Connect with us

Indiana

Pacers-Cavaliers: 5 takeaways as Indiana punches ticket to East Finals

Published

on

Pacers-Cavaliers: 5 takeaways as Indiana punches ticket to East Finals


Tyrese Haliburton goes off for 31 points to close out the Cavs in Game 5, sending the Pacers back to the East Finals.

CLEVELAND – NBA regular seasons are, apparently, what you make of them.

Consider the Cleveland Cavaliers being eliminated Tuesday night from the 2025 playoffs by the Indiana Pacers, who closed out the conference’s No. 1 seed from the Eastern Conference semifinals 4-1 with their 114-105 victory at Rocket Arena.

Advertisement

The Cavaliers, like Oklahoma City in the West, had stormed through the season from start to finish, stringing together winning streaks of 16, 15 and 12 on their way to a 64-18 record. Indiana was back in the pack, happy to land the No. 4 seed with a solid but unspectacular 50-32 mark.

Look a little deeper, though. The Pacers started the season 5-10 and for a variety of reasons – a tough schedule, injuries, a slower-than-expected start by point guard Tyrese Haliburton – were 16-18 when the calendar rolled over to 2025. They were 13.5 games behind Cleveland on New Year’s Day and never did gain ground.

Then again, they didn’t lose any. From Jan. 1 through Game 82, the Cavs went 35-14. The Pacers, 34-14.

“I’m sorry their season had to end like this, in a way,” coach Rick Carlisle said. “Kenny [Atkinson, Cleveland coach] did an amazing job with their guys, .They just kind of had the perfect season. Then we came along and we’re hot.”

Indiana didn’t get the acclaim the Cavs, the Thunder and the Celtics did in barreling to 60-plus victories, because it needed a couple months to find itself.

Advertisement

Now it finds itself back in the East finals for the second consecutive year. Here are five takeaways from the clincher:


1. Indiana: We’re not about the stats

It’s not accurate to say that the Pacers’ whole is greater than the sum of their parts because their parts are  many and talented. The roster is as deep as those of the league’s elite, with 10 or 11 players who – to use a popular NBA term – are stars in their roles.

But there is no Kia MVP candidate on this squad, no star’s name above the title. Haliburton is a two-time All-Star and a leader but the 31 points he scored Tuesday were the Pacers’ first 30-point performance of the postseason. Heck, even some of his peers consider him to be (cough) “overrated.”

“We’re different from every other team in the NBA,” Haliburton said. “We don’t have one guy who scores all the points. We defeat teams in a lot of different ways. We move the ball, the ball finds guys making shots, making plays.”

Said Carlisle: “People look at playoff victories and point to great scoring performances and triple-doubles and stuff like that. Series-defining plays oftentimes are loose-ball effort plays.”

Advertisement

Those moments were strewn throughout the game, but particularly so down the stretch. Myles Turner’s run-down block of De’Andre Hunter. Andrew Nembhard bursting along the left baseline. Bennedict Mathurin swatting a Donovan Mitchell layup off the glass.

All timely plays, pivotal sequences, and added effort.


2. Tough ending for Cavaliers

Boil it all down and this very special season for Cleveland ended with a splat. Three of its four losses in getting eliminated came at home. Its star, Donovan Mitchell, has yet to reach a conference finals. This wasn’t what it had in mind at all as it breezed through the previous six months.

Mitchell was so unprepared for this ending that, after the final horn, he went back out into the arena bowl to acknowledge the disappointed fans. He sounded as heartbroken as any of them.

“Just couldn’t believe it. Still don’t wanna believe it,” Mitchell said. “I love playing in that arena man. That energy, that crowd. Lost three at home, let the city down.

Advertisement

“Y’all gonna write us the [bleep] off man. But we’ll be back. We let the city down, we let each other down but will be back.”

After being eliminated in the semifinals, is it fair to call top-seeded Cleveland a regular-season team that fails to deliver in the playoffs?


3. Nipping it in the bud

The Pacers had gotten spanked in the first quarter 31-19 and Cleveland’s start spilled into the second quarter when it went up by 19, 44-25. Indiana scratched back to get within four by halftime, felt good about themselves … and then promptly messed up again.

Out of the break, the Pacers failed to execute a play, then turned over the ball. Cavs guard Darius Garland got to midcourt, veered around a soft pick-and-roll, then strolled in unobstructed from the logo for a layup. Several Indiana players shot each other puzzled looks. Carlisle called timeout just 55 seconds into the half.

Advertisement

“We had miscommunication,” he said. “We allowed a guy to defiantly just trot in there and lay the ball up. We came in the timeout and said ‘No more. This isn’t us.’ And our guys turned it around.”


4. Bryant shines in 3rd quarter

A lottery pick back in 2017, Thomas Bryant had settled into a journeyman’s role when the Pacers acquired him in December from Miami for the princely sum of a 2031 second-round draft pick. Indiana became his fifth NBA team in four seasons and his contributions the rest of the season were modest (6.9 ppg, 3.9 rpg, 15.1 mpg).

Not so in Game 5. Bryant was a force in the third quarter especially, active at both ends to give Turner the breathers he needed.

One sequence began with the 6-foot-10 Bryant getting his shot blocked by Evan Mobley. He raced downcourt, picked off Darius Garland’s pass and ran back for a fast-break dunk. He cut and dunked a pass from Obi Toppin, then closed his personal spurt with a 3-pointer from the right corner.

By that point, the Pacers were back up by 12. It had to be deflating to Cleveland for yet another player to come off Indiana’s bench and make a difference.

Advertisement

“Gave us some of the greatest minutes you can ask of a backup center,” Carlisle said. “His enthusiasm permeates our team.”


5. Brief scouting report for Knicks or Celtics

Playoff opponents are virtually autopsied by teams they’ll be facing in a series, and it’s safe to say the Pacers and Cavaliers knew each other inside and out. Still, they learn things from repeated competition squeezed into a week or 10 days.

Here’s Atkinson on the biggest thing he learned about the Pacers in this up-close look:

“The duration of their intensity,” the Cavs coach said. “How long they can go. They press fullcourt, and then they run consistently all game. They never stop. It’s hard to do. I give them a ton of credit for that. It’s extreme ball pressure.”

* * *

Advertisement

Steve Aschburner has written about the NBA since 1980. You can e-mail him here, find his archive here and follow him on X.

The views on this page do not necessarily reflect the views of the NBA, its clubs or Warner Bros. Discovery.





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Indiana

Some Indiana lawmakers ponder taking up marijuana debate after Trump’s reclassification order – Indianapolis Business Journal

Published

on

Some Indiana lawmakers ponder taking up marijuana debate after Trump’s reclassification order – Indianapolis Business Journal


For several years, the common refrain among some state lawmakers has been that they had no desire to tackle the issue until the federal government reclassified the drug. That argument will be removed if the president’s order receives federal regulatory approval as directed.



Source link

Continue Reading

Indiana

Indiana ethics panel approves Jennifer-Ruth Green settlement; possible criminal charges pending

Published

on

Indiana ethics panel approves Jennifer-Ruth Green settlement; possible criminal charges pending


The Indiana State Ethics Commission on Thursday approved a settlement requiring former Public Safety Secretary Jennifer-Ruth Green to pay a $10,000 civil fine, closing the ethics case against her — but potential criminal charges remain under review by the Marion County Prosecutor’s Office. The bipartisan, five-member commission voted unanimously to accept the agreement during its […]



Source link

Continue Reading

Indiana

Bears consider move to Indiana with effort to secure public funding for stadium in Illinois stalled

Published

on

Bears consider move to Indiana with effort to secure public funding for stadium in Illinois stalled


CHICAGO — The Chicago Bears say they’re mulling a move to Northwest Indiana with their efforts to secure public funding they say they need to build an enclosed stadium in Illinois stalled.

Team president Kevin Warren insisted Wednesday in an open letter to fans that the team still prefers to build a new home on a tract of land it owns in suburban Arlington Heights, Illinois. He also said the Bears are not using the threat to cross state lines as leverage.

“This is not about leverage,” Warren said. “We spent years trying to build a new home in Cook County. We invested significant time and resources evaluating multiple sites and rationally decided on Arlington Heights. Our fans deserve a world-class stadium. Our players and coaches deserve a venue that matches the championship standard they strive for every day.”

Warren did not say where in Northwest Indiana the Bears would look to move.

Advertisement

The letter comes just days before Chicago hosts rival Green Bay in a game with heavy playoff implications. The Bears (10-4) hold a slim lead over the Packers (9-4-1) in the NFC North. In their first season under coach Ben Johnson, they are trying to secure their first postseason appearance since 2020.

“The Bears have called Chicago home for more than a century,” Warren said. “One certainty is that our commitment to this city will not change. We will continue to provide unwavering support to the community. We need to secure a world-class venue for our passionate fanbase and honor the energy you bring every week.”

The Bears’ focus for a new home has fluctuated between a tract of land they own in Arlington Heights to the Chicago lakefront, and then back to the suburb. They have said they plan to pay for the stadium construction on the site of a former racetrack about 30 miles northwest of their longtime home at Soldier Field, though they would need assistance to complete the project.

According to a team consultant report released in September, they are seeking $855 million in public funding for infrastructure in order to build a stadium in Arlington Heights that could host Final Fours and Super Bowls. The Bears were also hoping the Illinois legislature would pass a bill in October that would freeze property taxes for large-scale construction projects such as the stadium, allowing them to begin construction this year. But that didn’t happen.

“For a project of this scale, uncertainty has significant consequences,” Warren said. “Stable timelines are critical, as are predictable processes and elected leaders, who share a sense of urgency and appreciation for public partnership that projects with this level of impact require. We have not received that sense of urgency or appreciation to date. We have been told directly by State leadership, our project will not be a priority in 2026, despite the benefits it will bring to Illinois.”

Advertisement

In September 2022, the Bears unveiled a nearly $5 billion plan for Arlington Heights that also called for restaurants, retail and more, when they were finalizing the purchase of that site 30 miles from Soldier Field. Their focus moved toward building a new stadium next to Soldier Field after Warren was hired as president two years ago to replace the retiring Ted Phillips. The plan to transform Chicago’s Museum Campus got an enthusiastic endorsement from Mayor Brandon Johnson but a tepid reception from Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker and state legislators when it was announced in April 2024.

Last spring, the team announced it was turning its attention back to Arlington Heights, citing “significant progress” with local leaders.

Since moving to Chicago in 1921, the Bears have never owned their stadium, whether playing at Wrigley Field from 1921 to 1970 or Soldier Field since then.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending