Connect with us

Finance

Opinion | How infrastructure borrowing can benefit Hong Kong for decades to come

Published

on

Opinion | How infrastructure borrowing can benefit Hong Kong for decades to come
Faced with a deficit of more than HK$100 billion (US$12.8 billion) this financial year, the Hong Kong government has proposed issuing bonds to finance large-scale infrastructure projects that could include the Northern Metropolis and land reclamation on Lantau Island.

This proposal makes sense. Hong Kong’s public debt to gross domestic product ratio is extremely low by international standards; the government therefore has the space and creditworthiness to borrow more – even though interest rates today are higher. There is also a strong economic case to rely on debt financing for infrastructure projects which incur costs today but generate benefits for the next few decades.

Nonetheless, there are concerns among some that such borrowing only deepens the government’s financial hole, burdens future generations, and masks the precarity of government finances. Rather than dismiss these concerns as invalid or ignorant, the government should engage seriously with them and, in so doing, build society’s trust in its ability to manage Hong Kong’s finances well. This is also an opportunity to educate the public on why borrowing for infrastructure is not only necessary, but may even be desirable in the current macroeconomic context.

A construction site for public housing on Hong Kong’s Lantau Island in 2020. Photo: Sam Tsang

Necessary and desirable

The first principle of public financial management that the Treasury should convey is that all deficits have to be financed eventually. In this, the government has to choose between three unpalatable options: raising taxes, cutting spending, or borrowing. Raising taxes – particularly the introduction of a Goods and Services Tax (GST) – is probably something that Hong Kong must do eventually.

But mainland China’s slow recovery, higher interest rates and a strong Hong Kong dollar (the result of the Hong Kong dollar’s peg to the US dollar) have contributed to the city’s current sluggish economic growth and in such an environment, authorities can ill afford to raise taxes that would reduce disposable incomes or consumer spending.
Cutting public spending in other areas is even less realistic than raising taxes. As long as growth remains weak (as is likely the case for 2024), the demand for publicly financed or subsidised services will increase. In the longer term, an ageing population will increase social spending as a share of GDP. While there is merit in reducing some health and welfare subsidies, the fact is that public provision of these services in Hong Kong is already very lean by the standards of developed economies. This also means the savings that can be squeezed in these areas are likely to be very small compared to the expenditure demands of an ageing society. Unless Hongkongers are willing to accept a significantly lower standard of health and welfare provision, there is little chance of public spending decreasing in the coming years.
An elderly man in a park at Cheung Sha Wan. In the longer term, an ageing population will increase social spending as a share of GDP, says academic Donald Low. Photo: Jelly Tse

That leaves increased public sector borrowing as the least bad option to finance Hong Kong’s infrastructure plans.

The second idea that the Treasury should convey is that borrowing is the more efficient and equitable way of financing infrastructure. It is more efficient because the benefits of infrastructure development accrue over many years – even decades – and so it makes sense to finance that development over a similar time frame. Just as households make costly capital purchases (such as a property) by taking a 30-year loan rather than pay for it entirely with cash, it is also more efficient for the government to finance infrastructure projects (which generate a stream of benefits over many years) using debt.

Debt financing is also more equitable because future generations are the major beneficiaries of these infrastructure projects. Future generations are likely to be richer than current generations, so it is only fair that future generations pay at least part of the costs. Meanwhile, paying for these projects with cash upfront represents a large subsidy from past and current generations of Hongkongers to future, richer generations. This is highly regressive. Unless one is extremely pessimistic about Hong Kong’s future – and believes that future Hongkongers would be poorer than today’s Hongkongers – debt financing is much fairer in terms of intergenerational equity.

Advertisement
An electronic ticker at the Exchange Square Complex, which houses the Hong Kong stock exchange, in January. The Hong Kong government should set up rules to ensure debt sustainability and build public trust. Photo: Bloomberg

A debt sustainability framework

While increased borrowing is a better way to finance infrastructure development, this does not mean the government should be allowed to borrow as much as it wants or to spend however it likes. To build public trust, the Treasury should put in place, and articulate, a set of principles to ensure debt sustainability. Such a framework would also assuage concerns that the Hong Kong government is becoming a less prudent or capable steward of public funds.

The first principle is that debt financing should be used only for infrastructure projects in which assets that can be valued are created. This is critical because debt financing creates liabilities for future generations of Hongkongers. Good financial management requires that these liabilities be matched with corresponding, long-term assets. This rule also means the government should borrow only for capital, not operating, expenditures.

Second, alongside the budget (that shows the government’s income and expenditure of the coming financial year), the Treasury should also present a debt sustainability report which shows the government’s outstanding liabilities and the estimated value of the assets. This need not be done for all the state’s assets and liabilities, only for those that result from its borrowing. The first two principles would address concerns that issuing debt boosts the government’s revenue for the year but masks (future) debt repayment obligations.

Why Hong Kong’s economy needs to become more than just China’s superconnector

Third, to the extent possible, the bonds the government issues should be linked to specific projects rather than be used for unspecified capital expenditure. While public funds are fungible (movable across various uses), this practice would require the government to make a strong case for the projects that it is borrowing for, and not rely only on its overall creditworthiness, to borrow at lower interest rates. This practice would also improve financial transparency and support the market’s scrutiny of the government’s development projects. Done well, this would establish Hong Kong as an issuer of high-quality government bonds, helping the city attract more capital through its bond market.

This principle does not mean the government would be barred from issuing bonds not linked to specific projects. But if it does so, it should have to explain why. Without this principle, governments always prefer more discretion over rules that constrain their flexibility or freedom of manoeuvre.

Advertisement

Finally, there should be a rule that sets a cap on the total stock of debt that the Hong Kong government owes, as well as a rule that limits (as a percentage of GDP) the amount of debt the government can issue in any one financial year. This would assure the public and financial markets that the government is still a disciplined steward of public funds.

Donald Low is Senior Lecturer and Professor of Practice, and Director of Leadership and Public Policy Executive Education, at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. He was formerly Director of Fiscal Policy at the Ministry of Finance in Singapore.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Finance

Private credit could ‘amplify’ next financial crisis, study finds

Published

on

Private credit could ‘amplify’ next financial crisis, study finds

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Private credit is now so intertwined with big banks and insurers that it could become a “locus of contagion” in the next financial crisis, a group of economists, bankers and US officials has warned.

Researchers from Moody’s Analytics, the Securities and Exchange Commission and a former top adviser to the Treasury Department found private credit funds have become enmeshed with the banking system, creating “new linkages [that] introduce new modes of systemic stress”.

“Their opaqueness and role in making the financial network more densely interconnected mean they could disproportionately amplify a future [financial] crisis,” the group said on Tuesday in a study published by Moody’s Analytics.

Advertisement

Private credit has boomed in recent years as regulations put in place following the 2008 financial crisis prompted banks to tighten their lending standards. Funds, which generally lend to riskier companies with significant debt loads, are subject to looser oversight than banks — something that has prompted concern as the sector has grown.

The report, written by Mark Zandi at Moody’s Analytics, Samim Ghamami of the SEC, and former Treasury adviser Antonio Weiss, is one of the most comprehensive analyses to date on how private credit would affect the broader financial system during a period of market upheaval.

The researchers relied on financial reporting and the stock prices of publicly listed middle-market corporate lenders, known as business development companies, as their proxy for the otherwise opaque private credit industry. They found that during recent moments of market stress, business development companies had become more tightly correlated with the turmoil in other sectors than they were previously.

“Today’s network of interconnections in the financial system is more distributed, with a denser web of connections than it had pre-crisis, when the system operated more like a ‘hub and spoke’ model with banks at the centre of the network,” the report said, noting that private credit firms, other speciality financial groups and insurers have taken a greater role in lending.

Private credit firms maintain they are better at lending than banks because they rely on capital from institutional investors with longer time horizons and not subject to “runs” such as bank deposits, which can lead to broader contagion in moments of panic.

Advertisement

“Banks are increasingly involved in private credit and other non-bank financial institutions through partnerships, fund financing and structured risk transfers that allow them to maintain economic exposure to credit markets while shifting assets off balance sheet,” the Moody’s Analytics study said.

The Boston Federal Reserve last month had similarly warned that banks were exposing themselves to new channels of risk by lending to private credit funds and other similar groups.

Fitch Ratings this week said that private credit’s “evolving products and asset classes requires close monitoring, with many untested through market cycles”.

The Moody’s Analytics report said the private credit sector should be required to share more public data on its lending, and for financial regulators to emphasise private credit in their overall “systemic risk monitoring”.

Advertisement

“The objective is not to stifle the beneficial innovation that private credit provides but to shine a light on its risks and linkages so that a rapidly growing part of corporate finance, and potentially other sectors, does not become a blind spot.”

Continue Reading

Finance

In this hi-tech world of finance, JPMorgan has an old school strategy to woo HNWs

Published

on

In this hi-tech world of finance, JPMorgan has an old school strategy to woo HNWs

Wealth management is a key focus for a new service tier.

Traditional banks are under attack as challenger brands, mostly fintechs, push their innovative solutions and streamlined customer experience with sharply focused product offerings.

But one of Wall Street’s old guard believes the way to attract more of America’s millionaires is through something that wasn’t developed in Silicon Valley, driven by AI, or offered by the latest unicorn fintech.

Advertisement

JP Morgan Chase believes that it will win over the wealthy with good old fashioned branches.

But far from being a standard banking experience, the locations chosen for the new service tier JP Morgan Private Client are 14 that were added to the firm’s footprint when it acquired First Republic two years ago. Another 17 luxury branches are to follow by the end of 2025.

These branches are in wealthy areas in New York, California, Florida, and Massachusetts, CNBC reports, and have a different feel to the 5000 standard JPMorgan Chase branches with a look more akin to a hotel lobby with pastel shades and artworks – and a concierge service to match.

Advertisement

For clients with at least $750K in deposits and investments, these new JP Morgan Financial Centers will offer a single point of contact for the new tier of service, which is a level up from Chase Private Client.

Wealth management is a key focus, something identified in a recent report as being critical to traditional banks’ revenues and profitability, rather than those driven by balance sheets.  

Advertisement

But Jennifer Roberts, CEO of Chase Consumer banking, knows getting clients to switch is a tough ask.

“Obviously it’s a big challenge, because clients already have their established wealth managers, but it’s something that we’ve been making really strong progress in,” she said, admitting that footfall at the first two branches opened has been slow.

The firm may roll out elements of the HNW-focused branches to standard format locations, especially the 1000 or so that are in more affluent areas. This could see areas of these branches dedicated to the JP Morgan Private Client experience.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

For travel-loving Canadians, other financial goals take a back seat to vacation spending

Published

on

For travel-loving Canadians, other financial goals take a back seat to vacation spending
Open this photo in gallery:

Liza Akhvledziani Carew and her husband David Carew visited Kenya’s Masai Mara National Reserve on their honeymoon. The couple strategically use credit card points to help pay for their travel.Supplied

Driving through rolling savannah plains in Kenya’s Maasai Mara National Reserve on her honeymoon, Liza Akhvledziani Carew saw elephants, lions and giraffes. She was reminded of the sheer vastness of the world and felt her “own little life” put into context.

For Ms. Akhvledziani Carew, the chief executive officer of a startup that helps Canadians earn more credit card points, travel is a non-negotiable budget item.

“It’s a big part of our lifestyle. That’s probably what I would spend most of my money on,” she said, adding that the couple pays for part of their travel with a “sophisticated [credit card reward] points strategy.”

The cost of travelling has soared in recent years, driven by the postpandemic travel boom, inflation and new taxes imposed by destinations affected by overtourism.

Advertisement

But for many Canadians, travel remains a high-priority spending area, regardless of rising costs. And it’s clashing with other financial goals.

On board a Ritz-Carlton yacht, I learned how the other half cruises

Kathleen Daunt, a financial adviser with the New School of Finance in Toronto, works with clients who are saving for a major financial milestone, most commonly to buy a home.

When she sits down with her clients and calculates the amount they’d need to save each month to reach that goal – which usually means not spending on travel – they balk at the trade-off.

“People expect to have all the items on their list of priorities. If anything, it means you have to understand your priorities and have flexibility,” she said.

Advertisement

She also said roughly two in five new clients will cite annual travel as one of their top financial goals.

Ms. Daunt said she sees the desire for travel as a mix of social media-induced fear of missing out, widespread burnout and a societal view of vacations as a right – all of which can make it easier to justify overspending.

“You have that same old expectation [of being able to take vacations] but everything just feels more pricey,” she said. “It’s so much money for a family of four or more to do an on-a-plane vacation.”

Canadians’ overseas trips were up 32 per cent in the July-to-September period last year from the same period a year earlier, and up 6.5 per cent from 2019, according to Statistics Canada’s most recent national travel survey. The amount they spent abroad also jumped, rising 20 per cent in 2024 from a year earlier and nearly 40 per cent from 2019.

Tourism operators anticipate a strong summer as more Canadians avoid U.S. travel

Advertisement

Even the trade war with the United States and growing possibility of a recession have not dimmed Canadians’ vacation ambitions. While travel south of the border by plane and car is down, Transat A.T. Inc. chief executive officer Annick Guerard said on a conference call with analysts in March that Canadians’ spending on transatlantic flights has not been affected.

According to estimates by Barry Choi, a personal finance and travel expert at moneywehave.com and regular Globe and Mail contributor, a two-week European vacation costs about US$5,050 ($7,000), though he noted the estimate was for a solo traveller, so couples or families should expect to pay notably more. Timing can significantly affect costs, with June to August the most expensive months.

In contrast, according to the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp., Canadians’ average monthly mortgage payment at the end of 2024 was $2,042 (and much higher in Toronto, at $3,006, and Vancouver, at $3,053).

Rachel Dodds, a professor at Toronto Metropolitan University’s Ted Rogers School of Hospitality and Tourism Management who studies overtourism and consumer motivations for travel, said social media plays a huge role in stoking travel interest. According to data from TikTok, as of mid-2024 the app had seen a 410-per-cent increase in travel content views since 2021.

“Everyone has a phone, everyone consumes [travel content] – if you see a reel on Instagram you’re like, ‘Oh, I wanna go there,’” Prof. Dodds said. That goes both ways: While on vacation, people are much more likely to post photos for the “instant gratification” of likes and comments. “There’s an emotional and sharing aspect of it that didn’t exist before 15 years ago.”

Advertisement

Relative to previous decades, travelling is now more affordable and is seen as a right rather than a privilege in Western countries, Prof. Dodds said. And that increase in affordability has come at a time when many people, particularly millennials and Gen Zers, have more disposable income but feel other large financial goals are out of reach.

Why Seoul is the perfect city for a girls’ getaway

“Travel has become a substitute for those kinds of things,” she said.

Prof. Dodds said we are an increasingly lonely society, and many people are travelling to connect with others to have meaningful, authentic experiences of other cultures. That’s given rise to sustainable travel, and nature-based trips and community experiences, rather than the traditional resort-based vacations.

While Ms. Daunt said none of her clients have ultimately chosen travelling over other financial goals, some have opted to delay major purchases. She said she usually sees people negotiating within their new budgets to downgrade from a trip every year to once every two or three years, or from pricier international trips to smaller ones close to home.

Advertisement

“It’s hard, because we have the push from feeling burnt out and I would argue expecting vacations. We live in a country where we feel like, ‘I deserve to be able to have vacations,’ and there’s this other push on the home-buying side where there’s so much FOMO when it comes to home purchasing despite a bonkers overpriced market,” she said. “We’re still putting those expectations on ourselves.”

A strategy of making small regular contributions to a dedicated travel savings account can be an effective way to save for vacations without compromising other travel goals, she said.

For Ms. Akhvledziani Carew’s part, when she and her husband bought their home a few years ago after years of rigorous monthly savings goals that mimicked what they expected to spend on mortgage payments.

They also tapped their investments, and her husband sold a condo he previously owned. She said they did slightly less-elaborate trips, but their points strategy meant they didn’t have to cut back much.

“It was a different position we were starting from,” she acknowledged, but added later “you build your lifestyle around the thing that’s most important to you.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending