Connect with us

Entertainment

Wendy Williams declares, 'I am not cognitively impaired,' disputing guardian's assertions

Published

on

Wendy Williams declares, 'I am not cognitively impaired,' disputing guardian's assertions

Wendy Williams is speaking out against her own legal guardian who stated last year that the former TV host is “cognitively impaired, permanently disabled, and legally incapacitated.”

The daytime talk personality, 60, asserted Thursday morning: “I am not cognitively impaired.” Williams and her niece Alex Finnie called into “The Breakfast Club” radio show, where they raised concerning allegations about Williams’ care under guardian Sabrina Morrissey.

“I feel like I’m imprisoned,” Williams said.

Williams was placed under financial guardianship amid a legal battle with Wells Fargo in 2022. Later that year, “The Wendy Williams Show” aired its final episode after 13 seasons. The daytime series was canceled amid its host’s physical, mental and financial struggles.

Since 2022, Williams has been receiving treatment at an unknown facility — a “luxury prison” in New York, her niece said Thursday. Williams and Finnie spoke to “The Breakfast Club” about allegedly tight security at the facility and accused Morrissey of keeping the former radio host from seeing and contacting her loved ones.

Advertisement

Morrissey’s role as Williams’ legal guardian garnered public attention last year ahead of Lifetime’s four-part documentary “Where Is Wendy Williams?” Before the documentary’s February release, news broke that Williams had been diagnosed with aphasia and frontotemporal dementia. That same week, Morrissey filed a lawsuit against the “Where Is Wendy Williams?” team, including Lifetime parent company A+E Networks. At the time, Morrissey requested a restraining order “prohibiting publication of [the] documentary,” but a New York judge gave Lifetime the green light to proceed.

Williams on Thursday shied away from questions about the documentary (“I don’t wanna watch that again,” “I don’t wanna talk about that”) and doubled down on her cognitive state. In a September legal filing, Morrissey alleged Williams did not “have the capacity to consent to being filmed” for the Lifetime documentary and that her dementia and aphasia diagnoses left her “cognitively impaired.”

“How dare,” Williams said Thursday. “Do I seem that way?”

She added: “For the last three years, I have been caught up in the system.”

Finnie, who has spoken out publicly against her aunt’s guardian, encouraged “The Breakfast Club” listeners to spread the word about Williams’ experience and take action “to make sure my aunt is in a place where she is living her life in dignity.” She called on Williams’ caretakers to “give her the freedom she deserves.”

Advertisement

Before the new year, Williams attended her son Kevin Hunter Jr.’s college graduation. Williams said she is hoping to get some time with family to celebrate her father’s 94th birthday, but alleged — seemingly fighting back tears — that Morrissey might not allow it. “My life is like f— up,” Williams said.

Roberta Kaplan, an attorney representing Morrissey in the lawsuit against A&E, bolstered the guardian’s September claims about Williams’ cognitive health. Kaplan said in a statement Thursday that “a state court found her to be legally incapacitated, meaning that she is not capable of making legal and financial decisions on her own.”

Kaplan added: “Unfortunately, because of her diagnosis, Wendy’s condition will only get worse with time and she will require care for the rest of her life. But as anyone who has had a family member with dementia knows, Wendy has both good days and bad days. It is truly a shame that there is so much voyeuristic attention to this right now, since it only leads to the same kinds of exploitation that we saw in the so-called documentary, as alleged in our complaint.”

Toward the end of her “Breakfast Club” appearance, Finnie condemned the “broken” guardianship system. Last month, Hunter also voiced concern for his mom and told fans his mother was “sober and wants to come home.”

“The longer she’s under this guardianship, the longer they have the keys to her life,” Finnie said, “her personal, her financial, emotional … everything.”

Advertisement

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: The Mortuary Assistant – HorrorFuel.com: Reviews, Ratings and Where to Watch the Best Horror Movies & TV Shows

Published

on

Movie Review: The Mortuary Assistant – HorrorFuel.com: Reviews, Ratings and Where to Watch the Best Horror Movies & TV Shows

Forget the “video game movie” curse; The Mortuary Assistant is a bone-chilling triumph that stands entirely on its own two feet. Starring Willa Holland (Arrow) as Rebecca Owens, the film follows a newly certified mortician whose “overtime shift” quickly devolves into a grueling battle for her soul.

What Makes It Work

The film expertly balances the stomach-churning procedural work of embalming with a spiraling demonic nightmare. Alongside a mysterious mentor played by Paul Sparks (Boardwalk Empire), Rebecca is forced to confront both ancient evils and her own buried traumas. And boy, does she have a lot of them.

Thanks to a full-scale, practical River Fields Mortuary set, the film drips with realism, like you can almost smell the rot and bloat of the bodies through the screen.

The skin effects are hauntingly accurate. The way the flesh moves during surgical scenes is so visceral. I’ve seen a lot of flesh wounds in horror films and in real life, and the bodies, skin, and organs. The Mortuary Assistant (especially in the opening scene) looks so real that I skipped supper after watching it. And that’s saying something. Your girl likes to eat.

Co-written by the game’s creator, Brian Clarke, the movie dives deeper into the demonic mythology. Whether you’ve seen every ending or don’t know a scalpel from a trocar, the story is perfectly self-contained. If you’ve never played the game, or played it a hundred times, the film works equally well, which is hard to do when it comes to game adaptations.

Advertisement

Nailed It

This film does a lot of things right, but the isolation of the night shift is suffocating. Between the darkness of the hallways and the “residents” that refuse to stay still, the film delivers a relentlessly immersive experience. And thankfully, although this movie is filled with dark rooms and shadows, it’s easy to see every little thing. Don’t you hate it when a movie is so dark that you can’t see what’s happening? It’s one of my pet peeves.

The oh-so-awesome Jeremiah Kipp directs the film and has made something absolutely nightmare-inducing. Kipp recently joined us for an interview, took us inside the film, discussed its details and the game’s lore, and so much more. I urge you to check out our interview. He’s awesome!

The Verdict

This isn’t just a cash-grab; it’s a high-effort adaptation that respects the source material while elevating the horror genre. With incredible special effects and a powerhouse cast, it’s the kind of movie that will make you rethink working late ever again. Dropping on Friday the 13th, this is a must-watch for horror fans. It’s grisly, intelligent, and genuinely terrifying.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Former Live Nation executive says he was fired after raising ‘financial misconduct’ concerns

Published

on

Former Live Nation executive says he was fired after raising ‘financial misconduct’ concerns

A former executive at Live Nation, the world’s largest live entertainment company, is suing the company, alleging that he was wrongfully terminated after he raised concerns about alleged financial misconduct and improper accounting practices.

Nicholas Rumanes alleges he was “fraudulently induced” in 2022 to leave a lucrative position as head of strategic development at a real estate investment trust to create a new role as executive vice president of development and business practice at Beverly Hills-based Live Nation.

In his new position, Rumanes said, he raised “serious and legitimate alarm” over the the company’s business practices.

As a result, he says, he was “unlawfully terminated,” according to the lawsuit filed Thursday in Los Angeles County Superior Court.

“Rumanes was, simply put, promised one job and forced to accept another. And then he was cut loose for insisting on doing that lesser job with integrity and honesty,” according to the lawsuit.

Advertisement

He is seeking $35 million in damages.

Representatives for Live Nation were not immediately available for comment.

The lawsuit comes a week after a federal jury in Manhattan found that Live Nation and its Ticketmaster subsidiary had operated a monopoly over major concert venues, controlling 86% of the concert market.

Rumanes’ lawsuit describes a “culture of deception” at Live Nation, saying its “basic business model was to misstate and exaggerate financial figures in efforts to solicit and secure business.”

Such practices “spanned a wide spectrum of projects in what appeared to be a company-wide pattern of financial misrepresentation and misleading disclosures,” the lawsuit states.

Advertisement

Rumanes says he received materials and documents that showed that the company inflated projected revenues across multiple venue development projects.

Additionally, Rumanes contends that the company violated a federal law that requires independent financial auditing and transparency and instead ran Live Nation “through a centralized, opaque structure” that enables it to “bypass oversight and internal checks and balances.”

In 2010, as a condition of the Live Nation-Ticketmaster merger, the newly formed company agreed to a consent decree with the government that prohibited the firm from threatening venues to use Ticketmaster. In 2019 the Justice Department found that the company had repeatedly breached the agreement, and it extended the decree.

Rumanes contends that he brought his concerns to the attention of the company’s management, but his warnings were “repeatedly ignored.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Madhuvidhu’ movie review: A light-hearted film that squanders a promising conflict

Published

on

‘Madhuvidhu’ movie review: A light-hearted film that squanders a promising conflict

At the centre of Madhuvidhu directed by Vishnu Aravind is a house where only men reside, three generations of them living in harmony. Unlike the Anjooran household in Godfather, this is not a house where entry is banned to women, but just that women don’t choose to come here. For Amrithraj alias Ammu (Sharafudheen), the protagonist, 28 marriage proposals have already fallen through although he was not lacking in interest.

When a not-so-cordial first meeting with Sneha (Kalyani Panicker) inevitably turns into mutual attraction, things appear about to change. But some unexpected hiccups are waiting for them, their different religions being one of them. Writers Jai Vishnu and Bipin Mohan do not seem to have any major ambitions with Madhuvidhu, but they seem rather content to aim for the middle space of a feel-good entertainer. Only that they end up hitting further lower.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending