Connect with us

Finance

Oakland finance director resigns; mayor delays release of budget

Published

on

Oakland finance director resigns; mayor delays release of budget

OAKLAND — Oakland’s interim mayor is delaying the release of a deeply consequential, two-year budget proposal that had been expected to detail how the city would balance a looming $265 million budget shortfall.

The move by Interim Mayor Kevin Jenkins comes just two weeks after Oakland’s top finance official quietly resigned from the job she’s held for the last four years, according to a resignation letter obtained by this news organization. The letter by Finance Director Erin Roseman, which was dated April 16, gave no reasons for her departure and said she planned to serve until June 15.

The developments mark the latest signs of upheaval at Oakland’s City Hall amid a perilous budget crisis, which has forced dozens of layoffs and potentially hundreds of millions of dollars in cutbacks to city services over the next two years. Compounding those issues is a leadership vacuum brought on by the unprecedented recall last November of former Mayor Sheng Thao — prompting the city to cycle through four mayors in the span of seven months.

A shortfall in the city’s current fiscal year budget recently spurred Oakland leaders to lay off 42 employees and demote 34 others, while also temporarily closing two fire stations, cancelling all police-training academies and slashing $2.6 million in funding for outside nonprofits and a host of other grants and citywide programs.

All of that pales in comparison to the financial challenges ahead over the next two years. As recently as January, city finance leaders warned that Oakland faces a $138 million deficit during its next fiscal year — which runs from July 1 until June 30, 2026 — and another $127 million deficit the following fiscal year. Much of that deficit has been blamed on lagging revenues from taxes on real-estate transfers and business licenses, along with rising overtime costs for the city’s police and fire departments.

Advertisement
Oakland city council district 6 member Kevin Jenkins, center, talks about his recent selection as the interim mayor of Oakland during the 2025 Inauguration Ceremony held at Oakland City Hall in Oakland, Calif., on Monday, Jan. 6, 2025. (Jose Carlos Fajardo/Bay Area News Group) 

Jenkins — who has been leading the city until former Congresswoman Barbara Lee takes over later this month —  was expected to release his budget proposal for the next two fiscal years on May 1. But a day ahead of its planned release, a city spokesman announced that the budget would instead be made public on Monday.

The announcement cited “a period of transition following the recent election,” and said that the four-day delay would “allow for the briefing and input of incoming elected officials and other key stakeholders.”

“Interim Mayor Kevin Jenkins thanks his budget team, which has worked incredibly hard to produce a balanced budget investing in public safety and core services while taking critical steps toward sustained fiscal balance,” city spokesman Sean Maher said in the announcement.

Maher later said in a statement that members of the City Council would be among those people briefed by Jenkins’ budget team. Those briefings would happen individually, and not as a group, he said.

Stephanie Ong, a campaign spokesperson for Lee, said Thursday that Lee also is being briefed by Jenkins on the budget proposal “to ensure a smooth transition,” and that Lee did not have a hand in the delay.

Advertisement

A key person expected to help in shaping that budget is now heading for the door.

Roseman, the city’s finance director, submitted her resignation letter a day after the April 15 mayoral election, when Lee defeated former City Councilman Loren Taylor in an election to replace Thao. Maher confirmed Thursday that Roseman plans to leave “to pursue other opportunities,” adding that the city would try to find an executive search firm over the next few weeks to help land a replacement.

Roseman’s departure came amid growing scrutiny over her handling of the city’s finances. Roseman appeared to take a more hands-on role at City Hall of late, leading to clashes with city leaders over seemingly procedural issues — among them the purchase of 37 police vehicles that, for months, sat unused at a Ford dealership in San Leandro.

Councilmember Rebecca Kaplan went so far as to liken Roseman’s decision-making to a “pattern of lies” in an internal email, which was obtained by this news organization and addressed to Deborah Edgerly, one of two consultants the city hired in February to assess its finances. In a subsequent interview, Kaplan said Roseman “does not have, legally speaking, the authority to overrule the council. But sometimes she just doesn’t sign the checks.”

Oakland Finance Director Erin Roseman addresses the Oakland City Council at a meeting on Dec. 17, 2024. (Screenshot courtesy of the city of Oakland)
Oakland Finance Director Erin Roseman addresses the Oakland City Council at a meeting on Dec. 17, 2024. (Screenshot courtesy of the city of Oakland) 

Last year, Roseman again made waves in City Hall when she authored a finance report warning the city was on the verge of bankruptcy, while pointedly advising city leaders against “fecklessness” in their continued spending. A version of it appeared online before being hastily taken down and replaced with a version edited by City Administrator Jestin Johnson, which included softer language, fewer references to “insolvency” and no more mention of the bankruptcy term “Chapter 9.”

In her newly-obtained resignation letter, Roseman gave no reasons for leaving her post. Attempts to reach Roseman on Thursday were not successful.

Advertisement

“I am grateful to have been able to serve the citizens of the City of Oakland for the last four years in this capacity and am proud of all the work I have been able to accomplish on their behalf with a great team in the Finance Department,” Roseman wrote in her letter addressed to Johnson.

Staff writer Shomik Mukherjee contributed to this report. 

Originally Published:

Finance

Bay Area gas prices near $4: The mental toll on drivers and financial strain on small businesses

Published

on

Bay Area gas prices near : The mental toll on drivers and financial strain on small businesses

According to new data from AAA, average gas prices in Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco, and Sarasota Counties are currently sitting just pennies below $4 a gallon.

In Citrus County, the average has already crossed that threshold, according to data.

Advertisement

The pain at the pump is becoming impossible to ignore for Bay Area drivers, and the rising costs are creating a ripple effect that is also hitting local small businesses hard.

Why you should care:

Why does that $4 mark trigger such a strong reaction from drivers?

Advertisement

“We have a bias towards round numbers. It’s why companies set prices at $9.99 instead of $10,” University of Tampa microeconomist Aaron Wood, who studies consumer behavior, said. “We have these reference points, these anchors in our brain. We use these heuristics to make consumption decisions.”

Wood, an associate professor of economics at UT, told FOX 13 it comes down to how our brains process the expense.

Advertisement

READ: Florida hospital sues to evict patient who refuses to leave for months

“When you’re standing there, pumping your own gas, you see the rotation of the number and so it’s different than like, if the Netflix price goes up or your lawn service — even sometimes grocery prices — gas is more upsetting. You’re watching it happen as opposed to something being buried in your credit card statement. So I think it’s upsetting to everybody because it’s so visceral, and it’s in your face,” Wood added.

Local perspective:

Advertisement

But that rising price tag isn’t just hurting daily commuters: It’s forcing local business owners to make tough choices, too.

Chris Gonzalez has owned Mona’s Floral Creations in Tampa for seven years. He says fuel costs are constantly on his mind.

Advertisement

“I’ve actually started watching the news every morning just to see how much it’s gone up from the day prior,” Gonzalez said. “I think about it more and more, like not even daily. It’s almost like every few hours I have to think about it, because I try to pass along the best, most competitive prices to my consumer — not only in my flowers, but also in my delivery charges.”

READ: DeSantis halts Manatee County cruise terminal plans with new environmental bill

Mona’s has been serving the Tampa community for nearly 50 years. In the seven years Gonzalez has owned the shop, he has only had to raise his delivery prices twice, from $10 to $12, and then to $15, which is the current rate. Now, he’s unsure what he’ll have to charge next week.

Advertisement

Gonzalez says he hopes that if he does have to raise delivery prices again—potentially up to $18, it will only be temporary.

“I’m trying to be as competitive as possible and continue the Mona’s brand that people know and love around here,” Gonzalez added.

Advertisement

What’s next:

To cope with the surge, Gonzalez is making adjustments to his shop’s daily operations. Instead of delivering a floral arrangement immediately after it’s made, his team is now holding orders so they can group deliveries together based on geographical routes.

“It just makes more sense from a fuel perspective,” he noted.

Advertisement

READ: Hillsborough deputies dismantle $388K multi-state luxury car theft ring; 3 arrested

And with Mother’s Day right around the corner, Gonzalez said he will be closely watching the changes in gas prices.

Advertisement

“We are in planning mode right now. We’re ordering our flowers. We’re planning what types of arrangements we’re going to offer for sale for moms,” Gonzalez said. “But now I have that additional thing: I have to think about what’s the price of gas going to be like in two months when Mother’s Day’s here?”

The Source: This article was written with information gathered by FOX 13’s Ariel Plaencia. 

Tampa
Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

Markets keep the faith – but oil staying above $100 could test that optimism | Nils Pratley

Published

on

Markets keep the faith – but oil staying above 0 could test that optimism | Nils Pratley

Was it only at the new year that the fanfare was heard for the FTSE 100 index breaking through 10,000 for the first time? It was – on 2 January – and the index then added another 900 points by the end of February. On Thursday, the Footsie briefly fell below that round number as Iran struck Qatar’s enormous Ras Laffan complex, which normally supplies a fifth of the world’s liquefied natural gas, before closing at 10,063, down 2.3% on the day.

There are two ways to view that price action. One is to say the sharp reversal from the peak represents a necessarily severe reaction to the war on Iran. Another is to conclude that a flat year-to-date return, after a bountiful 20% gain in 2025, suggests stock markets have barely begun to take seriously the inflationary impact if the war lasts many more weeks, or even months, and keeps oil above $100 a barrel.

“Markets are very resilient and complacent, ​and we are a bit surprised about that,” said Nicolai Tangen, the head of Norway’s $2tn (£1.5tn) sovereign wealth fund, earlier this week. Well, quite.

The resilience of companies themselves, as he suggested, is perhaps one explanation. Firms can cut costs and try to pass on increases in input prices. Recent shocks, such as the Covid pandemic and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, may have forced them to inject greater flexibility into their supply chains. It is still far too early to hear profit warnings. In the case of the Footsie, a size-weighted index, there are also a few big constituents that obviously benefit from higher oil and gas prices: Shell and BP are up 24% and 31% respectively since the new year.

Another explanation is that investors may be right – despite the strike on Ras Laffan – to keep the faith and believe that energy prices will calm down soon. That seems to be the consensus opinion. Bank of America’s closely watched regular poll of fund managers this week found that only 11% expect a barrel of Brent to be over $90 by the end of the year, and the average forecast was just $76.

Advertisement

That finding, though, also suggests there is plenty of room for expectations to be upset if the energy price shock intensifies. The pass-through effects would be fairly rapid. In a UK context, current oil and gas prices “are already enough to add around 1% to headline inflation in the coming months, while shortages of fertilisers could push food inflation higher later in the year”, reckons David Rees, the head of global economics at the fund manager Schroders.

In the circumstances, the Bank of England’s decision to hold interest rates was the only one possible. Policymakers are as clueless on the length of the war, and the cost of energy six weeks or six months from now, as stock market investors. The Bank’s messaging was inevitably of the fudged variety. On one hand, it stands “ready to act as necessary” on interest rates to control inflation. On the other, “markets are getting ahead of themselves in assuming rate rises”, said the governor, Andrew Bailey.

But one suspects we won’t have to wait too much longer to see central banks’ real analysis of the inflation risks. If oil stays at $100 for another month, higher interest rates will be the way to bet.

Continue Reading

Finance

EU pitched for Turkey to join its payments system, envoy says

Published

on

EU pitched for Turkey to join its payments system, envoy says
The European Union pitched ​to Turkey last month the idea that the candidate for bloc membership could join ‌a cost-cutting payments system to boost integration efforts and benefit those sending money abroad, the EU envoy to Ankara told Reuters.
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending