Connect with us

Finance

Embracing the next chapter: A personal finance writer’s journey to retirement

Published

on

Embracing the next chapter: A personal finance writer’s journey to retirement

A couple of years ago, I wrote a column about how to have a retirement worth saving for. It ended with a quote from personal finance educator Barbara O’Neill, who reflected on how the pandemic disrupted many retirees’ plans. “It wasn’t just two years lost, it was two good years,” O’Neill said then. “You don’t know how many of those you have left.” One of my younger colleagues objected to that sentiment, saying it was a jarring ending to an otherwise upbeat column. But my older co-workers got it. Those of us who currently have good health and energy don’t know how long those blessings will last. There’s no guarantee we’ll get to enjoy the retirements we have planned.

Embracing the next chapter: A personal finance writer’s journey to retirement(Freepik)

That lesson was driven home in July 2023, when a longtime colleague died at age 61. We’d had many talks over the years about the retirement he had envisioned. It’s heartbreaking that his dreams will never happen. But his death was the push I needed to make my own decision. By the time you read this, I will have retired from my job at personal finance site NerdWallet.

Stay tuned for all the latest updates on Ram Mandir! Click here

MAKING THE DECISION WAS SURPRISINGLY HARD

When our financial planner told us we could afford to retire, my initial reaction wasn’t joy but bemusement. I’ve been writing about retirement planning for three decades and saving for even longer, but it was always a goal in the distant, misty future. Making the decision felt like jumping off a cliff.

Would I be OK without the intellectual challenges, social interactions and sense of satisfaction I get from my job? Had I accomplished everything I wanted to in my career? And just how much would I miss that nice, steady paycheck and all the wonderful benefits NerdWallet provides, including massively subsidized health care?

Advertisement

DOING WHAT A JOURNALIST DOES: RESEARCH

At this point, I have to acknowledge the huge privilege of even having a choice about when to retire. Almost half of retirees leave the workforce earlier than they planned, according to the Employee Benefit Research Institute. Some are laid off or forced out. Others have health issues or must care for loved ones who are sick or disabled. Many people keep working out of necessity: They have bills to pay and too little savings.

Knowing all that didn’t make the choice easy, however. So I did what I do best: copious research. I found it hugely helpful to read O’Neill’s book, “Flipping a Switch: Your Guide to Happiness and Financial Security in Later Life.” Another good read is “Independence Day: What I Learned About Retirement from Some Who’ve Done It and Some Who Never Will,” by Steve Lopez, my former Los Angeles Times colleague.

My husband and I had many, many discussions with our financial planner. We asked her to rerun our plan with different assumptions about what we’d spend, how we’d tap our funds, what the markets might do and what we’d earn with part-time work. This stress testing gave us confidence in our plan.

Our planner also connected us with an insurance agent who helped us figure out health coverage. My husband is old enough for Medicare, but I’m a few years shy of 65 and we have a daughter going to college in another state. I’m glad we have the option to buy health insurance through the Affordable Care Act exchanges. But continuing my employer’s group coverage for my daughter and myself through the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) turned out to be the most cost-effective option for now.

Our financial plan worked and health care was solved, but emotionally I was still resisting. Ultimately, I realized why. I was looking at retirement solely as an ending.

Advertisement

LOOKING AHEAD, RATHER THAN BACK

With previous big life changes — buying a home, getting married, having a child, starting new jobs — excitement about the adventure to come quickly overcame concerns about what I was giving up. I needed to stop focusing on what I was retiring from and start contemplating what I was retiring to.

Today, I’m seeing retirement for what it is: the beginning of an interesting new chapter in our lives. The time I once spent building a career will be invested in travel, volunteering, and deepening relationships with friends and family.

I’m proud of what I’ve accomplished. I’ve won awards, written five books, contributed to the growth of a company (NerdWallet) and its award-winning podcast (“Smart Money”). Most importantly, I’ve helped people solve their money problems. I’ll continue with that last part, but I’m also looking forward to the rest of what comes next.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Finance

Trump win has economists concerned US economy will fail to make soft landing

Published

on

Trump win has economists concerned US economy will fail to make soft landing

Investors this year have grown increasingly confident the US economy will achieve a “soft landing.”

But the election of Donald Trump as the nation’s next president has complicated the outlook.

And some economists now think it’s likely the US could face another inflation resurgence if Trump follows through with his key campaign promises.

“We are in the soft landing,” Nobel prize-winning economist and Columbia University professor Joseph Stiglitz said at Yahoo Finance’s annual Invest conference on Tuesday. “But that ends Jan. 20.”

Joseph Stiglitz at Yahoo Finance Invest conference. (Source: Yahoo Finance)

Trump and his proposed policies have been viewed as potentially more inflationary due to the president-elect’s campaign promises of high tariffs on imported goods, tax cuts for corporations, and curbs on immigration. Those policies could also pressure an already bloated federal deficit, further complicating the Federal Reserve’s path forward for interest rates.

Advertisement

“The biggest risk is a large across-the-board tariff, which would likely hit growth hard,” Jan Hatzius, chief economist at Goldman Sachs, wrote in a note to clients on Thursday.

Jennifer McKeown, chief global economist at Capital Economics, also acknowledged in a note this week there are “upside risks” to inflation “stemming partly from Trump’s proposed tariff and immigration policies.”

And investors have taken notice.

On Wednesday, the latest Global Fund Manager Survey from Bank of America highlighted increased expectations of a “no landing” scenario, in which the economy continues to grow but inflation pressures persist, leading to a higher-for-longer interest rate policy from the central bank.

Tariffs have been one of the most talked-about promises of Trump’s campaign. The president-elect has pledged to impose blanket tariffs of at least 10% on all trading partners, including a 60% tariff on Chinese imports.

Advertisement

“It will be inflationary,” Stiglitz said. “And then you start thinking of the inflationary spiral. The prices go up. Workers will want more wages. And then you start thinking of what happens if others retaliate [with their own duties.]”

Minneapolis Fed president Neel Kashkari categorized a possible retaliation as a “tit-for-tat” trade war, which would keep inflation elevated over the long term.

“If inflation goes up, [Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell] is going to raise interest rates,” Stiglitz said.

“You combine the higher interest rates and the retaliation from other countries, you’re going to get a global slowdown. Then you have the worst of all possible worlds: inflation and stagnation, or slow growth.”

Advertisement

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

Trading assets at US banks cross $1tn for first time since financial crisis

Published

on

Trading assets at US banks cross tn for first time since financial crisis

Stay informed with free updates

The trading accounts of US banks topped $1tn in the third quarter — their highest level in more than 16 years and close to an all-time high — as the nation’s largest financial firms seek to profit from rebuilding their market-making businesses.

That growth has at the same time left the banks, particularly the largest ones, more exposed to market moves than at any time since the financial crisis as they hold ever-greater inventories of price-sensitive securities.

Their trading accounts last peaked at just over $1tn, slightly higher than today, in the first quarter of 2008, according to industry tracker BankRegData. That was just a few months before the bursting of the housing bubble that led to a credit crunch, cratered markets and sent the US into a significant recession.

Advertisement

“You see the cash that the banks had sitting on the sidelines flowing recently into their trading books,” said Bill Moreland, who runs BankRegData, which compiled the trading data from the bank’s regulatory filings with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. “It is a bet on financial assets, rather than say lending or the economy, because that’s where they see the returns.”

Trading was a key source of the bank instability that contributed to taxpayer-financed bailouts in the financial crisis, as desks took proprietary directional bets that turned against them. After the crisis, lawmakers adopted rules that prohibited banks from speculating with house money and required that trading facilitate client business.

Nearly all of the trading activity in the US banking industry remains concentrated at the nation’s largest banks. The biggest is JPMorgan Chase, which had $506bn, roughly half the industry total, in its trading account at the end of the third quarter, up from $329bn at the beginning of the year, according to its FDIC filings.

But all of the big lenders, including Citigroup, Bank of America and Wells Fargo, have boosted their trading assets this year, according to data logged with the FDIC.

Trading accounts at Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, which generate more of their income from Wall Street activity than lending, are the highest they have been in years.

Advertisement

The biggest jump, for all the banks, has been in plain-vanilla equity holdings. JPMorgan’s stock market traders held $190bn in securities, more than double the $85bn they had at the beginning of the year.

But bank trading desks also have increased their holdings of asset-backed securities. These have been among Wall Street’s hottest financing markets this year, such as bonds comprised of consumer debt like credit cards and auto loans.

Despite the jump in assets, executives and industry analysts say the banks’ trading businesses are significantly less risky than they were prior to the financial crisis.

They say much of the activity that the big banks carry out is either on behalf of their clients or to facilitate client trades. The Dodd Frank Act and other post-financial crisis legislation have made it hard for banks, as they once did, to make proprietary bets or to put their depositors funds at risk.

For example, value-at-risk — or VaR — assessments, which estimate how much a bank could lose in the market in any one day, in most cases stand at levels that are half of where they were before the financial crisis.

Advertisement

And while trading assets are up, they still only make up 4 per cent of the banking industry’s total assets, and about half of what they were as a percentage of assets back in 2008.

“Generally the business of banks these days is to sell the securities and investment to others, not to hold it themselves,” said Christopher Whalen, a veteran bank analyst at Institutional Risk Analyst. “But activity is up and can’t sell everything you want.”

Additional reporting by Joshua Franklin in New York.

Continue Reading

Finance

Kevin Costner Meeting “All the Billionaires” to Finance ‘Horizon’ 3&4 — World of Reel

Published

on

Kevin Costner Meeting “All the Billionaires” to Finance ‘Horizon’ 3&4 — World of Reel

As it remains in a state of limbo, Kevin Costner’s four-part Western “Horizon: An American Saga” has already been marked for dead by some in the industry.

Yes, things aren’t looking too bright for Costner’s saga, and with the third film having only been partially shot, his wallet is already looking at financial losses in the excess of $75M, maybe more. These downer numbers still haven’t stopped Costner in seeking financing to complete the third and fourth films.

In an interview with Deadline, Costner admits having had meetings with some of the richest people in the world.

“I’m hoping, I’m dreaming, I’m meeting all the billionaires that we all hear about — they’re all hiding in the shadows,” Costner is now telling Deadline.

“I’m don’t know how I’m going to do it,” he added, “but I’m going to make [Chapter 3] and then I’m going to make the fourth one. And if you want to say ’the end’ at that point, then that’s the end.”

Advertisement

Costner describes the project, and its hopeful completion, to pushing the rock of Sisyphus up the mountain and, alternately, to searching for proof of extraterrestrial life.

“It’s my own private UFO,” he said. “I’ve seen it, and I will never forget it, and I chase it as long as I can. … I will figure out a way to bring you 3 and 4, because you’ve gone to 1 and you’re gonna go to 2, and we’re all gonna go west together.”

Earlier in the year, Costner had repeatedly stated that he would be shooting ‘Part 3’ this fall, but that clearly hasn’t materialized. He shot nine days’ worth of footage in April, but production had to “temporarily” shut down due to lack of funds.

There is currently no release date for ‘Chapter 2,’ which was pulled from Warner Bros’ summer schedule after the first instalment, which cost $110M, failed to lure an audience into theaters, earning just $29M domestically. ‘Chapter 2’ did end up world premiering at the Venice Film Festival in September, albeit to weak reviews which further complicated matters for potential distribution.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending