Health
Trying to Remove a Skin Tag at Home? Put Down the Clippers ASAP
Pores and skin tags are completely regular. These small, non-cancerous growths are likely to develop within the folds of your pores and skin (the place pores and skin cells rub collectively), and cling off the pores and skin like tiny balloons. They will seem at any age however are likely to kind extra regularly as we grow old. Whereas a few of us pay them no thoughts, many people need them gone.
There’s nothing incorrect with desirous to take away your pores and skin tags — however understanding the best means to take action is significant to sustaining the well being of your pores and skin. To reply your removing questions, we linked with Reid Maclellan, MD, Founder and CEO of Cortina and Morgana Colombo, MD, FAAD, and co-founder of Skintap. Right here’s what they suggested about at-home removing (and why you need to keep away from it!)
Is it secure to take away pores and skin tags at house?
Utilizing an at-home pores and skin tag removing equipment is tempting as a result of it’s the cheaper choice — nevertheless it’s additionally not the very best thought.
“I’d not suggest eradicating pores and skin tags at house,” says Dr. Maclellan. “There are issues that would worsen in case you take issues into your personal arms. It could seem to be a small pores and skin tag or not one thing too critical, however doing it your self may result in an infection — in case you don’t sterilize or conduct aftercare correctly — bleeding, and even scarring.”
Even worse, chances are you’ll by chance take away one thing that isn’t a pores and skin tag. “An untrained individual can mistakenly assume they’ve a benign pores and skin tag and as a substitute have an atypical or cancerous pores and skin lesion that’s then improperly eliminated,” provides Dr. Colombo. “[It] could later even probably metastasize to different elements of the physique and turn into a way more major problem.”
If somebody insists on at-home removing, are there any strategies or units that you just’d suggest?
“I’d not suggest it,” Dr. Maclellan says merely. “Go to a trusted doctor to take away your pores and skin tags.”
“I don’t assist at-home removing,” Dr. Colombo confirms.
The underside line? No pores and skin tag remover, be it a freezing serum or needle-like pen, is secure to make use of at house. Actually, the Meals and Drug Administration (FDA) issued warning letters this month to Amazon, Ariella Naturals, and Justified Laboratories for promoting medicine for pores and skin tag and mole removing. The FDA argued that these corporations are promoting removing merchandise that haven’t been evaluated by the FDA, though they require the company’s approval.
How will a medical skilled take away a pores and skin tag?
“For smaller pores and skin tags, knowledgeable would most definitely domestically anesthetize the world with a topical ointment after which excise the pores and skin tag on the base,” Dr. Maclellan says. “For bigger pores and skin tags, different strategies like cryotherapy or electrocauterization could also be used. Typically these strategies could cause hyperpigmentation although.”
Cryotherapy entails utilizing an excessive supply of chilly to freeze and take away irregular pores and skin tissue. Electrocauterization is a type of surgical procedure that makes use of {an electrical} present to burn or destroy pores and skin tissue. “Electrocautery [and] cryotherapy are sometimes the least costly strategies of pores and skin tag removing,” Dr. Colombo says.
Prices will fluctuate relying on the supplier, although one supply estimates that pores and skin tag removing prices $150 or much less. “If eradicating a pores and skin tag is medically needed (getting in the best way of your every day life) then insurance coverage could cowl the removing,” Dr. Maclellan notes. “In any other case, you’ll have to pay out of pocket.”
Whether or not you resolve to take away your pores and skin tags or not, keep in mind that security comes first. A product that’s marketed on-line as a “secure choice” could not really be secure!
Health
Childhood Vaccination Rates Were Falling Even Before the Rise of R.F.K. Jr.
After years of holding steady, American vaccination rates against once-common childhood diseases have been dropping.
Nationwide, the rate of kindergartners with complete records for the measles vaccine declined from around 95 percent before the pandemic to under 93 percent last year, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Immunization rates against polio, whooping cough and chickenpox fell similarly.
Average rates remain high, but those national figures mask far more precipitous drops in some states, counties and school districts.
In those areas, falling vaccination rates are creating new pockets of students no longer protected by herd immunity, the range considered high enough to stop an outbreak. For a community, an outbreak can be extremely disruptive. For children, measles and other once-common childhood diseases can lead to hospitalization and life-threatening complications.
Immunization rates fell in most states early in the pandemic, and continued to fall in the years that followed.
States, not the federal government, create and enforce their own vaccine mandates, but the incoming Trump administration could encourage anti-vaccine sentiment and undermine state programs. The president-elect’s nominee for health secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., has spread the false theory that vaccines cause autism, among other misinformation.
But immunization rates had been falling for years before Mr. Kennedy’s recent political rise.
There are now an estimated 280,000 kindergartners without documented vaccination against measles, an increase of some 100,000 children from before the pandemic.
“These pockets are just waiting for an introduction of measles,” said Dr. William Schaffner, an infectious disease specialist at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. “It’s trouble waiting to happen.”
Why rates are falling
As the pandemic strained trust in the country’s public health system, more families of kindergartners formally opted out of routine vaccines, citing medical, philosophical or religious reasons. Others simply didn’t submit proof of a complete vaccination series, for any number of reasons, falling into noncompliance.
The shifts in exemptions mostly fall along political lines. In states that supported Mr. Trump for president in November, the number of students with official exemptions have increased on average (rising everywhere but West Virginia). Exemption rates rose in a few states that supported Vice President Kamala Harris — including Oregon, New Jersey and Minnesota — but stayed relatively flat or fell in most.
The pattern for noncompliance looks different: The rate of children with no vaccination record shot up in both red and blue states.
Not all children with missing records are unvaccinated. Some are in the process of getting their shots, delayed because of the pandemic, and others just never submitted documentation. Schools are supposed to bar out-of-compliance students from attending, but whether they do varies from state to state and school to school.
Surveys reveal a new and deep partisan division on this issue. In 2019, 67 percent of Democrats and Democratic leaners told Gallup that childhood immunizations were “extremely important,” compared with 52 percent of their Republican counterparts. Five years later, the enthusiasm among the Democratic grouping had fallen slightly to 63 percent. For Republicans and G.O.P. leaners it had plunged to 26 percent.
Today, 31 percent of Republicans say “vaccines are more dangerous than the diseases they were designed to protect.” Just 5 percent of Democrats say the same.
“There seems to be a divide in terms of people’s feelings about science and skepticism towards the government,” said Dr. Natasha Bagdasarian, chief medical executive for Michigan. “I think some of those divisions are becoming apparent in vaccination rates.”
Lawmakers in numerous states have tried to roll back school vaccine mandates, but most changes have been minor: Louisiana required schools to pair any mandate notifications with information about exemption laws; Idaho allowed 18-year-old students to exempt themselves; and Montana stopped collecting data from schools on immunizations.
But there are a few places where state-level policy changes, or lack thereof, appear to have had a direct effect on rates.
In Mississippi, which had long held the country’s highest kindergarten measles vaccination rate, a federal judge ordered the state to allow religious objections; the state’s vaccination rate fell. In contrast, West Virginia’s governor vetoed a bill that would have loosened school vaccine policy; the state now has the highest rate.
Rates rose in Maine and Connecticut, two states that eliminated nonmedical exemptions during the pandemic. They also rose in Alabama, according to C.D.C. data, though the state declined to comment on why.
Vulnerable pockets
Epidemiologists say that when vaccination rates slip under 90 percent for measles, outbreaks become significantly harder to contain. At some point below that, spread becomes almost inevitable if measles is introduced.
There are thousands more schools with vaccination rates below 90 percent compared with just five years ago, according to a New York Times analysis of detailed data from 22 states.
Schools with falling rates can be found in red and blue states, in large urban districts and in small rural ones.
