Indiana
Pacers-Cavaliers: 5 takeaways as Indiana punches ticket to East Finals
Tyrese Haliburton goes off for 31 points to close out the Cavs in Game 5, sending the Pacers back to the East Finals.
CLEVELAND – NBA regular seasons are, apparently, what you make of them.
Consider the Cleveland Cavaliers being eliminated Tuesday night from the 2025 playoffs by the Indiana Pacers, who closed out the conference’s No. 1 seed from the Eastern Conference semifinals 4-1 with their 114-105 victory at Rocket Arena.
The Cavaliers, like Oklahoma City in the West, had stormed through the season from start to finish, stringing together winning streaks of 16, 15 and 12 on their way to a 64-18 record. Indiana was back in the pack, happy to land the No. 4 seed with a solid but unspectacular 50-32 mark.
Look a little deeper, though. The Pacers started the season 5-10 and for a variety of reasons – a tough schedule, injuries, a slower-than-expected start by point guard Tyrese Haliburton – were 16-18 when the calendar rolled over to 2025. They were 13.5 games behind Cleveland on New Year’s Day and never did gain ground.
Then again, they didn’t lose any. From Jan. 1 through Game 82, the Cavs went 35-14. The Pacers, 34-14.
“I’m sorry their season had to end like this, in a way,” coach Rick Carlisle said. “Kenny [Atkinson, Cleveland coach] did an amazing job with their guys, .They just kind of had the perfect season. Then we came along and we’re hot.”
Indiana didn’t get the acclaim the Cavs, the Thunder and the Celtics did in barreling to 60-plus victories, because it needed a couple months to find itself.
Now it finds itself back in the East finals for the second consecutive year. Here are five takeaways from the clincher:
1. Indiana: We’re not about the stats
It’s not accurate to say that the Pacers’ whole is greater than the sum of their parts because their parts are many and talented. The roster is as deep as those of the league’s elite, with 10 or 11 players who – to use a popular NBA term – are stars in their roles.
But there is no Kia MVP candidate on this squad, no star’s name above the title. Haliburton is a two-time All-Star and a leader but the 31 points he scored Tuesday were the Pacers’ first 30-point performance of the postseason. Heck, even some of his peers consider him to be (cough) “overrated.”
“We’re different from every other team in the NBA,” Haliburton said. “We don’t have one guy who scores all the points. We defeat teams in a lot of different ways. We move the ball, the ball finds guys making shots, making plays.”
Said Carlisle: “People look at playoff victories and point to great scoring performances and triple-doubles and stuff like that. Series-defining plays oftentimes are loose-ball effort plays.”
Those moments were strewn throughout the game, but particularly so down the stretch. Myles Turner’s run-down block of De’Andre Hunter. Andrew Nembhard bursting along the left baseline. Bennedict Mathurin swatting a Donovan Mitchell layup off the glass.
All timely plays, pivotal sequences, and added effort.
2. Tough ending for Cavaliers
Boil it all down and this very special season for Cleveland ended with a splat. Three of its four losses in getting eliminated came at home. Its star, Donovan Mitchell, has yet to reach a conference finals. This wasn’t what it had in mind at all as it breezed through the previous six months.
Mitchell was so unprepared for this ending that, after the final horn, he went back out into the arena bowl to acknowledge the disappointed fans. He sounded as heartbroken as any of them.
“Just couldn’t believe it. Still don’t wanna believe it,” Mitchell said. “I love playing in that arena man. That energy, that crowd. Lost three at home, let the city down.
“Y’all gonna write us the [bleep] off man. But we’ll be back. We let the city down, we let each other down but will be back.”
After being eliminated in the semifinals, is it fair to call top-seeded Cleveland a regular-season team that fails to deliver in the playoffs?
3. Nipping it in the bud
The Pacers had gotten spanked in the first quarter 31-19 and Cleveland’s start spilled into the second quarter when it went up by 19, 44-25. Indiana scratched back to get within four by halftime, felt good about themselves … and then promptly messed up again.
Out of the break, the Pacers failed to execute a play, then turned over the ball. Cavs guard Darius Garland got to midcourt, veered around a soft pick-and-roll, then strolled in unobstructed from the logo for a layup. Several Indiana players shot each other puzzled looks. Carlisle called timeout just 55 seconds into the half.
“We had miscommunication,” he said. “We allowed a guy to defiantly just trot in there and lay the ball up. We came in the timeout and said ‘No more. This isn’t us.’ And our guys turned it around.”
4. Bryant shines in 3rd quarter
A lottery pick back in 2017, Thomas Bryant had settled into a journeyman’s role when the Pacers acquired him in December from Miami for the princely sum of a 2031 second-round draft pick. Indiana became his fifth NBA team in four seasons and his contributions the rest of the season were modest (6.9 ppg, 3.9 rpg, 15.1 mpg).
Not so in Game 5. Bryant was a force in the third quarter especially, active at both ends to give Turner the breathers he needed.
One sequence began with the 6-foot-10 Bryant getting his shot blocked by Evan Mobley. He raced downcourt, picked off Darius Garland’s pass and ran back for a fast-break dunk. He cut and dunked a pass from Obi Toppin, then closed his personal spurt with a 3-pointer from the right corner.
By that point, the Pacers were back up by 12. It had to be deflating to Cleveland for yet another player to come off Indiana’s bench and make a difference.
“Gave us some of the greatest minutes you can ask of a backup center,” Carlisle said. “His enthusiasm permeates our team.”
5. Brief scouting report for Knicks or Celtics
Playoff opponents are virtually autopsied by teams they’ll be facing in a series, and it’s safe to say the Pacers and Cavaliers knew each other inside and out. Still, they learn things from repeated competition squeezed into a week or 10 days.
Here’s Atkinson on the biggest thing he learned about the Pacers in this up-close look:
“The duration of their intensity,” the Cavs coach said. “How long they can go. They press fullcourt, and then they run consistently all game. They never stop. It’s hard to do. I give them a ton of credit for that. It’s extreme ball pressure.”
* * *
Steve Aschburner has written about the NBA since 1980. You can e-mail him here, find his archive here and follow him on X.
The views on this page do not necessarily reflect the views of the NBA, its clubs or Warner Bros. Discovery.
Indiana
Indiana redistricting: Senate Republicans side with Democrats to reject Trump’s voting map
Indiana Republicans have defied intense pressure from President Donald Trump by rejecting his demands that they pass a voting map meant to favour their party in next year’s midterm elections.
In one of the most conservative states in the US, 21 Republicans in the Senate joined all 10 Democrats to torpedo the redistricting plan by a vote of 31-19. The new map passed the House last week.
If it had cleared the legislature, Republicans could have flipped the only two Democratic-held congressional seats in the state.
Trump’s call for Republican state leaders to redraw maps and help the party keep its congressional majority in Washington next year has triggered gerrymandering battles nationwide.
Republican-led Texas and Democratic-led California, two of the country’s largest states, have led the charge.
Other states where redistricting efforts have been initiated or passed include Utah, Ohio, New Hampshire, Missouri and Illinois.
Republican state Senator Spencer Deery said ahead of Thursday’s vote: “My opposition to mid-cycle gerrymandering is not in contrast to my conservative principles, my opposition is driven by them.
“As long as I have breath, I will use my voice to resist a federal government that attempts to bully, direct, and control this state or any state. Giving the federal government more power is not conservative.”
Indiana Governor Mike Braun, a Republican, said he was “very disappointed” in the outcome.
“I will be working with the President to challenge these people who do not represent the best interests of Hoosiers,” he said on X, using a popular nickname for people from the Midwestern state.
The revolt of Indiana Republicans came after direct months of lobbying from the White House.
On Wednesday, Trump warned on his social media platform Truth Social that Republicans who did not support the initiative could risk losing their seats.
He directly addressed the Republican leader of the state Senate, Rodric Bray, calling him “the only person in the United States of America who is against Republicans picking up extra seats”.
To liberals, it was a moment of celebration. Keith “Wildstyle” Paschall described the mood on Thursday as “jubilant”.
“There’s a lot of relief,” the Indianapolis-based activist told the BBC. “People had thought that we would have to move on to a legal strategy and didn’t believe we could defeat it directly at the statehouse.”
The new map would have redistricted parts of Indianapolis and potentially led to the ouster of Indiana’s lone black House representative, André Carson.
In the weeks before Thursday’s vote, Trump hosted Indiana lawmakers at the White House to win over holdouts.
He also dispatched Vice-President JD Vance down to Indiana twice to shore up support.
Nearly a dozen Indiana Republican lawmakers have said they were targeted with death threats and swatting attacks over the planned vote.
Ultimately, this redistricting plan fell flat in another setback for Trump following a string of recent Democratic wins in off-year elections.
The defeat appears to have added to Republican concerns.
“We have a huge problem,” said former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon during his podcast, The War Room.
“People have to realise that we only have a couple opportunities,” he said.
“If we don’t get a net 10 pickup in the redistricting wars, it’s going to be enormously hard, if not impossible, to hold the House.”
Texas was the first state to respond to Trump’s redistricting request.
After a lower court blocked the maps for being drawn illegally based on race, the Supreme Court allowed Texas Republicans to go ahead.
The decision was a major win for Republicans, with the new maps expected to add five seats in their favour.
California’s map is also expected to add five seats for Democrats.
Indiana
Trump post signals Indiana redistricting vote too close for comfort
Indiana redistricting doomed by lobbyists who misread Senate | Opinion
Deputy Opinion Editor Jacob Stewart: The out-of-state donors funding redistricting lobbyists need to ask for their money back.
President Donald Trump issued a lengthy late-night plea to Indiana lawmakers on the eve of their critical Dec. 11 redistricting vote, seemingly betraying a lack of confidence in a favorable outcome.
“Rod Bray and his friends won’t be in Politics for long, and I will do everything within my power to make sure that they will not hurt the Republican Party, and our Country, again,” Trump concluded the Truth Social post. “One of my favorite States, Indiana, will be the only State in the Union to turn the Republican Party down!”
This afternoon, the Indiana Senate will decide the fate of Trump’s desire to redraw the state’s congressional map to give Republicans two more favorable districts. But this fate has been very uncertain: Republican senators are split on the issue, with a number of them having remained silent. The vote count is expected to be tight.
Trump’s post last night is leaving many with the impression that it’s too close for comfort.
He repeated some familiar refrains noted in other posts over the last few weeks: lambasting the leadership of Senate President Pro Tempore Rodric Bray, promising to support primary challengers against those who vote down mid-decade redistricting, emphasizing the importance of holding the Republican majority in Congress to beat back the “Radical Left Democrats.”
But in length and in detail, this post delved deeper. He lumped Bray in with the likes of former Gov. Mitch Daniels, who Trump called a “failed Senate candidate,” though Daniels never formally entered the race against U.S. Sen. Jim Banks in 2024. Trump made statements about the Republican “suckers” Bray found to vote against redistricting with him, as though the vote had already occurred.
Those conclusion sentences alone ― promising that Bray and others will not hurt the country “again” ― seems to foretell an outcome.
That outcome will ultimately come to light in the mid to late afternoon when senators take a final vote on House Bill 1032, the redistricting bill.
It had passed the Indiana House by a 57-41 vote last week.
The proposed map gives Republicans the advantage in all nine of Indiana’s congressional districts, chiefly by carving up Indianapolis voters into four new districts. The current congressional map has seven seats held by Republicans and two by Democrats.
Contact IndyStar Statehouse reporter Kayla Dwyer at kdwyer@indystar.com or follow her on X @kayla_dwyer17.
Indiana
Indiana redistricting is up for a final, deciding vote in the state Senate – The Boston Globe
Indiana state senators are expected to take a final, high-stakes vote on redistricting Thursday after months of pressure from President Donald Trump, and the outcome is still uncertain.
Even in the face of one-on-one pressure from the White House and violent threats against state lawmakers, many Indiana Republicans have been reluctant to back a new congressional map that would favor their party’s candidates in the 2026 elections.
Trump is asking Republican-led states to redistrict in the middle of the decade, an uncommon practice, in order to make more winnable seats for the GOP ahead of next year’s elections. Midterms tend to favor the party opposite the one in power, and Democrats are increasingly liking their odds at flipping control of the U.S. House after the results of recent high-profile elections.
In Indiana, Trump supports passage of a new map drawn up by the National Republican Redistricting Trust designed to deliver all nine of the state’s congressional districts to the GOP. Republicans currently hold seven of the nine seats.
On Wednesday night, he sharply criticized party members who didn’t want to go along with the plan, and he repeated his threat to back primary challenges for anyone who voted against it.
“If Republicans will not do what is necessary to save our Country, they will eventually lose everything to the Democrats,” Trump wrote on social media.
The new map would split the city of Indianapolis into four districts, each included with large portions of rural Indiana — three of which would stretch from the central city to the borders of nearby states. Indianapolis now makes up one congressional district long held by Democratic U.S. Rep. André Carson.
The proposed map is also designed to eliminate the district of U.S. Rep. Frank Mrvan, who represents an urban district near Chicago.
A dozen lawmakers of the 50-member state Senate have not publicly declared a stance on the new maps.
If at least four of that group side with the chamber’s 10 Democrats and 12 other Republicans who are expected to vote no, the vote would fail in a remarkable rebuke to Trump’s demand.
Supporters of the proposed map need at least 25 yes votes; a tie would be broken with Republican Lt. Gov. Micah Beckwith’s vote, who is in favor of redistricting.
In a Senate committee Monday, the redistricting legislation took its first step toward passage in a 6-3 vote, with one Republican joining the committee’s two Democrats in voting against it. However, a few of the Republican senators indicated they may vote against the bill in a final vote.
The Republican supermajority in the state House passed the proposed map last week. Twelve Republicans voted with the chamber’s 30 Democrats against the bill.
Nationally, mid-cycle redistricting so far has resulted in nine more congressional seats that Republicans believe they can win and six more congressional seats that Democrats think they can win. However, redistricting is being litigated in several states.
Texas, Missouri, Ohio and North Carolina quickly enacted new GOP-favorable maps. California voters recently approved a new map in response to Texas’ that would favor Democratic candidates, and a judge in Utah imposed new districts that could allow Democrats to win a seat, after ruling that Republican lawmakers circumvented voter-approved anti-gerrymandering standards.
Multiple Republican groups are threatening to support primary opponents of Indiana state senators who vote against redistricting. Turning Point Action pledged “congressional level spending” in state Legislature races if the redistricting measure does not pass. Trump has also vowed to endorse primary challengers of members who vote against the new map.
-
Alaska6 days agoHowling Mat-Su winds leave thousands without power
-
Politics1 week agoTrump rips Somali community as federal agents reportedly eye Minnesota enforcement sweep
-
Ohio1 week ago
Who do the Ohio State Buckeyes hire as the next offensive coordinator?
-
Texas6 days agoTexas Tech football vs BYU live updates, start time, TV channel for Big 12 title
-
News1 week agoTrump threatens strikes on any country he claims makes drugs for US
-
World1 week agoHonduras election council member accuses colleague of ‘intimidation’
-
Washington3 days agoLIVE UPDATES: Mudslide, road closures across Western Washington
-
Iowa5 days agoMatt Campbell reportedly bringing longtime Iowa State staffer to Penn State as 1st hire