Connect with us

Finance

EU weighs using Russian assets or borrowing to finance Kyiv

Published

on

EU weighs using Russian assets or borrowing to finance Kyiv
  • Russian assets most likely option, EU official says
  • Belgium seeks assurances against Russian lawsuits
  • Borrowing less appealing for indebted EU states
BRUSSELS, Nov 10 (Reuters) – The European Union will on Thursday discuss two main ways to raise financial support for Ukraine – borrowing the money, or the more likely option of using frozen Russian assets, a senior EU official said.
EU finance ministers are meeting in Brussels after the bloc’s leaders pledged on October 23 to cover Ukraine’s needs for 2026-2027, and asked the European Commission to prepare options on how to do that.

Sign up here.

The EU official close to the talks said the Commission’s options paper was not ready yet, but there were only two realistic ways to provide the 130-140 billion euros ($152-163 billion) Ukraine is likely to need.

One was to use the frozen Russian assets, as proposed by the Commission. Russia said last month any such move would be illegal and threatened to deliver a “painful response”.

The other was for EU governments to borrow the funds on the market, but this would involve paying interest.

Most of the Russian assets frozen in Europe are on the accounts of Belgian securities depository Euroclear. Since Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, almost all of the securities have matured and become cash.

The option involving frozen assets would mean the EU would replace the Russian cash on Euroclear accounts with zero-coupon AAA bonds issued by the European Commission.

Advertisement

The cash would then go to Kyiv, which would only repay the loan if it eventually gets war reparations from Russia, effectively making the loan a grant and making Russian reparations available before the war ends. The option is called the Reparations Loan, because it would be linked to Russia paying reparations.

PREFERENCE FOR USE OF RUSSIAN FROZEN ASSETS

Under that arrangement, the only financial contribution on the part of European Union governments would be to guarantee the Commission loans issued for Euroclear. The risk that the guarantees would be called upon is very small because EU governments themselves decide when to release the frozen Russian assets.

“In my mind EU leaders will opt for the reparations loan model,” the senior EU official said.

But Belgium, which is home to Euroclear, believes it would be liable in case of a successful Russian lawsuit against the company. It wants EU governments to pledge they would come up with the necessary cash to repay Moscow within three days if a court ever decided that the assets must be returned.

EU government officials say that, even though it was unlikely ever to be needed, mobilising potentially more than 100 billion euros in three days would be a big challenge for the EU.

Advertisement

Belgium also wants the Commission to produce a solid legal base for the whole operation to minimise the risk of a lost lawsuit and has asked other EU countries that hold frozen Russian assets to join the scheme to spread responsibility.

The Commission is now in talks with Belgium to address its demands with a view to securing support of EU leaders for the plan in December.

The other option would be for EU governments to borrow on the market and pass the cash on to Ukraine.

This is for them a far less appealing option because it would increase debt levels of many already highly indebted EU countries and entail paying annual interest for the duration of the loan, either by Ukraine, which can ill afford it, or by the EU.
($1 = 0.8575 euros)

Reporting by Jan Strupczewski; Editing by Andrew Heavens

Advertisement

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

Finance

UK financial regulators rush to assess risks of Anthropic’s latest AI model, FT reports

Published

on

UK financial regulators rush to assess risks of Anthropic’s latest AI model, FT reports
UK financial regulators ​are holding ‌urgent talks with ​the ​government’s cyber security agency ⁠and ​major banks ​to assess risks posed by ​the ​new artificial intelligence ‌model ⁠from Anthropic, the Financial Times ​reported ​on ⁠Sunday.
Continue Reading

Finance

Benin finance minister expected to coast to presidential election win

Published

on

Benin finance minister expected to coast to presidential election win
Benin’s long-serving finance minister Romuald Wadagni is expected to coast to victory in a presidential election ​on Sunday, buoyed by strong economic growth and the absence of a credible challenger even as fears ‌grow over the threat posed by jihadists in the north.
Continue Reading

Finance

Opinion: Teaching kids how to manage money is now a reality in New Hampshire – Concord Monitor

Published

on

Opinion: Teaching kids how to manage money is now a reality in New Hampshire – Concord Monitor

Money looks — and feels — different than it did a generation ago. The era of checkbooks and paper cash is fading; in its place is an all-digital ecosystem of instant payments, peer-to-peer apps, online shopping and real‑time betting markets. That shift has changed not only how people transact, but how they think about money. If we want our children to grow into financially capable adults, schools must catch up. New Hampshire is finally doing just that.

Today’s payments are frictionless. Venmo, PayPal, Zelle and similar apps let teens split dinner bills, send gifts or trade cash for concert tickets with a tap — and without the tactile reminder that handing over cash provides. That digital ease reshapes spending psychology: abstraction and immediacy can weaken the emotional “pain” of parting with money, making impulse purchases and casual transfers feel less consequential.

Layered on top of effortless payments are prediction markets and widely available sports gambling. Betting apps normalize risk‑taking behavior and create fresh avenues for rapid losses — especially among young people who grow up seeing real‑time odds, live lines and social feeds celebrating wins. Online shopping amplifies the problem. The fewer trips consumers make to local retailers, the more normalized becomes a culture of instant gratification: one click, next‑day delivery and a new item arrives before the buyer has reconsidered the impulse.

These trends matter beyond individual households. Roughly two‑thirds of the U.S. economy depends on consumer spending. When consumers overspend, accumulate avoidable debt or lack basic savings and investment know‑how, the ripple effects are real: financial stress at home, reduced long‑term economic resilience and less stable local economies.

Advertisement

That’s why financial education in schools is no longer optional. For over 25 years, the NH Jump$tart Coalition has advocated teaching personal finance in classrooms across the state. This fall brings a major milestone: beginning September for the 2026-2027 academic year, New Hampshire will require a standalone half‑credit course in personal finance for graduation, in addition to the existing half‑credit economics requirement. New Hampshire joins about 30 states that have adopted similar graduation requirements — a recognition that personal finance skills are foundational, not extracurricular. Reinforcing that momentum, Governor Kelly Ayotte has declared April as Youth Financial Literacy Month, a statewide acknowledgment that building these skills must start early.

A required course gives students structured exposure to budgeting, saving, credit, debt management, insurance, investing basics and the behavioral forces that drive spending. It provides a space to discuss how digital payments and gambling products influence decision‑making, how to spot predatory financial offers and how to build financial habits that support long‑term goals rather than immediate gratification.

But passing a graduation requirement is only the first step. Teachers need support. NH Jump$tart and partner organizations are working to provide professional development and classroom resources — many at no cost — so educators can teach personal finance confidently and effectively. Free curricula, interactive simulations, lesson plans and workshops help translate policy into practice in diverse classrooms.

Our next focus must be on measurement: determining what effective financial education looks like and how to scale it. We need clear metrics to evaluate whether students leave the course with durable knowledge, sound habits, and the confidence to make smart financial choices in a digital world. Measuring outcomes will help refine curricula, target teacher training and ensure the investment actually improves financial capability.

This new requirement, bolstered by the Governor’s proclamation and years of advocacy, signals a shift in priorities: New Hampshire recognizes that helping students manage money is as essential as reading and arithmetic. With two‑thirds of the economy riding on consumer choices, teaching financial literacy is not merely a personal benefit — it’s an economic imperative. By equipping young people to navigate digital payments, resist instant gratification and understand risk, we strengthen families, communities and the broader state economy.

Advertisement

New Hampshire has taken a meaningful step. Now we must ensure schools, teachers, parents and students have the tools and the evidence to make that step count.

Daniel H. Hebert is the state president of NH Jump$tart Coalition. He lives in Hillsborough.

Continue Reading

Trending