Pay Dirt is Slate’s money advice column. Have a question? Send it to Athena, Kristin, and Ilyce here. (It’s anonymous!)
Dear Pay Dirt,
How does one figure out what they’re even saving for? I’m reaching my 30s, and many of my friends are still in very “spendy” times of their lives—a lot of them spend big on going out/vacations/etc. by using the sentiment, “What am I even saving for?” I’m admittedly a bit more conservative with my money and try to save as big a portion of my salary as I can (while still making space for the things I enjoy). Because of this, I’ve amassed quite a bit in savings (just over $100,000).
But lately, I’ve been wondering, what am I actually saving for? The chances of affording a home one day in my high cost of living area are actually very small (a lot of people here are lifelong renters, even into middle age). Of course, there’s money for emergencies and retirement, but beyond that what is all this money actually for! How do people decide? It seems like the natural conclusion is saving for a home, but if that’s out of the picture, what then?
—A Saver With Doubts
Advertisement
Dear Saver with Doubts,
Congratulations on hitting a huge milestone: $100,000 in savings. That’s no small feat, and I’m sure you’ve made some tough choices to get there. I’d like to reframe your questions. You ask, “What am I saving for?” as if the only answer is something tangible: A house, a new car, a big, fancy trip. Instead, imagine if what you’re saving for are “options and opportunities.”
What happens if you save too much money? You can take a year off, retire early, help your family and friends, or contribute to a worthy cause. You can indulge your passions, whatever they may be, go back to school for an advanced or different degree, become a caregiver, or stay at home and game all day long. Having money in the bank (and hopefully the stock market) gives you the option and opportunity to explore and experience your life differently.
As for saving for a house, let’s reframe that, too. What if you continue to rent in your neighborhood but buy a vacation or investment property elsewhere? Could you start building a nest egg of rental properties or perhaps purchase a small commercial building that will eventually deliver passive income to help fuel your options and opportunities? You’re building financial security that will pay off down the line, just when you need it most. So, keep an open mind. Talk to people about their lives and investments. I have no doubt that one day you’ll find an opportunity worth pursuing.
Want Advice From Pay Dirt?
Advertisement
For questions on the money issues in your life try submitting to Pay Dirt!
Dear Pay Dirt,
My wife is in her first year as an attending physician and is absolutely burned out. She wants to quit and find a part-time position that would likely pay her around $100,000 less per year. We have a 3-year-old and recently bought a house in a high cost of living area based on the assumption that she’d be working full-time. We barely have savings after her eight years as an underpaid medical student and resident.
I want to support her choices, but I also know we can’t make up $100,000 just by cutting back on Starbucks. We would have to make life-altering changes to stay afloat financially. We fight whenever I bring it up. She gets upset when I talk about the trade-offs, and I get frustrated when she refuses to consider them. How should we approach this problem? What can I do differently?
—Bad News Bearer
Advertisement
Dear Bad News Bearer,
Your wife must be under immense stress: She’s in her first year as an attending physician, getting used to all that working full-time entails. She probably feels that she’s short-changing everything else in her life, including you, your toddler, and your marriage. She’s worried about financially supporting the family without losing her mind, especially if she has student loans. (The average medical school graduate owes over $250,000 in total student loan debt and 73 percent of medical school graduates have educational debt.)
For what it’s worth, my doctor friends say the first few years as an attending are the worst. You’re getting used to the job, the hours, and the pushback you get from the healthcare industry, older/more established physicians, and even some of your patients. So, yes. Her life is tough right now. She knows you’re barely making it financially. What she doesn’t realize is that she has a partner in her success: You!
You’re watching her struggle and in addition to keeping your eye on the bottom line, you have to help her remember why she went through eight to 12 years of schooling and residency to become a doctor. Help her recall the trade-offs you both made so that she could achieve her dream. Back off on the money discussion for the moment and focus on what you can do immediately to lighten her load. Can you pick up more slack with your toddler? Do more around the house? Manage playdates, run errands, or find a way for your wife to get some personal time (and maybe a massage, if she enjoys that sort of thing)?
More concerning is that you two are talking past each other when it comes to money. She doesn’t want to give up her home and lifestyle, not after all the time and energy she spent to get there. That’s why she fights you whenever you bring it up. On the other hand, you don’t want to dig a hole you can’t climb out of. That’s fair, too. The good news is there’s a way through these tough times. It involves sitting down and talking about how hard things are now and the timeline for when you both envision them getting better. Make a list of the positives and negatives of her staying full-time. Figure out how long it will take her to feel better about work and stabilize your finances. It might take six months or a year or two to get there. But I find that once you put a number down on paper, you can mark time against it. Writing down financial goals helps put things in perspective. It’s your own 30,000-foot view. Then, check-in at three or six months and see how much progress you’re making. If she’s still unhappy, nail down the new pain points she’s feeling and work to relieve the pressure. Is there a way you can increase your income to help balance a reduction in hers? Is there a temporary part-time role she can take on while she recovers her equilibrium that would help save on child care or other expenses? Are there strategic cuts (beyond Starbucks) that will help you stay in your home and focused on the future while you work through this financial pinch?
Advertisement
If you can’t have this conversation calmly (and opening a bottle of your favorite beverage doesn’t help), then you might need a third party to help you get there together. Marriage counseling is where I’d start. See if you can find a way to communicate about your money issues that doesn’t sound (to her ears) like a threat, a give-back of hard-won gains (like the house), or a vision of a bleak future devoid of fun. Once you learn how to talk to each other about money, find a financial advisor you can trust to help you plan through the tough times and visualize all the good stuff that’s coming.
Want more Pay Dirt every week? Sign up for Slate Plus now.
Dear Pay Dirt,
My husband and I (38 and 40, no kids) have steadily worked our way up and after 14 years of marriage, I feel like we’re finally pretty comfortable. We have a combined income of just over $100,000, a house with a decent amount of equity, retirement accounts, a more short-term investment account, and a savings account (“high-yield” at a pitiful half a percent) with around $60,000 in it. Our only debt right now besides the mortgage is my husband’s student loan, around $10,000.
I guess my question is… what now? Should we pay off his loans? Should I be more focused on maxing out retirement savings? Put some money into renovating our house? We have a financial advisor, but he’s pretty low-key and just asks us what WE want. I’m not sure how to prioritize!
Advertisement
—We’re Comfortable, Now What?
Dear We’re Comfortable,
What a nice place to be at 40. Congratulations on doing so much right. Here are a few suggestions for taking it all to the next level:
First, take some of your low-yield savings and pay off those student loans. You’re probably paying 8 percent on the debt while earning half a percent. That’s not a winning strategy. And, while you’re at it, there are plenty of true high-yield savings accounts online. Some are returning 5 percent, or more. So, find one (Bankrate lists a bunch) and transfer a big chunk of your excess savings there so you can make your money work harder for you.
Next, absolutely maximize your 401(k) accounts. And, if you haven’t already, open up a couple of Roth IRAs. In 2024, you can plow up to $7,000 each in after-tax funds ($8,000 if you’re at least 50 years old) into those accounts, which will grow tax-free forever. Trust me: It’ll be nice to have the option of using tax-free funds in retirement. Once you’ve done all that, pay down your vehicle loan(s) and home loan.
Advertisement
As for renovating your house, that’s a huge project in and of itself. The question you need to answer is whether you need to do something (i.e., the roof is leaking) or you think you’ll live happier or better in some way. That could mean freshening up your decorating or perhaps tackling a larger project like redoing a bathroom or kitchen. Renovating your home is costly and it takes up a lot of time. And, unless your home is way out of date, it’s unlikely you’ll recoup the cost of the renovation within a year, according to the latest Cost vs. Value report. I wonder if you wouldn’t have more fun planning a special trip somewhere instead.
Finally, I’m all for steady and dependable financial advisors. But asking you what you want without offering a conversation around setting goals seems a little too laid back. Try engaging your financial advisor in a conversation about short-term and long-term goals. Put down some of each on paper and spitball some numbers so you know what you’re working toward. Then, go back to your financial advisor and have a more specific discussion about each item on your wish list and talk about what it would take to get there now, in five years, or in retirement.
Dear Pay Dirt,
My partner and I are finally about to move to a big city with a much higher cost of living compared to the smaller town we’ve lived in for the past few years. We’ve talked about this move for many years and are finally in a place with our careers where we can make it happen. We’re so excited! We’ve started the initial search of looking for apartments. But there’s one thing that’s keeping me up at night: How do we prep for this major change in the cost of living? Our rent is about to at least double, that is the easy part to prepare for. But I can’t stop worrying about everything else: groceries, transportation, nights out, hobbies, etc.
Right now we don’t have strict budgets, we just generally spend about $300-ish on our credit cards bi-weekly and pay it in full when we get paid and keep track of our spending in that way. I know realistically we won’t be able to save as much as we do now, but how does one prepare for this big of a financial change? Do we need to make a strict budget even though we’ve never been spreadsheet people?
Advertisement
—The City of $$$
Dear City of $$$,
Landing a long-time dream feels great, doesn’t it? But like most things in life, dreaming is safe while reality bites. I don’t love the idea of setting a strict budget now without knowing what your new life will cost. It’s like saying you’ll spend $10,000 renovating your kitchen before you discover that the stove you’ve been eyeing actually costs $15,000.
Instead, do some field research. Move into your new place and unpack. Take a month or two in your new city and see where you’re spending money. Focus on your behavior, not on the dollars. For example, if you find yourself eating out every night or ordering food for delivery, you know you’ll wind up in the red pretty quickly. So limit restaurants to one or two nights a week, and make sure you have enough food in the fridge so your default isn’t DoorDash. If theater or concerts are your thing, buy tickets monthly, not weekly. Make sure you have a healthy emergency savings account and are continuing to contribute to your retirement savings.
I do want you to write down what you’re spending. Use a pad of paper, your phone, a budgeting app, or a spreadsheet. At the end of the month, take a look at your credit cards and bank accounts. Are they in balance? Are they (hopefully) growing? If not, go back to your list of expenses and analyze where you’re leaking cash. You may have some extra one-time expenses that won’t be repeated or perhaps you met friends for drinks a few too many times. You should be able to pinpoint a few places where you can reduce your spending immediately and keep your budget in balance.
Advertisement
If the goal is to stay in this new city permanently, then you’ll need to find a way to pare back while still enjoying the social and cultural benefits your new home offers. Writing down every cent you spend will speed up that process and get you to the joy part faster!
—Ilyce
Classic Prudie
Recently, a local center focused on LGBT issues posted my dream job. I was not able to apply due to timing. My partner applied and got the job. I know she’ll be incredible at it. But I feel very envious knowing that my dream job exists and I missed out.
The $537,000-a-year office created in 2014 to advise the City Council on financial issues and avoid a repeat of the parking meter fiasco has failed to deliver on that mission, the city’s chief watchdog said Tuesday.
Days before concluding her four-year term, Inspector General Deborah Witzburg said a shortage of both adequate staff and financial information closely held by the mayor’s office prevents the Council’s Office of Financial Analysis from helping the Council be the the “co-equal branch of government” it aspires to be.
In a budget rebellion not seen since “Council Wars” in the 1980s, a majority of alderpersons led by conservative and moderate Democrats rejected Mayor Brandon Johnson’s corporate head tax and approved an alternative budget, including several revenue-generating items the mayor’s office adamantly opposed.
But Witzburg said the renegades would have been in an even better position to challenge Johnson if only their financial analysis office had been “equipped and positioned to do what it’s supposed to do” — provide the Council with “objective, independent financial analysis.”
“We are entering new territory where the City Council is asserting new, independent authority over the budget process. It can’t do that in a meaningful way without its own access to financial analysis,” Witzburg told the Chicago Sun-Times.
Advertisement
Chicago Inspector General Deborah Witzburg’s latest report focuses on the Chicago City Council’s Office of Financial Analysis.
Jim Vondruska/Jim Vondruska/For the Sun-Times
But the Council’s financial analysis office, she added, “has never been equipped or positioned to do what it needs to do. It needs better and more independent access to data, and it needs enough staff to do its job. It has a small number of employees and comparatively limited access to data.”
Advertisement
The inspector general’s farewell audit examined the period from 2015 through 2023. During that time, the financial analysis office budget authorized “either three or four” full-time employees. It now has a staff of five .
Witzburg is recommending a staffing analysis to identify how many people the financial office really needs — and also recommending that the office “get data directly” from other city departments, “ rather than having it go through the mayor’s office.”
The audit further recommends that the office develop “better procedures to meet their reporting requirements” in a timely manner. As it stands now, reports are delivered “sometimes late, sometimes not at all,” the inspector general said.
“We find that those reports have been both not timely and not complete in terms of what they are required to report on and that those reports therefore have provided limited assistance to the City Council in its responsibility to make decisions about the city’s budget,” she said.
The Council Office of Financial Analysis responded to the audit by saying it hopes to add at least three full-time staffers in the short term and has made “some progress” over the last three years in improving their access to data, but not enough.
Advertisement
The office was created in 2014 to provide Council members with expert advice on fiscal issues.
For nearly two years the reform was stuck in the mud over whether former 46th Ward Ald. Helen Shiller had the independence and policy expertise to lead the office.
Shiller ultimately withdrew her name, but the office was a bust nevertheless. In an attempt to breathe new life into it, sponsors pushed through a series of changes.
Instead of allowing the Budget chair alone to request a financial analysis on a proposal impacting the city budget, any alderperson was allowed to make that request.
The office was further required to produce activity reports quarterly, not just annually.
Advertisement
Now former-Budget Chair Pat Dowell (3rd) then chose Kenneth Williams Sr., a former analyst for the office, as director and gave him the “autonomy” the ordinance demanded.
Two years ago, a bizarre standoff developed in the office.
Budget Committee Chair Jason Ervin (28th) was empowered to dump Williams after Williams refused to leave to make way for a director of Ervin’s own choosing.
The standoff began when Williams said he was summoned to Ervin’s office and told the newly appointed Budget chair was “going in a different direction, and I’m putting you on administrative leave” with pay.
“He took all my credentials and access away. I would love to come to work. I wasn’t allowed to come to work,” Williams said then.
Advertisement
Williams collected a paycheck for doing nothing while serving out the final days remainder of a four-year term.
Ervin’s resolution stated the director “may be removed at any time with or without cause by a two-thirds” vote or 34 alderpersons. He chose Janice Oda-Gray, who remains chief administrator.
Little League® International has announced that Reilly Barnes accepted a new role as Purchasing/Finance Assistant, effective April 6, 2026. Barnes transitions from a temporary Purchasing Assistant to this full-time position to assist in the year-round demands of purchasing for the organization, as well as the region and Little League Baseball and Softball World Series tournaments.
“We are thrilled to welcome back Reilly to our team as a full-time Purchasing/Finance Assistant. Reilly’s prior experience, time management, and attention to detail make him an invaluable asset to the purchasing team,” said Nancy Grove, Little League Materials Management Director. “We look forward to the positive contributions he will have on our organization.”
In this role, Barnes will be responsible for processing purchase requisitions, coordinating souvenir products, and tracking order fulfillment. He will also assist with evaluating suppliers, reviewing product quality, and negotiating contracts for effective operations.
After most recently working as a Logistician Analyst at Precision Air in Charleston, South Carolina, Barnes, a Williamsport native, returns after honing his skills in the fast-paced environment. Prior to his time at Precision Air, Barnes served as a Procurement Specialist at The Medical University of South Carolina, where his expertise and knowledge were instrumental in supporting both education and healthcare needs.
“I am thrilled to return to Little League in this full-time role,” said Barnes. “Coming back to my hometown and having the opportunity to work for an organization that has played such a special part of my upbringing means a lot. I can’t wait begin this new opportunity.”
Advertisement
Barnes graduated from the University of Pittsburgh in 2022 with a B.A. in Supply Chain Management, Finance, and Business Analytics.
As conflict continues to destabilise the Middle East, the Gulf States elite are seeking solace in European alternatives that offer comparable financial benefits with a far lower risk of war on the doorstep. One such destination is the small Swiss town of Zug, which is becoming a “bolt-hole” for Gulf-based wealth, said the Financial Times.
‘Swiss Monaco’
Switzerland’s reputation as a magnet for the world’s financial elite is nothing new. In 2025, the country recorded the “densest concentration of millionaires” with an estimated 146 per 1,000 adults last year, said The Times. Now home to around 135,000 people, Zug’s canton – also named Zug – used to be the “poorest corner of Switzerland” until it lowered its tax rates in the 1950s. “Now it has corporate tax rates of 16.2% compared with 40% in the US and 33.3% in France.”
“In almost all ways Zug is unremarkable”, with its traditional Swiss architecture and cobbled waterfront lanes. But if its “Alpine lake water is clear”, the financial scene is more “murky”. Many credit Marc Rich and Pincus “Pinky” Green, founders of metals and minerals trading firm Glencore, with the transformation of Zug from a “Swiss backwater” to its status as the “Swiss Monaco”. The multinational is headquartered just outside Zug, and has made the town a “global powerhouse for trading crude and refined oil products”. It should be “no surprise” that the “1% of the world’s 1%” are taking shelter there, and at the same time, hoping to still “keep a hand in the oil business”.
Article continues below
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
Sign up for The Week’s Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
“Industry estimates suggest that tens of billions of dollars could flow into Switzerland depending on how the current conflict evolves,” said the Outbound Investment Group. The “immediate trigger” for the “surge in interest” from Gulf-based investors is the war in the Middle East. However, Switzerland’s underlying appeal is its unwavering “Swissness”: “political neutrality”, “strong legal frameworks”, and reputation for wealth preservation. It’s a safe bet with no sign of slowing.
Advertisement
‘Availability tightening’
There are some drawbacks, said the FT. For “would-be arrivals”, the appeal of the region for Middle Eastern residents comes with “practical constraints”. Those outside the EU “face a higher bar”. Usually, the condition of residency is “tied” to employment or company formation. For the “very wealthy”, there is the added option of “negotiated lump-sum taxation agreements with cantonal authorities” that allow individuals to “pay a flat annual tax based on living expenses rather than global income”.
Even if they are holders of EU passports, the “main bottleneck” is the availability of property. Competition is “intense” and “rental supply is extremely limited, with properties often snapped up within days”. With Zug’s “availability tightening”, other cantons in the region with similar tax arrangements could benefit, such as Lugano, an Italian-speaking city in the Ticino region.
The uncertainty of the duration of the conflict is one of the most pressing concerns, said Bloomberg. The recent breakdown of ceasefire talks risks “forcing a reckoning for the professional and expat classes considering options after putting down roots in the Middle East”.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
The short-term benefits of physical safety from leaving the Gulf are clear, but changing tax residency “takes time” and practicalities such as finding schools and “conforming to national requirements such as opening local bank accounts” is often “complicated and time-consuming”. The region’s ultra-wealthy are facing “uncomfortable decisions on whether to make the move permanent, especially with the end of the school year in sight”.