Movie Reviews
Review: ‘Not Okay’ tackles the seductiveness of internet celebrity, plus more weekend movies
![Review: ‘Not Okay’ tackles the seductiveness of internet celebrity, plus more weekend movies Review: ‘Not Okay’ tackles the seductiveness of internet celebrity, plus more weekend movies](https://ca-times.brightspotcdn.com/dims4/default/6eabab3/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1265x664%20168%200/resize/1200x630!/quality/90/?url=https://california-times-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com/28/ed/da8bd31d4307be68f73587ff0f04/01-notokay-lo-v30453278-fp-dpo-prohq-hd-sdr-23-eng-239-eng-5120-opsos49re.jpg)
‘Not Okay’
Quinn Shephard made a formidable writing and directing debut — in her early 20s, no much less — with 2017’s “Blame,” a eager and classy teen-movie spin on “The Crucible.” Shephard takes a good greater swing with “Not Okay,” a big-hearted social satire that roasts hashtag activism and influencer tradition whereas nonetheless suggesting that individuals could make a distinction in the event that they go about it the best approach.
Zoey Deutch performs Danni Sanders, an aspiring journalist uninterested in being missed by the a lot cooler colleagues and editors on the New York-based web site the place she works. In a determined try and impress, she pretends to be on a writers’ retreat in Paris — and fakes images of the journey. When the town is then hit by a collection of terrorist assaults, everybody assumes Danni is a survivor, and the surge of consideration (to not point out the massive enhance in Instagram followers) convinces her to roll with the lie.
Shephard has a variety of enjoyable spoofing the wild trip of being extraordinarily common on-line, the place relevance is measured in clicks and FOMO can really feel as painful as real-world trauma. Shephard balances the comedy with a subplot about Rowan (Mia Isaac), a school-shooting survivor and gun-law crusader whose friendship with Danni boosts the impostor’s credibility. These shifts within the movie between earnestness and anything-for-a-laugh comedy typically really feel off, permitting the viewers to excuse the characters’ unhealthy habits as foolish, not reckless.
However “Not Okay” hits surprisingly exhausting with its ending, reframing a variety of the previous 90 minutes from a unique and harsher perspective. And all through, Shephard is refreshingly trustworthy about how seductive web fame will be. “Not Okay” hits its marks most of the time, and at its greatest it illustrates, step by inexorable step, how a fastidiously sculpted social media persona can encourage folks to pretend their approach into an actual disaster.
‘Not Okay.’ R, for language all through, drug use and a few sexual content material. 1 hour, 40 minutes. Out there on Hulu.
‘We Met in Digital Actuality’
For all of the cheap anxiousness we could have about whether or not we’re spending an excessive amount of time on-line, it’d be improper to disclaim that many individuals depend on the digital world for a way of group, a inventive outlet and a option to safely discover different cultures and alternate identities. Joe Searching’s animated documentary “We Met in Digital Actuality” — recorded totally inside VRChat — explores the true relationships which have developed inside these digital areas and gives an optimistic tackle the way forward for human interplay inside a man-made world.
None of “We Met in Digital Actuality” is about “IRL.” There are not any dry talking-head interviews with even-handed VR consultants, no direct comparisons between the on a regular basis lives of the film’s topics and who they’re once they placed on their headsets. As a substitute, Searching simply roams overtly and curiously via brightly coloured fantastical realms, assembly a few of the horny human-animal hybrids and whimsically goofy creatures who’ve discovered little corners of VRChat the place they’ll go on dates, have outings with pals, take courses … actually, do no matter folks do within the outdoors world however with far fewer bodily or logistical limitations.
The character designs and backdrops are amazingly imaginative; and although the actions and rendering are sometimes glitchy, that solely provides to the attraction of the residents’ informal conversations. It’s reassuring in a option to know that even a web-based utopia is imperfect, and that in the long run it solely succeeds due to the goodwill and brilliant concepts of the individuals who collect there.
‘We Met in Digital Actuality.’ V-MA. 1 hour, 31 minutes. Out there on HBO Max.
Sally Phillips within the film “How one can Please a Lady.”
(David Dare Parker / Brainstorm Media)
‘How one can Please a Lady’
Just like the current indie drama “Good Luck to You, Leo Grande” — however crossed with “The Full Monty” and a bit of little bit of “Magic Mike” — the Australian comedy “How one can Please a Lady” is about older girls in search of sexual success and the good-looking younger males paid to offer it. Sally Phillips offers a successful efficiency as Gina, a 50-year-old who loses her job, then takes benefit of a clumsy encounter with a pleasant stripper named Tom (Alexander England) to begin her personal enterprise: hiring out hunky guys to wash homes and, if requested, to offer sexual providers.
Author-director Renée Webster retains the tone gentle and at occasions even jokey, which initially shortchanges a few of the points at play right here, such because the calls for of intercourse work and the skinny line between commerce and exploitation. However Webster rapidly will get to the film’s actual level as soon as Gina realizes her workers could not know sufficient about romance, fantasy or sensuality to fulfill their purchasers. When she begins doing buyer surveys, the enter she will get about what girls really need will get her fascinated with her personal unfulfilling marriage, and whether or not her affable middle-aged enterprise associate Steve (Erik Thomson) may also help her discover what she’s been lacking.
“How one can Please a Lady” is overlong; and it runs out of plot effectively earlier than it will get to its climax (so to talk). However whereas its premise is at occasions iffy, the film as an entire has a refreshing randiness about it. To her credit score, Webster doesn’t draw back from the intercourse a part of this intercourse comedy. It’s on the heart of the image, as a result of Webster’s girls need it — even want it — to be a extra central a part of who they’re.
‘How one can Please a Lady.’ Not rated. 1 hour, 47 minutes. Out there on VOD.
‘The Reef: Stalked’
The Australian survival thriller “The Reef: Stalked” isn’t a sequel to writer-director Andrew Traucki’s acclaimed 2010 movie “The Reef” a lot because it’s a brand new iteration of the identical story. As soon as once more a bunch of pals discover themselves stranded within the ocean with a lethal shark close by; and as soon as once more Traucki constructs the plot like a bit of puzzle, because the characters muster no matter assets they’ll discover to make it safely again to civilization.
The shark’s prey this time are all girls: a band of expert snorkelers that features two sisters nonetheless recovering from a sibling’s current homicide. Their private trauma impacts a few of the selections they make — and, frankly, leads to a couple soul-searching conversations that decelerate “The Reef: Stalked.” General, the motion right here isn’t as taut because it was in “The Reef,” and the shark results aren’t as spectacular. Nonetheless, for probably the most half the film delivers what it guarantees. We watch these women attempt to keep away from turning into victims by pondering their approach via seemingly inconceivable issues, realizing any mistake could possibly be their final.
‘The Reef: Stalked.’ Not rated. 1 hour, 29 minutes. Out there on Shudder.
‘BlackWood’
In writer-director Chris Canfield’s debut function, “BlackWood,” a gang of outlaws in late nineteenth century South Dakota pressure a Native American lady (Tanajsia Slaughter) to information them on a hunt for gold in a mysterious forest, which seems to be the house of the legendary man-beast the Wendigo. This horror-western hybrid performs up the pulpier sides of each genres, counting on inventory variations of Outdated West characters and a kind of monster-movie plots the place folks hold stumbling throughout horribly mutilated our bodies but stubbornly resist the concept one thing bizarre is happening.
Canfield additionally introduces themes associated to the American frontiersmen’s merciless remedy of the natives — a be aware of seriousness that, whereas admirable, conflicts with the movie’s general tone. That is extra of a film for anybody who needs to see burly jerks in cowboy hats get knocked round by a large, bushy humanoid within the attractive Black Hills wilderness — and who doesn’t thoughts ready via a variety of slow-paced setup to get to some fairly nifty chases and gore.
‘BlackWood.’ R, for violence, gore and language. 1 hour, 38 minutes. Out there on VOD.
Additionally on VOD
“Neptune Frost” is in contrast to another film launched this yr: a gender-bending science-fiction musical set amongst a band of revolutionary hackers residing in a Rwandan village surrounded by digital waste. Co-directors Saul Williams and Anisia Uzeyman meld Afrofuturism and trendy common tradition right into a singular imaginative and prescient. Out there on VOD.
Out there now on DVD and Blu-ray
![A woman and two men look toward the camera with expressions of concern.](https://ca-times.brightspotcdn.com/dims4/default/00b5817/2147483647/strip/true/crop/4096x1716+0+0/resize/840x352!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcalifornia-times-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2F71%2F04%2F6a86d6c242cabbca1d9f054970b3%2Fdoctor-strange.jpg)
Xochitl Gómez, from left, Benedict Wong and Benedict Cumberbatch within the film “Physician Unusual within the Multiverse of Insanity.”
(Marvel Studios)
“Physician Unusual within the Multiverse of Insanity” continues the current pattern in Marvel films and TV exhibits towards exploring alternate realities as everybody’s favourite sorcerer (Benedict Cumberbatch) bounces between universes, making an attempt to repair issues brought on by his outdated Avengers colleague the Scarlet Witch (Elizabeth Olsen). The film additionally marks a return to Marvel for director Sam Raimi, who helmed the primary three Spider-Man films again within the 2000s. Walt Disney.
![](https://newspub.live/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/np-logo.png)
Movie Reviews
‘Martha’ Review: R.J. Cutler Tries to Get Martha Stewart to Let Down Her Guard in Mixed-Bag Netflix Doc
![‘Martha’ Review: R.J. Cutler Tries to Get Martha Stewart to Let Down Her Guard in Mixed-Bag Netflix Doc ‘Martha’ Review: R.J. Cutler Tries to Get Martha Stewart to Let Down Her Guard in Mixed-Bag Netflix Doc](https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Martha_00044009_01191620.jpg?w=1440&h=810&crop=1)
From teenage model to upper-crust caterer to domestic doyenne to media-spanning billionaire to scapegoated convict to octogenarian thirst trap enthusiast and Snoop Dogg chum, Martha Stewart has had a life that defies belief, or at least congruity.
It’s an unlikely journey that has been carried out largely in the public eye, which gives R.J. Cutler a particular challenge with his new Netflix documentary, Martha. Maybe there are young viewers who don’t know what Martha Stewart‘s life was before she hosted dinner parties with Snoop. Perhaps there are older audiences who thought that after spending time at the prison misleadingly known as Camp Cupcake, Martha Stewart slunk off into embarrassed obscurity.
Martha
The Bottom Line Makes for an entertaining but evasive star subject.
Venue: Telluride Film Festival
Distributor: Netflix
Director: R.J. Cutler
1 hour 55 minutes
Those are probably the 115-minute documentary’s target audiences — people impressed enough to be interested in Martha Stewart, but not curious enough to have traced her course actively. It’s a very, very straightforward and linear documentary in which the actual revelations are limited more by your awareness than anything else.
In lieu of revelations, though, what keeps Martha engaging is watching Cutler thrust and parry with his subject. The prolific documentarian has done films on the likes of Anna Wintour and Dick Cheney, so he knows from prickly stars, and in Martha Stewart he has a heroine with enough power and well-earned don’t-give-a-f**k that she’ll only say exactly what she wants to say in the context that she wants to say it. Icy when she wants to be, selectively candid when it suits her purposes, Stewart makes Martha into almost a collaboration: half the story she wants to tell and half the degree to which Cutler buys that story. And the latter, much more than the completely bland biographical trappings and rote formal approach, is entertaining.
Cutler has pushed the spotlight exclusively onto Stewart. Although he’s conducted many new interviews for the documentary, with friends and co-workers and family and even a few adversaries, only Stewart gets the on-screen talking head treatment. Everybody else gets to give their feedback in audio-only conversations that have to take their place behind footage of Martha through the years, as well as the current access Stewart gave production to what seems to have been mostly her lavish Turkey Hill farmhouse.
Those “access” scenes, in which Stewart goes about her business without acknowledging the camera, illustrate her general approach to the documentary, which I could sum up as “I’m prepared to give you my time, but mostly as it’s convenient to me.”
At 83 and still busier than almost any human on the globe, Stewart needs this documentary less than the documentary needs her, and she absolutely knows it. Cutler tries to draw her out and includes himself pushing Stewart on certain points, like the difference between her husband’s affair, which still angers her, and her own contemporaneous infidelity. Whenever possible, Stewart tries to absent herself from being an active part of the stickier conversations by handing off correspondences and her diary from prison, letting Cutler do what he wants with those semi-revealing documents.
“Take it out of the letters,” she instructs him after the dead-ended chat about the end of her marriage, adding that she simply doesn’t revel in self-pity.
And Cutler tries, getting a voiceover actor to read those letters and diary entries and filling in visual gaps with unremarkable still illustrations.
Just as Stewart makes Cutler fill in certain gaps, the director makes viewers read between the lines frequently. In the back-and-forth about their affairs, he mentions speaking with Andy, her ex, but Andy is never heard in the documentary. Take it as you will. And take it as you will that she blames prducer Mark Burnett for not understanding her brand in her post-prison daytime show — which may or may not explain Burnett’s absence, as well as the decision to treat The Martha Stewart Show as a fleeting disaster (it actually ran 1,162 episodes over seven seasons) and to pretend that The Apprentice: Martha Stewart never existed. The gaps and exclusions are particularly visible in the post-prison part of her life, which can be summed up as, “Everything was bad and then she roasted Justin Bieber and everything was good.”
Occasionally, Stewart gives the impression that she’s let her protective veneer slip, like when she says of the New York Post reporter covering her trial: “She’s dead now, thank goodness. Nobody has to put up with that crap that she was writing.” But that’s not letting anything slip. It’s pure and calculated and utterly cutthroat. More frequently when Stewart wants to show contempt, she rolls her eyes or stares in Cutler’s direction waiting for him to move on. That’s evisceration enough.
Stewart isn’t a producer on Martha, and I’m sure there are things here she probably would have preferred not to bother with again at all. But at the same time, you can sense that either she’s steering the theme of the documentary or she’s giving Cutler what he needs for his own clear theme. Throughout the first half, her desire for perfection is mentioned over and over again and, by the end, she pauses and summarizes her life’s course with, “I think imperfection is something that you can deal with.”
Seeing her interact with Cutler and with her staff, there’s no indication that she has set aside her exacting standards. Instead, she’s found a calculatedly imperfect version of herself that people like, and she’s perfected that. It is, as she might put it, a good thing.
Movie Reviews
Reagan Is Almost Fun-Bad But It’s Mostly Just Bad-Bad
![Reagan Is Almost Fun-Bad But It’s Mostly Just Bad-Bad Reagan Is Almost Fun-Bad But It’s Mostly Just Bad-Bad](https://pyxis.nymag.com/v1/imgs/191/afd/c29a986144336e39edf1ea310d979113fd-reagan-review.1x.rsocial.w1200.jpg)
Dennis Quaid in Reagan.
Photo: Showbiz Direct/Everett Collection
Reagan is pure hagiography, but it’s not even one of those convincing hagiographies that pummel you into submission with compelling scenes that reinforce their subject’s greatness. Sean McNamara’s film has slick surfaces, but it’s so shallow and one-note that it actually does Ronald Reagan a disservice. The picture attempts to take in the full arc of the President’s life, following him from childhood right through to his 1994 announcement at the age of 83 that he’d been diagnosed with Alzheimer’s Disease. But you’d never guess that this man was at all complex, complicated, conflicted — in other words, human. He might as well be one of those animatronic robots at Disney World, mouthing lines from his famous speeches.
Dennis Quaid, a very good actor who can usually work hints of sadness into his manic machismo, is hamstrung here by the need to impersonate. He gets the voice down well (and he certainly says “Well” a lot) and he tries to do what he can with Reagan’s occasional political or career setbacks, but gone is that unpredictable glint in the actor’s eye. This Reagan doesn’t seem to have much of an interior life. Everything he thinks or feels, he says — which is maybe an admirable trait in a politician, but makes for boring art.
The film’s arc is wide and its focus is narrow. Reagan is mainly about its subject’s lifelong opposition to Communism, carrying him through his battles against labor organizers as president of the Screen Actors Guild and eventually to higher public office. The movie is narrated by a retired Soviet intelligence official (Jon Voight) in the present day, answering a younger counterpart’s questions about how the Russian empire was destroyed. He calls Reagan “the Crusader” and the moniker is meant to be both combative and respectful: He admires Reagan’s single-minded dedication to fighting the Soviets. They, after all, were single-minded in their dedication to fighting the U.S., and the agent has a ton of folders and films proving that the KGB had been watching Reagan for a long, long time.
By the way, you did read that correctly. Jon Voight plays a KGB officer in this picture, complete with a super-thick Russian accent. There’s a lot of dress-up going on — it’s like Basquiat for Republicans, even though the cast is certainly not all Republicans — and there’s some campy fun to be had here. Much has been made of Creed’s Scott Stapp doing a very flamboyant Frank Sinatra, though I regret to announce that he’s only onscreen for a few seconds. Robert Davi gets more screentime as Leonid Brezhnev, as does Kevin Dillon as Jack Warner. Xander Berkeley puts in fine work as George Schultz, and a game Mena Suvari shows up as an intriguingly pissy Jane Wyman, Reagan’s first wife. As Margaret Thatcher, Lesley-Anne Down gets to utter an orgasmic “Well done, cowboy!” when she sees Reagan’s “Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall” speech on TV. And my ’80s-kid brain is still processing C. Thomas Howell being cast as Caspar Weinberger.
To be fair, a lot of historians give Reagan credit for helping bring about both the Gorbachev revolution and the eventual downfall of the U.S.S.R. and its satellites, so the film’s focus is not in and of itself a misguided one. There are stories to be told within that scope — interesting ones, controversial ones, the kind that could get audiences talking and arguing, and even ones that could help breathe life into the moribund state of conservative filmmaking. But without any lifelike characters, it’s hard to find oneself caring, and thus, Reagan’s dedication to such narrow themes proves limiting. We get little mention of his family life (aside from his non-stop devotion to Nancy, played by Penelope Ann Miller, and vice versa). Other issues of the day are breezed through with a couple of quick montages. All of this could have given some texture to the story and lent dimensionality to such an enormously consequential figure. But then again, if the only character flaw you could find in Ronald Reagan was that he was too honest, then maybe you weren’t very serious about depicting him as a human being to begin with.
See All
Movie Reviews
‘Don’t Let’s Go to the Dogs Tonight’ Review: An Extraordinary Adaptation Takes a Child’s-Eye View of an African Civil War
![‘Don’t Let’s Go to the Dogs Tonight’ Review: An Extraordinary Adaptation Takes a Child’s-Eye View of an African Civil War ‘Don’t Let’s Go to the Dogs Tonight’ Review: An Extraordinary Adaptation Takes a Child’s-Eye View of an African Civil War](https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Don-t-Let-s-Go-to-the-Dogs-Tonight_Still_01-H-2024.jpg?w=1296&h=730&crop=1)
Alexandra Fuller‘s bestselling 2001 memoir of growing up in Africa is so cinematic, full of personal drama and political upheaval against a vivid landscape, that it’s a wonder it hasn’t been turned into a film before. But it was worth waiting for Embeth Davidtz’s eloquent adaptation, which depicts a child’s-eye view of the civil war that created the country of Zimbabwe, formerly Rhodesia — a change the girl’s white colonial parents fiercely resisted.
Davidtz, known as an actress (Schindler’s List, among many others), directs and wrote the screenplay for Don’t Let’s Go to the Dogs Tonight and stars as Fuller’s sad, alcoholic mother. Or, actually, co-stars, because the entire movie rests on the tiny shoulders and remarkably lifelike performance of Lexi Venter — just 7 when the picture, her first, was shot. It is a bold risk to put so much weight on a child’s work, but like so many of Davidtz’s choices here, it also turns out to be shrewd.
Don’t Let’s Go to the Dogs Tonight
The Bottom Line Near perfection.
Venue: Telluride Film Festival
Cast: Lexi Venter, Embeth Davidtz, Zikhona Bali, Fumani N Shilubana, Rob Van Vuuren, Anina Hope Reed
Director-screenwriter: Embeth Davidtz
1 hour 38 minutes
Another those smart calls is to focus intensely on one period of Fuller’s childhood. Don’t Let’s Go to the Dogs Tonight is set in 1980, just before and during the election that would bring the country’s Black majority to power. Bobo, as Fuller was called, is a raggedy kid with a perpetually dirty face and uncombed hair, who’s seen at times riding a motorbike or sneaking cigarettes. She runs around the family farm, whose run-down look and dusty ground tell of a hardscrabble existence. The film was shot in South Africa, and Willie Nel’s cinematography, with glaring bright light, suggests the scorching feel of the sun.
Much of the story is told in Bobo’s voiceover, in Venter’s completely natural delivery, and in another daring and effective choice, all of it is told from her point of view. Davidtz’s screenplay deftly lets us hear and see the racism that surrounds the child, and the ideas that she has innocently taken in from her parents. And we recognize the emotional cost of the war, even when Bobo doesn’t. She often mentions terrorists, saying she is afraid to go into the bathroom alone at night in case there’s one waiting for her “with a knife or a gun or a spear.” She keeps an eye out for them while riding into town in the family car with an armed convoy. “Africans turned into terrorists and that’s how the war started,” she explains, parroting what she has heard.
At one point, the convoy glides past an affluent white neighborhood. That glimpse helps Davidtz situate the Fullers, putting their assumptions of privilege into context. Bobo has absorbed those notions without quite losing her innocence. Referring to the family’s servants, her voiceover says that Sarah (Zikhona Bali) and Jacob (Fumani N. Shilubana) live on the farm, and that “Africans don’t have last names.” Bobo adores Sarah and the stories she tells from her own culture, but Bobo also feels that she can boss Sarah around.
Venter is astonishing throughout. In close-up, she looks wide-eyed and aghast when visiting her grandfather, who has apparently had a stroke. At another point, she says of her mother, “Mum says she’d trade all of us for a horse and her dogs.” When she says, after the briefest pause, “But I know that’s not true,” her tone is not one of defiant disbelief or childlike belief, as might have been expected. It’s more nuanced, with a hint of sadness that suggests a realization just beyond her young grasp. Davidtz surely had a lot to do with that, and her editor, Nicholas Contaras, has cut all Bobo’s scenes into a sharply perfect length. Nonetheless, Venter’s work here brings to mind Anna Paquin, who won an Oscar as a child for her thoroughly believable role as a girl also who sees more than she knows in The Piano.
The largely South African cast displays the same naturalism as Venter, creating a consistent tone. Rob Van Vuuren plays Bobo’s father, who is at times away fighting, and Anina Hope Reed is her older sister. Bali and Shilubana are especially impressive as Sarah and Jacob, their portrayals suggesting a resistance to white rule that the characters can’t always speak out loud.
Davidtz has a showier role as Nicola Fuller. (The movie doesn’t explain its title, which hails from the early 20th century writer A.P Herbert’s line, “Don’t let’s go the dogs tonight, for mother will be there.”) Once, Nicola shoots a snake in the kitchen and calmly wanders off, ordering Jacob to bring her tea. More often, Bobo watches her mother drift around the house or sit on the porch in an alcoholic fog. But when her voiceover tells us about the little sister who drowned, we fathom the grief behind Nicola’s depression. And wrong-headed though she is, we understand her fury and distress when the election results make her feel that she is about to lose the country she thinks of as home. Davidtz gives herself a scene at a neighborhood dance that goes on a bit too long, but it’s the rare sequence that does.
There is more of Fuller’s memoir that might be a source for other adaptations. It is hard to imagine any would be more beautifully realized than this.
-
Connecticut1 week ago
Oxford church provides sanctuary during Sunday's damaging storm
-
Technology1 week ago
Breakthrough robo-glove gives you superhuman grip
-
Politics1 week ago
2024 showdown: What happens next in the Kamala Harris-Donald Trump face-off
-
News1 week ago
Who Are Kamala Harris’s 1.5 Million New Donors?
-
Politics1 week ago
Trump taunted over speculated RFK Jr endorsement: 'Weird as hell'
-
Politics1 week ago
Vivek Ramaswamy sounds off on potential RFK Jr. role in a Trump administration
-
World6 days ago
Portugal coast hit by 5.3 magnitude earthquake
-
Politics1 week ago
House GOP demands elite universities counteract 'dangerous' anti-Israel protests in the fall semester