Finance
EU paper argues for permissionless blockchain usage in traditional finance – Ledger Insights – blockchain for enterprise
The European Union has published a report exploring the potential for permissionless blockchain in traditional finance (TradFi). It argues that permissionless blockchains should at least be considered as options for TradFi and financial market infrastructures. However, adoption should happen in a cautious manner.
Fabian Schär of the University of Basel is the paper’s author. He wrote one of the most cited early papers on Decentralized Finance (DeFi). While Mr Schär is a proponent of permissionless blockchains and DeFi, the paper is nonetheless objective and thorough.
It argues that permissionless blockchains can be more neutral than private ones, and in turn encourage competition. Unfettered access enabled by public blockchains contrasts with the siloed permissioned blockchains that are proliferating. While public blockchains have drawbacks, there are many widely known workarounds to their challenges, particularly by adding permissions at the smart contract level.
Mr Schär proposes that permissionless blockchains can provide an interoperability layer for layer 2 blockchains, including regulated ones. When smart contracts are on a single chain, they are capable of being composable into more complex functionality. Composability is possible across multiple blockchains but is weaker and messy. We’d note the point about composability is sometimes a blind spot in the TradFi space. Our recent report on DLT payments highlights that some application designs overlook composability and how to address that.
The EU paper doesn’t gloss over the drawbacks of public blockchains, such as scalability, privacy, finality and governance. It delves into each topic, as well as the contentious issue of maximal extractable value (MEV) in which block proposers sometimes reorder transactions at the expense of blockchain users, a type of front running. Mr Schär describes each challenge and the pros and cons of the various workarounds.
Why permissionless blockchains are so topical in TradFi
Clearly asset managers are attracted to the potential of permissionless chains with the likes of BlackRock and Frankin Templeton launching on-chain funds.
From a policy perspective, the paper is timely for three reasons:
In the latter case, one example is Singapore’s global layer one (GL1), a public, permissioned and regulated blockchain, which looks similar to a permissionless blockchain.
The EU DLT Pilot Regime
In early 2023 the EU DLT Pilot Regime came into force, which relaxes some regulations relating to central securities depositories. Most importantly it allows the use of permissionless blockchains. We’ve previously written about DLT Pilot Regime candidate 21x, which plans to operate a trading and settlement infrastructure on a permissionless blockchain. Many of the workarounds mentioned in the EU paper will be put into action by 21x and other DLT Pilot Regime participants.
For example, 21x participants are restricted to known entities and it uses a central limit order book. Hence, market surveillance will result in the identification of MEV activities and the seizure of a frontrunner’s on-exchange assets. If there’s an issue with the blockchain infrastructure then the assets can be moved to a different blockchain.
Another reason why the paper is timely is the ongoing debate by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, which recently imposed tighter rules for permissionless blockchains, particularly for tokenized assets that are likely to take many of the precautions mentioned in this paper. This encourages the banks to only engage with permissioned blockchains and creates a divide between them and asset managers who don’t face the same restrictions. The Basel Committee also published a paper addressing potential workarounds, but the EU paper is more technical and goes further.
For anyone wishing to really understand the ins and outs of permissionless blockchains in the context of TradFi, this paper is a must read.
Finance
RIV Capital Reports Financial Results for the Third Quarter Ended September 30, 2024
Adjusted EBITDA1 loss improves; net loss primarily driven by non-cash pre-tax impairment charge on intangible assets
Ended the quarter with $50.7 million of cash to support growth initiatives in New York and Florida
TORONTO, Nov. 29, 2024 /PRNewswire/ – RIV Capital Inc. (“RIV Capital” or the “Company“) (CSE: RIV) (OTC: CNPOF), a firm dedicated to developing a leading multi-state platform with a strong portfolio of cannabis brands focused on key strategic markets in the United States (“U.S.“), today released its financial results for the third quarter ended September 30, 2024 (“Q3 2024“). All financial information in this press release is reported in U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated.
“Since the launch of adult-use sales in New York this year, we have achieved significant growth, driven by our ongoing enhancements to customer retail experiences and commitment to delivering exceptional customer service,” said Dave Vautrin, Chief Retail Officer and Interim Chief Executive Officer of RIV Capital. “With our operations scaling as patient and consumer demand continues to build, we experienced significant acceleration in the third quarter results, demonstrated by our record net revenue of $4.9 million. We now proudly operate three co-located adult-use and medical retail dispensaries, plus an additional medical-only location, across our footprint, and customer response has been great, with especially strong enthusiasm following the launch of the highly popular MOODS brand by FLUENT into the New York market.”
Mr. Vautrin added, “As we continue to improve our retail network, we’re also scaling our wholesale operations, with a growing pipeline of approximately 60 retailers. With the recent strategic distribution agreement with Nabis, we’re well-positioned to support this rapid growth across the state. This momentum has continued into the fourth quarter.”
Mr. Vautrin concluded, “Since announcing the proposed Business Combination with Cansortium, we’ve identified and captured substantial synergies, and our joint integration efforts are progressing smoothly. With Cansortium, we’re poised to complete this transaction on a solid foundation and positioned to quickly capitalize on the combined expertise and experience of our teams in some of the most dynamic markets in the cannabis industry.”
Finance
Pinstripes, Inc. Faces Financial Uncertainty Amid Capital Challenges and Store Performance Concerns
Pinstripes, Inc. (PNST) has disclosed a new risk, in the Accounting & Financial Operations category.
Pinstripes, Inc. is facing significant uncertainty regarding its ability to continue operations, as highlighted by concerns over meeting current financial obligations related to capital expenditures, lease commitments, and ongoing operations within the next year. The company’s financial projections, particularly those involving the performance of newly opened stores, contribute to this uncertainty. In response, management is seeking additional financing and capital raising efforts, with plans to address these issues by the end of the fiscal third quarter. However, there is no guarantee that these efforts will succeed, and failure to secure the necessary capital could severely impact the company’s financial health and stock price.
Overall, Wall Street has a Moderate Buy consensus rating on PNST stock based on 2 Buys.
To learn more about Pinstripes, Inc.’s risk factors, click here.
Finance
Elon Musk calls to ‘delete’ US finance consumer watchdog agency
Elon Musk has said he wants to “delete” the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), a federal watchdog that helps protect consumers from predatory financial practices.
The tech billionaire, who has been tapped to run a “Department of Government Efficiency” in the incoming Donald Trump administration, posted “Delete CFPB” on X, the social media site he owns. He added a declaration that the agency, which employs 1,700 people and has an annual budget of close to $700m, is an example of “too many duplicative regulatory agencies” in Washington.
The CFPB is an independent watchdog agency with oversight over banks and other financial institutions, created after the financial crash of 2008 and charged with overseeing consumer protection in the industry.
Musk’s post came in response to a recent podcast clip from the venture capitalist Marc Andreessen, a significant Trump donor, who said the agency’s primary purpose is to “terrorize financial institutions”.
But it was soon reported that Andreessen’s venture capital firm, Andreessen Horwitz, was among other investors who had backed LendUp, an online consumer payday lender, that was shut down by the CFPB in 2018.
The CFPB director, Rohit Chopra, said the company’s lending operations were shuttered “for repeatedly lying and illegally cheating its customers”.
Trump announced a plan for Musk and fellow entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy to run a new advisory agency, known by the acronym Doge, earlier this month. Musk has said he would like the newly formed commission to cut $2tn from federal government running costs – approximately a third of all government spending.
Trump has said Doge and its new “efficiency” tsars would “provide advice and guidance from outside of Government” to “restructure Federal Agencies”.
Ramaswamy and Musk – whose X bio is now headlined: “the people voted for major government reform” – outlined plans for a “drastic reduction” in regulations and “mass head-count reductions” last week in the Wall Street Journal.
The men said they would rely on two recent US supreme court rulings that limited the authority of federal regulatory agencies to “liberate individuals and businesses from illicit regulations never passed by Congress”.
They said Doge would target more than $500bn “authorised by Congress or being used in ways that Congress never intended”, including $535m in funding for public broadcasting, $1.5bn in grants to international organisations and nearly $300m given to progressive groups including Planned Parenthood.
DOoge would also carry out audits of government contracts to “yield significant savings” and “identify the minimum number of employees required at an agency for it to perform its constitutionally permissible and statutorily mandated functions”.
“Critics claim that we can’t meaningfully close the federal deficit without taking aim at entitlement programs like Medicare and Medicaid, which require Congress to shrink,” they wrote, referring to the healthcare programs covering more than 150 million Americans.
How far Ramaswamy and Musk will be able to influence cuts to federal programs and spending before running into legislative opposition is yet to be determined. Many have warned them that cutting bureaucracy is difficult and time-consuming.
On Wednesday, Musk asked in a poll on X what should happen to the budget for the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), the agency responsible for collecting federal taxes. The most popular result was to have its budget “deleted”. He later replied positively to a post that called for the IRS itself to be audited by Doge.
But dismantling the CFPB would be a signal of broader plans for disruption. The agency was formed after the financial crash of 2008, which was caused by insecure or predatory lending to “subprime” mortgage borrowers.
Safeguards to prevent a repeat of the disaster included regulatory financial reforms and the formation of CFPB. The agency reports that its work has resulted in over $20.7bn in compensation, cancelled debt and other forms of monetary relief for consumers and has requested responses from companies involved in more than 5.6m consumer complaints.
It has also drawn the attention of the conservative policy blueprint known as Project 2025, which called for CFPB to be abolished.
“The CFPB is a highly politicized, damaging, and utterly unaccountable federal agency. It is unconstitutional,” the document said. “The next conservative President should order the immediate dissolution of the agency”.
Musk last week also posted on social media naming several specific people and jobs that he aims to eliminate, targeting relatively obscure posts and otherwise unknown government employees.
“These tactics are aimed at sowing terror and fear at federal employees,” said Everett Kelley, president of the American Federation of Government Employees, which represents more than 800,000 of the 2.3 million civilian federal employees, told CNN. “It’s intended to make them fearful that they will become afraid to speak up.”
-
Science1 week ago
Trump nominates Dr. Oz to head Medicare and Medicaid and help take on 'illness industrial complex'
-
Health6 days ago
Holiday gatherings can lead to stress eating: Try these 5 tips to control it
-
Science3 days ago
Despite warnings from bird flu experts, it's business as usual in California dairy country
-
Health4 days ago
CheekyMD Offers Needle-Free GLP-1s | Woman's World
-
Science1 week ago
Alameda County child believed to be latest case of bird flu; source unknown
-
Technology3 days ago
Lost access? Here’s how to reclaim your Facebook account
-
Sports1 week ago
Behind Comcast's big TV deal: a bleak picture for once mighty cable industry
-
Entertainment2 days ago
Review: A tense household becomes a metaphor for Iran's divisions in 'The Seed of the Sacred Fig'