Connect with us

Finance

These 3 Numbers Show Why It’s Likely for XRP to Hit $3 and Beyond | The Motley Fool

Published

on

These 3 Numbers Show Why It’s Likely for XRP to Hit  and Beyond | The Motley Fool

XRP was above $3 in 2025, and it might soon be once again.

Can XRP (XRP 3.09%) hit $3 sometime in the next 18 months, given that its price is near $1.80 today?

I think it’s more likely to happen than not, barring any major market hiccup. There are three numbers in particular that each count as a reason.

Image source: Getty Images.

These numbers outline XRP’s paths to adoption

The first number, 10 drops, is denominated in a unit you’re probably not familiar with. It’s the XRP Ledger’s (XRPL’s) typical base transaction fee, and it’s equal to 0.00001 XRP per transaction. So even if XRP’s price reached $3, that fee would still be just $0.00003 — you and pretty much anyone else can afford to pay that fee over and over, and it will never add up to be more than a negligible amount.

Advertisement

In fact, its fees are so cheap that they’re usually lower than other dirt cheap chains, like Solana. In other words, for financial institutions that want to move money inexpensively, the network is a great choice for their needs, and if they decide to use it, they will first need to park that money on the XRPL, buying up some XRP in the process to use as working capital.

XRP Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(-3.09%) $-0.05

Current Price

$1.65

The second number is also an important one for attracting financial institutions to the network, and it’s 1 XRP. The XRP Ledger requires a base reserve of 1 XRP in a wallet address, so there’s a small amount that must remain locked to reduce spam. This reserve is not a toll, but it does encourage adoption, as new users do not need to prefund much of anything in their wallet to get started, and users who might need many hundreds (or even tens of thousands) of different wallets won’t find the start-up costs to be prohibitive.

The third number is denominated in dollars, and it’s $45. That’s a common fee that people need to pay for an outgoing international wire transfer at a major U.S. bank. With a price that high, sending small amounts is a nonstarter, which likely prevents a lot of transfers that might lead to economic activity.

Using XRP slashes that cost to practically nothing, and it also ensures that the transaction takes moments instead of days.

Advertisement

How these numbers could eventually add up to $3

Obviously, these three numbers aren’t new in XRP’s history, nor do they guarantee that its price will go to $3. They’re just pieces of proof that the network will have an edge in getting financial institutions to use it to manage their tokenized assets and transfer money internationally.

For these to translate into a higher coin price, there needs to be actual adoption that creates more usage of the chain, which itself needs to lead to more demand for holding XRP. Ripple, the company that issues XRP, is hard at work driving that adoption by developing new capabilities for the XRPL, and interlinking its set of financial services to it. For instance, it now issues a stablecoin native to the XRPL, which creates a capital base that institutional investors can tap for liquidity using one of Ripple’s services.

All Ripple’s efforts benefit from the fact that cheaper movement of capital using XRP lowers the threshold for experimentation. When paired with its commitment to developing its on-chain capital base, more users will arrive seeking to tap that capital, and with them, more demand for XRP as a transactional asset and as a liquidity tool. This investment thesis is playing the long game, as accumulating the capital base needed to attract the biggest financial companies will take quite a while.

So, is getting to $3 likely? If the network’s adoption keeps compounding and attracts sustained usage, these numbers support the claim that XRP has a cost advantage big enough to thrive. Just don’t expect it to happen immediately because there are a lot of other factors affecting the coin’s price that could make the path slower.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Finance

Stamford Finance Students Wow Judges, Take Home Trophy in Regional CFA Competition – UConn Today

Published

on

Stamford Finance Students Wow Judges, Take Home Trophy in Regional CFA Competition – UConn Today

A tenacious team of finance majors, who sacrificed most of their winter break to prepare for the CFA Institute Research Challenge, took first place in that regional competition last week.

Students Hunter Baillargeon, Dylan Fischetto, Richard Opper, Philip Ochocinski and Rushit Chauhan were tasked with researching and analyzing a major utility company, and then producing a 10-page report about whether to buy, hold, or sell its stock. They chose to sell.

One of the CFA judges said both the team’s report and presentation were among the best he had seen in many years.

“As a team, we were thrilled our hard work paid off and our many hours of work allowed us to achieve what we did,’’ Baillargeon said. “What we accomplished couldn’t have been done without working with such a cohesive and collective unit.’’

“From a technical perspective, I realize how valuable true analysis is and the importance of looking where others don’t for a differentiated approach,’’ Baillargeon said.

Advertisement

The first round of competition featured 24 college teams from the Stamford-Hartford-Providence region. The Stamford team, composed of seniors all of whom all participate in UConn’s Student Managed Fund program, received its first-place award Feb. 26 in a ceremony in Hartford. The team will advance to the East Coast competition later this month.

Stamford Finance Program is Robust

“The Stamford team’s advancement in this competition reflects not only the students’ exceptional talent and work ethic, but also the rigor and applied focus of the UConn finance curriculum,’’ said professor Yiming Qian, head of the Finance Department.

“Our Stamford campus hosts approximately 200 financial management majors. The Stamford program is a vital part of the School and continues to demonstrate outstanding strength,” she said.

Professors Steve Wilson and Jeff Bianchi, who combined have 75 years of experience in the investment industry, were the team’s advisers and were supported by academic director Katherine Pancak.

Wilson said the task of analyzing a utility is particularly complex because of the company’s structure and the regulatory environment in which it operates.

Advertisement

“I believe the Stamford team stood out because of the depth of their research, and willingness to take a bold stand, including the decision to ‘go out on a limb’ and recommend selling the stock,’’ he said. “They didn’t ‘play it safe.’’’

“This clean-sweep was a true team effort. They were tireless throughout, and sleepless too often, but they never wavered from their desire to always dig deeper and uncover any information that would strengthen our investment case,’’ he said. “What a phenomenal job they did!’’

Competition in Hong Kong Is Ultimate Goal

The Stamford team will compete against Loyola, Canisius, Sacred Heart; Seton Hall, Villanova, St. Michaels, Western New England, University of Maine, Fordham and Penn State next. In total, some 8,000 students are expected to participate in various competitions worldwide, culminating in a championship round in Hong Kong in May.

Wilson said the financial industry is always welcoming of new talent. And when one of the judges told him that the Stamford team produced some of the best work that he’d seen in years, Wilson felt tremendous pride for the students.

“Finance is an open playing field. In investments, the best idea wins,’’ he said.

Advertisement

Baillargeon said he will always appreciate the whole team’s dedication.

“What I’ll remember most is the help of our advisers and our cohesive, close-knit team where everyone pulled their weight,’’ Baillargeon said. “We put in long hours, did a tremendous amount of research, and collaborated well together. I hope when I enter the workforce I get to work with a team as committed as this one is.’’

Continue Reading

Finance

Board Advances Motion to Address LAHSA’s Failure to Pay Service Providers – Supervisor Lindsey P. Horvath

Published

on

Board Advances Motion to Address LAHSA’s Failure to Pay Service Providers – Supervisor Lindsey P. Horvath



Board Advances Motion to Address LAHSA’s Failure to Pay Service Providers – Supervisor Lindsey P. Horvath
















Advertisement





Advertisement







Advertisement

Advertisement

Board Advances Motion to Address LAHSA’s Failure to Pay Service Providers


Board Advances Motion to Address LAHSA’s Failure to Pay Service Providers


1024
888



Supervisor Lindsey P. Horvath







Advertisement



Advertisement

Continue Reading

Finance

How “impact accounting” can integrate sustainability with finance

Published

on

How “impact accounting” can integrate sustainability with finance

Around three years ago, Charles Giancarlo, CEO of data platform Pure Storage, came back from Davos and asked his sustainability team to look into an idea he’d encountered at the meeting: Impact accounting, a method for integrating emissions and other externalities into company balance sheets. 

The idea had been slowly picking up adherents in Europe for around a decade, but Pure Storage, which rebranded this month to Everpure, would go on to become the first U.S. company to join the Value Balancing Alliance (VBA), a group of 30 or so companies developing the approach. Trellis checked in last week with Everpure and the VBA for an update.

How does impact accounting work?

At the heart of the approach are a set of “valuation factors,” developed by third-party experts, that are used to convert activity data for emissions, water use, air pollution and other externalities into dollar figures that can be integrated into balance sheets. In the case of emissions, for example, the VBA uses $220 per ton of carbon dioxide equivalent, a figure based on the estimated social impact of rising greenhouse gases levels. 

At Everpure, one long-term goal is to have cost centers be aware of the dollar impact of relevant externalities. After an initial focus on identifying and collecting the most material data, the team is now rolling out a dashboard containing several years of impact accounting numbers.

“It’s catered to different personas,” explained Adrienne Uphoff, Everpure’s ESG regulations and impact accounting manager. Finance was an initial use case, with product managers also on the roadmap. “You can compare it to financial numbers to really understand the impact intensity.”

Advertisement

What value does the approach bring?

“The essence of impact accounting is that you’re translating all these different metrics in the sustainability space into the language the decision makers understand,” said Christian Heller, the VBA’s CEO. “Everyone understands what you’re talking about, and you get a sense of the magnitude of your impact and the risks and opportunities.”

This has allowed Everpure to calculate what Uphoff called the “environmental costs of goods sold” and to estimate the impact of circular strategies, such as refurbishing hardware. The analysis reveals “impact savings across the full value chain across five different environmental topics all in a single dollar unit,” she said. 

Analyses like that can then be shared with customers and used to distinguish Everpure from competitors. “The long-term winners in this space are going to be those that can perform against sustainability goals,” said Kathy Mulvany, Everpure’s global head of sustainability. “Impact accounting gives us a way to bring comparability, so companies can understand how they’re truly stacking up.”

What does it take to implement impact accounting?

A great deal of technical work goes into creating valuation factors, but the system is designed so that outside experts create the numbers and hand them to sustainability professionals for use. Still, not every company will have the in-house environmental data that is also needed. Many companies have been collecting emissions data for five years or more, for example, but detailed datasets for water use are less common.

Internal teams also need to be familiar with the concepts. “One of the key learnings from our impact accounting implementation is that the socialization curve is longer than you expect,” said Uphoff. “Attaching monetary values on externalities introduces new metrics and mental models, and that can naturally make people a little nervous at first. It takes time and dialogue for teams to build confidence in how to interpret this new lens on performance.” 

Advertisement

What’s next?

In the early days of impact accounting, companies and consultancies worked independently on different methodologies. Now that work is coalescing, said Heller. The International Standards Organization will start work on a standard this summer, he added, and the VBA is having conversations with the IFRS Foundation, which creates international financial reporting standards.

The approach may also be integrated into mandatory disclosure standards. Heller noted that the European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive mentions the potential benefits of companies putting a dollar figure on some environmental impacts. “It’s the next evolutionary step of any kind of sustainability disclosure regulations,” he said.

.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending