Connect with us

Movie Reviews

‘Natchathiram Nagargirathu’ movie review: Perhaps Pa Ranjith’s best, despite being too long

Published

on

‘Natchathiram Nagargirathu’ movie review: Perhaps Pa Ranjith’s best, despite being too long

That is Ranjith’s most interesting and purest movie, until date. Not simply when it comes to what it stands for but additionally the shape with which it presents. This visible language is a departure for the filmmaker too

That is Ranjith’s most interesting and purest movie, until date. Not simply when it comes to what it stands for but additionally the shape with which it presents. This visible language is a departure for the filmmaker too

Lovers in mattress having a seemingly considerate but uneasy dialog about their relationship shouldn’t ideally remind you of that unbroken shot in Jean-Luc Godard’s seminal Contempt. But, that’s what the smashing opening sequence of Pa Ranjith’s Natchathiram Nagargirathu does to you. There’s contempt right here too, simply that it takes a distinct kind: a casteist comment.

Rene (Dushara Vijayan. She is one of the best Pa Ranjith protagonist) and Iniyan (Kalidas Jayaram in an efficient efficiency) have a heated dialogue over Ilaiyaraaja’s music. Their distinction in personalities establishes their political opinions and the place they wish to stand: Iniyan, a fan of Nina Simone, is dismissive of the maestro, whereas Rene says that Ilaiyaraaja is as superior because the American singer-activist. If not, extra. 

Advertisement

Iniyan will get “triggered” by Rene’s rendition of ‘En Vaanile’ from Johnny — a movie that handled impersonation and identification disaster, and a lady dwelling a caged life — and asks her to cease. Have a look at the selection of the track. It is political too. Iniyan cuts her off when Rene sings this line: “Neerodai polave en penmai. Neerada vandhathae en menmai.” This “ penmai” and “ menmai” splendidly segues into Rene’s arc later, the place she talks a few shadow known as caste that made her run all by means of life but additionally empowered her to be fearless and assertive. “That’s my social identification,” she says. We’ll get there in a bit. 

In the event you assume this scene is a innocent argument over music, you’re fallacious. Rene (her beginning title is Tamizh) is Dalit and he or she is made to grasp this by Iniyan. The very nature of this scene is political and jogged my memory of the terrific quick movie Modi & A Beer, additionally produced by Neelam Productions. Rene and Iniyan break up, and the title card “A Pa Ranjith movie” seems. Love is political.

Natchathiram Nagargirathu

Solid: Dushara Vijayan, Kalidas Jayaram, Kalaiarasan, Hari Krishnan, Charles Vinoth and Subatra Robert

Director: Pa Ranjith

Advertisement

Storyline: A theatre group does the groundwork for staging a play on love, its politics, and the assorted narratives that society perpetuates to keep up the established order.

The primary half hour resulting in Tenma’s energetic ‘Rangarattinam’ track is so delicately written and spaced out that it may be taken as a strong instance to know why a movie must have an incredible set-up. Ranjith did this beforehand with Sarpatta Parambarai, the place its first half hour was laboriously spent to determine its world. However this movie additionally takes a very long time to reach at its first escalation level. Subeer (Regin Rose), mentor of a motion theatre group, comes up with the thought of a play on love. They talk about love, its politics and aspects that flip right into a heated dialogue exhibiting individuals’s true colors. What are the completely different varieties of affection? Inter-caste? Inter-faith? Queer love? Unrequited love? Natchathiram… is all that. 

By making an inclusive cinema, with a various set of voices with various gender, sexual and political identities, Ranjith illustrates the purpose that the oppressed class of 1 can even grow to be a dominant voice in one other. That is evident within the scene the place a personality places the blame on an upper-caste title which will get muted. And Dayana (Sumeeth Borana), a queer individual, will get labored up. Dayana is nonetheless a minority and always faces the specter of oppression for his sexual orientation. However that doesn’t appear to take away the privilege of his caste. Due to this fact, the movie questions the foundations of beliefs and prejudices which can be hypocritical. For example, a personality shoots down love that’s based mostly on bodily attraction, calling it “ gaaji” (lust). However the identical individual asks for a selfie from his potential accomplice, when she tells him she simply had a bathe. Or when Shekar (Charles Vinoth) says, “Love has nothing to do with age.”

After all, it begins as romance between two characters. However quickly, we realise it isn’t about Rene and Iniyan. We get the larger image. It’s a few motion theatre group which they’re part of. In essence, their “love” story turns into a part of a bigger factor. It is a masterstroke by Ranjith. The theatre backdrop, the place individuals of various colors and social backgrounds converge to grow to be one, is used as a springboard to image society as a complete. Due to this fact, the characters’ imperfections and political consciousness grow to be very important on this labour of affection. The truth that all characters are handled as parts, that they grow to be a power to reckon with solely once they unite within the face of menace, drives house Natchathiram Nagargirathu’s core precept: “The universe is so giant that we’re simply thugal (particles),” says a personality within the movie.

There’s a third vital character: Arjun (Kalaiarasan is totally terrific), an aspiring actor who comes from a dominant caste and finds it actually onerous to slot in. His dad and mom need him to get married to Roshini (Vinsu Rachel Sam). On his first day, he’s visibly uncomfortable round Sylvia (Sherin Celin Mathew), a transwoman who can also be a part of the theatre group. Arjun is written as a counterpoint to Iniyan. However they each belong to 2 sides of the identical coin.

Advertisement

Shakespeare known as this world a stage and we’re all mere gamers. Natchathiram… appears to ponder alongside related strains. By staging a “play” the place actors act out their respective characters, it makes an incisive case in opposition to nadaga kadhal, a time period slapped in opposition to Dalits by dominant caste teams so as to vilify inter-caste marriages. Ranjith, subsequently, takes this nadagam (stage play) as a weapon to “stage” a performative piece in opposition to honour killing. Components of the performative items jogged my memory of Gasper Noe’s Climax

The theatre group hits a roadblock as a result of they can’t point out the names of the caste. As a substitute, they provide you with a metaphor: kaatu poonai (jungle cat) and naatu poonai (pet cat). We would assume the play is about these two teams till there comes a wild cat (Shabeer Kallarakkal in a cameo). In idea, a cat can’t kill a tiger. It’s virtually not potential. However what if 100 cats band collectively? A thousand? Sounds doable, no? 

That is Ranjith’s most interesting and purest movie, until date. Not simply when it comes to what it stands for but additionally the shape with which it presents. This visible language is a departure for Ranjith too. Discover the best way it employs intercuts (edited by Selva RK) that appear seamless for the Rene and Iniyan strand. Natchathiram… can also be Ranjith’s bold movie; he’s solely getting higher as a filmmaker with every movie. Proper from shot compositions, establishing photographs to the color palette and Tenma’s music, this movie speaks of ambition.

Natchathiram…is as a lot Rene’s story as it’s Ranjith’s. In the end, it’s a movie about her arc. She is handled because the conscience keeper, to the purpose the place when Arjun oversteps his boundaries together with her, she is prepared to present him an opportunity. “Political correctness is not going to are available a day’s time,” she says. On this movie’s softest scene, you see Rene opening a door that has the Buddha’s mural on it. The sunshine from the door illuminates the body. Rene asks Arjun to observe her, as if to embrace the Buddha. That is Pa Ranjith’s dhammam.

Natchathiram Nagargirathu is presently working in theatres.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Rex Reed’s 2024 Movie Review Roundup: A Masterclass in Blistering Honesty

Published

on

Rex Reed’s 2024 Movie Review Roundup: A Masterclass in Blistering Honesty

Rex Reed’s scalpel was particularly sharp in 2024, slicing through 43 films with the kind of ruthless precision only he can wield. This was the year he likened Mean Girls to “cinematic Covid,” torched Longlegs as a “dumpster fire,” and suggested that Cash Out had John Travolta so lost, “somebody stage an intervention.” For those seeking unfiltered truths about Hollywood’s latest offerings, Reed delivered—though not without a handful of pleasant surprises.

His ratings reveal a critic tough to impress: 28 percent of films earned 1 star, while 5 percent received the graveyard of zero stars. Horror films bore the brunt of his wrath—Longlegs and Heretic were sacrificed at the altar of his biting prose. Yet, amid the wreckage, 5 percent clawed their way to 4 stars, with dramas like One Life and Cabrini standing out for their emotional gravitas. Biopics, historical narratives and character studies fared best under his gaze, suggesting Reed still has a soft spot for films anchored in strong performances and rich storytelling.

One of the more controversial reviews? Reed’s glowing praise for Coup de Chance, which he called “Woody Allen’s best film in years.” In an industry where few dare applaud Allen publicly, Reed’s unapologetic endorsement (“unfairly derailed by obvious, headline-demanding personal problems”) was as bold as ever. Interestingly, the most-read review wasn’t the most positive—The Last Showgirl dazzled readers, perhaps more for the spectacle of Pamela Anderson’s Vegas reinvention than the film’s plot. It seems Reed’s audience enjoys his kinder takes, but they revel in his cinematic eviscerations just as much. When Reed loves a film, he ensures you know it—just as he ensures the worst offenders are left gasping for air.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: A Locksmith lives to Regret Taking that One “Night Call”

Published

on

Movie Review: A Locksmith lives to Regret Taking that One “Night Call”

I’m of two minds about that subgenre we call the hero/heroine with “particular skills” thriller.

The parade of Liam Neeson/Jason Statham/John Cena et al action pictures where this mobster, that rogue government or rogue government agency or creepy neighbor crosses this or that mild-mannered man or woman who turns out to be ex-CIA, a retired Marine, a former assassin or Navy SEAL has worn out its welcome.

Somebody effs around, somebody finds out they’ve “Taken” the wrong relative, crossed the wrong professional mayhem-maker. Yawn.

It’s always more interesting when somebody a lot more ordinary is tested by an extraordinary situation, and by people ostensibly a lot more capable of what Mr. or Ms. In Over Their Heads is attempting. “Three Days of the Condor” is the template for this sort of film. A more recent example is the snowplow operator tracking down and avenging himself on his son’s mob killers — “In Order of Disappearance.”

Throwing somebody with one “particular skill” that doesn’t include violence, criminal or espionage subterfuge or the like? As an exercise in screenwriting problem-solving that’s almost always a fun film to watch. That’s why I have high hopes for Rami Malek’s upcoming spring fling, “The Amateur.”

Advertisement

Let’s hope that’s as good as the lurid, violent and tight-as-a-drum Belgian thriller, “Night Call.” A young man (Jonathan Feltre) is tricked, trapped and life-or-death tested by one long night at work.

Mady is a student, we gather, and a native-born Belgian with a thing for Petula Clark ’60s pop — in French. His night gig is as a locksmith. On this one night, that job will get him into trouble despite his best efforts to avoid it. And his “particular skills” and the tools of his trade will come in handy just enough to make you mutter, “clever, clever boy” at the screen and what writer-diector Michiel Blanchart has cooked-up for his feature filmmaking debut.

Mady’s the guy you summon when you’ve locked yourself out of your car, business or flat in the wee hours. He’s professional, courteous and honest. No, the quoted price — 250 Euros — is all you owe.

He’s also careful. The young woman named Claire (Natacha Krief) summons him to a Brussels flat she’s locked out of. She doesn’t have the 250. It’s in her purse, in her flat. With her keys. No, that’s where her ID is, too. As she’s flirted, just a bit, and the streets all around them are consumed by Black Lives Matter protests because Black people die at the hands of white cops in Belgium, too, he takes her word for it.

Mady might be the last to figure out that her last lie, about “taking out the trash” (in French with English subtitles) and hitting the ATM downstairs, is her get-away. When she rings him up and warns him to “Get OUT of there” (in French with subtitles) he’s still slow on the uptake.

Advertisement

That’s when the apartment’s real resident, a musclehead with a punching bag and lots of Nazi paraphrenalia on the walls, shows up and tries to beat Mady to death. He fails.

But can a young Black man call the possibly racist cops about what’s happened and have them believe him? Maybe not. It’s when he’s trying to “clean” the scene of the “crime” that he’s nabbed, and his night of hell escalates into torture, threats and attempts to escape from the mobster (Romain Duris at his most sadistic) in pursuit of stolen loot and the “real” thief, the elusive but somehow conscience-stricken “Claire.”

As Hitchcock always said, “Good villains make good thrillers.” Duris, recently seen in the French “The Three Musketeers” and “The Animal Kingdom,” famous for “The Spanish Apartment” and “Chinese Puzzle,”, is the classic thriller “reasonable man” heavy.

“Either you become a friend, or a problem,” his Yannick purrs, in between pulling the garbage bag off the suffocating kids’ head, only to wrap Mady’s face in duct tape, a more creative bit of asphyxiation.

The spice that Blanchart seasons his thriller with is the backdrop — street protests, with Black protesters furious that Mady isn’t joining them and riot police pummeling and arresting every Black face in sight. That’s jarringly contrasted by the oasis-of-calm subway and unconcerned discos where Mady chases clues and Claire.

Advertisement

A getaway on a stolen bicycle, dashing through streets and down into a subway station, suspense via frantic escapes, frantic bits of outwitting or outfighting crooks and cops, a decent confrontation with the not-cute-enough-to-excuse-all-this Claire and a satisfying “ticking clock” finale?

That’s what makes a good thriller. And if those “particular skills” show up here and there, at least we know Mady’s learned something on a job that if he lives to finish school, won’t be his career.

Rating: unrated, graphic violence, sex scenes in a brothel

Cast: Jonathan Feltre, Natacha Krief, Jonas Bloquet, Thomas Mustin and Romain Duris.

Credits: Scripted and directed by Michiel Blanchart. A Magnet release.

Advertisement

Running time: 1:37

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

'Cunk on Life' movie review: Laugh-out-loud mockumentary on life’s big questions

Published

on

'Cunk on Life' movie review: Laugh-out-loud mockumentary on life’s big questions

‘Cunk on Earth’ (2023), a mockumentary series on BBC, was hailed for its laugh-aloud mockery of pretentious documentaries and Morgan’s razor-sharp comedic timing — British droll at its very best.

Rashmi Vasudeva

Last Updated : 04 January 2025, 03:01 IST

Follow Us :

Comments

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Trending