Connect with us

Entertainment

Unpacking the wild twists, excessive vomit in ‘Triangle of Sadness’: ‘Maybe it was too much’

Published

on

Unpacking the wild twists, excessive vomit in ‘Triangle of Sadness’: ‘Maybe it was too much’

Ruben Östlund factors to his personal “triangle of unhappiness.”

(Evelyn Freja / For The Instances)

Spoiler alert: The next interview addresses plot twists and particulars of “Triangle of Disappointment,” together with the ending.

When Swedish filmmaker Ruben Östlund gained the highest prize at this yr’s Cannes Movie Competition for “Triangle of Disappointment,” it put him within the rarified class of two-time Palme d’Or winners. The distinguished group additionally contains Francis Ford Coppola, Michael Haneke, Jean-Pierre and Luc Dardenne, Emir Kusturica, Shohei Imamura, Bille August, Alf Sjöberg and Ken Loach.

Advertisement

However none of these titans of worldwide cinema ever gained for a movie with an outrageously prolonged sequence of passengers aboard a luxurious yacht violently vomiting and soiling themselves throughout a storm at sea. Östlund, 48, prides himself on upending the traditions of upscale artwork cinema, creating biting social satires in his earlier movies, “Drive Majeure” and the Palme d’Or-winning “The Sq.,” with surgical precision. Taken collectively, they compose a casual trilogy on privilege and up to date male anxiousness. However apart from being trenchant examinations of contemporary life, his motion pictures are additionally very enjoyable.

In “Triangle of Disappointment” — the title refers back to the space on the high of the nostril and between the eyebrows, usually mounted with Botox — a male mannequin Carl (Harris Dickinson), insecure in regards to the monetary success of his mannequin/influencer girlfriend, Yaya (Charlbi Dean), accompanies her aboard a luxurious yacht with a drunken Marxist captain (Woody Harrelson). When a violent storm causes all of the company to change into extraordinarily seasick and the ship itself to crash, a bunch of survivors land on a seemingly abandoned island. That’s the place Abigail (Dolly de Leon), a cleansing lady from the ship, immediately assumes an more and more tyrannical management place because of her sensible expertise, comparable to figuring out the best way to begin a hearth.

Following the movie’s Cannes success, surprising tragedy struck in August when the South African-born Dean died at age 32 in New York Metropolis from a sudden sickness. Östlund addressed paying tribute to Dean as he sat for an interview on the latest Toronto Worldwide Movie Competition within the form of luxurious resort restaurant his motion pictures may very properly upbraid.

Charlbi Dean and Harris Dickinson in the movie "Triangle of Sadness."

Charlbi Dean and Harris Dickinson within the film “Triangle of Disappointment.”

(Cannes Movie Competition)

Advertisement

I can’t even think about how troublesome it should be to advertise the movie following the demise of Charlbi Dean. The timing of that will need to have come as such a shock.

I used to be involved together with her a number of days earlier than, and all of us, the ensemble, had been planning to go collectively to Toronto and to the totally different premieres. And mainly I used to be woken up by a textual content … first you didn’t imagine it was a hundred-percent true, and it took many hours earlier than I might affirm [it was]. In fact then probably the most unhappy factor is Charlbi was an incredible colleague. She was a crew participant, she was lifting up everyone round her, and you might actually really feel that on set. She was trying ahead a lot for the premiere of the movie within the States or in Canada. And we had a good time in Cannes. It was like a sense of this was her time, and possibly a brand new route of her profession.

It’s all the time a tragedy when somebody is younger and dies, it got here very sudden and it’s going to really feel a bit empty when she’s not there subsequent to us. For me, it’s essential to enter this work in the identical approach I’d have completed if she was subsequent to me, as a result of it’s additionally a approach for me to pay tribute to her, to her work and to her legacy. However I undoubtedly assume that the individuals within the forged felt it was a bit bit laborious to speak in regards to the movie.

