Entertainment
The problematic white, male Southern writer who inspired a diverse generation
“My uncle gave me a replica of ‘A Feast of Snakes’ in alternate for cleansing out his shed,” says S.A. Cosby, writer of “Razorblade Tears,” remembering his first encounter with the late Southern writer Harry Crews. The Tennessee author Kevin Wilson occurred upon Crews’ paperbacks whereas studying between lessons in a Vanderbilt College English division workplace. The novelist Ryan Chapman picked up Crews when his now-wife declared “A Feast of Snakes” her favourite novel. Solely later did she reassure him she didn’t share the cult writer’s nihilistic tackle real love.
Critics and awards anoint some authors as legends. Others rely on word-of-mouth and prose that stands the take a look at of time. “Artwork’s major goal was to supply up pleasure and crush the human coronary heart with a residing reminiscence,” Byron Crews writes, of his father’s central focus, in an electronic mail. “Papa usually judged writing by the diploma to which it’s sincere and resonates and is memorable — throughout time — throughout years.”
This week, Penguin Classics will reissue Crews’ memoir “A Childhood: A Biography of a Place” (1978) and his debut novel, “The Gospel Singer” (1968). The imprint’s writer and buying editor, Elda Rotor, recalled being “intrigued by his affect as an writer and a instructor and curious in regards to the craft of storytelling.” Struck by Crews’ “bigger than life” mark on literature, she hopes the reissues will permit a brand new, wider readership to wrestle along with his works and “revisit them via the lens of classics.”
Crews was a totally Southern novelist, however there’s nothing folksy, by no means thoughts pastoral or genteel, about his writing.
(Property of Harry Crews)
For a number of years now, Penguin Classics has taken nice pains to republish unsung works by marginalized authors. So what prompted them to revisit a straight, white male whose work is fraught with racism and a masculinity so poisonous it someday shoots previous misogyny and straight into assault? The reply is as difficult as the person himself.
At instances higher often called a tattooed provocateur who sported a mohawk lengthy into his later years, Crews was the unusual and blistering writer of 20-odd works. Between his start right into a Georgia sharecropping household in 1935 and his 2012 dying in Florida as a retired professor and former Marine, he witnessed the South’s shift from a rural society to an more and more industrial and cosmopolitan area marked by the civil rights motion and its backlash.
The conception of the standard Southern author has developed simply as dramatically over these many years. The one fixed throughout generations has been the paradoxical place of Southern lit: acknowledged as maybe essentially the most vibrant regional writing within the nation but usually dismissed as too idiosyncratic to characterize American literature at giant. Its bestsellers, from “The place the Crawdads Sing” to John Grisham’s thrillers, are hardly ever related to it; “Gone With the Wind” certainly is, however it rang false when it was new.
Canonical midcentury Southern writers — Faulkner, O’Connor, Welty — had been usually perceived as white eccentric outsiders. In the present day the sector displays the variety and modernity of the area (Jesmyn Ward, Tayari Jones, Kiese Laymon, Cosby and plenty of others). They characterize the entire of America — however then, so did their forbears, as a result of, as Imani Perry just lately argued, the South is America. It’s a farce to isolate racism, classism and misogyny previous or current in a single area.
Amongst these combating again towards such handy parlor tales was Crews, whose work serves as a bridge between Southern writers previous and current. Richard Howorth, the proprietor of storied Sq. Books in Oxford, Miss., notes that whereas Crews’ voice was “distinctly Southern,” he was additionally “unquestionably unaffected, real. There was nobody like him on the time.”
Harry Crews in his later years. Penguin is reissuing his memoir, “A Childhood,” and his novel “The Gospel Singer.”
(Property of Harry Crews)
There’s nothing folksy, by no means thoughts pastoral or genteel, about Crews. With caustic and fabulist writing, he exhumed the ghosts of America’s unique sin.
Crews’ memoir is studded with stunning occasions: After dropping his father at age 2, he was raised as his uncle’s baby till that uncle practically murdered Crews’ mom; he survived untreated polio and an unintended toss right into a vat of boiling water with a hog; he closes the guide with an evangelical revival that evokes the disturbing sexual assault of one other baby.
That is an account of a life devoid of choices or guideposts save for ritual and religion. His novels too are set in a lawless South, their characters so surreal and disturbed they could possibly be discovered solely in dead-end cities marked by filth roads and moonshine. In “The Gospel Singer,” the title character returns to carry out in his hometown simply as his outdated acquaintance, the Black preacher Willalee, who shares a reputation with Crews’ childhood buddy, is charged with the rape and homicide of the singer’s childhood sweetheart. The singer is trailed, in the meantime, by a freak present the likes of which Katherine Dunn couldn’t have imagined.
Wilson, a professor at Sewanee, wrote the introduction for “The Gospel Singer.” The novel is “horrific,” he notes in an interview — and but “the sentences at instances are simply unbelievably stunning.” Constructing on this distinction, Wilson debunks any rumor of sentimentality within the work: “Crews doesn’t have nuance relating to race or gender or faith or actually something, however the one place he’s nuanced is his language.” By being “wildly exact and violent,” Crews’ type captures a society unsuccessfully struggling to maneuver previous its complicity within the horrors of slavery.
“You’re implicated each minute of your life right here, proper?” Wilson provides. “Like, if it is a damaged place that’s haunted by the specter of all this violence and cruelty, then merely current in it makes you culpable.” Even the stunning conclusion of “The Gospel Singer” leaves Wilson with the impression that “Crews isn’t essentially making a commentary on race. To him, there’s simply no escaping the cruelty and violence of this world.”
Cosby, a local and lifelong resident of Virginia, additionally expanded in an interview on his relationship to Crews’ work. “I grew up in a small city the place there’s a large Accomplice statue in entrance of the courthouse that sends a message to you as a Black individual,” he says. “Don’t search for redress of grievances. I all the time love studying his stuff, as a result of, even when [Crews’] characters will embrace the Confederacy or the Misplaced Trigger, he doesn’t embrace it. He ridicules it.”
For Crews, it’s in the end certain up in school: Stoking racism distracts poor white folks from organizing towards the elites. His bleak observations keep away from judgment, but the carnage in his writing speaks for itself. And not using a ethical reckoning, there isn’t sufficient cash, medicine or faith to avoid wasting a group from itself.
“Papa usually judged writing by the diploma to which it’s sincere and resonates and is memorable,” Byron Crews (proper) says of his father, Harry.
(Property of Harry Crews)
Cosby and Wilson spoke at size about how Crews exceeds even Faulkner and O’Connor in depicting a grotesque anti-pastoral that spares nobody. “After I learn him,” says Cosby, “I all the time felt like he was an individual who realized racism, sexism, misogyny had been all incorrect, however as a substitute of shying away from [these horrors],” Crews opts for “sensory overload.” He imagines Crews saying, “I’m not going to provide you any ethical proclamations. However I’m going to point out you ways dangerous it might get.”
Finally, the feelings and conflicts Crews depicted weren’t certain by geography. He wrote about nothing lower than the starkest extremes of human nature.
In “A Childhood,” he asks who would inform his son about him. He surmises, “Just a few motorbike riders, bartenders, editors, half-mad karateka, drunks, and writers. They’re scattered everywhere in the nation, however even when he may discover them, they might converse to him with no shared voice. … For half my life I’ve been within the college, however by no means of it. By no means of wherever actually. Besides the place I left, and that of necessity solely in reminiscence.” He concludes the thought by explaining why he turned to memoir. “Solely using I, pretty and terrifying phrase, would get me to the place the place I have to go.”
Self-deprecation apart, Crews captured the uncooked essence of humanity in each fiction and nonfiction. Facet by aspect, these reissues type the whole image of an imperfect man who charged onerous into extremes to flee his cultural inheritance. Leaving the South was no reply; his demons belong to all of us. His journey was a nightmare we should all face earlier than waking.
LeBlanc is a guide columnist for the Observer. She lives in Chapel Hill, N.C.

Movie Reviews
Kapkapiii movie review: Horror-comedy signals a saturation point for the genre

Kapkapiii movie review
Cast: Shreyas Talpade, Tusshar Kapoor
Director: Sangeeth Sivan
Star Rating: ★★
As I exited the theatre after watching Kapkapiii, I had two thoughts: one, the film leaves you with more questions than answers. And two, Bollywood really needs to break up with horror comedies—the situationship is reaching a saturation point.
Directed by the late Sangeeth Sivan, the story revolves around a group of friends—played by Shreyas Talpade, Dinker Sharma, Dherendra Kumar Tiwari, and Sonia Rathee—who begin playing a dangerous game with an ouija board, unknowingly summoning the spirit of Anamika. Word spreads fast, and soon there’s a long queue of people eager to get answers from the spirit—ranging from revelations about someone’s father’s real identity to solving petty domestic mysteries like stolen jewellery.
But things soon spiral out of control. How the group handles the chaos that follows forms the rest of the plot.
Kapkapiii, a remake of the 2023 Malayalam film Romancham, starts off as harmless fun. We’ve seen enough buddy comedies to know the tropes—a token drunk, a scaredy-cat—and they’re all present here. The problem is that Kapkapiii thinks it’s funnier than it actually is. Written by Kumar Priyadarshi and Saurabh Anand, the story gets increasingly convoluted. A tenant who fancies one of the guys is thrown in. Then comes a gangster, played by Dibyendu Bhattacharya. After the intermission, Tusshar Kapoor joins the gang, and from that point, it’s hard to track where the film is even headed. We get “chadar mod” and “len ke bode” in the name of jokes. Eventually, you stop laughing—and even stop feeling scared. You just sit there like a zombie—expressionless.
Shreyas Talpade is the anchor of this sinking ship. He’s the only one who truly understands the comic timing the genre demands, but with limited material, there’s only so much he can do. Tusshar Kapoor’s character is confusing—you’re never sure why he’s even in the film. Every actor tries, which is both reassuring and a little sad. Reassuring because at least there’s effort. Sad because, despite that, you’re bored.
The jump scares are minimal, and that’s about all you get.
The music by Ajay Jayanthi is a miss.
In the end, Kapkapiii is a classic case of wasted potential—a film that wants to be a quirky horror-comedy but ends up being neither spooky nor funny. It leans too heavily on tired tropes, underdeveloped subplots, and a scattered screenplay.
Entertainment
Shaquille O'Neal drops a bomb on Jimmy Fallon: A recent viral moment was indeed about No. 2
One may be the loneliest number, but No. 2 is what sent Shaquille O’Neal urgently mincing off the “Inside the NBA” stage last month while the cameras kept running.
O’Neal copped to the truth Thursday night during his 18th appearance on “The Tonight Show With Jimmy Fallon,” giving what might be more detail than anyone needed about that sudden departure in April.
First, he clung to the fib, saying, “I was drinking a lot of water that day. So I know I had the No. 2 run, but it was really a No. 1. So let’s just get that out of the way.”
He explained he was drinking olive oil at the time “to be sexy,” because he’d seen on Instagram that if he drank olive oil daily for 14 days, he would clean out his system and have a flat stomach. “So I was trying that.”
A laughing Fallon held his face in his hands.
“You know what,” O’Neal said. “I just made a mistake. I lied to you on national TV. It wasn’t a No. 1 run. It was a No. 2 run. I had to go bad. Oh, I had to go so bad.”
Fallon begged him to keep telling the lie. O’Neal asked whether the host had seen him squeezing his butt cheeks as he scooted away from the “Inside the NBA” desk.
Then Fallon showed a photo of what the crew did to O’Neal the next day: It put a blue porta-potty in studio on his side of the table.
Blessedly, the conversation then moved in a different direction.
Things were a bit more serious but no less amusing back in April when O’Neal got up while a co-host was in the middle of talking and — in a big hurry — walked awkwardly in front of his fellow panelists and out the stage door. Ernie Johnson Jr., Kenny Smith and Charles Barkley weren’t sure what was going on.
“You all right, big fella?” Barkley asked with a look of concern on his face.
As the camera (cruelly) followed him, O’Neal blurted to his co-hosts to “go ahead, keep talking” while one reminded him, “Hey, we’re on TV.”
“It’s that olive oil you’ve been drinking,” Barkley said. “Hey, take some matches with you.”
As the remaining hosts broke into giggles, Kenny Smith said, “After 40, you can’t hold it no more.”
“That wasn’t something planned, was it?” Ernie Johnson Jr. wondered.
Smith also noted that O’Neal had been drinking olive oil to clean out his system, saying, “Oh, he’s cleaning out his gut all right!”
“I did not like his gait as he left!” Johnson said.
And Barkley simply couldn’t move past the idea of the smell.
“Please turn his mic off, that’s all,” Smith quipped. Then, as Smith tried to return to talking about L.A. Clippers forward Kawhai Leonard, the team in TNT’s Studio J came through with the instant replay of Shaq bailing out. Instant. Freaking. Replay.
IN SLO-MO.
The three very professional analysts immediately began very professional analysis of O’Neal’s shambolic gait.
The big man returned fairly soon after that, mumbling something about drinking too much water and about Barkley talking way too long when he really needed to cut to a break.
“Sorry about that, America,” he said.
Seriously Shaq, you have absolutely no reason to apologize. As long as you remember the matches.
Movie Reviews
Movie review: 'Dogma' re-release highlights thoughtful script – UPI.com

1 of 5 | Ben Affleck (L) and Matt Damon star in “Dogma,” returning to theaters June 5. Photo courtesy of Triple Media Films
LOS ANGELES, May 23 (UPI) — Dogma, returning to theaters June 5, comes from a decade where indie writer/directors were celebrated for the words in their screenplays. Kevin Smith was one of the major voices that emerged in the era of Quentin Tarantino, Richard Linklater and Sofia Coppola.
In his first film, Clerks, Smith had his convenience store clerks express all of his thoughts about Star Wars, retail and relationships. Dogma, his fourth film, was the work of a writer who grew up Catholic and had thoughts about faith.
Exiled angels Bartleby (Ben Affleck) and Loki (Matt Damon) find a way to get back into heaven. As part of a Catholicism outreach campaign, New Jersey Cardinal Glick (George Carlin) promises forgiveness to anyone who passes through his church’s arch.
If the angels gain forgiveness, then take human form and die, God will have no choice but to allow them back into heaven. What they don’t realize is that invalidating God’s decree will cause the end of all existence.
So God’s Metatron (Alan Rickman) visits Planned Parenthood employee Bethany (Linda Fiorentino) and gives her the task of preventing Loki and Bartleby from entering the church. Smith regulars Jay (Jason Mewes) and Silent Bob (Smith) are sent as prophets to help Bethany in her quest.
This is a story that adapts Catholic scripture into a modern apocalyptic story, but it is really a vehicle for characters to talk about religion, the way characters in other Smith movies talk about movies and comic books.
That dialogue is performed emphatically, and more subtly it’s well edited by Smith and producer Scott Mosier. Smith’s biblical figures would use the F word while making their profound points, but maybe they learned it from millennia of humans, or at the Tower of Babel.
The film’s messages challenge some of the oldest doctrines of Catholicism. No one has to base their values on a movie, but as an artistic exploration of this thesis, all of Smith’s questions are backed up by a creative interpretation of the scripture.
The message is ultimately that God doesn’t care which religion you follow as long as you believe. That would offend organized religion, but the film unabashedly believes in God.
Jesus’ unsung 13th apostle Rufus (Chris Rock) tells Bethany that God wants people to think for themselves. As bold a take on religion as that might be, it is ultimately optimistic.
Bethany is a character seeking to regain her faith. She remembers the feelings that church gave her as a child.
Yet she no longer feels that as an adult, which is understandable with painful life experience. But she’s open to restoring her faith and this adventure gives her a reason.
Of course, Smith has a mischievous spark. Loki likes to talk nuns out of their faith when he’s literally an Angel with knowledge of God herself (Alanis Morissette).
Smith speculates on eras of Jesus’ life that were not in the Bible as characters speak of their time with him. Those extrapolations show empathy towards the burden of being the son of God for a teenager.
They’re also not meant to be canonical. Smith’s point is to get viewers thinking as they laugh, not launch a religion himself.
Exposure to biblical figures certainly does not make Jay any more wholesome, but his ability to keep making vulgar sexual innuendo amid crises of faith of apocalyptic proportions is impressive.
There is a little bit of gay panic when Bethany mistakes Bartleby and Loki for lovers, and Rufus exposes Jay’s secret desires for men. Characters also use the R-word, because 1999 was unfortunately before many people learned it was a slur, but Smith has addressed both of those issues in subsequent work.
The complicated release history of Dogma, passing between several studios, has made it difficult to see since its Blu-ray release. Now out of print and not streaming anywhere, the re-release is a welcome return of one of Smith’s seminal works.
Fred Topel, who attended film school at Ithaca College, is a UPI entertainment writer based in Los Angeles. He has been a professional film critic since 1999, a Rotten Tomatoes critic since 2001, and a member of the Television Critics Association since 2012 and the Critics Choice Association since 2023. Read more of his work in Entertainment.
-
Education1 week ago
Video: Opinion | We Study Fascism, and We’re Leaving the U.S.
-
Technology1 week ago
Love, Death, and Robots keeps a good thing going in volume 4
-
News1 week ago
As Harvard Battles Trump, Its President Will Take a 25% Pay Cut
-
Culture1 week ago
Book Review: ‘Hunger Like a Thirst,’ by Besha Rodell
-
Technology1 week ago
Meta asks judge to throw out antitrust case mid-trial
-
Politics1 week ago
Republicans say they're 'out of the loop' on Trump's $400M Qatari plane deal
-
World1 week ago
Commissioner Hansen presents plan to cut farming bureaucracy in EU
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago
Classic Film Review: ‘Mad Max: Fury Road’ is a Lesson in Redemption | InSession Film