Health
When This Professor Got Cancer, He Didn’t Quit. He Taught a Class About It.
Dr. Bryant Lin stood before his class at Stanford in September, likely one of the last he would ever teach.
Just 50 years old and a nonsmoker, he had been diagnosed with Stage 4 lung cancer four months earlier. The illness is terminal, and Dr. Lin estimated that he had roughly two years left before the drug he was taking stopped working. Instead of pulling back from work, he chose to spend the fall quarter teaching a course about his own illness.
Registration for the class had filled up almost immediately. Now the room was overflowing, with some students forced to sit on the floor and others turned away entirely.
“It’s quite an honor for me, honestly,” Dr. Lin said, his voice catching. “The fact that you would want to sign up for my class.”
He told his students he wanted to begin with a story that explained why he chose to pursue medicine. He picked up a letter he had received years earlier from a patient dying of chronic kidney disease. The man and his family had made the decision to withdraw from dialysis, knowing he would soon die.
Dr. Lin adjusted his glasses and read, choking up again.
“‘I wanted to thank you so much for taking such good care of me in my old age,’” he read, quoting his patient. “‘You treated me as you would treat your own father.’”
Dr. Lin said this final act of gratitude had left a lasting impact on him. He explained that he had created this 10-week medical school course — “From Diagnosis to Dialogue: A Doctor’s Real-Time Battle With Cancer” — with similar intentions.
“This class is part of my letter, part of what I’m doing to give back to my community as I go through this,” he said.
Later, an 18-year-old freshman in his first week at Stanford caught up on a recording of the class, which was also open to students outside the medical school. The course had filled up before he could enroll, but after emailing Dr. Lin, he received permission to follow along online. He had questions that needed answers.
From Doctor to Patient
Last spring, Dr. Lin developed a persistent and increasingly severe cough. A CT scan showed a large mass in his lungs, and a bronchoscopy confirmed the diagnosis: cancer. It had metastasized to his liver, his bones and his brain, which alone had 50 cancerous growths. He is married, with two teenage sons.
The diagnosis was particularly cruel given his work. Dr. Lin, a clinical professor and primary care physician, was a founder of the Stanford Center for Asian Health Research and Education. One of its priorities has been nonsmoker lung cancer, a disease that disproportionately affects Asian populations.
A self-described “jolly” person, Dr. Lin is known for his booming laugh and voice made for radio. A longtime mentor called him a “pied piper” for ideas — someone who can rally people around a vision. In addition to his other work, he directs the medical humanities program at Stanford and has patented medical devices.
Across his roles, he stresses that people are at the heart of medical practice. He said he tries to emulate an “old-timey country doctor” and once helped throw a 100th birthday party for one of his patients.
Dr. Lin learned that his cancer was advancing rapidly. He felt pain in his spine and ribs, and his weight dropped. His doctor put him on a targeted therapy designed to attack the specific mutation driving his cancer. He also underwent chemotherapy, which caused nausea and sores in his mouth.
“Day in the life of a cancer patient,” he said in a video diary he began keeping after his diagnosis. “So I guess that’s what I’ve become. Rather than a dad or husband.”
After a few cycles of chemotherapy, his breathing and coughing began to improve, and scans showed drastic reductions in the cancer’s extent. He continued to see patients and teach, and he began to think about what to do with the time he had left.
The dying dialysis patient had written a letter because he wanted Dr. Lin to know he was appreciated. Dr. Lin had a couple of ambitions for his own message to his students. He liked to think that some of them, having taken his course, might go on to dedicate themselves to some aspect of cancer care. And he wanted them all to understand the humanity at the core of medicine.
The ‘Primary Care’ Model
Dr. Lin’s class met for about an hour each Wednesday. One week, he led a session on having difficult conversations, where he stressed that doctors should be honest enough to say “I don’t know” when necessary — an answer he had to accept as a patient amid the uncertainties of his own diagnosis.
In another class, he discussed how spirituality and religion help some patients cope with cancer. Though he isn’t religious, he shared that he found comfort in others’ offering to pray, chant or light a candle on his behalf.
And in a session on the psychological impact of cancer, Dr. Lin spoke about the disappointment he felt after a scan showed that some of his tumors had shrunk but hadn’t disappeared — because, deep down, he was still holding out hope for a miracle.
He taught the sessions using what he described as the “primary care” model. He was the initial point of contact, sharing how his cancer diagnosis had affected him, but he referred his students to specialists — guest speakers — when more exploration was needed.
One of his first guests was Dr. Natalie Lui, a thoracic surgeon and lung cancer expert. Standing before a set of slides, she placed Dr. Lin’s diagnosis within the broader context of lung cancer among nonsmokers, particularly in Asian populations.
“In the U.S., about 20 percent of people diagnosed with lung cancer never smoked,” she said. “But in Asian populations and Asian American populations, that could be really up to 80 percent in some racial and ethnic groups,” she added, with Chinese women especially likely to receive the diagnosis.
For a class on caregiving, Dr. Lin brought in Christine Chan, whom he introduced as “my wonderful wife.” The students, some in scrubs, had been chatting and laughing, but grew quiet as the session began. Chairs shifted closer, and one person stood to get a better view.
Like her husband, Ms. Chan softened difficult truths with a smile, meeting students’ eyes across the audience. She spoke to the students as though they were or would become caregivers themselves.
Ms. Chan said she had been overwhelmed at first, buried in medical terminology she didn’t understand. Wanting to give her husband the best chance at continued health, she tried cutting out sausages and red meat from his diet — but felt disappointed when he turned down some of the new foods she made. While she encouraged caregivers to lean on friends and family, she warned that coordinating well-meaning offers of help could become a task in itself.
An M.I.T. graduate and program manager at Google DeepMind, she acknowledged that letting go of her instinct to plan for the future had been difficult.
“We just have to go through it one day at a time,” she said. Dr. Lin nodded in agreement.
A Job Not Quite Finished
Watching Dr. Lin teach, I often wondered what his students, many in their late teens and early 20s, were thinking. What was it like for them to become attached to him as a professor, knowing his prognosis was so dire?
When I asked, some used the phrase “once-in-a-lifetime opportunity” to describe the course. Others saw Dr. Lin as brave and said that if they were in his position, they probably wouldn’t be teaching a class.
But a significant number of students said they were confused. They had signed up for the course expecting something more “existential,” as one student put it. They were prepared for a harrowing emotional experience. But, save for choking up during the first lecture, Dr. Lin remained steadfastly upbeat, even cracking jokes.
When his wife told the class about cleaning up his diet, he feigned alarm, saying, “I’m like, ‘I don’t eat this food!’” And when he quizzed his oncologist, another guest speaker, about what might come next for people who developed resistance to the drug he was taking, Dr. Lin quipped, “Asking for a friend!”
It was difficult for some students to reconcile this upbeat attitude with the severity of his diagnosis. Gideon Witchel, of Austin, Texas, was one. He was the 18-year-old freshman who had watched a recording of the first class from his dorm room. A spot had since opened up, and now he was enrolled.
When Mr. Witchel was 5 years old and his sister was 3, his mother, Danielle Witchel, was diagnosed with breast cancer, but he had never talked to her about it in depth. He had never been able to say, “Tell me the story of your cancer.” He was taking Dr. Lin’s class in hopes that it would help him start that conversation.
One of his strongest memories of his mother’s illness was of playing with her colorful scarves while she sat on the couch, bald. But looking back, he felt unsettled. The thought that she could have died was terrifying.
During the session on spirituality, the idea of control came up, and that gave Mr. Witchel the opening he needed to approach Dr. Lin. He lingered after class and asked the professor whether he had chosen to teach the class to regain a sense of control over his diagnosis.
Dr. Lin replied without hesitation: no. He said he tried not to dwell on what was out of his control. “I’m very conscious that I have limited time left,” he said. “So I think about that. How am I going to live my life today? Is this a worthwhile way to spend my time?”
The class, he said, was worthwhile. “Does that make sense?”
“It’s powerful,” Mr. Witchel said. “It’s impressive that you’re doing this.”
“You know, I think if I were 20, it would be different,” Dr. Lin responded. He said his work as a doctor had perhaps enabled him to cope faster than other people would. He asked again, “Does that make sense?”
Mr. Witchel nodded, and Dr. Lin smiled, this time with a shrug.
Sometimes, in private, Dr. Lin was less sanguine than he appeared in class. More than once, he told me, he looked back on time passing and thought, “Wow, that was a fast week.”
When he saw an older person, he was reminded that he probably wouldn’t live to be that age. What hurt was missing not the opportunity to grow old, but what growing older represented — the chance to attend his children’s graduations, to watch them grow up and start their own families. The expectation of spending his later years with his wife.
Dr. Lin and Ms. Chan had told their children about his diagnosis, but they weren’t sure the boys fully understood what it meant. It was hard to think of a man as dying when he looked as healthy as Dr. Lin did. “They think, Daddy can take care of everything, fix everything, solve everything,” Dr. Lin said.
He referred to the class as his letter to his students, but he had crafted an actual letter to his sons for them to read after he was gone.
“Whether I’m here or not, what I want you to know is that I love you,” he wrote. “Of the many things I’ve done that have given my life meaning, being your daddy is the greatest of all.”
The ‘Luckiest Man’
For the last class, held on a sunny day in December, Dr. Lin and his students met in a library at Stanford Hospital. The room was walled in with glass, offering a view of the foothills and flowering plants on the adjoining rooftop garden. Students spilled over from the designated seats into a computer cluster, and the librarian leaned against one of the sections of shelves to watch.
Near the end of the class, Dr. Lin stood at the front of the room, folding and unfolding a piece of paper where he had printed his closing remarks. It was time to finish his letter.
He gave what he called his version of Lou Gehrig’s farewell speech, referring to the Hall of Fame baseball player for the New York Yankees who died at 37 from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or A.L.S., an incurable neurological disease.
Dr. Lin unfolded the paper once more, this time all the way.
“For the past quarter, you’ve been hearing about the bad break I got,” he said, echoing parts of Gehrig’s address at Yankee Stadium. “Yet today, I consider myself the luckiest man on the face of this earth.”
With that, he choked up. “Sure, I’m lucky,” he said. He said he was lucky to have his two sons, who brought joy and laughter into his house. His teaching assistants, who made the course possible. The Stanford community, his colleagues and the people at the Asian health center. His students and residents. His patients. His friends. His parents. His wife.
“So I close in saying that I may have had a tough break, but I have an awful lot to live for,” he said. “Thank you. And it’s been an honor.”
It seemed clear that Dr. Lin had achieved at least some of his goals. When he asked whether students were thinking of careers in cancer care, about a third raised their hands. The ones planning to be doctors told me they would remember Dr. Lin’s story when seeking to understand their patients’ experience of illness.
But the class moved students in ways he hadn’t anticipated. I talked to several students who said they had advised their parents to get screened for lung cancer. A master’s student told me they were integrating vocabulary about lung cancer into the Mandarin class for medical trainees that they planned to help teach in the winter.
For Mr. Witchel, the effect of the quarter was more personal. He had finally talked to his mother about her cancer.
He told me his story as we sat at a table outside Tresidder Memorial Union, a student center in the heart of campus. His mother had come to visit him during the fall, and he had told her about Dr. Lin’s class and broached the subject with her. The class had removed the taboo from his thinking, and he was able to start talking without the discomfort he had once expected to feel.
He learned that she had something in common with Dr. Lin: letters.
During her illness, Ms. Witchel had written messages to family members and friends. Some wrestled with her uncertainty about whether she would survive, as well as the effect her diagnosis might have on her children. They became a way for her to process what she was experiencing and to connect with loved ones.
“There has been a shuttling back and forth between a very private experience and a very public experience and both have given me strength,” she wrote in one.
After she went into remission, she compiled the writings along with medical records, photographs and other documents into a book bound with ribbon. When Mr. Witchel returned home for Thanksgiving break, he sat down at the kitchen table with the book and his parents, his mother tucked between him and his father.
Together, they alternated between reading from the book and talking. They laughed and cried. For the first time, Mr. Witchel felt he was interacting with his mother as an adult.
In her letters, he heard echoes of Dr. Lin’s philosophy. In one passage, she wrote about the puzzles scattered throughout the waiting areas in the hospital where she received care. Difficult puzzles with hundreds of pieces that “no one person could possibly finish no matter how long the wait.”
Perhaps that was the point, she wrote. Not to finish, but to try.
Audio produced by Sarah Diamond.
Health
Heart disease threat projected to climb sharply for key demographic
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
A new report by the American Heart Association (AHA) included some troubling predictions for the future of women’s health.
The forecast, published in the journal Circulation on Wednesday, projected increases in various comorbidities in American females by 2050.
More than 59% of women were predicted to have high blood pressure, up from less than 49% currently.
The review also projected that more than 25% of women will have diabetes, compared to about 15% today, and more than 61% will have obesity, compared to 44% currently.
As a result of these risk factors, the prevalence of cardiovascular disease and stroke is expected to rise to 14.4% from 10.7%.
The prevalence of cardiovascular disease and stroke in women is expected to rise to 14.4% from 10.7% by 2050. (iStock)
Not all trends were negative, as unhealthy cholesterol prevalence is expected to drop to about 22% from more than 42% today, the report stated.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Dr. Elizabeth Klodas, a cardiologist and founder of Step One Foods in Minnesota, commented on these “jarring findings.”
“The fact that on our current trajectory, cardiometabolic disease is projected to explode in women within one generation should be a huge wake-up call,” she told Fox News Digital.
NEARLY 90% OF AMERICANS AT RISK OF SILENT DISEASE — HERE’S WHAT TO KNOW
“Hypertension, diabetes, obesity — these are all major risk factors for heart disease, and we are already seeing what those risks are driving. Heart disease is the No. 1 killer of women, eclipsing all other causes of death, including breast cancer.”
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death for women in the U.S. and around the world. (iStock)
Klodas warned that heart disease starts early, progresses “stealthily,” and can present “out of the blue in devastating ways.”
The AHA published another study on Thursday revealing one million hospitalizations, showing that heart attack deaths are climbing among adults below the age of 55.
The more alarming finding, according to Klodas, is that young women were found more likely to die after their first heart attack than men of the same age.
DOCTOR SHARES 3 SIMPLE CHANGES TO STAY HEALTHY AND INDEPENDENT AS YOU AGE
“This is all especially tragic since heart disease is almost entirely preventable,” she said. “The earlier you start, the better.”
Children can show early evidence of plaque deposition in their arteries, which can be reversed through lifestyle changes if “undertaken early enough and aggressively enough,” according to the expert.
Moving more is one part of protecting a healthy heart, according to experts. (iStock)
Klodas suggested that rising heart conditions are associated with traditional risk factors, like smoking, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, diabetes, obesity and a sedentary lifestyle.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES
Doctors are also seeing higher rates of preeclampsia, or high blood pressure during pregnancy, as well as gestational diabetes. Klodas noted that these are sex-specific risk factors that don’t typically contribute to complications until after menopause.
The best way to protect a healthy heart is to “do the basics,” Klodas recommended, including the following lifestyle habits.
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER
Klodas especially emphasized making improvements to diet, as the food people eat affects “every single risk factor that the AHA’s report highlights.”
“High blood pressure, high blood sugar, high cholesterol, excess weight – these are all conditions that are driven in part or in whole by food,” she said. “We eat multiple times every single day, which means what we eat has profound cumulative effects over time.”
“Even a small improvement in dietary intake, when maintained, can have a massive positive impact on health,” a doctor said. (iStock)
“Even a small improvement in dietary intake, when maintained, can have a massive positive impact on health.”
The doctor also recommends changing out a few snacks per day for healthier choices, which has been proven to “yield medication-level cholesterol reductions” in a month.
TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ
“Keep up that small change and, over the course of a year, you could also lose 20 pounds and reduce your sodium intake enough to avoid blood pressure-lowering medications,” Klodas added.
“Women should not view the AHA report as inevitable. We have power over our health destinies. We just need to use it.”
Health
Vanessa Williams, 62, Opens up About Weight Loss and HRT After Menopause
Use left and right arrow keys to navigate between menu items.
Use escape to exit the menu.
Sign Up
Create a free account to access exclusive content, play games, solve puzzles, test your pop-culture knowledge and receive special offers.
Already have an account? Login
Health
Common vision issue linked to type of lighting used in Americans’ homes
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Nearsightedness (myopia) is skyrocketing globally, with nearly half of the world’s population expected to be myopic by 2050, according to the World Health Organization.
Heavy use of smartphones and other devices is associated with an 80% higher risk of myopia when combined with excessive computer use, but a new study suggests that dim indoor lighting could also be a factor.
For years, scientists have been puzzled by the different ways myopia is triggered. In lab settings, it can be induced by blurring vision or using different lenses. Conversely, it can be slowed by something as simple as spending time outdoors, research suggests.
Nearsightedness occurs when the eyeball grows too long from front to back, according to the American Optometric Association (AOA). This physical elongation causes light to focus in front of the retina rather than directly on it, making distant objects appear blurry.
The study suggests that myopia isn’t caused by the digital devices themselves, but by the low-light environments where they are typically used. (iStock)
Researchers at the State University of New York (SUNY) College of Optometry identified a potential specific trigger for this growth. When someone looks at a phone or a book up close, the pupil naturally constricts.
COMMON VISION ISSUE COULD LEAD TO MISSED CANCER WARNING, STUDY FINDS
“In bright outdoor light, the pupil constricts to protect the eye while still allowing ample light to reach the retina,” Urusha Maharjan, a SUNY Optometry doctoral student who conducted the study, said in a press release.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
“When people focus on close objects indoors, such as phones, tablets or books, the pupil can also constrict — not because of brightness, but to sharpen the image,” she went on. “In dim lighting, this combination may significantly reduce retinal illumination.”
High-intensity natural light prevents myopia because it provides enough retinal stimulation to override the “stop growing” signal, even when pupils are constricted. (iStock)
The hypothesis suggests that when the retina is deprived of light during extended close-up work, it sends a signal for the eye to grow.
In a dim environment, the narrowed pupil allows so little light through that the retinal activity isn’t strong enough to signal the eye to stop growing, the researchers found.
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER
In contrast, being outdoors provides light levels much brighter than indoors. This ensures that even when the pupil narrows to focus on a nearby object, the retina still receives a strong signal, maintaining healthy eye development.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES
The team noted some limitations of the study, including the small subject group and the inability to directly measure internal lens changes, as the bright backgrounds used to mimic the outdoors made pupils too small for standard equipment.
Researchers believe that increasing indoor brightness during close-up work could be a simple, testable way to slow the global nearsightedness epidemic. (iStock)
“This is not a final answer,” Jose-Manuel Alonso, MD, PhD, SUNY distinguished professor and senior author of the study, said in the release.
TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ
“But the study offers a testable hypothesis that reframes how visual habits, lighting and eye focusing interact.”
The study was published in the journal Cell Reports.
-
World2 days agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Massachusetts2 days agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Montana1 week ago2026 MHSA Montana Wrestling State Championship Brackets And Results – FloWrestling
-
Oklahoma1 week agoWildfires rage in Oklahoma as thousands urged to evacuate a small city
-
Louisiana4 days agoWildfire near Gum Swamp Road in Livingston Parish now under control; more than 200 acres burned
-
Technology6 days agoYouTube TV billing scam emails are hitting inboxes
-
Denver, CO2 days ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Technology6 days agoStellantis is in a crisis of its own making