Connect with us

Indiana

Indiana Republicans may have to break with their rules to redistrict. Can Democrats stop them?

Published

on

Indiana Republicans may have to break with their rules to redistrict. Can Democrats stop them?


play

Though the Indiana House plans to reconvene to talk about redistricting on Dec. 1, there are two things that could get in the way: making quorum, and overcoming the fact that Republican leaders appear to have broken a House rule.

Per House rules, Republican legislative leaders should have gotten approval from House leadership in order to convene in December. Democrats say they never signed off on the change, but House leaders maintain they’re still following state law.

Advertisement

Either way, the House needs a two-thirds vote to meet in order to take up redistricting. If all Democrats are on the same page in their opposition, and with just 70 Republicans in the House, only five could break from the party, and the House would not be able to move forward with redistricting in December.

Should either of these things happen, it would only be the latest whiplash Indiana has experienced with regard to President Donald Trump’s request to redraw the state congressional map mid-decade, in order to give Republicans more favored seats before the 2026 midterm elections.

How we got here

State leaders held out for months, even with two visits from Vice President JD Vance and a mounting pressure campaign from the White House. Then Gov. Mike Braun called for a special session to redistrict in October, even though Senate President Rodric Bray insisted his chamber didn’t have the votes to make it successful. But the two legislative leaders came up with a date anyway: They would convene during the first two weeks of December for redistricting.

Then on Nov. 14, Bray reversed course and said the Senate would not show up since the votes weren’t there. This seemed to solidify on Organization Day Nov. 18, which kicked off the 2026 legislative session. Both the House and Senate chambers agreed to a concurrent resolution that set their return date on Jan. 5.

Advertisement

House Speaker Todd Huston, in a harbinger of what was to come, nonetheless told his members to keep their December calendars open.

On Nov. 25, he formally announced his chamber would be convening Dec. 1. Minutes later, Bray again switched up and said his chamber, too, would convene and a week later and vote on whatever map the House sends over.

Why lawmakers aren’t following the House’s rules

Therein lies the rule issue. The time and date that the House reconvenes can be changed from what was in that concurrent resolution from Organization Day, but only “with the agreement of the Speaker and minority leader,” the House standing rules say. House minority leader Phil GiaQuinta, D-Fort Wayne, said there was no such agreement, and it’s his position that the House should reconvene on Jan. 5 as written.

“The speaker called me this morning and said we will be going in Dec. 1,” he said on Nov. 25. “I did not agree to that.”

Advertisement

Even if lawmakers aren’t following their rules, they would be following state law by meeting on a different date than planned as long as enough lawmakers are present. A spokesperson for Huston pointed to the provision in state law that enables lawmakers to meet “either on a certain day fixed by concurrent resolution or when the gavel of each house falls in the presence of a quorum.”

It’s also not unusual to suspend House rules, but it too can only be done with a two-thirds vote.

Huston has said his chamber has the votes to pass a redistricting measure, but that’s because they just need a simple majority, or 51 members. Establishing quorum and suspending rules is a higher bar.

A House Democrat is focusing on the quorum issue in particular, calling out five Republicans by name and urging them to deny quorum on Dec. 1.

Advertisement

“I’m just saying, for the period of time where there’s a quorum call, people may be busy,” said Rep. Mitch Gore, D-Indianapolis. “I’ll pick listening to the people and showing some backbone over allowing my constituents to get ripped off by a 9-0 gerrymander.”

The five Republicans Gore is publicly naming are Reps. Becky Cash, R-Zionsville, Dave Hall, R-Norman, Danny Lopez, R-Carmel, Hunter Smith, R-Zionsville, and Ed Clere, R-New Albany.

Clere, Lopez and Cash have stated publicly or on social media that they are opposed to redistricting. Hall and Smith have not made clear their positions.

“If they really oppose redistricting, it’s up to them to deny a quorum,” Gore said.

But Clere sees it a different way, saying in a statement to IndyStar that a walkout is not the answer to stopping redistricting because “it’s not constructive.”

Advertisement

“Mid-cycle redistricting is harmful to both the legislative institution and to democracy more broadly,” he said. “A walkout would only deepen the existing partisan divide and further undermine the legislative institution.”

Likewise, Lopez and Cash said they will be there on Dec. 1.

Through spokespeople, the other Republican representatives did not respond to requests for comment.

The pressure has been intense around the redistricting debate. Voters in certain districts have been targeted with texts and calls from various nonprofits supporting redistricting. And some of the pressure has turned dark:  At least seven state senators have received some kind of violent threat since Organization Day, including some incidents of swatting, which is when a person calls in a false tip that prompts a large law enforcement response. Even Braun has received “credible threats,” his office said. 

There’s also the threat of primary challenges against lawmakers who vote against redistricting. Trump has openly called for this; at least one such challenger has already emerged in Republican state Sen. Spencer Deery’s West Lafayette district.

Advertisement

This story may be updated.

Contact IndyStar Statehouse reporter Kayla Dwyer at kdwyer@indystar.com or follow her on X @kayla_dwyer17.





Source link

Indiana

Thief takes game store’s valuable Pokémon cards

Published

on

Thief takes game store’s valuable Pokémon cards


INDIANAPOLIS (WISH) — A business owner on the city’s south side on Friday morning reported a theft, saying a person stole thousands of dollars’ worth of Pokémon cards from his store.

Security footage captured the suspect breaking into Grandmaster Games and targeting valuable card collections.

The thief gained entry by breaking through a window and immediately went to a display case containing high-value cards.

The suspect bypassed six other display cases, making a direct route to the owner’s private collection, which included a One Piece card alone worth approximately $12,000. Other stolen cards are valued between $5,000 and $6,000 each.

Advertisement

Alex Bradshaw, owner of Grandmaster Games, said many people underestimate the value of such collectibles. “People think ‘cardboard,’ not really worth a lot. Except for these instances where a bunch of stuff gets taken. You can see the suspect trying to break into the display case, but couldn’t get it open.”

Bradshaw described the suspect’s actions inside the store. “He came over here to where our Pokémon cases are, and he smashed one of our cases that had our ungraded cards. Took the top row of those and moved on to graded cards.”

Approximately 60 Pokémon cards were stolen during the break-in, with their total value estimated to be between $10,000 and $15,000. The suspect was inside the store for only about five or six minutes.

Bradshaw thinks the suspect had prior knowledge of the store’s layout due to the targeted nature of the theft. “Because if you aren’t familiar with my store, you wouldn’t necessarily know to go to this display case because this has stuff of value.”

Grandmaster Games has been in business for about a decade, and it’s the first break-in the store has experienced.

Advertisement

Following the theft, Bradshaw is reconsidering how he displays his valuable collection. “I don’t know if I’m going to completely take this display down because there’s a lot of cool nostalgic stuff from the last 20 years — especially the Pokémon and Yu-Gi-Oh! items. But the manga collection is definitely going into the safe. I realize having this stuff out makes me a target.”

With the PopCon Indy convention underway during the weekend at the downtown Indiana Convention Center, Bradshaw was concerned the stolen cards could easily be sold or concealed among other merchandise.

Despite the significant loss, Bradshaw has expressed a desire not to press charges. He attributes the theft to potential desperation and indicated he would rather offer assistance than punishment. “Nobody steals because they want to. They steal because they need to. Most of the time, people are at the end of the rope. They want something easy, which you can’t blame them for wanting something easy. If you need some help, most of us are willing to help one way or another.”

The Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department encouraged anyone with information regarding the theft to contact them.

Bradshaw said he simply wants his cards returned.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Indiana

Lottery Luck Or Not, Indiana Pacers Have Roster Needs To Address

Published

on

Lottery Luck Or Not, Indiana Pacers Have Roster Needs To Address


INDIANAPOLIS – Just two days stand between the Indiana Pacers and their offseason-defining date. May 10 is the 2026 NBA Draft lottery, and the Pacers have a 52.1% chance of keeping their first-round draft pick.

If the lottery places the Pacers top selection inside the first four slots, Indiana will keep that draft pick. If it falls to fifth or sixth, the only other possible outcomes, it will be sent to the Los Angeles Clippers as a part of the trade that netted the Pacers center Ivica Zubac.

“We were trying to protect our upside at the top of the draft mostly,” Pacers general manager Chad Buchanan said of the trade and draft pick protections in February. The Pacers would also have kept the first rounder if it landed between 10 and 30, but that became irrelevant after the Pacers ended the season poorly.

Advertisement

Now, the team has roughly a coin flip chance to hang on to their high draft selection this season. They have an offseason plan for any draft lottery outcome, but a top pick would be preferred. Any direction the Pacers go this summer will be determined by their lottery fate.

Buchanan had much more to say about the Pacers offseason during a recent interview on The Ride with JMV on 107.5 The Fan in Indianapolis. “When we made the trade, we knew there was risk involved just as there is in any other trade. But with the draft pick involved, you’ve got to look at the finances of the situation and the scenario where you keep the pick, the scenario where we lose the pick. We felt that both scenarios provided opportunities to help our team be better next year,” he said. The Pacers eyes toward championship contention right now made the trade worth it, even with the draft-related risk. “We feel like we have a team [that]… We’re in that [Contention] mix when we’re healthy.”

What will the Pacers do to stay contenders?

Buchanan admitted that while long-term thinking is generally prudent, the Pacers have a window right now with Tyrese Haliburton and Pascal Siakam on the roster. They want to go for it. Losing the top-four pick would hurt, but there are other opportunities for the team to get better.

“Should we lose the pick, there’s other opportunities to improve our team through free agency. We still have trades. We gain a pick that we can use in the future for a trade. We felt like there’s a way to improve our team either way with whatever the ping pong balls, however they fall for us. We’re not putting all of our eggs into one basket, that ‘Hey, if we don’t keep this pick, it’s doom and gloom,’ [thinking], because it’s not,” Buchanan said. “Because there’s other windows and other doors that open with that opportunity. If we do get the pick, obviously it’s a great opportunity to add a young player to this team. The core of it comes down to, Ivica [Zubac] is a great player. We’ve been a big believer, a big fan of him for a long time. This team has shown that it’s capable of doing some really special things, and we were missing a starting center that we felt could keep us in that mix.”

Buchanan and Pacers head coach Rick Carlisle have discussed the two directions the Pacers offseason could take. One is more draft focused, with the team’s major addition obviously being a top-four pick in that case. The other way Indiana could go is into free agency. That’s far more likely if they lose their first-round selection. They could use various salary cap exceptions to add talent in that reality, though the roster would still be expensive and near the luxury tax or first apron.

Advertisement

But if the team isn’t providing lip service about their belief that they have a contention window right now, they shouldn’t care as much about those spending barriers. Rather, they should be focused on adding to the team, and in particular replacing some key roles they’ve lost in the last few seasons.

While the Pacers core remains intact, some of their better reserves have either taken deals elsewhere or been traded across the last few seasons. Zubac replaced Myles Turner, but since the Pacers first made the Eastern Conference Finals in 2023-24, they’ve also lost the likes of Jalen Smith, Isaiah Jackson, Bennedict Mathurin, Doug McDermott, and Thomas Bryant. Along the way, most of those departures made sense for one reason or another – Jackson and Mathurin were traded as matching salary for Zubac, as an example. But the Pacers depth, a superpower in recent campaigns, has slowly dripped away.

That influences their needs in the offseason. “Can I say health? Does that count as a need?” Buchanan joked when asked about what the Pacers need next season. To his point: The Pacers had the second-most games lost due to injury and the most salary lost in player absences.

In terms of actual roster needs, Buchanan identified a few. The departure of Mathurin created a big hole for the team’s second unit, and they have some other questions to answer.

Advertisement

“I think one thing this season revealed for us is the need for some scoring off our bench… Probably from the wing position. Losing (Mathurin), you lose some of that. But I think this team, we have some depth. We still have some holes to fill,” Buchanan began. Some of the projected top-four picks in the upcoming draft could fill that role, as could a free agent acquired using some of the Mid-Level Exception.

Most of the Pacers rotation seems fairly set. Their starting five from the 2025 NBA Finals – minus Turner, plus Zubac – seems fairly set. T.J. McConnell and Obi Toppin have obvious roles off the bench. A draft pick could be in the mix, as could one or both of Ben Sheppard and Jarace Walker.

On the interior, Jay Huff currently projects to be the Pacers backup center. Buchanan did mention that position as a possible spot to look at in the offseason.

“I think you look at maybe the five position, do we have a backup center we feel comfortable with? We had (Huff) and (Micah Potter), both had good moments this year. Do we feel good about that position?” Buchanan wondered. Huff’s production given his contract is solid, and he’s never played with Haliburton. But his first season in Indiana was certainly up and down.

Buchanan also mused about the depth of the wing position on his roster, a natural thought with Johnny Furphy injured and Kobe Brown entering free agency. He also mentioned reserve point guard as a possible need – the Pacers cycled through many players in that role during the 2025-26 campaign.

Advertisement

Some of the team’s needs may be filled by internal candidates. And they won’t have a ton of spending power in the offseason. But they will look to make improvements as contenders, and they’ll explore every avenue to make it happen. Including, yes, trading their first-round pick if the right opportunity appears.

“You’ve got to consider everything. If you have a pick up there, you’re looking at obviously who are the players on the board to pick from,” Buchanan began. “But if we can find another player or multiple assets that help us with this team to try to compete for a championship, we’re going to consider everything on that.”

While there will be top-end stability for the Pacers, the offseason could come with changes to the rotation. How those changes look will be determined at Sunday’s draft lottery.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Indiana

Republican primary voters sent dangerous message to America | Opinion

Published

on

Republican primary voters sent dangerous message to America | Opinion



A handful of Indiana Republican state senators saw this abuse of power unfolding and said, ‘Not on our watch.’ And now they’ve been voted out by those who placed loyalty to Trump ahead of democracy.

Advertisement
play

Donald Trump, even more so than other presidents, needs guardrails to keep his worst impulses in check. 

But on May 5, Republican primary voters in Indiana further weakened the political and legislative guardrails around the president when they threw out of office at least five GOP state senators because they put the Constitution ahead of Trump’s partisan demands.

It wasn’t just those relatively obscure legislators in Indiana who lost. We all did.

That’s because the message delivered to GOP members of Congress, as well as to Republican lawmakers in other states, is that defying even Trump’s most outrageous demands is still the path to defeat within their own party.

Advertisement

The vote also helps accelerate both political parties’ obscene rush to gerrymander congressional maps beyond any reasonable facsimile of fairness.

Indiana primary sent message to Republicans who stood up to Trump

In 2025, the Indiana Senate, thoroughly dominated by conservative Republicans, said no to Trump’s partisan order to redraw the state’s congressional maps to favor GOP candidates even more heavily than the current districts already do. The senators’ thoughtful independence not only drew Trump’s wrath but also triggered his vow to punish the legislators in the next election cycle. 

Now, five senators whom Trump targeted have lost their reelection bids, and one other race is too close to call. Only one Republican incumbent targeted by Trump managed to withstand the president’s onslaught.

Advertisement

Message sent and received.

Our constitutional system is, of course, designed to provide checks and balances, but the system works only if we follow it. 

Trump helped kickstart the rush to prematurely redraw congressional boundaries ahead of November’s midterms elections in a desperate bid to salvage Republicans’ tenuous control of the U.S. House.

Congressional redistricting normally takes place every 10 years, following the national census, as prescribed in the Constitution. Trump, as is his wont, ignored historical standards to advance his own interests. 

Advertisement

Redistricting push in Tennessee, South Carolina and others won’t help voters

So far, GOP lawmakers in Florida, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio and Texas have redrawn districts in ways that could enable Republican candidates to flip 13 Democratic-held seats in November.

Other Republican-dominated states, such as South Carolina and Tennessee, may push forward their own reconfigured maps. 

In response, Democrats in California and Virginia adopted heavily gerrymandered maps that favor their party. Democrats could pick up nine seats in those two states, as well as one in Utah, from court-ordered redistricting.

Advertisement

None of this partisan manipulation helps ordinary Americans, and it certainly doesn’t strengthen the public’s trust in our democracy.

A handful of Republican state senators in Indiana saw this abuse of power unfolding and said, “Not on our watch.” They should have been rewarded for their political courage. Instead, they were bullied for months by our nation’s commander in chief and the mercurial leader of their own political party.

And now they’ve been turned out of office by voters who placed loyalty to Trump over allegiance to democratic values.

I scoffed at liberals who claimed before and after the 2024 election that Trump’s win would destroy our democracy. Their self-serving hysteria was over the top then and remains so now, even in light of the president’s heavy-handed redistricting push.

Advertisement

American democracy will be just fine, long after Trump has shuffled out of the Oval Office for the last time. But just as fences make good neighbors, guardrails make better presidents.

It’s our nation’s loss that the guardrails built by brave Republican leaders in Indiana didn’t hold.

Tim Swarens is a former deputy opinion editor of USA TODAY and opinion editor of The Indianapolis Star.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending