Indiana
Indiana’s third grade retention bill could violate federal law on English learners, advocates say
Sign up for Chalkbeat Indianaâs free daily newsletter to keep up with Indianapolis Public Schools, Marion Countyâs township districts, and statewide education news.
A bill that would hold back more third graders in Indiana has raised alarms among teachers of English language learners, who say the retention mandate ignores research on language acquisition, and could violate federal law.
Senate Bill 1 â a priority bill for GOP lawmakers this year â requires schools to remediate young students who donât demonstrate reading skills and retain most third graders who donât pass the state reading test, the IREAD3. Itâs part of a legislative effort to address the stateâs literacy scores, which have declined for more than a decade.
The bill has passed the Senate and is heading for a full vote in the House with support from the Indiana Department of Education.
The bill includes âgood causeâ exemptions to retention for several groups of students, including English learners who have received services for less than two years and whose teachers and parents agree that promotion is appropriate.
But advocates for English learners say that the exemption for this population doesnât align with what research says about how long it takes for students to learn a new language.
With a growing population of 93,000 English learners in Indiana, and a history of shortages of educators licensed to teach language learners, advocates worry that English learners will be denied an appropriate education if theyâre retained. The state also has an increasing number of immigrant students, some of whom will need language services.
Advocates also say the provision conflicts with the stateâs implementation of the Every Student Succeeds Act, which gives students six years to demonstrate proficiency in English before their schools face a penalty. Federal law also states that English learners should not be retained solely on the basis of their English language proficiency and that they are entitled to age-appropriate curriculum and participation in school programs.
State officials who support the bill, however, say it does not conflict with federal law or state rules.
Sen. Linda Rogers, the billâs co-author, said in a statement that the language conforms with federal guidance, and that the billâs authors âworked to ensure that was the case as the legislation was being written.â
Become a Chalkbeat sponsor
And the Indiana Department of Education said in a statement that federal guidance requires school districts to help students become English proficient and participate in regular classes âwithin a reasonable period of time.â
Per the bill, that reasonable amount of time is two years to make sure EL students arenât retained only because of âtheir lack of English proficiency and before they have been provided with meaningful opportunity and academic instruction,â the IDOE statement said.
But learning a new language can take anywhere from five to 14 years, said Patricia Morita-Mullaney, a professor of language and literacy at Purdue University and past president of the Indiana Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, or INTESOL.
English learners who are retained under the provisions of Senate Bill 1 could sue the state for failing to meet federal requirements, Morita-Mullaney said.
âIndiana is setting itself up for an enormous class action lawsuit,â Morita-Mullaney said.
Meeting the needs of English learners
Historically, most of Indianaâs young English learners were U.S. citizens who had attended American schools since kindergarten, Morita-Mullaney said. A large percentage then could become eligible for retention in third grade, when they are in their fourth year of receiving English language services â an insufficient amount of time, she said.
The effect would be a penalty for the child, instead of the school as currently outlined by ESSA, she said.
Current Indiana law exempts English learners from retention.
In addition to concerns about violating federal law, holding students back based on their English proficiency has a negative impact on their content knowledge, said Donna Albrecht, a professor of ENL/ESL at Indiana University Southeast and a member of the advocacy team at INTESOL. Instead, teachers should be trained in methods that teach content and language at the same time.
âItâs not that they werenât taught to read; theyâre learning two languages. It takes more time,â Albrecht said. âBy the time they reach fourth and fifth grade, theyâre surpassing their monolingual peers.â
Become a Chalkbeat sponsor
Of the 2,819 English learner students who failed the IREAD-3 statewide in 2023, 1,922 received a good cause exemption from retention, while 897 did not. Most of the latter â 868 students â were promoted to fourth grade anyway. Such âsocial promotionâ has increased in Indiana schools over the last decade.
Retaining hundreds more students will affect both urban districts like Indianapolis Public Schools, which has a large population of English learners, as well as small, rural districts where these students make up a large share of the population, Morita-Mullaney said.
In both cases, schools will need to staff additional third grade classrooms with teachers who are prepared to teach English learners, Morita-Mullaney said. Indiana schools have struggled to find enough qualified teachers for English learners â another federal requirement.
âTheyâll move teachers to third grade, or theyâll bring in new people who have never been in high-stakes testing environments before,â Morita-Mullaney said.
Improving Senate Bill 1 for English learners
There are 93,625 English learners in all grades statewide in 2023-24, according to Indiana Department of Education data.
To improve the bill for English learners, INTESOL recommends changing the exemption language to reference scores on Indianaâs assessment for English learners â WIDA.
Under the organizationâs proposed language, students who score less than a 5.0 proficiency level on WIDA, the score needed to exit the English learner programs and join the general student body, would be eligible for an exemption if they fail IREAD3.
On average, students gain half a level of proficiency per year on the assessment, said Albrecht. But even students who gain a full level of proficiency each year may not be ready to pass the IREAD-3 in third grade if they started learning English in kindergarten.
Itâs not clear from available state data at what WIDA level students can typically pass the IREAD-3, Albrecht added. Comparing data has been challenging due to years of changes in state and federal testing, Morita-Mullaney said.
The state Department of Education said WIDA measures English language proficiency at grade level, as mandated by ESSA, while IREAD3 measures reading proficiency overall.
Become a Chalkbeat sponsor
Advocates pushed back on this interpretation saying WIDA focuses on all parts of language, but IREAD is designed to test reading for native speakers.
Bill author Rogers also said that retention would not conflict with Indianaâs ESSA plan.
âThe legislation highlights early identification of students that may not be reading proficient by the end of third grade. These students will be provided remediation and summer school aligned with the Science of Reading,â Rogersâ statement said. âThe goal is not to retain anyone that doesnât have a good cause exemption and ensure that âEvery Child Learns to Read.ââ
Previously, proponents said that retention will remain a last resort for students after they have more intervention and multiple attempts to pass the test. Still, retention is a necessary step in some cases, they said, giving students another year to develop literacy skills.
Both Rogers and Secretary of Education Katie Jenner have said they donât believe very many students will be retained after receiving increased intervention.
âThis is a crisis for our state right now and we have no time to waste,â Jenner said at a Wednesday meeting of the House Ways and Means Committee.
The bill is scheduled for a second reading in the House on Monday.
You can track Senate Bill 1 on the General Assembly website.
Aleksandra Appleton covers Indiana education policy and writes about K-12 schools across the state. Contact her at aappleton@chalkbeat.org.
Indiana
Some Indiana lawmakers ponder taking up marijuana debate after Trump’s reclassification order – Indianapolis Business Journal
Indiana
Indiana ethics panel approves Jennifer-Ruth Green settlement; possible criminal charges pending
Indiana
Bears consider move to Indiana with effort to secure public funding for stadium in Illinois stalled
CHICAGO — The Chicago Bears say they’re mulling a move to Northwest Indiana with their efforts to secure public funding they say they need to build an enclosed stadium in Illinois stalled.
Team president Kevin Warren insisted Wednesday in an open letter to fans that the team still prefers to build a new home on a tract of land it owns in suburban Arlington Heights, Illinois. He also said the Bears are not using the threat to cross state lines as leverage.
“This is not about leverage,” Warren said. “We spent years trying to build a new home in Cook County. We invested significant time and resources evaluating multiple sites and rationally decided on Arlington Heights. Our fans deserve a world-class stadium. Our players and coaches deserve a venue that matches the championship standard they strive for every day.”
Warren did not say where in Northwest Indiana the Bears would look to move.
The letter comes just days before Chicago hosts rival Green Bay in a game with heavy playoff implications. The Bears (10-4) hold a slim lead over the Packers (9-4-1) in the NFC North. In their first season under coach Ben Johnson, they are trying to secure their first postseason appearance since 2020.
“The Bears have called Chicago home for more than a century,” Warren said. “One certainty is that our commitment to this city will not change. We will continue to provide unwavering support to the community. We need to secure a world-class venue for our passionate fanbase and honor the energy you bring every week.”
The Bears’ focus for a new home has fluctuated between a tract of land they own in Arlington Heights to the Chicago lakefront, and then back to the suburb. They have said they plan to pay for the stadium construction on the site of a former racetrack about 30 miles northwest of their longtime home at Soldier Field, though they would need assistance to complete the project.
According to a team consultant report released in September, they are seeking $855 million in public funding for infrastructure in order to build a stadium in Arlington Heights that could host Final Fours and Super Bowls. The Bears were also hoping the Illinois legislature would pass a bill in October that would freeze property taxes for large-scale construction projects such as the stadium, allowing them to begin construction this year. But that didn’t happen.
“For a project of this scale, uncertainty has significant consequences,” Warren said. “Stable timelines are critical, as are predictable processes and elected leaders, who share a sense of urgency and appreciation for public partnership that projects with this level of impact require. We have not received that sense of urgency or appreciation to date. We have been told directly by State leadership, our project will not be a priority in 2026, despite the benefits it will bring to Illinois.”
In September 2022, the Bears unveiled a nearly $5 billion plan for Arlington Heights that also called for restaurants, retail and more, when they were finalizing the purchase of that site 30 miles from Soldier Field. Their focus moved toward building a new stadium next to Soldier Field after Warren was hired as president two years ago to replace the retiring Ted Phillips. The plan to transform Chicago’s Museum Campus got an enthusiastic endorsement from Mayor Brandon Johnson but a tepid reception from Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker and state legislators when it was announced in April 2024.
Last spring, the team announced it was turning its attention back to Arlington Heights, citing “significant progress” with local leaders.
Since moving to Chicago in 1921, the Bears have never owned their stadium, whether playing at Wrigley Field from 1921 to 1970 or Soldier Field since then.
-
Iowa4 days agoAddy Brown motivated to step up in Audi Crooks’ absence vs. UNI
-
Washington1 week agoLIVE UPDATES: Mudslide, road closures across Western Washington
-
Iowa6 days agoHow much snow did Iowa get? See Iowa’s latest snowfall totals
-
Maine3 days agoElementary-aged student killed in school bus crash in southern Maine
-
Maryland4 days agoFrigid temperatures to start the week in Maryland
-
Technology1 week agoThe Game Awards are losing their luster
-
South Dakota5 days agoNature: Snow in South Dakota
-
Nebraska1 week agoNebraska lands commitment from DL Jayden Travers adding to early Top 5 recruiting class