Connect with us

Finance

What to know about George Santos and his campaign finance issues as questions grow | CNN Politics

Published

on

What to know about George Santos and his campaign finance issues as questions grow | CNN Politics



CNN
 — 

Rep. George Santos started his third week as a congressman with an array of questions nonetheless swirling across the New York Republican’s private and marketing campaign funds.

He ended the week with much more unanswered questions – after his marketing campaign submitted a raft of modifications to federal election regulators, together with showing to put in a brand new marketing campaign treasurer with out that individual’s permission.

“I can’t consider one other instance (of a marketing campaign) that has introduced such all kinds of authorized issues,” mentioned Erin Chlopak, senior director of marketing campaign finance on the watchdog group Marketing campaign Authorized Middle and a former lawyer with the Federal Election Fee. “I really feel just like the George Santos saga is sort of a marketing campaign finance legislation faculty course, multi function.”

Santos, who faces a number of investigations about his funds and lies about his biography and resume, repeatedly refused to reply to reporters’ inquiries about his filings and funds this week – saying at one level that he doesn’t “contact” FEC reviews.

Advertisement

Leaving his workplace Friday morning on Capitol Hill, Santos advised a reporter that he would put collectively a information convention “quickly” to “deal with the whole lot.”

“We’ll provide you with all of the solutions to the whole lot you’re asking for,” he mentioned.

Santos’ private lawyer Joe Murray declined to remark when reached by CNN this week. “In gentle of all of the complaints which were filed, it will simply be inappropriate to debate something about it,” he mentioned.

Santos’ longtime marketing campaign treasurer Nancy Marks has not responded to a number of inquiries from CNN.

Right here’s what you must know concerning the newest developments:

Advertisement

As of Friday afternoon, it was not clear who serves as treasurer of the Santos marketing campaign – the individual accountable for submitting disclosure reviews with the FEC, authorizing spending and guaranteeing that the marketing campaign complies with federal marketing campaign finance legal guidelines.

Earlier this week, Santos’ marketing campaign filed paperwork putting in Thomas Datwyler, a Wisconsin-based political marketing consultant, as the brand new treasurer of his marketing campaign and a number of other Santos-aligned political committees.

However in a press release Wednesday, Datwyler’s lawyer mentioned that his shopper had turned down the treasurer’s place and that the marketing campaign had filed the paperwork with out Datwyler’s authorization.

Marketing campaign finance specialists say solely somebody with entry to the marketing campaign committee’s login credentials can file digital amendments with the FEC.

Derek Ross, Datwyler’s legal professional, advised CNN that company officers mentioned they had been conscious of the state of affairs and despatched letters to Datwyler on Friday to “verify the authenticity and accuracy of the varied filings.”

Advertisement

Datwyler’s crew has responded, “notifying the FEC that the filings are unauthorized and Mr. Datwyler needs to be eliminated as treasurer,” Ross mentioned.

Santos, like all congressional candidates, faces a looming Tuesday deadline to file new reviews with the FEC that element his fundraising and spending through the closing weeks of 2022.

Santos this week additionally filed a slew of amended reviews with the FEC that solely added to the confusion concerning the supply of the loans he has mentioned he made to his marketing campaign.

In some filings, the marketing campaign didn’t test bins denoting that two six-figure loans got here from the candidate’s private funds.

Marketing campaign finance specialists say it’s laborious to inform whether or not the unmarked bins amounted to little greater than sloppy bookkeeping or level to one thing extra severe. Over the course of his marketing campaign, Santos’ reviews have provided inconsistent details about the loans.

Advertisement

However how Santos achieved the monetary windfall to offer greater than $700,000 in loans to his profitable 2022 marketing campaign has been a central query ever for the reason that 34-year-old flipped a Lengthy Island-based Home seat in November, serving to Republicans safe their slim majority within the chamber.

Throughout his unsuccessful 2020 marketing campaign for the Home, he reported a wage of $55,000 and no property in his candidate filings to Congress.

Two years later, Santos reported a $750,000 wage from the Devolder Group, which he mentioned had earned between $1,000,001 and $5 million in revenue the earlier yr. He additionally reported proudly owning an residence in Rio De Janeiro, a checking account valued at between $100,001 and $250,000, and a financial savings account price between $1,000,001 and $5 million.

For weeks, Santos has confronted questions concerning the dozens of bills his marketing campaign has reported at precisely $199.99, one cent beneath the brink above which the marketing campaign is required to retain receipts.

The Marketing campaign Authorized Middle has filed a grievance with the FEC that describes the disbursements as “odd and seemingly not possible.” It notes that one of many $199.99 bills was presupposed to be for a “lodge keep” on the luxurious W Lodge South Seashore in Florida in October 2021, the place the lowest-price room usually would have price greater than $700.

Advertisement

However The Washington Publish first reported this week that Santos’ marketing campaign briefly reported in an earlier submission to the FEC a raft of further just-under-$200 bills – however described each the recipients and goal of the disbursements as “nameless.”

These nameless entries later had been eliminated in revised filings.

Clopak of the Marketing campaign Authorized Middle mentioned these entries simply add to the cloud surrounding Santos’ marketing campaign.

“We’ve marketing campaign finance disclosure legal guidelines to serve to make sure numerous pursuits,” she mentioned. “One of many issues is to guarantee that voters are knowledgeable concerning the sources of … the cash that they spend and what they spend it on.”

“When folks file reviews indicating that the recipients of their marketing campaign spending is ‘nameless,’ that defeats the very goal of these transparency legal guidelines,” Clopak mentioned.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Finance

US SEC obtained record financial remedies in fiscal 2024, agency says

Published

on

US SEC obtained record financial remedies in fiscal 2024, agency says

NEW YORK (Reuters) -The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission obtained $8.2 billion in financial remedies, the highest amount in its history, in fiscal 2024, the agency said in a statement on Friday.

The SEC filed 583 enforcement actions in the year that ended in September, down 26% from a year earlier, it said in a statement.

The $8.2 billion in financial remedies included $6.1 billion in disgorgement and prejudgment interest, a record, and $2.1 billion in civil penalties, the second-highest amount on record, according to the SEC’s statement.

Much of the total financial remedies came from a single action: a $4.5 billion settlement with the now-bankrupt crypto firm Terraform Labs, following a unanimous jury verdict against the firm and its founder Do Kwon. The SEC is expected to collect little of that settlement amount because it agreed to be paid only after Terraform satisfies crypto loss claims as part of its bankruptcy wind-down.

The SEC also obtained orders barring 124 individuals from serving as officers and directors of public companies, the second-highest number of such prohibitions in a decade. Holding individuals accountable for misconduct has been a priority of the agency under Chair Gary Gensler, who is stepping down in January.

Advertisement

“The Division of Enforcement is a steadfast cop on the beat, following the facts and the law wherever they lead to hold wrongdoers accountable,” Gensler said in a statement about the agency’s 2024 enforcement results.

(Reporting by Chris Prentice; Editing by Leslie Adler and Jonathan Oatis)

Continue Reading

Finance

Cop29: $250bn climate finance offer from rich world an insult, critics say

Published

on

Cop29: 0bn climate finance offer from rich world an insult, critics say

Developing countries have reacted angrily to an offer of $250bn in finance from the rich world – considerably less than they are demanding – to help them tackle the climate crisis.

The offer was contained in the draft text of an agreement published on Friday afternoon at the Cop29 climate summit in Azerbaijan, where talks are likely to carry on past a 6pm deadline.

Juan Carlos Monterrey Gómez, Panama’s climate envoy, told the Guardian: “This is definitely not enough. What we need is at least $5tn a year, but what we have asked for is just $1.3tn. That is 1% of global GDP. That should not be too much when you’re talking about saving the planet we all live on.”

He said $250bn divided among all the developing countries in need amounted to very little. “It comes to nothing when you split it. We have bills in the billions to pay after droughts and flooding. What the heck will $250bn do? It won’t put us on a path to 1.5C. More like 3C.”

According to the new text of a deal, developing countries would receive a total of at least $1.3tn a year in climate finance by 2035, which is in line with the demands most submitted before this two-week conference. That would be made up of the $250bn from developed countries, plus other sources of finance including private investment.

Advertisement

Poor nations wanted much more of the headline finance to come directly from rich countries, preferably in the form of grants rather than loans.

Civil society groups criticised the offer, variously describing it as “a joke”, “an embarrassment”, “an insult”, and the global north “playing poker with people’s lives”.

Mohamed Adow, a co-founder of Power Shift Africa, a thinktank, said: “Our expectations were low, but this is a slap in the face. No developing country will fall for this. It’s not clear what kind of trick the presidency is trying to pull. They’ve already disappointed everyone, but they have now angered and offended the developing world.”

The $250bn figure is significantly lower than the $300bn-a-year offer that some developed countries were mulling at the talks, to the Guardian’s knowledge.

The offer from developed countries, funded from their national budgets and overseas aid, is supposed to form the inner core of a “layered” finance settlement, accompanied by a middle layer of new forms of finance such as new taxes on fossil fuels and high-carbon activities, carbon trading and “innovative” forms of finance; and an outermost layer of investment from the private sector, into projects such as solar and windfarms.

Advertisement

These layers would add up to $1.3tn a year, which is the amount that economists have calculated is needed in external finance for developing countries to tackle the climate crisis. Many activists have demanded more: figures of $5tn or $7tn a year have been put forward by some groups, based on the historical responsibilities of developed countries for causing the climate crisis.

skip past newsletter promotion

This latest text is the second from an increasingly embattled Cop presidency. Azerbaijan was widely criticised for its first draft on Thursday.

Advertisement

There will now be further negotiations among countries and possibly a new or several new iterations of this draft text.

Avinash Persaud, a former adviser to the Barbados prime minister, Mia Mottley, and now an adviser to the president of the Inter-American Bank, said: “There is no deal to come out of Baku that will not leave a bad taste in everyone’s mouth, but we are within sight of a landing zone for the first time all year.”

Continue Reading

Finance

US Treasury Selects BNY as Financial Agent for Direct Express Program | PYMNTS.com

Published

on

US Treasury Selects BNY as Financial Agent for Direct Express Program | PYMNTS.com

The Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) will serve as the financial agent for the Direct Express program, which provides 3.4 million Americans with a prepaid debit card to receive monthly federal benefits.

The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Bureau of the Fiscal Service said in a Thursday (Nov. 21) press release that it selected BNY for this role after evaluating proposals from multiple financial institutions and seeing the bank’s offering of features and customer service options.

The new agreement will begin Jan. 3 and will last five years, according to the release.

“Since 2008, the Direct Express program has paid federal beneficiaries seamlessly, inclusively and securely, while sparing taxpayers and customers the costs and risk associated with cashing paper checks,Fiscal Service Commissioner Tim Gribben said in the release.This new agreement will further our goals of delivering a modern customer experience and strengthening Treasury’s commitment to paying the right person, in the right amount, at the right time.”

With this agreement, BNY will add to the cardholder experience features like online/digital funds access, bill pay, cardless ATM access, omnichannel chat and text customer service, online dispute filing and in-person authentication options, the bank said in a Thursday press release.

Advertisement

“Drawing on our leading platform capabilities, we look forward to advancing the program’s goal of providing high-quality financial services to individuals and communities throughout the U.S.,Jennifer Barker, global head of treasury services and depositary receipts at BNY, said in the release.

Seventy-seven percent of the recipients of disbursements opt for instant payments when given the option, according to the PYMNTS Intelligence and Ingo Payments collaboration,Measuring Consumers’ Growing Interest in Instant Payouts.”

That’s because consumers looking for disbursements — paychecks, government payments, insurance settlements, investment earnings — want their money quickly, the report found.

In October, the Treasury Department credited the Office of Payment Integrity, within the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, with enhancing its fraud prevention capabilities and expanding offerings to new and existing customers.

The department said itstechnology and data-driven” approach allowed it to prevent and recover more than $4 billion in fraud and improper payments, up from $652 million in 2023.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending