Finance
EU paper argues for permissionless blockchain usage in traditional finance – Ledger Insights – blockchain for enterprise
The European Union has published a report exploring the potential for permissionless blockchain in traditional finance (TradFi). It argues that permissionless blockchains should at least be considered as options for TradFi and financial market infrastructures. However, adoption should happen in a cautious manner.
Fabian Schär of the University of Basel is the paper’s author. He wrote one of the most cited early papers on Decentralized Finance (DeFi). While Mr Schär is a proponent of permissionless blockchains and DeFi, the paper is nonetheless objective and thorough.
It argues that permissionless blockchains can be more neutral than private ones, and in turn encourage competition. Unfettered access enabled by public blockchains contrasts with the siloed permissioned blockchains that are proliferating. While public blockchains have drawbacks, there are many widely known workarounds to their challenges, particularly by adding permissions at the smart contract level.
Mr Schär proposes that permissionless blockchains can provide an interoperability layer for layer 2 blockchains, including regulated ones. When smart contracts are on a single chain, they are capable of being composable into more complex functionality. Composability is possible across multiple blockchains but is weaker and messy. We’d note the point about composability is sometimes a blind spot in the TradFi space. Our recent report on DLT payments highlights that some application designs overlook composability and how to address that.
The EU paper doesn’t gloss over the drawbacks of public blockchains, such as scalability, privacy, finality and governance. It delves into each topic, as well as the contentious issue of maximal extractable value (MEV) in which block proposers sometimes reorder transactions at the expense of blockchain users, a type of front running. Mr Schär describes each challenge and the pros and cons of the various workarounds.
Why permissionless blockchains are so topical in TradFi
Clearly asset managers are attracted to the potential of permissionless chains with the likes of BlackRock and Frankin Templeton launching on-chain funds.
From a policy perspective, the paper is timely for three reasons:
In the latter case, one example is Singapore’s global layer one (GL1), a public, permissioned and regulated blockchain, which looks similar to a permissionless blockchain.
The EU DLT Pilot Regime
In early 2023 the EU DLT Pilot Regime came into force, which relaxes some regulations relating to central securities depositories. Most importantly it allows the use of permissionless blockchains. We’ve previously written about DLT Pilot Regime candidate 21x, which plans to operate a trading and settlement infrastructure on a permissionless blockchain. Many of the workarounds mentioned in the EU paper will be put into action by 21x and other DLT Pilot Regime participants.
For example, 21x participants are restricted to known entities and it uses a central limit order book. Hence, market surveillance will result in the identification of MEV activities and the seizure of a frontrunner’s on-exchange assets. If there’s an issue with the blockchain infrastructure then the assets can be moved to a different blockchain.
Another reason why the paper is timely is the ongoing debate by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, which recently imposed tighter rules for permissionless blockchains, particularly for tokenized assets that are likely to take many of the precautions mentioned in this paper. This encourages the banks to only engage with permissioned blockchains and creates a divide between them and asset managers who don’t face the same restrictions. The Basel Committee also published a paper addressing potential workarounds, but the EU paper is more technical and goes further.
For anyone wishing to really understand the ins and outs of permissionless blockchains in the context of TradFi, this paper is a must read.
Banks have had a stellar first quarter. The major U.S. banks raked in nearly $50 billion in profits in the first three months of the year, The Guardian reported.
That was largely due to Wall Street bank traders, who profited from a volatile stock exchange, Reuters showed.
But even without the extra bump from stock trading, banks are doing well when it comes to interest, the same Reuters article found. And some banks could stand to benefit even more from this one potential rule change.
Morgan Stanley thinks it could have a major impact on Citi in particular.
Upcoming changes for banks
To understand why Morgan Stanley thinks things are going to change at Citi, you need to understand some recent bank rule changes.
Banks make money by lending out money, which usually comes from depositors. But people need access to their money and the right to withdraw whenever they want.
So, banks keep a percentage of all money deposited to make sure they can cover what the average person needs.
But what happens if there is a major demand for withdrawals, as we saw during the financial crisis of 2008?
That’s where capital requirements come in. After the financial crisis, major banks like Citi were required by law to hold a higher percentage of money in order to avoid major bank failures.
For years, banks had to put aside billions of dollars. Money that couldn’t be lent out or even returned to shareholders.
Now, that’s all about to change.
Capital change requirements for major banks
Banks that are considered globally systemically important banking organizations (G-SIBs) have a higher capital buffer than community banks as they usually engage in banking activity that is far more complicated than your average market loan.
The list depends on the size of the bank and its underlying activity, according to the Federal Reserve.
Current global systemically important banks
A proposal from U.S. federal banking regulators could drastically reduce the amount that these large banks have to hold in reserve.
Changes would result in the largest U.S. banks holding an average 4.8% less. While that might seem like a small percentage number, for banks of this size, it equates to billions of dollars, according to a Federal Reserve memo.
The proposed changes were a long time coming, Robert Sarama, a financial services leader at PwC, told TheStreet.
“It’s a bit of a recognition that perhaps the pendulum swung a little too far in the higher capital requirement following the financial crisis, making it harder for banks to participate in some markets,” he said.
Natasha Luscri and Luke Miller consider themselves among the lucky ones. The couple recently bought their first home in the northwest suburbs of Melbourne.
It wasn’t something they necessarily expected to be able to do, but some good fortune with an investment in silver bullion and making use of government schemes meant “the stars aligned” to get into the market. Luke used the federal government’s super saver scheme to help build a deposit, and the couple then jumped on the 5 per cent deposit scheme, which they say made all the difference.
“We only started looking because of the government deposit scheme. Basically, we didn’t really think it was possible that we could buy something,” Natasha told Yahoo Finance.
RELATED
Last month they settled on their two bedroom unit, which the pair were able to purchase in an off-market sale – something that is becoming increasingly common in the market at the moment.
Rather perfectly, they got it for about $20-30,000 below market rate, Natasha estimated, which meant they were under the $600,000 limit to avoid paying stamp duty under Victoria’s suite of support measures for first home buyers.
“They wanted to sell it quickly. They had no other offers. So we got it for less than what it would have gone for if it had been on market,” Natasha said.
“We didn’t have a lot of cash sitting in an account … I think we just got lucky and made some smart investment decisions which helped.”
It’s a far cry from when the couple couldn’t find a home due to the rental crisis when they were previously living in Adelaide and had to turn to sub-standard options.
“We’ve managed to go from living in a caravan because we were living in Adelaide and we couldn’t find a rental with our dogs … So we’ve gone from living in a caravan, being kind of tertiary homeless essentially because we couldn’t get a rental, to now having been able to purchase our first home,” Natasha explained.
Rate rises beginning to bite for new homeowners
Natasha, 34, and Luke, 45, are among more than 300,000 Australians who have used the 5 per cent deposit scheme to get into the housing market with a much smaller than usual deposit, according to data from Housing Australia at the end of March. However that’s dating back to 2020 when the program first launched, before it was rebranded and significantly expanded in October last year to scrap income or placement caps, along with allowing for higher property price caps.
-
Pennsylvania3 minutes agoPA targets AI developers for allegedly misleading users
-
Rhode Island9 minutes agoOne Big Question After RHORI Renewal
-
South-Carolina15 minutes ago
Missouri’s new US House map goes to court while Louisiana and South Carolina consider redistricting
-
South Dakota21 minutes agoSD Lottery Powerball, Lotto America winning numbers for May 11, 2026 – AOL
-
Tennessee27 minutes agoMemphis voters file federal lawsuit against new congressional map, claiming discrimination: ‘White control over Tennessee politics’
-
Texas33 minutes ago
Texas sues Netflix for allegedly spying on kids, addicting users
-
Utah39 minutes agoData centers raise air quality and environmental concerns in Utah, doctor says
-
Vermont45 minutes ago
VT Lottery Powerball, Gimme 5 results for May 11, 2026