And as a method to begin speaking in regards to the film, are you able to talk about the construction? What made you need to have the three distinct sections to the film — opening with Carl and Yaya, shifting onto the yacht after which on the island?

I knew from the start that I wished the movie to be about magnificence as a foreign money. This got here out of discussions I had with my spouse, she’s a trend photographer, and she or he had advised me so many fascinating tales about how the fashions usually come from very totally different elements of society. Unexpectedly they’re pushed up in society, and so they get used to a sure form of life-style and go on these journeys all over the place. However the profession could be very, very brief, so what ought to they do afterwards? Ought to they return to being a automobile mechanic, just like the inspiration for the character of Carl — that mannequin labored as a automobile mechanic, and unexpectedly he turned one of many best-paid fashions on this planet. There’s one thing absurd with this, to depend on your magnificence as foreign money.

Advertisement

That was the start line of the thought [and then the models] go to a luxurious yacht, the place many of those individuals possibly don’t have entry to that world if it wasn’t due to their foreign money. After which go to the third a part of the desert island, the place we take away all of the earlier hierarchies and we begin from the underside and know-how turns into a very powerful factor.

I assumed that the abandoned island was an effective way of commenting on our instances, the place only a few of us even have the fundamental talent of the best way to survive [and] are so used to a sure form of life-style. What occurs after we take that away?

With the yacht sequence specifically, was it essential that it not be really easy to scale back the movie to simply “wealthy individuals are terrible?” Did you need it to be in some way extra sophisticated?

Sure, undoubtedly. However I feel one factor with regards to my movies, I’m form of imply to all the characters. I’m not nicer to the poor than I’m to the wealthy, I’m form of imply to everybody. And for me, I feel the reason being as a result of I’m keen on after we are failing and when we’re not succeeding in being good people. I’m not so keen on after we succeed. I’m keen on failing as sociology — we’re not pointing our fingers on the person, we’re truly pointing fingers on the context, the set-up that may create our habits.

For me, it will be fully not fascinating to point out a superb particular person succeeding in being good. We have already got all these tales doing that. I need to add one thing … and I need to nook the characters. That’s possibly higher than saying being imply or harsh. I need to nook them and put them as much as cope with dilemmas: “You will have two choices, none of them are simple. How do you cope with it?”

Advertisement

I heard one thing fascinating after I did the analysis of the yachts. That they had an issue with the jacuzzi that that they had in the master suite, as a result of fairly often the person that stayed in the master suite wished to replenish the jacuzzi with champagne. In order that they crammed it up with champagne each time they had been requested for this, nevertheless it occurred very often. That they had sufficient when one of many passengers wished to fill it up with champagne and goldfish. They’re like, “Possibly we have now to maneuver the jacuzzi from the master suite.” I assumed it was improbable.

They take a look at it from a behavioristic perspective. It simply creates unhealthy issues with these passengers. They’re so used to asking for no matter they need. And we’re not allowed to say no, so possibly we should always transfer the grasp jacuzzi.

Ruben Ostlund poses for a portrait in New York

Ruben Östlund is a part of the choose membership of filmmakers to win two Palme d’Ors on the Cannes Movie Competition. Of the primary time, he displays, “To win it as soon as was the sensation of like, ‘Okay, wow, I’m one of many fortunate ones that really get to expertise this.’”

(Evelyn Freja / For The Instances)

I’ve to ask in regards to the vomiting sequence, when everybody on the yacht turns into graphically sick. Clearly, the extremity of it’s a part of the purpose, however how did you resolve on the correct quantity of an excessive amount of?

Advertisement

From the start, I made a decision that I wished to push it very far, so the viewers would really feel, “Please save them. They’ve had sufficient.” It’s very laborious to know the way far you’ve got pushed it since you get so used to the fabric your self. So after I was sitting and enhancing it, I stated, “That is nothing,” as a result of I’ve watched it 100 instances. After which after we had the primary screening of the movie, I spotted, “Oh s—, possibly I overdid it.” Possibly I ought to have been a bit bit extra cautious. Possibly it ought to have been a bit bit much less. Possibly it was an excessive amount of ultimately. I apologized to the viewers. But it surely was too late to recut the movie.

It’s in regards to the dynamic of the entire movie, in fact. I like to push my scenes. There’s so many motion pictures that I watch the place you’ve got an incredible expertise whenever you watch the movie, however then after that I don’t actually bear in mind it. For me, I actually need to depart a mark. I would like individuals to know, “Oh my God, that is pushing it additional than I might count on.” The primary model of the movie was 3 hours and 45 minutes, mainly with the identical scenes, so the scenes had been a lot, for much longer. After which I slowly sculpt it down … however the throw-ups, that took me half a yr to edit.


Now I hope you don’t thoughts speaking a bit in regards to the ending. The movie ends with a cliffhanger, whether or not one character will kill one other, sending them again to civilization or not. What was it that made you need to depart audiences as you do?

I don’t assume it is crucial if she kills her or not. I feel the essential half is can we establish with the opportunity of her to do it? Then if she does it or not, okay, that may randomly play out in two other ways. And I feel additionally that I had an concept that I wished half of the viewers to need her to kill and half of the viewers to say, ‘No, don’t do it.’ So for me, it’s not fascinating what she does, however that it’s potential for her to kill her.

The dilemma of the ending looks like an incredible distillation of your filmmaking and the type of ethical questions that you just wish to ask of audiences.

Advertisement

Sure, undoubtedly. Each time I watch one thing that I’ve to mirror myself on how I ought to relate to a state of affairs, then I get . After which I additionally begin to ask questions. Mainly, all my movies attempt to confront myself with conditions that I feel are laborious to deal with.

Director Ruben Ostlund and "Triangle of Sadness" co-star Dolly De Leon pose with the Palme d'Or Award

Director Ruben Ostlund and “Triangle of Disappointment” co-star Dolly de Leon pose with the Palme d’Or Award in the course of the seventy fifth annual Cannes Movie Competition.

(Stephane Cardinale – Corbis/Corbis through Getty Photos)

You at the moment are in extraordinarily rarified firm to have gained the Palme d’Or at Cannes twice. What was the expertise like?

To win it as soon as was the sensation of like, “Okay, wow, I’m one of many fortunate ones that really get to expertise this.” Everyone knows how laborious it’s to make a movie that’s ok to enter competitors, and if you find yourself in competitors, then to battle with the perfect movies as a way to get a prize. So I used to be very fortunate.

Advertisement

The subsequent time after we had been sitting within the award ceremony and we see prize after prize go to different movies — lastly it’s just one prize left, and I began to really feel this vacancy as a result of I began to determine we’re going to win the Palme d’Or once more. I’m beginning to really feel, “Do I actually need to undergo this once more?” It’s lots of work, however on the similar time, like, wow, am I now within the league with Coppola and Michael Haneke and the Dardennes and it feels so regular, however I assumed it will really feel particular? It’s scary how regular it feels.

And one factor with the second Palme — I need to be humble, however you recognize, it’s a chance now to win a 3rd Palme. Nobody has completed that earlier than. I don’t need to be conceited, nevertheless it truly is a chance.

A man

Ruben Ostlund.

(Evelyn Freja / For The Instances)

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Movie review: 'Despicable Me 4' is exactly what you'd expect

Published

on

Movie review: 'Despicable Me 4' is exactly what you'd expect

Charm sets the film apart

“Despicable Me 4” isn’t amazing by any means and probably won’t be in conversation for Best Animated Film at the Oscars, but, like “Rise of Gru,” what sets it apart from any other run-of-the-mill animated film is the charm of the franchise. The reason people continue to rush to the theaters to see these films is their consistency. No matter if it’s a spinoff or a direct sequel, you know walking into a “Despicable Me” film what you’re going to get, and that’s perfectly fine because you’ll still have a good time.

The new additions of Maxime Le Mal (Will Ferrell) and Poppie (Joey King) are fine. They don’t get much setup and are just thrown at you as new characters, which is fine but very forgettable. The standouts, of course, are the Minions, as well as the addition of Gru Jr. The combination of the two was probably the best part of the whole film. I could’ve watched a 90-minute film of just that.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

'MaXXXine' is Ti West's Hollywood horror story. The real-life locations are even scarier

Published

on

'MaXXXine' is Ti West's Hollywood horror story. The real-life locations are even scarier

Horror filmmaker Ti West steps out of the blackness behind the Bates Motel hours after the last tourist tram has made it to safety. Behind him looms the “Psycho” house where Mrs. Bates lurked in the window monitoring the movements of Janet Leigh’s Marion Crane — a shot West references in his 2022 slasher “X,” set in 1979, about an elderly farm wife named Pearl who becomes murderously inflamed by a troupe of adult actors shooting a skin flick in her barn. Pearl, an aspiring performer herself, got her own movie the following year in West’s eponymous prequel that rewinds to 1918, when the psychotic failed starlet fed her rival to an alligator named Theda Bara.

Now, West is releasing the third chiller in the series, “MaXXXine,” which finds Maxine Minx, the sole survivor of the first film’s “Texas porn star massacre,” hellbent on becoming a legitimate movie star in 1980s Los Angeles. After six years of sex work, Maxine, played ferociously by Mia Goth, has finally landed her first mainstream role in a sequel called “The Puritan 2.” But her past is still in pursuit, with one chase scene sending Maxine fleeing for her life across the Universal Studios backlot, through the Old West facades to the New York stoops, eventually scampering up the jagged “Psycho” stairs right behind him.

“It’s a weird thing to point a camera at if you’re not making ‘Psycho,’” says West, 43, as he heads farther into the darkness, lighted only by a handful of eerie red lanterns. He calls his trilogy “movie-flavored movies” — artifice and dreams are the top notes. “X” is about scrappy strivers trying to break into the business; “Pearl,” about the dangers of buying into the fantasies onscreen. “MaXXXine,” the highest-profile film of West’s career, wrestles with accepting that Hollywood isn’t quite what one hopes.

Mia Goth in the movie “MaXXXine,” her third with West. “It was the first time I had that dynamic between me and a director where it felt there was something really intimate to it,” she says.

(A24)

Advertisement

“He was ready to deal with this kind of scale, and it’s definitely something he was hungry for,” Goth says, chiming in over Zoom. In addition to playing multiple roles across this mini-franchise, Goth co-wrote “Pearl” and executive-produced the last two films. “We just kind of manifested it,” she continues, “built this entire trilogy into existence. And it’s been incredible to see it unfold.”

West, however, tends to be scrupulously anti-hype. “It is not lost on me that there is a meta thing happening with these movies and me and Mia, and that’s gratifying and strange,” he says. “And it’s also something that we’ve never taken any time to stop and talk about. We were too busy making movies.”

While the marketing team at A24 is all in on “MaXXXine” — “I’ve never had a billboard before,” the director beams — West has been a legitimate filmmaker for well over a decade. His resume of well-regarded independent movies includes the 2016 cowboy vengeance drama “In a Valley of Violence” with Ethan Hawke and John Travolta, plus a string of festival hits like 2009’s “The House of the Devil,” which disposed of a pre-celeb Greta Gerwig early on in a marvelously nasty Hitchcock-esque shock.

Unafraid, a man sits on the front steps of an iconic movie murder house.

“It hasn’t lost its mystique,” West says of the “Psycho” house, a “MaXXXine” location. “Even tonight it’s still like: What a rare opportunity to actually walk up the steps.”

(Jason Armond / Los Angeles Times)

Advertisement

Still, he’s come a long way since his first trip to the Bates Motel. When he was in middle school, he and his family vacationed at Universal Studios Florida, which had just wrapped “Psycho IV” on its own copy of the set. As a promotional tie-in, the park launched an attraction that taught fans the camera tricks behind the famous shower scene. One volunteer got to brandish a rubber knife and learn how to stab a Marion Crane scream-a-like. West wasn’t chosen, but he went back home with a pair of Bates Motel souvenir slippers and an appreciation for film craft.

“Now that’s all gone, and it’s a Shrek ride or something,” he shrugs. “No offense to Shrek.”

West spent the rest of his youth in Wilmington, Del., renting five VHS tapes for $5 on Fridays at his local video store. One weekend, he rented “Habit,” a grungy but brilliant microbudget vampire flick made by filmmaker Larry Fessenden. Shortly after, he moved to New York and took a film class taught by director Kelly Reichardt, who’d played a cameo in the film. Reichardt introduced the two and Fessenden became West’s mentor, eventually producing his debut feature, “The Roost,” shot exactly 20 years ago with more moxie than money.

“Apparently, now we’re mentioned on the tour,” West adds of his upgraded circumstances, in mild disbelief. “I feel a little bit like I’ve made it.” Filming on the lot took Herculean coordination. Some theme-park trams were rerouted, others couldn’t be. Shots were hastily filmed in the gaps between gawkers. Once, the timing went awry and a few dozen tourists interrupted a take. Cameras out, the visitors snapped away at Goth and Elizabeth Debicki like they were tigers in a zoo.

Advertisement
A man and his black dog walk in a Los Angeles cemetery.

West and his dog, Molly, visit Hollywood Forever Cemetery, one of the filming locations for “MaXXXine.”

(Myung J. Chun / Los Angeles Times)

If West is now a Hollywood animal himself, the only affectation he’s adopted is a tiny 12-pound black dog named Molly who accompanies him everywhere. During this night stroll, she’s quietly tucked into a sling around his hips. On set, Molly had her own chair that read “Executive Paw-ducer.” The next morning, as our personal tour of “MaXXXine’s” locations continues, she’s wearing an A24-branded leash and trying to sneak sips of West’s iced oat-milk latte.

Today, he and Molly and a photographer are piled into an SUV that stops at Hollywood Forever Cemetery, the location where two of the film’s detectives, played by Michelle Monaghan and Bobby Cannavale, make a grisly discovery. (Molly insists on relieving herself in a spot without any graves — she’s a professional.) The fictional corpses planted here by the production were mutilated in the manner of Richard Ramirez, popularly known as the Night Stalker, the real-life L.A. serial killer who murdered at least 13 people during the ’80s. That paranoia is the film’s terrifying backdrop, just as the Spanish flu pandemic leaves scars on “Pearl.”

But this isn’t a Night Stalker story — there’s already half a dozen of those. “MaXXXine,” like West’s “The House of the Devil” before it, vibrates with the tension of Reagan-era Satanic panic, a moment of media-hyped conspiracy that manages to feel both old-fashioned and contemporary.

Advertisement

“When I was growing up, you could get arrested for skateboarding, and now it’s going to be in the Olympics,” West says. But grandstanding moralists stay the same, even if A24 had to hire faux protesters to wave placards that read, “Honor God, End Smut.”

A woman sits in her car outside a video store in Hollywood.

“I’m hopeful that this October there are people that are going to dress up as her from all three movies,” West says of Goth’s many incarnations, including “MaXXXine,” pictured. “That’ll be really strange.”

(A24)

West puts a lot of emphasis on making the past look real, not cartoonish. No ridiculous zebra prints, no suburban mall pastels. Authenticity is baked into everything, from the camera techniques and practical effects to Maxine’s fried split ends.

The “MaXXXine” review embargo has just broken as our car arrives at Hollywood Boulevard and Wilcox Avenue, but West barely glances at his phone. “It’ll be the appropriate mixture of ‘best movie of the three,’ ‘worst movie ever,’” he says calmly. So far, the critics like it, but West seems more fulfilled by the act of making, promoting and releasing three films in four years with barely a day off. During that same time span, he also met his fiancée, DJ Alison Wonderland, and welcomed his first child, who was born two weeks after the trilogy wrapped. (Wonderland, nine months pregnant at the time, cameos in the film spinning records at a nightclub.)

Advertisement

“Weirdly enough, my first place in Los Angeles was also on Hollywood Boulevard,” West says, crossing the street toward Maxine’s second-story dump, which usually houses overstock from the Hollywood Suit Outlet next door.

He moved to L.A. in 2005 after wrapping “The Roost,” figuring the natural progression of things was to head west and write another script. Relocation was daunting. “There’s no real sense of where you’re supposed to live and who to send the script to,” he laughs. His first spot was quieter — “a little garden apartment, very L.A.” — but it amused him to get mail addressed to Ti West, Hollywood Blvd.

A man and his dog hang out on Hollywood Blvd.

“I didn’t have an interest in telling that ‘Hollywood chews you up and spits you out’ story,” says West, on Hollywood Boulevard where the movie was shot.

(Myung J. Chun / Los Angeles Times)

Nearly two decades later, he’s lived and worked here for so long that he pokes fun at being that naive kid who hoped he’d be instantly handed the keys to the city. In truth, his ascent has been a grind. West kept at it, as did colleagues Joe Swanberg and Andrew Bujalski and the Duplass Brothers, who also premiered films alongside “The Roost” at the South by Southwest Festival in Austin, Texas, the year that mumblecore became a movement.

Advertisement

They were all “making very tiny movies,” West remembers. “I think that’s where the chip on your shoulder comes from: Why doesn’t someone just realize all the work I’ve been putting in? Why don’t they know that I’m up 19 hours a day, seven days a week, working on this thing?” He describes those lean, exhausting years like someone who’s scaled his share of mountains.

“But I came of age in the ’90s, when making independent movies was cool,” he continues. “Are the 25-year-olds sleeping on floors doing that now? Or do they want to be making influencer content? Probably I would have wanted to do that too because if it goes viral, you just jump ahead. If you’re trying to change your life, that’s a quicker path.”

A woman takes notes from a director on a western set.

“We were in the Old West town and I was like, ‘Ti, this is the coolest job in the world,’” says Goth. “And he looked at me like, ‘I know.’ And we were just so giddy.”

(A24)

West’s first climb when he arrived in town was a hike up to the Hollywood sign before more fences and alarms were erected around it. “I had to do it,” he recalls. “I just thought, ‘Are they really going to arrest me?’” He hesitates, then chuckles. “Maybe the answer’s yes.” But he got away with it and was permitted to legally return while scouting for “MaXXXine” as he wanted to stage a showdown under the letters. For practical reasons, he was forced to rebuild the sign nearly to scale in Santa Clarita. Even so, the shoot was so tight on time and money that he had just eight hours to film at the duplicate site, including a lunch break and the commute up and down the hill.

Advertisement

“PTSD,” West mutters, flashing back to the hectic pace as he continues down Hollywood Boulevard and turns into the alleyway where Maxine gets menaced by a Buster Keaton clone. Every scene shot on the busy street — and there are a lot of them — had to be completed in four days, with the vintage store fronts mostly erected the morning-of to make sure the sets weren’t destroyed. When the film’s phony video shop went up, West’s phone buzzed with texts from friends who’d happened to drive by. A few asked if he was behind the fake signage; others mistakenly celebrated it as real.

A man and his dog walk in Hollywood.

“It’s just a circus at all times and nobody really cares that you’re shooting a movie,” says West, in front of the Hollywood Theatre.

(Myung J. Chun / Los Angeles Times)

“To turn this all into an X-rated area was a very big project, lots of neon,” West says. As he gestures toward the marquees of the Déjà Vu gentlemen’s club and the Vine Theatre (both seen in “MaXXXine”), a bus pulls up and unloads 50 or so Scientologists in matching navy skirts and trousers who politely ignore his descriptions of sin as they head into the L. Ron Hubbard Life Exhibition. West is also unfazed. “We had to be out here in the chaos of it all. It shows in the movie.”

Some days, he got lucky. West wanted an insert shot of Theda Bara’s star on the Walk of Fame as a nod to Pearl’s pet gator, and, magically, it was just steps from the Déjà Vu. Kevin Bacon, playing one of “MaXXXine’s” heavies, has his own star across the intersection, while Giancarlo Esposito, cast in a memorable role as Maxine’s agent, is embedded three streets to the east.

Advertisement

But this is also the block where an angry driver smashed through the barricades and crashed into a parked car in the middle of filming. The cops who were hired to guard the set had to abandon their posts in pursuit. West and the cast and crew held their positions and finished the scene.

“From making a movie here, I realize it’s difficult to get permits because the neighborhoods just don’t want movies shooting,” West says. “But it’s Hollywood. If there’s ever a reason to be in traffic, it should be because Will Smith is flipping a car in the middle of the street. Every other reason to be stuck in traffic sucks.”

West hopes to stage his next movie in a more controlled environment. He’s 40 pages into that script — “It will not be a trilogy, I assure you of that” — and already imagining the comforts of constructing a set that’s “meticulous and complicated.” He’s challenging himself to surprise audiences and top all three Maxine films combined. “That’s the goal: You put in the reps and you keep getting better.”

A glamorous woman walks the red carpet at her movie's premiere.

“She’s not trying to work for UNICEF,” West says of Goth’s Maxine Minx, “but I’m just trying to put you on her side in the movie so that by the end of ‘MaXXXine,’ you’re like, ‘I’m just glad she made it.’”

(A24)

Advertisement

But for now, he’s focused on getting people to root for the trials and tribulations of his marvelously wicked Maxine Minx. Right after the car crash, West and Goth hustled to film a scene of Maxine strutting the red carpet at Mann’s Chinese.

Eventually, “MaXXXine” itself will debut there too: an ’80s-chic world premiere with Angelyne parked outside in her pink Corvette and attendees dressed like Gordon Gekko and Sunset Strip metal heads. West wears a white suit jacket — “very ‘Miami Vice,’” he says — while his toddler sports “Risky Business”-style sunglasses and charms paparazzi by giving them a let’s-do-lunch-babe finger point.

That was a couple days ago and West is back with us at the Chinese’s autographed concrete, still finding his footing in the surreality of it all. He nods approvingly that the town hasn’t swapped out its shoe prints of classic stars for, well, Shrek.

“The movies aren’t going anywhere, because telling stories is how people communicate,” he says. Tenacious creatives like Maxine and Pearl and yes, even he and Goth, are now part of Hollywood lore. West exhales. “Maybe someday, someone will say, ‘I really like those old movies — like ‘MaXXXine.’”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Boneyard (2024) – Review | Crime Thriller | Heaven of Horror

Published

on

Boneyard (2024) – Review | Crime Thriller | Heaven of Horror

The True Story Behind Boneyard

Boneyard is inspired by (and fairly closely based on) the true crime case of West Mesa in Albuquerque, New Mexico, just like in the movie. The film is also dedicated to the victims of that unsolved case.

While the West Mesa case remains unsolved, we do know that the remains discovered in 2009 belonged to girls and women. Also, we know that they disappeared between 2001 and 2005.

The 11 victims in the true case are:

Jamie Barela, age 15
Monica Candelaria, age 22
Victoria Chavez, age 26
Virginia Cloven, age 24
Syllannia Edwards, age 15
Cinnamon Elks, age 32
Doreen Marquez, age 24
Julie Nieto, age 24
Veronica Romero, age 28
Evelyn Salazar, age 27
Michelle Valdez, age 22

At one point, the unknown serial killer is called the “Bone Collector” which threw me off. However, this was one of the names used for the suspected serial killer. The complete name used for him was “West Mesa Bone Collector“.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending