Connect with us

Indiana

Indiana judge rejects abortion providers’ challenge to near-total ban

Published

on

Indiana judge rejects abortion providers’ challenge to near-total ban


An Indiana judge on Wednesday has ruled against abortion providers seeking to challenge the state’s near-total abortion ban.

The ruling, handed down by Monroe County Circuit Court Judge Kelsey Blake Hanlon, denies efforts by the providers, including Planned Parenthood, who sought a permanent injunction to expand medical exceptions within the ban and remove restrictions limiting abortion procedures to hospitals.

Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, Indiana outlawed abortions except when the mother’s life or health is in jeopardy, or in instances of rape, incest and deadly fetal anomalies under limited circumstances. The law, enacted in August 2022, makes Indiana one of the most restrictive states in the U.S. regarding access to the women’s health care procedure.

In her decision on Wednesday, Hanlon, who conducted a three-day bench trial in late May, denied the providers’ request for the permanent injunction against both elements of the state law, known as S.B. 1, stating that while the court considered evidence on the impact of the law, it could not substitute the legislature’s decision-making. Hanlon, a Republican appointed to oversee the case, emphasized that the Indiana General Assembly holds the authority to shape policy on the matter.

Advertisement

“Significant and compelling evidence regarding the policy implications of S.B. 1 and its effect on medical professionals in particular was presented. However, the Court cannot substitute its own policy preferences for that of the Indiana General Assembly,” Hanlon wrote.

The case comes after the state’s Supreme Court upheld the ban in June 2023, but maintained that the Indiana Constitution still safeguards a woman’s right to terminate a pregnancy if her life or health is at risk.

But abortion providers argue that the language in the law is so vague that many doctors are hesitant to perform abortions, even in cases that technically qualify under the exemptions.

While Hanlon, in her 50-page order, acknowledged the difficulties posed by the law’s language—particularly for doctors operating under the threat of criminal liability—and recognized that the “politically charged environment” creates challenges, she ultimately sided with the state’s argument. She said that providers did not identify a situation where the health and life exemption or the hospital requirement prevented a woman from obtaining an abortion.

Newsweek has reached out to Planned Parenthood Federation of America via email for comment on Wednesday.

Advertisement
Abortion supporters and opponents clash in front of the Supreme Court on May 3, 2022, in Washington, D.C. An Indiana judge on Wednesday ruled against abortion providers seeking to challenge the state’s near-total ban on…


Win McNamee/Getty Images

The ruling also upheld the requirement that all abortions be performed in hospitals, rejecting the providers’ plea to allow outpatient clinics to offer the procedure, stating that hospitals are better equipped to manage cases involving serious health risks, fetal anomalies and cases of rape or incest.

“The evidence demonstrates that many women receiving abortion care when they are seriously ill or at risk of becoming seriously ill will likely be receiving in-hospital care irrespective of the hospital requirement,” Hanlon wrote.

In response to the ruling, Planned Parenthood Federation of America warned in a joint statement with the ACLU of Indiana and other plaintiffs that the court’s ruling means “lives will continue to be endangered by Indiana’s abortion ban,” adding that they “are still evaluating all options” on whether or not they will appeal the ruling.

“Already, Hoosiers with serious health complications have been forced to endure unjustifiable suffering due to miscarriages, ectopic pregnancies, and other pregnancy-related issues or leave the state to access appropriate care,” the statement said.

Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita praised the decision, calling the state’s abortion law both “reasonable and constitutional.”

Advertisement

Abortion has been a key issue for the Republican and Democratic campaigns as former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris vie for the presidency.

Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe, many Republican-controlled states have enacted abortion restrictions, with 21 states banning or restricting the medical practice at every stage of pregnancy.

This article includes reporting by the Associated Press.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Indiana

Report: Quarterback Tayven Jackson Enters Transfer Portal

Published

on

Report: Quarterback Tayven Jackson Enters Transfer Portal


BLOOMINGTON, Ind. – When Tayven Jackson announced his intention to transfer to Indiana from Tennessee before the 2023 season, it caused a ripple of excitement.

In the end, it didn’t work out for Jackson at Indiana. After two years with the Hoosiers, Jackson is expected to move on.

On3.com’s Pete Nakos posted on X on Saturday that Jackson entered the transfer portal.

Jackson played in 13 games for the Hoosiers during the 2023 and 2024 seasons. He threw for 1,300 yards, six touchdowns and six interceptions during his Indiana career.

Jackson compiled the majority of his production during the 2023 season when he started the first six games of the 2023 season. Brendan Sorsby started the games in the second half of the season for the Hoosiers.

Sorsby transferred to Cincinnati after the 2023 season, but Jackson stuck with the Indiana program when 2023 coach Tom Allen was replaced by Curt Cignetti.

Cignetti recruited Kurtis Rourke out of Ohio University from the transfer portal and Jackson never seemed to be seriously considered as the starting quarterback. Jackson did settle in as the No. 2 quarterback ahead of Tyler Cherry and Alberto Mendoza.

Advertisement

Jackson played in four games in a reserve role before he got the chance to start against Washington on Oct. 26 after Rourke injured his thumb. Jackson led Indiana to a 31-17 victory over the Huskies as he completed 11 of 19 passes for 124 yards, one touchdown and one interception.

Those proved to be the last passes Jackson threw in an Indiana uniform – though he did appear in two more games and had three rushing attempts in the regular season finale against Purdue.

Rourke is also out of eligibility so Indiana is in the market for a quarterback.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Indiana

Social media reacts to Indiana, SMU’s decisive losses in College Football Playoff

Published

on

Social media reacts to Indiana, SMU’s decisive losses in College Football Playoff


play

From the moment the inaugural 12-team College Football Playoff bracket was revealed, a debate raged over who was and wasn’t included in the field.

Should SMU, despite a loss to Clemson in the ACC championship game, have earned the final at-large berth over Alabama? Was Indiana, even with a gaudy 11-1 record, worthy of a spot despite what ended up being a softer-than-expected schedule in the Big Ten?

Advertisement

The start of playoff games this week didn’t end those arguments. If anything, it only intensified them.

The Hoosiers and Mustangs both suffered double-digit, largely lopsided road losses in the first round of the playoff. On Friday night, No. 10 seed Indiana fell to No. 7 seed Notre Dame 27-17 in a game it trailed by 24 with two minutes remaining while No. 11 seed SMU was drubbed by No. 6 Penn State 38-10 Saturday afternoon.

People from across the country who follow the sport — broadcasters, writers, analysts and even coaches — reacted to the results, with some using them as a justification for their belief that the playoff selection committee made mistakes on who it allowed in the field. Many of the loudest complaints came from the SEC, which had the second-most teams in the field, with three, but had three three-loss teams — Alabama, Ole Miss and South Carolina — among the first teams left out of the playoff.

Advertisement

Here’s a sampling of the reaction to Indiana and SMU’s CFP losses:

Social media reacts to Indiana, SMU College Football Playoff losses

Indiana and SMU losing their College Football Playoff games by a combined 38 points in dominant fashion raised a variety of opinions, with some believing it to be an indictment of the playoff committee for selecting the Hoosiers and Mustangs for the final two at-large spots.

Others, though, countered with an argument that Indiana and SMU had pieced together playoff-worthy resumes and deserved to make the field, regardless of how they fared in their games this week.

Lane Kiffin trolls CFP committee

The loudest, or at least most prominent, voice piling on Indiana and SMU’s struggles was Ole Miss coach Lane Kiffin, whose squad was the third team left out of the playoff.

Advertisement

Many, however, rightfully pointed out that Kiffin’s 9-3 Rebels team could have made the playoff had it simply won at home against a 4-8 Kentucky team that managed only one victory in SEC play this season.



Source link

Continue Reading

Indiana

Indiana's Curt Cignetti Learned Valuable Lesson in Keeping Your Mouth Shut | Deadspin.com

Published

on

Indiana's Curt Cignetti Learned Valuable Lesson in Keeping Your Mouth Shut | Deadspin.com


“Don’t write a check with your mouth that your ass can’t cash.”

My mom once told me that growing up. Can’t quite remember why. Somebody should probably tell that to Indiana head coach Curt Cignetti, who did a lot of talking all season long just to get demoralized in the first round of the College Football Playoff.

Way back when Cignetti got hired in November 2023 after a successful run with James Madison University, he was asked about how he plans on getting recruits to come to an Indiana program that appeared to be rebuilding.

“Google me,” Cignetti said. “I win.”

Advertisement

Cignetti backed that statement up. He landed starting quarterback Kurtis Rourke in December and running backs Justice Ellison and Ty Son Lawton. 

The season could not have started any better for Cignetti’s Hoosiers, as their unbeaten 10-0 record had the attention of the nation before getting curb stomped 38-15 by Ohio State.

Before his first real test against the Buckeyes, Cignetti said, “Ohio State sucks,” at halftime of an Indiana basketball game. Bulletin board material? Sure seemed that was as Ohio State quarterback Will Howard went viral for “putting out the cig” celebration after thrashing the Hoosiers in Columbus.

That should have been Cignetti’s first lesson: to keep his yap shut. He did not learn.

Indiana bounced back from that loss with a 66-0 rout of the Purdue Boilermakers. Despite Purdue’s hapless 1-11 record, that victory put the wind right back in Cignetti’s sails before their College Football Playoff matchup with Notre Dame. 

Advertisement

“We don’t just beat top 25 teams, we beat the shit out of them.”

That’s what Cignetti actually said on the set of ESPN’s College Game Day just hours before the Hoosiers kicked off with the Fighting Irish. It’s important to note that despite Cignetti’s impressive 11-1 record in his first year coaching Indiana, literally none of those victories came against Top 25 teams.

To make things even more hilarious, No. 5 Notre Dame completely embarrassed Indiana in a game where the Hoosiers looked like they did not belong on that same stage.

It’s a friendly reminder for the new coach of Indiana to just keep his mouth shut. Every time he opened it this year, he paid the price. It’s part of what made Indiana a story for a little while, but when the lights were the brightest, Cignetti’s team wasn’t as bold as his comments to the media.

That’s never a good thing.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending