Critics have been hard on “Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny,” the fifth and final installment of the Indiana Jones movies (starting in 1981 with “Raiders of the Lost Ark”). But whereas the current Indiana Jones movie is by no means as good as Raiders of the Lost Ark (perhaps not as good as any of the previous Indiana Jones movies), it’s an enjoyable film worthy of summer viewing.
As in “Raiders of the Lost Ark,” Indiana is again tangling with Nazis over an ancient artifact. The year is 1944 and Germany is in tatters as it heads to inevitable and crushing defeat at the hands of the Allies. Indiana Jones (Harrison Ford) manages to seize from a Nazi train a dial dating back to 212 BC and which was owned by the mathematician Archimedes. The other half of the dial is somewhere at the bottom of the Mediterranean.
Fast forward to 1969. Indiana is an aging and retired archaeology professor at Hunter College in New York. On this particular day, there is a ticker-tape parade for the Apollo 11 astronauts who have just returned from the first manned mission to the Moon. Indiana is relaxing in a bar when he is approached by a person from his past. Helena Shaw (Phoebe Waller-Bridge) is both his god-daughter and the daughter of Indiana’s late colleague. She has a proposition for Indiana that the both of them try to retrieve the other half of the dial.
Indiana invites Helena to the archives to show her the half of the dial he had seized and is now in the possession of the college museum. They are at this time accosted by thugs, one being Nazi astrophysicist Jurgen Voller (Mads Mikkelsen). Helena manages to evade the bandits and flee with the dial (and abandoning Indiana). She goes to North Africa to sell the dial on the antiquities black-market. Indiana follows Helena to North Africa and confronts her as she is engaging in the bidding war for the dial. At the same time, the Nazi thugs appear and seize the dial. After several involved chase scenes (perhaps too involved), the duel ends up between two boats on the Mediterranean with Indiana recovering the dial.
But it’s important at this time to discuss the importance of the dial. Its value is way beyond the fact that it is an ancient artifact. Archimedes believed the dial possessed the power to form a time fissure, in other words to enable time travel, if only the dial could be connected to its missing half. Indiana and Helena find the other half while deep sea diving in the Mediterranean.
Advertisement
Whereas Indiana is skeptical of such power, Voller is convinced of it. His plan is to travel back in time to Germany in 1939. Voller intends to assassinate Hitler prior to the latter waging war. Not that Voller is trying to avoid a world war. It is his position that Hitler was a fool and that the Third Reich would have triumphed had it only rid itself of him.
Voller and the Nazi thugs again seize the dial (this time with its other half) and by plane create a time fissure to travel to Munich, Germany in 1939. They have also taken Indiana as a prisoner. Helena pursues them also by plane and everyone ends up beyond the time fissure. But the results aren’t what Voller had expected.
The several pursuits back and forth are tiring and take up too much a part of the movie. But the film is in the fun tradition of Indiana Jones and there is genuine suspense toward the conclusion of the movie. Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny is an enjoyable film and the two plus hours go by fast (a sign of a good movie). Director James Mangold has delivered a quality film the whole family will enjoy.
1 of 6 | Harris Dickinson and Nicole Kidman star in “Babygirl,” in theaters Dec. 25. Photo courtesy of A24
LOS ANGELES, Dec. 22 (UPI) —Babygirl, in theaters Wednesday, is the kind of erotic drama they used to make a lot in the ’80s and ’90s. As such, it is refreshing in 2024, though perhaps still derivative of its genre predecessors.
Romy Mathis (Nicole Kidman) is the founder and CEO of Tensile, a robotics company developing automated drones for warehouses. She is married to a theater director, Jacob (Antonio Banderas), and they have two daughters.
When Tensile begins a mentorship program for interns, Samuel (Harris Dickinson) pushes Romy’s buttons to get one-on-one time with her. His power plays unlock Romy’s repressed sexual desires and they begin an affair.
Playing power games may be inherent to many sexual relationships, so it’s not like one movie invented them, but it’s hard not to think about 9½ Weeks. In that notorious 1986 film, Mickey Rourke played a man who seduces a woman (Kim Basinger) with sex games involving food, spanking and blindfolds.
Advertisement
Still, Babygirl doesn’t play Romy as a cliche of a powerful businesswoman who really likes to be submissive in bed and experience the adrenaline of risking exposure.
Not that the affair compromises Romy’s success, either, although it could if Samuel reports her. She also starts to blur the lines of being submissive in private and at the office, but she doesn’t let it interfere with business decisions.
The love scenes between Kidman and Dickinson are revealing, but not gratuitous. They are vulnerable and uncomfortable rather than titillating.
The way writer-director Halina Reijn approaches consent is interesting and seems realistic. Samuel does insist on consent before continuing, which is a fantastic portrayal of obtaining verbal consent, though the conditions of Romy’s consent remain nebulous.
Romy makes it clear that Samuel’s power games make her uncomfortable. Agreeing to continue while feeling uncomfortable seems like it adds a level of duress.
Advertisement
It’s 80 minutes into the movie before Samuel and Romy even discuss using a safe word, which would give either party, but especially Romy, a way to end a session at her discretion. Yet, this is believable because Romy and Samuel are amateurs at this, so they’re figuring it out.
Samuel may play the dominant role, but he is in many respects just a poser. He is a young intern and very emotional when things don’t go his way.
It seems like Samuel is imitating what he thinks a Casanova would act like, but whenever Romy goes off script, Samuel seems to be at a loss for words. It’s not natural to him, either, though he thinks of some clever workplace games that make Romy play along.
He’s probably watched 9½ Weeks, too, or more likely just read the Wikipedia summary.
The Jacob character is the film’s most stereotypical.
Advertisement
Jacob is a loving husband who just can’t excite Romy. Romy tries to teach him to play games in bed, but Jacob doesn’t enjoy experimenting. It’s odd that a person whose job is in the arts would lack any creativity with his partner, but he’s entitled to have traditional desires, too.
The lack of monogamy is an unmitigated betrayal, as even submissive relationships should respect loyalty unless they’ve discussed and agreed to having an open relationship. The film eventually explores how a couple navigates compatibility, but Romy has to own hers first.
Individual choices the characters make in Babygirl will provoke discussions, and won’t be spoiled in this review. The positive is that the film does show Romy’s growth through the experience.
So, even if a viewer disagrees with part of the journey, the film makes its case for the value of those experiences. That makes it an engaging, provocative film.
Advertisement
Fred Topel, who attended film school at Ithaca College, is a UPI entertainment writer based in Los Angeles. He has been a professional film critic since 1999, a Rotten Tomatoes critic since 2001, and a member of the Television Critics Association since 2012 and the Critics Choice Association since 2023. Read more of his work in Entertainment.
Pottel, directed by Sahith Mothkuri and starring Ajay, Yuvachandra, and Ananya Nagalla in pivotal roles, is a rural drama that delves into the socio-cultural issues of the 1970s. The movie, which captivated audiences with its intriguing title, was released in theaters in October and recently debuted on OTT platforms Amazon Prima and Aha. With music by Sekhar Chandra, the film aims to strike an emotional chord with its thought-provoking narrative.
Plot Summary: The story is set in a remote village during the 1970s, where the powerful Patel family dominates the region. Believing that education empowers people to question authority, the Patels discourage the villagers from pursuing it. Mallanna (Chatrapathi Sekhar), who recognizes the importance of education, dreams of educating his son Gangadharam (Yuvachandra). However, his efforts are thwarted when Patel (Ajay) kills him to maintain control over the village.
The villagers revere a local deity, Balamma, and Patel manipulates their beliefs to suppress dissent. Gangadharam grows up in this oppressive environment, determined to bring change. He marries Bujjamma (Ananya Nagalla), defying her brother and societal norms.
Meanwhile, the village observes a ritual every 12 years, offering a Pottel as a sacrifice to their deity. This time, Gangadharam is tasked with overseeing the ritual. The stakes are high, as failure to perform the ritual properly could have dire consequences for him. Caught between his goal of educating his daughter and empowering the villagers, and the ritualistic traditions, Gangadharam faces immense challenges from Patel. How he overcomes these obstacles forms the crux of the story.
Analysis: The film effectively portrays the socio-political dynamics and superstitions prevalent in rural India during the 1970s. The director highlights the dominance of landlords like the Patels and their efforts to maintain control by keeping the marginalized sections uneducated. The screenplay weaves these themes with clarity, emphasizing the need for education as a tool for empowerment.
Advertisement
The movie also sheds light on superstitions and rituals like animal sacrifices, which were exploited by the powerful to manipulate the weak. The village itself feels like a character in the story, with its landscapes and traditions adding depth to the narrative. The realistic portrayal of the struggles and resilience of rural communities enhances the film’s authenticity.
Performances: Yuvachandra delivers a compelling performance as Gangadharam, capturing the character’s struggle and determination effectively. Ajay excels as the antagonist Patel, portraying the role with authority and menace. Ananya Nagalla impresses with her portrayal of Bujjamma, adding emotional depth to the story. The supporting cast, including Chatrapathi Sekhar, performs within the scope of their roles, contributing to the narrative’s strength.
Technical Aspects: Cinematography by Monish Bhupathiraju stands out, beautifully capturing the rural and forest backdrops, adding an immersive visual quality. Music by Sekhar Chandra complements the narrative well, with both songs and background score enhancing the emotional impact. Editing by Karthik Srinivas ensures a cohesive flow, although some scenes feel slightly stretched. The authentic depiction of rural settings and customs adds to the film’s credibility.
Final Verdict: Pottel is a sincere attempt to address important social issues like education, empowerment, and superstition through a rural narrative. While the film’s pacing and predictability in certain areas might deter some viewers, its emotional core and relevant themes make it a worthwhile watch for those interested in rural dramas.