Connect with us

Culture

'Inevitable': Max Verstappen and Lando Norris’s first true F1 fight ends in tears

Published

on

'Inevitable': Max Verstappen and Lando Norris’s first true F1 fight ends in tears

Stay informed on all the biggest stories in Formula One. Sign up here to receive the Prime Tire newsletter in your inbox every Tuesday and Friday.

SPIELBERG, Austria — Over the past three seasons, the combination of Max Verstappen and the Red Bull car has proven so potent that the rest of the Formula One field has only seriously challenged him on rare occasions.

And over the past few races, that has changed.

Lando Norris snared victory in Miami, closed late on Verstappen at Imola, and could have won in Canada and Spain, only for small errors to cost him. At no point had he truly raced Verstappen. Their friendship, sharing flights and padel courts, has stayed strong.

But on Sunday at the Austrian Grand Prix, the inevitable happened: Verstappen and Norris raced for real, raced hard, and it ended in a collision that will test the bonds between them.

Advertisement

“It’s just a bit reckless,” Norris said in the media pen after the race, downbeat from having a shot at victory snatched away. “It seemed like (it was) a little bit desperate from his side.”

GO DEEPER

George Russell wins the Austrian GP after Verstappen, Norris collision

How Red Bull put Verstappen in trouble

It was a crash that shouldn’t have been likely in the first place. Verstappen was in total control right up to his pit stop on Lap 51 of 71. His only slight bugbears were the traffic, the lack of blue flags at times as he lapped cars, and one slower pit stop.

But a second, terribly slow pit stop from Red Bull, the slickest and quickest crew in the F1 grid, put Verstappen in trouble. A stop that usually takes around two seconds took 6.5 seconds due to an issue getting the left-rear wheel nut on, wiping away the buffer to Norris.

Advertisement

Verstappen was calm in the media pen after the race, seemingly more disappointed in the execution by Red Bull than the clash itself. He called it an “awful” race and said the team “did a lot of things wrong today,” citing the strategy that left him battling traffic along with the “disaster” pit stops. “You give free lap time, six seconds over those two pit stops, then, of course, it’s a race again,” Verstappen said. “That’s why we put ourselves in that position.”

The added complication for Verstappen was that he had a lightly used set of medium tires instead of the fresh set Norris could run, giving the McLaren the grip advantage. As they weaved through traffic, Norris could easily sit within DRS range of Verstappen and start plotting where to make his move.

Aggression meets aggression

“When I need to, and the time comes to race him, I 100 percent will.”

Norris’s promise in an interview with The Athletic at Suzuka would always be tested at some point. And he quickly made good on it with his lunges on Verstappen.

Advertisement

On Lap 59, Norris went for his first attempt to overtake Verstappen at the top of the hill into Turn 3, a wide corner with plenty of room for a send up the inside. Norris briefly got ahead, only to run off the track and have Verstappen sweep back ahead on the run to Turn 4. Verstappen immediately alerted his engineer to the off-track move, noting that Norris had already been shown a black and white flag, a last warning for exceeding track limits. As a fourth strike, this would trigger a five-second penalty, only issued after Norris was out of the race.

Norris claimed he’d been pushed off by Verstappen and continued to attack undeterred. Verstappen complained on the radio that Norris was “dive-bombing,” and in the media pen, he described the moves as “just sending it up late and hoping the other guy stays out of it and you make the corner, which wasn’t the case.”

Norris kept the pressure on while the stewards investigated the track limits breach, going for another move at the same corner four laps later. This time, the Red Bull went off the track. He stayed ahead, prompting a radio complaint from Norris, who had already called out Verstappen for illegally moving under braking (moving laterally while slowing down). Verstappen said he was forced off. Classic gamesmanship from both.

And then, on Lap 64, the clash happened. Verstappen covered the inside and squeezed Norris, his car drifting slightly to the left. The side-on collision left both with damage and a long crawl back to the pits. Verstappen recovered to finish fifth, while Norris was forced to retire. Mercedes’ George Russell scooped up the win, followed by Oscar Piastri and Carlos Sainz.

Hard racing or over the limit?

Before his current dominant run, Verstappen made his name in F1 for a hard, no-holds-barred approach to wheel-to-wheel racing. When a driver fights him, there’s no surprise in what they get in return.

Advertisement

“I expect a tough battle against Max, I know what to expect,” Norris said. “I expect aggression and pushing the limits and that kind of thing. But all three times, he’s doing stuff that can easily cause an incident.” He added he was “in a way not surprised” by the clash but felt disappointed not to get “tough, fair, respectful, on-the-edge racing” in the battle for the win. “There’s times where I think he goes a little bit too far,” Norris added.

Verstappen denied crossing a line, claiming he hadn’t moved under braking in their battle. He noted Norris’s “dive-bombs” and called the stewards’ 10-second time penalty — they said Verstappen was “predominantly at fault” due to his shift to the left — “a bit severe.” Red Bull team boss Christian Horner described it as a racing incident. “Max is a hard racer, and they know that,” he said.

SPIELBERG, AUSTRIA - JUNE 30: Max Verstappen of the Netherlands driving the (1) Oracle Red Bull Racing RB20 leads Lando Norris of Great Britain driving the (4) McLaren MCL38 Mercedes on track during the F1 Grand Prix of Austria at Red Bull Ring on June 30, 2024 in Spielberg, Austria. (Photo by James Sutton - Formula 1/Formula 1 via Getty Images)

Norris’ challenge has revived Verstappen’s dormant penchant for hard racing. (James Sutton – Formula 1/Formula 1 via Getty Images)

Verstappen is a hard racer, yes. That’s partly why this was always going to happen. He hasn’t been pushed like this since the peak of his fight against Hamilton in 2021. Now Norris and McLaren have a package capable of not just challenging Verstappen but beating him, prompting a return of these more aggressive on-track tactics, which are more likely to result in such incidents.

McLaren team principal Andrea Stella felt the stewards should have shown Verstappen the black and white warning flag for moving under braking, as it would have made the Red Bull driver “much more prudent in closing the door on Lando.”

“It’s a great battle, but there’s no need to act so desperately,” Stella said. “There’s no need to think that the world is going to finish if the overtaking maneuver by the car behind is going to be completed.”

Advertisement

Was it inevitable? Horner used that word twice post-race. “You could see this building perhaps for a couple of races,” he said. “At some point, there was going to be something close between the two of them.”

Verstappen didn’t want to think that way. “It’s never how I thought about stuff,” he said. “But close battles, sometimes these things happen which you never want to happen.”

Will Norris and Verstappen clear the air?

The Austria clash is a flash point in the competitive and personal relationship between Norris and Verstappen, who look a step ahead of the rest of the pack in F1 right now, as seen so plainly in Sunday’s race.

The pair have shared many cool-down rooms and press conferences in the last 12 months, regularly joking and bantering. Now, there’s a tension that showed little sign of cooling in the heat of the immediate aftermath of the collision. Norris wasn’t interested in being the one to extend an olive branch or look to clear the air. “It’s not for me to say,” he said. “It’s for him to say.”

Verstappen said there’d be a chance for them to talk, but it was “not the right moment,” and it was “better to cool down.” He said they had already not planned to travel back together to Monaco, as they’ve done after other races this season.

Advertisement

Verstappen said he hoped it wouldn’t damage their relationship. “We’re all racing drivers, of course you don’t want to crash into each other,” he said. “When you’re fighting for the lead, it’s always tough battles. It happened today. It’s always a shame. I’m annoyed, he’s annoyed. I think that’s fair.”

Verstappen is right that there will be a right moment for reconciliation. You can already predict the shared Instagram post of the two together smiling, a sign to the world that everything is OK. Friends again.

Yet as long as the margins between Norris and Verstappen remain so close on the track and as we see such intense battles more often, their dynamic will continue to be tested.

Which, after so long without that kind of competitive edge, is a thrilling prospect for F1.

(Lead image: Rudy Carezzevoli, ERWIN SCHERIAU/APA/AFP via Getty Images)

Advertisement

Culture

Do You Recognize These Snappy Lines From Popular Crime Novels?

Published

on

Do You Recognize These Snappy Lines From Popular Crime Novels?

Welcome to Literary Quotable Quotes, a quiz that tests your recognition of classic lines. This week’s installment celebrates lines from popular crime novels. (As a hint, the correct books are all “firsts” in one category or another.) In the five multiple-choice questions below, tap or click on the answer you think is correct. After the last question, you’ll find links to the novels if you’re intrigued and inspired to read more.

Continue Reading

Culture

Xia De-hong, 94, Dies; Persecuted in China, She Starred in Daughter’s Memoir

Published

on

Xia De-hong, 94, Dies; Persecuted in China, She Starred in Daughter’s Memoir

Xia De-hong, who survived persecution and torture as an official in Mao Zedong’s China and was later the central figure in her daughter’s best-selling 1991 memoir, “Wild Swans: Three Daughters of China,” died on April 15 in Chengdu, China. She was 94.

Ms. Xia’s death, in a hospital, was confirmed by her daughter Jung Chang.

Ms. Chang’s memoir, which was banned in China, was a groundbreaking, intimate account of the country’s turbulent 20th century and the iron grip of Mao’s Communist Party, told through the lives of three generations of women: herself, her mother and her grandmother. An epic of imprisonment, suffering and family loyalty, it sold over 15 million copies in 40 languages.

The story of Ms. Chang’s stoic mother holding the family together while battling on behalf of her husband, a functionary who was tortured and imprisoned during Mao’s regime, was the focus of “Wild Swans,” which emerged out of hours of recordings that Ms. Chang made when Ms. Xia visited her in London in 1988.

Ms. Xia was inspired as a teenager to become an ardent Communist revolutionary because of the mistreatment of women in the Republic of China, as well as the corruption of the Kuomintang nationalists in power. (Her own mother had been forced into concubinage at 15 by a powerful warlord.)

Advertisement

In 1947, in Ms. Xia’s home city of Jinzhou, the Communists were waging guerrilla war against the government. She joined the struggle by distributing pamphlets for Mao, rolling them up inside green peppers after they had been smuggled into the city in bundles of sorghum stalks.

Captured by the Kuomintang, she was forced to listen to “the screams of people being tortured in the rooms nearby,” her daughter later wrote. But that only stiffened her resolve.

She married Chang Shou-yu, an up-and-coming Communist civil servant and acolyte of Mao, in 1949.

It was then that disillusionment began to set in, according to her daughter. The newlyweds were ordered to travel a thousand miles to Sichuan, her husband’s home province. Because of Mr. Chang’s rank, he was allowed to ride in a jeep, but she had to walk, even though she was pregnant, and suffered a miscarriage as a result.

“She was vomiting all the time,” her daughter wrote. “Could he not let her travel in his jeep occasionally? He said he could not, because it would be taken as favoritism since my mother was not entitled to the car.”

Advertisement

That was the first of many times that her husband would insist she bow to the rigid dictates of the party, despite the immense suffering it caused.

When she was a party official in the mid-1950s, Ms. Xia was investigated for her “bourgeois” background and imprisoned for months. She received little support from Mr. Chang.

“As my mother was leaving for detention,” Ms. Chang wrote, “my father advised her: ‘Be completely honest with the party, and have complete trust in it. It will give you the right verdict.’ A wave of aversion swept over her.”

Upon her release in 1957, she told her husband, “You are a good Communist, but a rotten husband.” Mr. Chang could only nod in agreement.

He became one of the top officials in Sichuan, entitled to a life of privilege. But by the late 1960s, he had become outraged by the injustices of the Cultural Revolution, Mao’s blood-soaked purge, and was determined to register a formal complaint.

Advertisement

Ms. Xia was in despair; she knew what became of families who spoke out. “Why do you want to be a moth that throws itself into the fire?” she asked.

Mr. Chang’s career was over, and both he and his wife were subjected to physical abuse and imprisoned. Ms. Xia’s position was lower profile; she was in charge of resolving personal problems, such as housing, transfers and pensions, for people in her district. But that did not save her from brutal treatment.

Ms. Xia was made to kneel on broken glass; paraded through the streets of Chengdu wearing a dunce’s cap and a heavy placard with her name crossed out; and forced to bow to jeering crowds.

Still, she resisted pressure from the party to denounce her husband. And unlike many other women in her position, she refused to divorce him.

Twice she journeyed to Beijing to seek his release, the second time securing a meeting with the prime minister, Zhou Enlai, who was considered a moderate. Ms. Xia was “one of the very few spouses of victims who had the courage to go and appeal in Peking,” her daughter wrote in “Wild Swans.”

Advertisement

But Ms. Xia and her husband never criticized the Cultural Revolution in front of their children, checked by the party’s absolute power and the fear it inspired.

“My parents never said anything to me or my siblings,” Ms. Chang wrote. “The restraints which had kept them silent about politics before still prevented them from opening their minds to us.”

She was held at Xichiang prison camp from 1969 to 1971 as a “class enemy,” made to do heavy labor and endure denunciation meetings.

The camp, though less harsh than her husband’s, was a bitter experience. “She reflected with remorse on the pointlessness of her devotion,” her daughter wrote. “She found she missed her children with a pain which was almost unbearable.”

Xia De-hong was born on May 4, 1931, in Yixian, the daughter of Yang Yu-fang and Gen. Xue Zhi-heng, the inspector general of the metropolitan police in the nationalist government.

Advertisement

When she was an infant, her mother fled the house of the general, who was dying, and returned to her parents, eventually marrying a rich Manchurian doctor, Xia Rui-tang.

Ms. Xia grew up in Jinzhou, Manchuria, where she attended school before joining the Communist underground.

In the 1950s, when she began to have doubts about the Communist Party, she considered abandoning it and pursuing her dream of studying medicine, her daughter said. But the idea terrified her husband, Ms. Chang said in an interview, because it would have meant disavowing the Communists.

By the late 1950s, during the Mao-induced Great Famine that killed tens of millions, both of her parents had become “totally disillusioned,” Ms. Chang said, and “could no longer find excuses to forgive their party.”

Mr. Chang died in 1975, broken by years of imprisonment and ill treatment. Ms. Xia retired from her government service, as deputy head of the People’s Congress of the Eastern District of Chengdu, in 1983.

Advertisement

Besides Ms. Chang, Ms. Xia is survived by another daughter, Xiao-hong Chang; three sons, Jin-ming, Xiao-hei and Xiao-fang; and two grandchildren.

Jung Chang saw her mother for the last time in 2018. Ms. Chang’s criticism of the regime, in her memoir and a subsequent biography, made returning to China unthinkable. She told the BBC in a recent interview that she never knew whether her mother had read “Wild Swans.”

But the advice her mother gave her and her brother Xiao-hei, a journalist who also lives in London, was firm: “She only wanted us to write truthfully, and accurately.”

Continue Reading

Culture

Why Is Everyone Obsessed With Bogs?

Published

on

Why Is Everyone Obsessed With Bogs?

In prehistoric northern Europe, peatlands — areas of waterlogged soil rich with decaying plant matter — were considered spiritual sites. Since then, swords, jewelry and even human bodies have been found fossilized in their sludgy depths. More recently, however, many of these bogs have been depleted by overharvesting, neglect and development. But as awareness of their important role in removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere grows, more wetlands are being restored, while also serving as unlikely creative inspiration. Here’s how bogs are showing up in the culture.

At fall 2026 Paris Fashion Week, several houses — including Louis Vuitton (above left) and Hermès — staged shows amid mossy sets featuring spongy green structures and mounds of vegetation. And the Danish fashion brand Solitude Studios is distressing its eerie, grungy looks (above right) by submerging them in a local peat bog.

For her exhibition at California’s San José Museum of Art, on view through October, the Chalon Nation artist Christine Howard Sandoval is presenting sculptures, drawings and plant-dyed works (above) exploring how the state’s wetlands were once sites of Indigenous resistance and community. This month, at Storm King Art Center in New York’s Hudson Valley, the conceptual artist Anicka Yi will unveil an outdoor installation featuring six-foot-tall transparent columns holding algae-rich ecosystems cultivated from nearby pond water and soil.

The Bog Bothy (above), a mobile design project by the Dublin-based architecture practice 12th Field in collaboration with the Irish Architecture Foundation, was inspired by the makeshift huts once used by peat cutters who harvested the material for fuel. After debuting in the Irish Midlands last year, it’ll tour the region again this summer. In Edinburgh, the designer Oisín Gallagher is making doorstops from subfossilized bog-oak scraps carbon-dated to 3300 B.C.

At La Grenouillère on France’s north coast, the chef Alexandre Gauthier reflects the restaurant’s reedy, frog-filled river valley landscape with dishes like a “marsh bubble” of herbs encased in hardened sugar. This spring, Aponiente — the chef Ángel León’s restaurant inside a 19th-century tidal mill on Spain’s Bay of Cádiz — added an outdoor dining area on a pier above the neighboring marshland, serving local sea grasses and salt marsh flowers alongside seafood (above) from the estuary.

Advertisement
Credit…Penguin Random House

The Irish British writer Maggie O’Farrell’s forthcoming novel, “Land,” about an Irish cartographer and his son surveying the island in 1865 after the Great Famine, depicts haunting encounters with the verdant landscape, including its plentiful oozing bogs.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending