their fields and allocates state funds to those practices.

The Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship now covers 100 percent of the costs of oxbow restorations that will receive water from a tile line.

Advertisement

Unlike other nutrient-reduction practices the state funds, such as saturated buffers and bio-reactors, oxbows are both natural and long-lasting, said Wilke. “You do it, and it’s done. And then you just let nature take over and do its thing.”

The water quality benefits of oxbow restorations have brought a new group of landowners on board, said Grace Yi, habitat systems manager at Practical Farmers of Iowa, the most recent member of the Iowa Topeka Shiner Recovery Partnership.

“That’s what makes oxbows really great. They have a lot of different benefits and angles that you can approach farmers and landowners with,” said Yi.

Some of those benefits, “you can’t really put a price tag on,” like a more beautiful property or, as one farmer told Yi, time spent catching frogs with his grandson.

For Kathy Law, oxbow restorations have returned her family’s farm to a state she remembers from her early days there.

Advertisement
Kathy and David Law stand next to a restored oxbow on their farm in Carroll County, Iowa. Credit: Courtesy of Kathy LawKathy and David Law stand next to a restored oxbow on their farm in Carroll County, Iowa. Credit: Courtesy of Kathy Law
Kathy and David Law stand next to a restored oxbow on their farm in Carroll County, Iowa. Credit: Courtesy of Kathy Law

Mallards now paddle through the still waters. Off the muddy banks, fat tadpoles whip their golf-ball-sized bodies beneath fallen leaves. 

If Law encountered the Topeka shiner during childhood fishing expeditions on the farm, she doesn’t remember it. But the oxbows stir at something in her memory.

“I remember there were little creeks, little streams going through here. We hadn’t had those for forever.” 

About This Story

Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.

That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.

Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.

Advertisement

Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?

Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.

Thank you,

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending