Connect with us

Illinois

88 Illinois hospitals failed to properly treat victims of sexual assault, NBC 5 Investigates found

Published

on

88 Illinois hospitals failed to properly treat victims of sexual assault, NBC 5 Investigates found


In the early morning hours of New Year’s Day, Cheryl Thompson said she woke up in her driveway.

She wasn’t sure how she got there.

Hours earlier, she’d gone to a bar less than a half mile from her Cobden, Illinois, home to meet a friend and celebrate New Year’s Eve.

She doesn’t remember leaving and said she woke up sore.

Advertisement

“I know I was sexually assaulted,” she told NBC 5 Investigates.

Her medical records show she went to Union County Hospital hours later with concerns someone may have spiked her drink.

According to her medical records she shared with NBC 5 Investigates, the emergency room physician’s wrote that Cheryl repeatedly said she did not think she had been sexually assaulted – something Cheryl disputes.

According to Cheryl and the voluntary statement she gave Illinois State Police eight days later, she said the doctor told her they didn’t do rape kits there – that she’d need to be transferred and need a referral to see a sexual assault nurse examiner at another hospital more than 70 miles away.

Thompson also said the doctor was dismissive of her claims.

Advertisement

“As you can tell, I am not a thin woman, but he had the audacity to say to me – based on your size and your height, it is highly unlikely that anyone would try to assault you,” Thompson said.

An NBC 5 Investigates’ review of a Union County Hospital inspection report from May of 2024 found the hospital violated the state statute when it failed to contact police – which is required by state law.

And even though they were giving Cheryl a referral to go elsewhere, the hospital should have notified authorities, inspectors noted, because they collected Cheryl’s urine and blood, which was sent off to a lab to be tested for a date rape drug.

Cheryl ultimately left and learned she could get a rape kit exam performed much closer to home – about 15 miles away.

But she said she was so traumatized by her experience at Union County Hospital that she waited another eight days before going to have her exam. By then, she’d already showered. She said a nurse took photos of bruising on her thighs and cuts and scrapes on her knees and elbows.

Advertisement

“When a victim comes into the ER, we’re already at our most vulnerable state,” Cheryl said, fighting back tears. “We are looking for doctors and nurses to treat us with some human decency and to do what you’re supposed to do. The Hippocratic oath says to do no harm. But in my case, not only was I victimized in my own driveway, I was re-victimized when I went to the hospital.”

As of our reporting deadline Monday, Union County Hospital had not responded to multiple calls and emails seeking comment from NBC 5 Investigates over the past two weeks.

A woman who answered the phone there Monday referred an investigative reporter to another hospital representative.

A spokeswoman for Deaconness Health, which owns Union County Hospital, defended its actions to American Public Media for a story earlier this year, adding that “not all treatment hospitals in southern Illinois accept transfers from other hospitals.”

With the help of a counselor, Thompson later filed a complaint with the Illinois Department of Public Health about her experience and shared with NBC 5 Investigates a copy of a letter sent to her by IDPH in late October.

Advertisement

The letter confirms that her complaint was investigated, and that “the evidence the surveyors collected did confirm some of your allegations and deficiencies were cited. An acceptable plan of correction was submitted by the facility and approved by the department.”

NBC 5 Investigates found Cheryl’s story was not a one-off.

An NBC 5 investigation revealed dozens of Illinois hospitals failed to properly treat victims of sexual assault.

An Illinois law known as the Sexual Assault Survivors Emergency Treatment Act – or SASETA – was designed to ensure victims of rape and sexual assault get proper care. The law requires that hospitals offer forensic services including rape kits, and that they contact police, collect forensic photographs with the patients’ consent and provide them with things like access to a shower, calling a friend or a rape crisis counselor, among other services.

But our review of six years’ worth of hospital inspection records from the IDPH found time and again that did not happen.

Advertisement

Between 2018 and 2024, NBC 5 Investigates found 88 hospitals failed to properly treat victims of sexual assault, according to our review of thousands of pages of state health department inspection reports.

In many cases, the hospitals were found to have poor recordkeeping – failing to document if a rape kit was collected or contact information for the victim.

But we also found more egregious errors, including Illinois hospitals that failed to contact police, left rape kits sitting on shelves for years or told victims they couldn’t offer them rape kits services and sent them home.

Among our findings:

  • MercyHealth Hospital in Rockford failed to photograph 54 sexual assault victims between 2019 and 2021. When inspectors from the state health department spoke with the hospital’s sexual assault nurse examiner during a 2021 inspection, she said the hospital “does not have the means to store the photos… so they do not take (them).”
  • At Memorial Hospital in Springfield, inspectors on a 2021 inspection found four sealed rape kits had been left in a cabinet. Two of them had been sitting on a shelf for five years.
  • During a 2024 inspection at the University of Chicago Medical Center, state health inspectors found four pediatric rape kits had been sitting on a shelf for nearly a year.
  • At Insight Hospital on Chicago’s south side, a 2022 inspection found the hospital failed to provide forensic services to seven patients because the hospital lacked supplies and lacked trained staff – all seven patients were sent home.

Of the above referenced hospitals, none would agree to be interviewed and only the University of Chicago Medical Center and Mercy Health provided statements, which did not directly answer our questions.

The University of Chicago Medicine statement read:

Advertisement

“The University of Chicago Medicine health system, which includes Comer Children’s Hospital, operates one of the region’s busiest Level 1 trauma centers, and our specialized emergency services — including care for survivors of sexual assault — are among the most in-demand in Illinois and surrounding areas. Each year, our dedicated team of specially trained Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners provide 24/7 care for as many as 450 pediatric and adult patients, many of whom are transferred by hospitals unable to offer this highly specialized and labor-intensive service.

During a routine regulatory review by the Illinois Department of Public Health, a citation was issued for not escalating that a limited number of forensic examination kits, which had been appropriately collected and reported by UChicago Medicine, were still awaiting pickup by law enforcement.

In response to the incident, UChicago Medicine strengthened its monitoring and auditing process to ensure our escalations and notifications comply with all regulatory requirements.

This is important and much-needed work, and our clinical teams are committed to their roles serving as vital medical resources for patients across the region who are navigating complex trauma.”

In a separate statement, MercyHealth provided a separate statement, which it attributed to Chief Medical Officer, Dr. John Dorsey:

Advertisement

“Our hearts go out to our patients who are victims of sexual assault. At Mercyhealth, we want to care for all our patients in the best way possible.  State assessments like this often provide an opportunity for us to identify ways to better prepare to meet our patients’ needs.  Mercyhealth used this opportunity to ensure we provide the best care possible. We took steps to correct our processes in regard to photographing victims of sexual assaults and are now in full compliance when it comes to caring for sexual assault victims.” 

“That’s just outrageous. Stuff like that should not be happening,” said Cheryl Thompson.

While Illinois law requires that hospitals offer treatment for sexual assault victims, it also includes a carve out that allows hospitals to send patients to other facilities by creating transfer agreements with other hospitals.

Of the 185 hospital inspection reports we reviewed, we found 85 with transfer agreements. And more than half of those 85 send their patients between 40 to 80 miles away – which sexual assault advocates say can place an undue burden on victims.

The concern is that it may create a chilling effect where victims will be turned away at one hospital and ultimately won’t travel to get a rape kit done somewhere else.

Advertisement

Illinois state Rep. Kelly Cassidy wants to close that loophole in Illinois law and place guardrails on how far a hospital can transfer a sexual assault survivor.

“We are systemically failing survivors,” Cassidy told NBC 5 Investigates in a recent interview. “We’ve tried to build in some work arounds for hospitals who can’t meet that barrier. It’s gone too far to be perfectly honest with you. We’ve got hospitals that are permitted to send someone 70 miles away.”

We reached out to the Union County State’s Attorney’s Office to check on the status of Cheryl Thompson’s case. So far, we have not heard back. Cheryl maintains she was sexually assaulted.

“I know I was. I just don’t have the proof now,” she said.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Illinois

Central Illinois could see tornadoes tonight. How to sign up for alerts

Published

on

Central Illinois could see tornadoes tonight. How to sign up for alerts


play

Central Illinois is expected to be hit with tornado alerts Tuesday afternoon and evening, with the highest risk between 6 and 10 p.m.

The National Weather Service announced on X that a Tornado Watch is 95% likely in east-central Illinois through 4:30 p.m. The potential storm is forecast to reach a peak intensity of 2-3.5 inch hail, 55-70 mph winds and 120-150 mph tornadoes.

Advertisement

Here’s how to stay updated on weather alerts in your area.

How to sign up for weather alerts in Illinois

Most residents throughout Illinois will automatically receive Wireless Emergency Alerts on their mobile phones from the NWS, warning them of potentially dangerous weather in their area. These will look like normal text messages and will typically show the type and time of the alert, any action you should take and the agency issuing the alert. 

Other sources of information include NOAA Weather Radio, the Storm Prediction Center’s live map of nationwide tornado watches and the Emergency Alert System on radio and TV broadcasts.

Residents can also sign up for text alerts through their local county emergency management agency, such as NotifyChicago.

Sign up for USA TODAY Network weather alerts

Illinois residents can sign up for alerts from the USA TODAY Network to receive texts about current storms and weather events in their area.

Advertisement

Tornado watch vs warning

The NWS explains the difference between the varying tornado alert terminology on its website.

A tornado watch means tornadoes are possible in the area, while a tornado warning means a twister has been sighted or indicated by the weather radar. A tornado emergency is the most severe alert, meaning a violent tornado has touched down in the area.

The website uses the phrases “be prepared,” “take action” and “seek shelter immediately” to summarize the three alerts.

Central Illinois weather radar

Chicago weather radar



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Illinois

Record-high Illinois university workers opt-out of pensions

Published

on

Record-high Illinois university workers opt-out of pensions



A record share of Illinois university employees opt-out of pensions for a 401(k)-style plan, lawmakers should give other state employees the same flexibility.

More retired state university employees are opting for a 401(k)-style plan rather than a traditional pension than ever before. They want more choice and flexibility in their retirement benefits. Lawmakers should expand the option to all state workers.

SURS published its annual actuarial evaluation for 2025. With only 47.1% of what they need to pay retirees, they are the second-highest funded state pension in Illinois, beaten only by the Teachers Retirement System with a funded ratio of 47.8%. That shouldn’t be a source of pride, however.

Experts say 60% funded is dangerous and 40% funded or lower is past the point of no return, so 47% is far too low. Illinois’ pension crisis is the worst in the nation.

Advertisement

But the system stands apart because it offers a way out for employees who don’t want to be stuck in the outdated, one-size-fits-all pension model or a pension system that might become insolvent.

SURS gained 1,314 new employees last year, 725 to the traditional and portable pension plans while 589 opted into the Retirement Savings Plan. Nearly half, 45%, of all new members joining are opting out of a traditional pension.

The numbers show 18.2% of all active employees opted into the Retirement Savings Plan, the highest ever since it started in 1998.

It’s a defined contribution plan, similar to a 401(k), rather than the typical defined benefit pension available in most state retirement systems. That’s up from 17.7% of active employees in 2024.

Actuaries expect this pattern to continue, projecting a growing share of active employees opting into the plan until it reaches around 30% of all active employees who are on a defined contribution plan.

Advertisement

Academic hires such as professors are expected to opt-in to the Retirement Savings Plan at a rate of 45%. Non-academic employees such as administrators are expected to opt-in at a rate closer to 25%.

In both cases, employees seem to enjoy getting more choice over how to invest their retirement benefits, but the difference highlights why this option is so important. Currently state university employees are the only ones with this defined contribution option.

Traditional pensions for new workers at Illinois universities have a vesting period of 10 years. That means if someone leaves their job or the state before they’ve completed 10 years, they won’t be eligible for anything but a refund of their contributions. Not the state match or any interest they could’ve accrued while working.

Early-career academics face higher job uncertainty and are more likely to change institutions than later-career or tenured faculty. Under higher expected mobility, defined contributions are more attractive because you don’t have to worry about losing out on retirement benefits because the vesting period is much lower at 5 years.

Advertisement

Mobility isn’t only important in academia. The ability to change careers is important for a variety of jobs today. Wage and salary workers in the public sector today have a median tenure of 6.2 years. That number is likely skewed because 3-in-4 government workers are aged 35 and older.

Younger workers tend to stay in jobs for shorter periods. Across the public and private sectors, the median tenure of workers 55 to 64 is 9.6 years and 2.7 years for workers 25 to 34. Both figures are far below the 10-year vesting requirement for most Illinois pensions.

There’s no reason to limit flexibility and control to only employees under the State University Retirement System. Senate Bill 3389 offers a step in the right direction by allowing downstate teachers to opt-in to a similar Retirement Savings Plan. But that is only the start.

Illinois should expand this option to all five of its state pension systems so that employees can choose to have more control over their retirement finances. Similar plans have been enacted in Rhode Island and Tennessee, which has one of the best-funded pension systems in the country. A defined contribution plan offers more freedom and security for retirees.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Illinois

New rule nearly doubles eligibility for Illinois ABLE savings accounts

Published

on

New rule nearly doubles eligibility for Illinois ABLE savings accounts


Illinois is making it possible for thousands more people with disabilities to set aside money for their needs without losing critical federal benefits.

A new rule, announced this week by State Treasurer Michael Frerichs, raises the eligibility age so that anyone whose disability began before age 47 can now open an ABLE (Achieving a Better Life Experience) savings account.

Advertisement

The change nearly doubles the number of Illinois residents who can use the program, which lets people with disabilities save and invest money tax-free for qualified expenses. 

Frerichs called the expansion a “game changer,” estimating that 250,000 additional Illinoisans and about 6 million people nationwide now qualify. 

“We’re happy to report that ABLE accounts are now available to anyone who acquired their disability before age 46, and I think this is a game changer for a lot of people,” Frerichs said.

Advertisement

Until this expansion, ABLE accounts were only available to people who acquired a disability before age 26. That restriction left out veterans, accident survivors, and people diagnosed with disabling conditions later in life. The new rule took effect this year after Congress responded to calls from Illinois advocates and families to expand access.

How ABLE accounts work:

Advertisement

An ABLE account functions much like a 529 college savings account. Account holders, friends, and family can contribute cash, which is then invested. The money grows tax-free as long as it is used for disability-related expenses such as housing, transportation, assistive technology, or education. Illinois also offers a state income tax deduction for contributions.

Before ABLE accounts, people with disabilities who received Supplemental Security Income (SSI) or Medicaid faced strict asset limits. Having more than $2,000 in savings could mean losing those benefits. 

“This created a lot of anxiety for families who were preparing,” Frerichs said. “There’s a lot of fear for people who wanted to go out and work. What would happen if my paycheck put me over that threshold? Well, ABLE is the answer.”

Advertisement

The program allows up to $100,000 in savings without affecting federal benefits. Earnings and withdrawals remain tax-free if used for qualified expenses.

Real-life impact:

Advertisement

Frerichs shared stories from families who had to make difficult choices before ABLE accounts existed. 

“I talked to parents who had to tell their children’s employer don’t give my kid a raise,” he said. “I’ve talked to parents who talked with their financial advisors, saying, don’t name your child in your will. We created a system that put parents in horrible positions, but now we have a solution that allows them to do more long-term planning and to truly set their kids up for a better life experience.”

Stephanie Cantor, director of the Illinois ABLE program, said the expansion lets her and thousands like her save for expenses that come with disability. 

Advertisement

“Living with a disability just costs more, and it makes me think of all the ways an ABLE account could have been useful to me over the years to be able to save money and pay for these expenses,” Cantor said.

What’s next:

Advertisement

Illinois has about 8,500 ABLE account holders who have saved $121 million so far. The state treasurer’s office encourages anyone who thinks they may qualify to learn more and apply at illinoisable.com.

The Source: The information in this article was reported by FOX Chicago’s Terrence Lee. 

IllinoisNewsMoney
Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending