Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Two new films in which white men aren’t villains

Published

on

Two new films in which white men aren’t villains

The only feature I’ve seen in the past few years that waved the flag so proudly was Top Gun 2 (2022). Somehow the filmmakers have resisted the temptation to make the poor white boys in the boat into a multi-racial crew.

The Berlin Olympics provided an opportunity to focus on the great black athlete, Jesse Owens, but he gets no more than a cameo, telling one of the boat crew that he’s less concerned about impressing the Germans than the people back home. The political point is made with maximum economy.

One of the ironies of this patriotic production is that there are so few Americans in the cast. Callum Turner and Sam Strike are both British, as is Peter Guinness, who plays boat-builder George Pocock. Aussie Joel Edgerton is probably the star of the show, doing his best impersonation of the anxious, grim-faced mentor who hides his human feelings. Women, such as Hadley Robinson and Courtney Henggeler, who plays Al’s wife, Hazel, adopt supporting roles in an overwhelmingly masculine film.

This is not the first time Clooney has demonstrated his love of Golden Age Hollywood, or his willingness to indulge the most sentimental themes. But The Boys in the Boat is a huge advance on a movie such as The Monuments Men (2014), with its irritatingly jaunty approach to the Second World War.

The characters are more convincing, the shots of the boat races expertly executed, and there is a clear sense of momentum in the narrative. An Alexandre Desplat score is closely fitted to task, although Chariots of Fire it ain’t.

Advertisement

Clooney has given us a reminder of all the reasons people once went to the cinema and suggests those preferences have been repressed but not abandoned. He’s given us a great, nostalgic wind-up toy of a film, which may not appeal to “sophisticated” tastes but has already exceeded box office expectations. As movies go, I can see plenty of reasons not to like it, but I liked it anyway.

The Boys in the Boat

  • Directed by George Clooney
  • Written by Mark Smith, after a book by Daniel James Brown
  • Starring Joel Edgerton, Callum Turner, Hadley Robinson, Sam Strike, Peter Guinness, Jack Mulhern, Luke Slattery, Tom Varey, Wil Coban, Thomas Elms, Joel Phillimore, Bruce Herbelin-Earle
  • USA, PG, 123 mins

Dominic Sessa, Paul Giamatti and Da’Vine Joy Randolph in The Holdovers. Universal

The Holdovers

If The Boys in the Boat stirs dim echoes of Chariots of Fire (1981), Alexander Payne’s The Holdovers may conjure up memories of Peter Weir’s Dead Poets Society (1989). Like that earlier film, this one is set in a private boarding school for boys, but instead of Robin Williams infusing his charges with a love of poetry, we have Paul Giamatti teaching them to loathe Thucydides.

Williams scored an Academy Award nomination for best actor, and it would be surprising if Giamatti doesn’t follow in his footsteps, especially since he won a Golden Globe for the role this week. The history of the cinema is stuffed with inspirational teachers, from Mr Chips to Monsieur Lazhar, but there’s something even more compelling about the misanthropic, bitter and twisted teacher everyone despises.

The year is 1970, the place is Barton Academy in up-state Massachusetts – a fictional prep school cobbled together from parts of five real schools. It’s the beginning of the Christmas holidays, and the teachers are scouting around for someone to stay at school and look after the handful of boys who, for one reason or another, are not spending the yuletide with their families.

Advertisement

Inevitably the job gets foisted onto Paul Hunham (Giamatti), the Classics teacher. As Paul is a bachelor with nowhere to go and, apparently, no friends, he is the logical candidate. He accepts the responsibility with both stoicism and cynicism, having no desire to share the holiday with a group of Christmas rejects.

For the boys it’s even less fun. Paul is notorious for his acid tongue and his delight in failing the sons of tycoons and politicians. From a motley collection of five boys, most are given permission to go off on a ski trip. Now there is only one: willowy senior Angus Tully (Dominic Sessa), whose mother has left with her new partner for a holiday in St Kitts. At the last minute, Angus gets a phone call telling him he’s not invited because the lovebirds would like to spend some quality time together.

While the snow lies round about, the holiday becomes a battle of wills between Paul and Angus, overseen by the school cook Mary (Da’Vine Joy Randolph), whose only son has just been killed in Vietnam. In watching the exchanges within this trio, we see a different, more sympathetic, side of Paul, who drops his armour when talking with Mary. As we piece together Angus’ story, we can see his intelligence, and his deep unhappiness.

In a film that manages to be touching and consistently funny, you won’t be surprised to learn that a rapport develops between existentially miserable Paul, who seeks solace in Jim Beam and Marcus Aurelius, and prickly, troublesome Angus. It becomes a quasi father-and-son relationship, with Mary in the occasional role of mother.

This conflicts with Paul’s habit of keeping everyone at a distance. A bad eye and a body odour condition he can’t control have convinced him he is nobody’s idea of an attractive companion. When the strange Miss Crane (Carrie Preston) bakes him a plate of cookies, he seems alarmed.

Advertisement

On an excursion into Boston, Paul and Angus will learn each other’s best-kept secrets, laying bare two life stories that have been kept heretofore under wraps. If Giamatti is reliably good in the role of Paul, Dominic Sessa, on debut, is a revelation. We can expect to be hearing more about him in years to come.

The ending, both melancholy and satisfying, might even be interpreted as happy. Like so many of Payne’s protagonists, Paul is a man who has spent his life as a permanent “holdover”, going through the same rituals and routines, feeling depressed, resigned, incapable of change.

The events of late 1970 force him to drop the mask of stoicism and embrace what his beloved Greeks called catharsis – a long-postponed emotional release from a stitched-up personality. It could only happen at Christmas.

The Holdovers

  • Directed by Alexander Payne
  • Written by David Hemingson
  • Starring Paul Giamatti, Dominic Sessa, Da’Vine Joy Randolph, Brady Hepner, Carrie Preston, Naheem Garcia, Jim Kaplan, Ian Dolley, Michael Provost, Andrew Garman
  • USA, M, 133 mins
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Into the Deep (2025) – Movie Review

Published

on

Into the Deep (2025) – Movie Review

Into the Deep. 2025

Directed by Christian Sesma
Starring Scout Taylor-Compton, Richard Dreyfuss, Stuart Townsend, Jon Seda, AnnaMaria Demara, Tom O’Connell, Callum McGowan, Lorena Sarria, Ron Smoorenburg, Tofan Pirani, Quinn P Hensley, and Maverick Kang Jr.

SYNOPSIS:

Modern day pirates on the hunt for sunken drugs kidnap a boat of tourists and force them to dive into shark infested waters to retrieve the contraband.

Advertisement

Nothing about director Christian Sesma’s VOD budget shark attack/modern-day pirates thriller Into the Deep is particularly good. Let’s get that out of the way. The ending credits are far more baffling and intriguing than anything within the actual movie, where Richard Dreyfuss delivers a speech about shark conservation. Everything about the speech (from discussing cruelly hunting and murdering them to make soup out of their fins or how an alarming number of types are gradually going extinct) is well laid out and worth preaching about. The question is, what the hell is it doing here in a movie that has no traces whatsoever of that message?

Into the Deep is as generic as they come, with sharks standing in as childhood trauma and fear to face. Now, as an adult, Scout Taylor-Compton’s Cassidy is taking steps toward overcoming general ocean fright by boarding a boat with her boyfriend Gregg (Callum McGowan) on a quest for sunken treasure. Naturally, this is the same body of water where her father was teaching her how to swim before he was “viciously” murdered by a shark (quotations are necessary since nothing about this film is graphic or intense, and the actors mostly look like they are flailing to stay afloat whenever presented with the acting challenge of pretending a shark is dragging them down under.)

Sailing alongside another couple, plans quickly go sideways once some pirates storm the ship. Leader Jordan (Jon Seda, playing the character as a cross between sociopathic and 1980s bike-riding bad boy, mostly to unintentional comedic effect more than terror) and his criminal gang hold everyone hostage, demanding that Cassidy (the smallest of everyone here) uses the shark cage to reach the bottom of the ocean and bring back up several kilos of valuable drugs. Yes, there is more than one kind of treasure here.

While Cassidy attempts that, there are also flashbacks (some going as far back as her being a child) with her survivalist, ocean expert grandfather Seamus (a jittery Richard Dreyfuss who seems incapable of sitting still while delivering wooden dialogue) teaches her everything she needs to know to one day face her fear. Such flashbacks are visually ghastly, with unbelievably washed-out colors.

There isn’t much else to say other than that it is trite and entirely clichéd with questionable acting, aside from one or two displays of ferocity from Scout Taylor-Compton. Whether it’s director Christian Sesma or screenwriters Chad Law and Josh Ridgway, someone (or everyone) failed at ensuring anything about this formulaic genre exercise matched the intent spoonfed during the ending credits. There are no points for an actor showing up during the credits and giving an activist speech inside a film that has nothing to do with activism. That’s not deep; it renders Into the Deep shallow. And that’s without getting into what passes for special effects here.

Advertisement

Flickering Myth Rating – Film: ★ / Movie: ★

Robert Kojder is a member of the Chicago Film Critics Association, Critics Choice Association, and Online Film Critics Society. He is also the Flickering Myth Reviews Editor. Check here for new reviews and follow my BlueSky or Letterboxd 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=embed/playlist

 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

A Complete Unknown – Movie Review

Published

on

A Complete Unknown – Movie Review

Bob Dylan is one of the most important musicians of his time. He revolutionized the music landscape, pushing the boundaries of folk music with poetic lyricism that went against traditional songwriting. Many of his songs became anthems for civil rights and anti-war movements in the 60s and inspired other genres moving forward. This past holiday season, A Complete Unknown was released to theaters, a biopic covering Dylan’s initial rise to fame. 

Dylan is portrayed by Timothée Chalamet, who bears a resemblance to a younger Bob. Chalamet does an impressive job of being able to disappear into the role, as at some point in the movie I almost forgot it was him. He nails Dylan’s distinctive voice and his delivery really amplifies the line he’s reading. It is no secret that Chalamet is a talented actor, and in this movie, that is no different. 

What is interesting to note is that this biopic doesn’t cover Bob Dylan’s entire career – just his rise to fame, which spans from 1961 to 1965. We see him move to New York City with almost nothing except his guitar and dreams of becoming a successful musician. The movie sees how over the course of just a couple of years, Dylan solidifies himself as a cultural icon. So while the movie covers a small portion of his life, it is arguably the most pivotal part.  

 

Advertisement

Bob Dylan was known as someone who hated conforming to traditional music and always pushed himself to create something different than what was normal at the time. This is what the conflict centers around. We see Dylan face plenty of external pressure to do exactly what his fans and the record label want. They want him to stick with his folk roots that initially made him famous, and continue to perform his most popular songs during live performances. But Dylan has no desire to do any of the sort and would rather create music that challenges and redefines the folk genre, for which he faces an extreme amount of backlash. 

The 1965 Newport Folk Festival serves as the movie’s climax. This was a significant moment in music history, when Dylan shifted from acoustic folk to electric folk, combining the folk and rock genres for the first time. He performed three songs backed by electric instruments, which fans saw as a betrayal of traditional folk. This was my favorite scene, as it contextualized a lot of previous scenes that showcased Dylan’s rebellious nature and refusal to conform.  

 

I got a lot out of this moment, as I love and enjoy when artists experiment with their new material when they can easily stick with the music that they might be known for making. An artist can make an album that becomes a smash hit, though when it comes to the album that follows it, they are faced with a choice. Do they essentially make the same album again and confirm their success? Or do they branch out and create something that ventures into a new style, despite what their fans might be used to? 

I found this movie to be interesting. I went into it knowing close to nothing about Bob Dylan, and while it did only cover a small portion of his life and career, it meant that the movie was able to drill down into this short time period and give a lot of attention and care to everything that came with it. Bob Dylan’s entire career spans a very long time, he is still performing to this day. Perhaps a movie that tried to cover more of his career would’ve resulted in a lot of important context being cut for time’s sake. I’m glad the movie was set during a small period, as it allowed more focus on what was happening. I got a lot of enjoyment out of it, and I feel inspired to go check out some of his work. 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Review | Happyend: dystopian surveillance in chilling Japanese high school drama

Published

on

Review | Happyend: dystopian surveillance in chilling Japanese high school drama

4/5 stars

An inner-city high school becomes the testing ground for an intrusive new security system in Happyend, the debut feature from Japanese-American filmmaker Neo Sora.

Through the prism of this institution, the film observes the strengthening grip of an authoritarian regime as anxiety builds over an impending earthquake and widespread malaise among the adolescent community is quashed with an iron fist.

Students Yuta (Hayato Kurihara) and Kou (Yukito Hidaka) are best friends and founders of the school music club. When caught sneaking into a nightclub, Yuta is let off with a slapped wrist, but as Kou is Korean, the police immediately give him grief, even questioning the legitimacy of his Japanese residency.

When the boys pull an elaborate prank on their corrupt principal (Shiro Sano), upending his luxury sports car in the school courtyard, the faculty fights back by installing state-of-the-art surveillance cameras around campus.

Advertisement

For Kou, this is the final straw. Sick of being incessantly discriminated against, he falls in with Fumi (Kilala Inori), a girl with ties to an activist group, and over time, he steadily becomes radicalised.

Continue Reading

Trending