Measles vaccination rates dropped from 83 percent to 75 percent in Yavapai County in Arizona; from 93 percent to 78 percent in Pacific County on the coastline of Washington; from 97 percent to 93 percent in Union County, N.J., just outside New York City — places that span the political spectrum.
These numbers capture vaccination rates only for kindergartners, often partway through the school year, so they include students who may have finished their vaccine series later or will go on to finish it. And across the U.S., most students remain protected against childhood diseases.
But high rates nationally don’t help places no longer protected by herd immunity, as evidenced by recent outbreaks of childhood diseases. Measles and whooping cough cases both climbed last year; polio partly paralyzed a man in New York in 2022.
Growing anti-vaccine sentiment is only part of the public health challenge. In the Minneapolis public schools, completion rates for the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine among kindergartners dropped from around 90 percent to 75 percent. The district’s exemption rate barely moved; instead, far more students had incomplete vaccination records.
Few of those students’ families are strongly anti-vaccine, said Luisa Pessoa-Brandao, director of public health initiatives with the Minneapolis Health Department. Some are immigrants who moved into the district recently, missing either shots or records. Others missed regular doctor visits during the pandemic and got out of the habit of preventative care.
“I think we’re going to be catching up for a while,” Ms. Pessoa-Brandao said.
While vaccination rates were dropping in Minneapolis, they climbed in neighboring St. Paul Public Schools, from around 91.4 percent to around 93 percent, according to state data.
The district attributed the rise to strict new procedures started in 2021, including letters and phone calls to families in their native languages; more vaccines available on district grounds; and monthly compliance reports — an extra mile that not every district is able or willing to go.
There are still parents who opt out. But during a measles outbreak last year, a few changed their mind, said Rebecca Schmidt, the St. Paul district’s director of health and wellness.
“The fear of measles,” she said, “is sometimes greater than the ease” of getting an exemption.
Data for all 50 states
Health
How wildfire smoke affects the body: Doctors warn of health hazards
The Los Angeles wildfires have caused devastating losses of homes and lives — and survivors may also face hidden, although still potentially very dangerous, health effects.
Wildfire smoke contains a “complex mixture” of fine particles that can pose hazards after just short-term exposure, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Known as PM2.5, or particulate matter, these microscopic particles and droplets are 2.5 micrometers or less in diameter.
CALIFORNIA WILDFIRES: NAVY VETERAN AND MOTHER SHARES HEART-WRENCHING EVACUATION FROM HER HOME AND COMMUNITY
“Your nose and mouth are entry points into your body,” Dr. Gustavo Ferrer, a Florida pulmonologist with extensive experience in respiratory health and air quality-related illnesses, told Fox News Digital.
“The smoke you are breathing gets caught inside your sinuses, and if you’re exposed a lot, some of that will start to irritate the lining and lead to inflammation,” he warned.
“These are signs that the pollution may be overwhelming the body’s natural defenses.”
Austin Perlmutter, MD, a board-certified internal medicine physician in Seattle, noted that exposure to wildfire smoke can penetrate through the lung tissue and enter the bloodstream.
Specific health effects
People exposed to air pollution can have a number of different symptoms, including burning eyes, sore throat, cough, sinus problems, fatigue, headaches, chest pain, shortness of breath and brain fog, according to Perlmutter.
Prolonged exposure to wildfire smoke can also aggravate existing conditions such as asthma, bronchitis and other chronic respiratory diseases, Ferrer noted.
CALIFORNIA FIRES AND MENTAL HEALTH TOLL: CELEBRITIES AND THERAPISTS OFFER TIPS
“The smoke can also worsen pre-existing respiratory conditions, like asthma or emphysema,” noted Dr. Marc Siegel, clinical professor of medicine at NYU Langone Health and Fox News senior medical analyst.
“Also, not having enough oxygen can provoke a heart attack or stroke.”
Wildfire smoke has also been linked to an increased risk of a number of diseases, including heart and lung problems and brain dysfunction, Perlmutter added.
Certain groups are at a higher risk, he cautioned, including people with underlying heart and lung diseases or other existing chronic diseases, as well as infants, young children and older adults.
“The smoke can worsen pre-existing respiratory conditions, like asthma or emphysema.”
There are also mental health effects, according to Siegel.
A 10-year study in Nature Mental Health showed a “significant mental health impact” on Californians exposed to wildfires, the doctor pointed out.
“People may feel anxiety over being displaced or fear of losing their homes,” Siegel said. “This may lead to them being unable to sleep.”
There is also the increased danger of falls and other injuries from being in damaged areas where fire-related devastation occurred, he added.
6 tips to protect health amid wildfires
Experts shared the following steps people can take to help reduce the risk of wildfire health effects.
1. Practice nasal hygiene
Keeping your nasal passages open and clean is essential, Ferrer emphasized.
“Washing daily, or up to two times a day or regularly, using a saline nasal spray can help clean the filter that’s inside your nose so it’s as effective as possible,” he told Fox News Digital.
People can use a pre-made saline solution or make their own at home with distilled water and salt, he said.
2. Stay indoors and optimize indoor air
During periods of high smoke levels, it’s best to limit time outdoors and keep windows and doors closed, according to Ferrer.
Using HEPA filters can also help to improve air quality, Shah noted.
“Invest in air purifiers with HEPA filters to trap fine particulate matter (PM2.5) from wildfire smoke,” he suggested.
Shah also recommends using weather stripping where needed and changing HVAC filters at a higher frequency.
People may also want to minimize “indoor air pollution,” Perlmutter added.
“Don’t light candles, fires or incense and don’t smoke indoors,” he advised. “If you cook, ventilate using a hood if you have one.”
3. Consider leaving the area temporarily
During the first few months of cleanup, excess chemicals and particulates that are released can significantly worsen air quality, warned Dr. Darshan Shah, MD, a board-certified surgeon and founder and CEO of Next Health in California.
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER
“Consider relocating temporarily to a safer area until conditions improve,” he recommended.
4. Wear a mask
When venturing outside, experts recommend wearing a well-fitting N95 respirator mask to filter out smoke particles.
“Cloth masks, dust masks and other lower quality masks likely won’t provide much protection,” Perlmutter said.
5. Monitor air quality
Experts recommend regularly checking the AQI (Air Quality Index).
“Use apps or websites (like AirNow) to monitor air quality and avoid outdoor activities when AQI is unhealthy,” Shah said.
For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health
6. Do not tour burned areas
“Avoid visiting recently burned areas, as they pose a high risk of exposure to harmful chemicals and smoldering smoke, which can severely impact respiratory and overall health,” Shah advised.
Health
How The Great British Bake Off Host Alison Hammond Lost 150 Lbs Naturally
Sign Up
Create a free account to access exclusive content, play games, solve puzzles, test your pop-culture knowledge and receive special offers.
Already have an account? Login
Use left and right arrow keys to navigate between menu items.
Use escape to exit the menu.
-
Politics1 week ago
Who Are the Recipients of the Presidential Medal of Freedom?
-
Health1 week ago
Ozempic ‘microdosing’ is the new weight-loss trend: Should you try it?
-
Technology4 days ago
Meta is highlighting a splintering global approach to online speech
-
News1 week ago
Seeking to heal the country, Jimmy Carter pardoned men who evaded the Vietnam War draft
-
Science2 days ago
Metro will offer free rides in L.A. through Sunday due to fires
-
News1 week ago
Trump Has Reeled in More Than $200 Million Since Election Day
-
Movie Reviews6 days ago
‘How to Make Millions Before Grandma Dies’ Review: Thai Oscar Entry Is a Disarmingly Sentimental Tear-Jerker
-
Technology6 days ago
Las Vegas police release ChatGPT logs from the suspect in the Cybertruck explosion