Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: H.P. LOVECRAFT’S WITCH HOUSE

Published

on

Movie Review: H.P. LOVECRAFT’S WITCH HOUSE


By ABBIE BERNSTEIN / Employees Author


Posted: July twentieth, 2022 / 02:08 AM

H.P. LOVECRAFT’S WITCH HOUSE film poster | ©2022 Horror Wasteland Photos Worldwide

Score: Not Rated
Stars: Portia Chellelynn, Michelle Morris, Julie Anne Prescott, Erin Trimble, Shonda Laverty, Andie Noir, John Johnson, Joe Padgett, Solon Tsangaras
Writers: Bobby Easley & Ken Wallace
Director: Bobby Easley
Distributor: Horror Wasteland Photos Worldwide
Launch Date: July 5, 2022 (digital/DVD)

Enjoyable truth: H.P. Lovecraft’s 1932 brief story “The Goals within the Witch Home” actually is partly about geometry. Lovecraft’s protagonist, Walter Gilman, is a mathematician attempting to show that sure shapes and planes, in relation to 1 one other, can create gateways to different universes.

Advertisement

That angle (pardon the pun) has been adopted in H.P. LOVECRAFT’S WITCH HOUSE, the newest adaptation of the story. It was beforehand made because the MASTERS OF HORROR episode “Goals within the Witch-Home,” directed by the late Stuart Gordon – cited on this movie’s “thanks” part – and scripted by Dennis Paoli. Earlier than that, with out credit score to Lovecraft or his work, it was the idea for the function THE CRIMSON CULT, that includes Boris Karloff and Christopher Lee, directed by Vernon Sewell, written by Mervyn Haisman and Henry Lincoln, from a display story by Jerry Sohl. Moreover, there’s a online game model.

For H.P. LOVECRAFT’S WITCH HOUSE, director Bobby Easley and his co-writer Ken Wallace replace the narrative to the current and provides the protagonist, now a girl, some life exterior of her predicament.

Alice (listed in a Lovecraft-worthy paradox as Michelle Morris within the onscreen credit, however as Portia Chellelynn on IMDB and within the publicity supplies) is a grad scholar in hiding from her bodily battering ex-boyfriend.

After staying together with her buddy Kelly (Erin Trimble) for a number of months, Alice feels it’s time to get a spot of her personal. Her professor (John Johnson) means that Alice room at a storied previous home close to campus.

Alice is delighted, exclaiming over the individuality of the home’s design. She’s not thrown off by the brusqueness of home-owner Edda (Shonda Laverty), nor the truth that she’s given a really messy albeit big attic room.

Advertisement

Edda’s niece Tommi (Julie Anne Prescott) is exceedingly pleasant, and helps Alice tidy up very quickly. However there are rats, and nightmares about these different dimensions Alice is attempting to entry …

What works about H.P. LOVECRAFT’S WITCH HOUSE is the general sense of chaos, that something may occur at any second. Alice reaches a degree the place she can not inform waking state from desires, and we’re pulled alongside together with her on this.

A part of the motion additionally takes place at Lovecraft’s well-known (fictional) Miskatonic College, which works as pleasing homage. We’re made to grasp sufficient about “sacred geometry” to suppose it’s a stable foundation for this sort of storytelling.

The spirit and colours of the blacklight-esque cinematography by d.p. James Brenton additionally really feel in step with Lovecraft’s descriptions.

Sadly, this final additionally makes sections of the movie so darkish that it’s a bit tough to make out what’s taking place. This can be intentional, in step with the supply materials – Lovecraft typically described pictures which might be solely partially seen – however it’s irritating.

Advertisement

H.P. LOVECRAFT’S WITCH HOUSE in some methods seems to be and feels prefer it may need been made within the ‘70s. Particularly, the movie demonstrates that period’s disregard as to how disparate parts do or don’t match collectively.

Supernatural orgies and discussions of “horrors and pleasures” appear extra Clive Barker than H.P. Lovecraft, and the idea of the Antichrist is distinctly anti-Lovecraftian. Girls displaying as much as skilled conferences carrying camisoles, and there’s plain previous self-reference within the type of Alice truly studying a Lovecraft e-book. None of this appears meant to be amusing, however it’s not thought-provoking or scary, both.

The home seems to be like a stable nineteenth-century mansion, which has its prospects. Nevertheless, it doesn’t have any attention-grabbing architectural properties that we will see, regardless of Alice’s enthusiasm for its development. (It’s too unhealthy the filmmakers didn’t have entry to the first location for INCARNATION, which appears to have been constructed with “sacred geometry” in thoughts.)

H.P. LOVECRAFT’S WITCH HOUSE is an indie fever dream horror film. It’s very best quality could also be that it’s going to make older viewers nostalgic for the nice previous days of seize bag fare on the grindhouse.

Associated: Film Assessment: THOR: LOVE AND THUNDER
Associated: Film Assessment: THE PRINCESS
Associated: Film Assessment: MINIONS: THE RISE OF GRU
Associated: Film Assessment: GOOD LUCK TO YOU, LEO GRANDE
Associated: Film Assessment: THE BLACK PHONE
Associated: Film Assessment: A TOWN FULL OF GHOSTS
Associated: Film Assessment: ABANDONED
Associated: Film Assessment: SCARE ZONE
Associated: Film Assessment: THE RIGHTEOUS
Associated: Film Assessment: JURRASIC WORLD: DOMINION
Associated: Film Assessment: WATCHER
Associated: Film Assessment: THE PASSENGER
Associated: Film Assessment: TOP GUN: MAVERICK
Associated: Film Assessment: THE INNOCENTS
Associated: Film Assessment: DOCTOR STRANGE IN THE MULTIVERSE OF MADNESS
Associated: Film Assessment: ESCAPE THE FIELD
Associated: Film Assessment: CHILDREN OF SIN
Associated: Film Assessment: HATCHING
Associated: Film Assessment: THE UNBEARABLE WEIGHT OF MASSIVE TALENT
Associated: Film Assessment: ROOM 203
Associated: Film Assessment: WE’RE ALL GOING TO THE WORLD’S FAIR
Associated: Film Assessment: FANTASTIC BEASTS: THE SECRETS OF DUMBLEDORE
Associated: Film Assessment: MINAMATA
Associated: Film Assessment: LET THE WRONG ONE IN
Associated: Film Assessment: NIGHT’S END
Associated: Film Assessment: THE CONTRACTOR
Associated: Film Assessment: SO COLD THE RIVER
Associated: Film Assessment: THE LOST CITY
Associated: Film Assessment: X
Associated: Film Assessment: YOU ARE NOT MY MOTHER
Associated: Film Assessment: 6:45
Associated: Film Assessment: THE OUTFIT
Associated: Film Assessment: THE BOY BEHIND THE DOOR
Associated: Film Assessment: THE BATMAN
Associated: Film Assessment: TAKE BACK THE NIGHT
Associated: Film Assessment: ASKING FOR IT
Associated: Film Assessment: UNCHARTED

Advertisement

Comply with us on Twitter at ASSIGNMENT X
Like us on Fb at ASSIGNMENT X

Article Source: Project X
Article: Film Assessment: H.P. LOVECRAFT’S WITCH HOUSE

 

Associated Posts:

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

MOVIE REVIEW: I cried my eyes out in 'Mufasa: The Lion King' and scared the kids

Published

on

MOVIE REVIEW: I cried my eyes out in 'Mufasa: The Lion King' and scared the kids

The original ‘Lion King’ was the first film I ever saw in cinemas as a teeny child in the 90s, and it had a profound impact on me. 

The concept of the circle of life, the great kings of the past looking down and guiding us, that we all have our place in the world… it’s the closest I’ve ever gotten to having a religion.

It might make Mufasa my Jesus. Or would that be Simba? Either way, no offence intended. 

Mum tells me I used to run around as a four-year-old playing the character ‘Lion King’ – I hadn’t fully grasped the concept – and heartily sang ‘Hakuna Matata’ with the lyrics “it’s our problem-free…alosony…”

So it was a bit special to go and see ‘Mufasa’, the live-action prequel (and sequel?) to the OG ‘Lion King’ with my mum, as well as my nephew Ari and niece Ruby in tow. 

Advertisement

Although, I was apprehensive. I didn’t HATE the 2019 remake of ‘The Lion King’, but like many, I thought it was unnecessary. It was basically a shot-for-shot copy of the original with some new songs and fancy animation.

‘Mufasa’ promised to tell the origin story of the great king I grew up worshipping more than any Disney princess, and despite some serious flaws, I did love being told the tale.

Much like his son Simba, Mufasa’s early life is rocked by tragedy and heartbreak. I shed my first tear approximately 23 minutes in. Everyone’s favourite shaman monkey Rafiki recounts the story of Mufasa to his granddaughter (grandcub?) Kiara, along with Timon and Pumbaa, who occasionally chime in with comedic complaints about their minor roles in this movie. 

We already knew that Mufasa was set to be introduced as an orphaned cub, but watching that play out accompanied by the iconic notes of Hans Zimmer’s original Oscar-winning score sent me right back to my childhood and strapped me firmly back on the emotional rollercoaster of the first movie. 

I replayed Mufasa’s death scene in the 1994 version over and over on video tape, marvelling at the entirely new feelings those swelling orchestral crescendos made me feel as a child, trying to grapple with the idea of death, and worse – losing your parents.

Unfortunately, the rest of the music in ‘Mufasa’ didn’t prompt the same level of emotion. Hans Zimmer dropped out ahead of production, and while ‘Hamilton’ creator and ‘Moana’ songwriter Lin Manuel-Miranda is an exceptional talent, he just couldn’t compete with Elton John and Tim Rice’s epic bangers like ‘Can You Feel The Love Tonight?’ and ‘Circle of Life’. 

Advertisement

Perhaps the biggest let down was the new villain song, sung by an ‘outsider’ giant white lion named Kiros, who despite being genuinely quite scary, was restrained by a jokey, peppy Broadway number called ‘Bye Bye’. It didn’t have a whisker of the operatic, ominous energy of Scar’s ‘Be Prepared’, a battle cry worthy of one of the greatest cartoon bad guys ever. 

Still, the film did a good job of answering questions some 30 years in the making – were Scar and Mufasa enemies from birth? (No) How did Mufasa and Sarabi fall in love? (Cheesily, of course) How did Scar get the injury that gave him his name? (You see it coming, but it’s still satisfying as hell). 

One particularly earth-shaking moment saw me and my 10-year-old nephew turn to each other and simultaneously yell ‘Pride Rock!’ as the familiar scenery of the original story started to come together, and my heart could have burst. 

This film had huge paw prints to fill, and I’m not sure it ever truly could have – especially not for a devotee like me – but it worked its way towards an ending that at least paid spectacular homage to the themes of the original. The last half hour left me an absolute blubbering mess, with my niece and nephew shooting me alarmed looks when they could tear their eyes away from the film’s climax. 

As Rafiki finished up his epic tale, Kiara mourned the grandfather she never knew, saying she “didn’t want him to go” after seeing a vision of him in the clouds so vivid she felt like he was there – just like Simba once did. 

Advertisement

I’ve felt the same hearing stories about my grandfather, who I also never met. Mum still gets visits from her late dad in her dreams, incredibly exhilarating and bittersweet. 

Of course, Rafiki would say none of these heroes of our past ever really leave us – and the magic of these universal, deeply relatable themes from ‘The Lion King’ still shines through by the end of ‘Mufasa’. 

The kids should go for the majestic creatures, close calls, comedic asides and vibrant visuals, but the grown ups should go for the kid they once were.

‘Mufasa: The Lion King’ hits cinemas Thursday 19th December.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Mufasa: The Lion King’: If Pride Rock could talk – The Boston Globe

Published

on

‘Mufasa: The Lion King’: If Pride Rock could talk – The Boston Globe
Left to right: Sarabi (voiced by Tiffany Boone), Taka (voiced by Kelvin Harrison Jr.), Mufasa (voiced by Aaron Pierre), and young Rafiki (voiced by Kagiso Lediga) in “Mufasa: The Lion King.”Disney

The plot is simple: Mufasa’s trusted mandrill friend, Rafiki (John Kani), tells the origin story of Mufasa (Aaron Pierre) and his friend Taka (Kelvin Harrison Jr.) to Simba’s daughter, Kiara (Blue Ivy Carter). Kiara’s father is once again played by Donald Glover; her mother, Nala, is reprised by Blue Ivy’s real-life mother, Beyoncé Knowles-Carter. The late James Earl Jones didn’t reprise his role as Mufasa, but the film is dedicated to him.

Initially, meerkat Timon (Billy Eichner) and warthog Puumba (Seth Rogen) were the baby sitters planning on regaling Kiara with tales of their derring-do. Their stories stink on ice, and are clearly fabrications, so Rafiki takes over.

We learn that Mufasa was born to Masego (Keith David) and Afia (Anika Noni Rose). He was swept away from his family by a massive rain that occurred after a long drought. He is saved by Taka, a lion from another pride. Taka’s father, Obasi (Lennie James), wants no part of the cub he refers to as “a stray,” but Taka and his mother, Eshe (Thandiwe Newton), take a shine to him.

Meanwhile, Kiros and his crew of white lions are laying waste to every village of animals. This conquest is to ensure that Kiros is the “ruler of everything the light touches,” a description you’ll recall Mufasa said to Simba in the original “The Lion King.” Kiros also has revenge in mind, as his only son was killed in a previous altercation with Mufasa and Taka.

Top to bottom: Timon (voiced by Billy Eichner) and Pumbaa (voiced by Seth Rogen) in “Mufasa: The Lion King.”Disney

Screenwriter Jeff Nathanson, who wrote “Catch Me If You Can” and adapted the 2019 version of “The Lion King,” keeps the story moving but succumbs to one major mistake. Every so often, the story is interrupted by Timon and Puumba. Full disclosure: I hate these characters. I hated them in the original movie and couldn’t stand that “Hakuna Matata” song. So, whenever they popped up with commentary (at one point, they sing “Hakuna Mufasa”) I growled like Kiros.

Kiros (voiced by Mads Mikkelson) in “Mufasa: The Lion King.”Photo courtesy of Disney. © 2024 Disney Enterprises Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Since “Mufasa: The Lion King” is one of only two family-friendly offerings coming out the week before Christmas, I expect it will make an enormous amount of money. Its predecessor made over $1.6 billion worldwide — and it was terrible! A movie like this is critic-proof anyway. I doubt exhausted parents looking to distract their kids for two hours will give a damn that this film is directed by Barry Jenkins.

Yes, that Barry Jenkins, the Oscar-winning director of “Moonlight,” “If Beale Street Could Talk,” and the series “The Underground Railroad.” His name is on two Christmastime offerings, as he also wrote the excellent boxing movie, “The Fire Inside,” which opens Dec. 25. The announcement that he took this project wreaked havoc, with some film buffs rending their garments over the fact that such an esteemed director would helm a franchise entry.

Advertisement
Left to right: Mufasa (voiced by Aaron Pierre), young Rafiki (Kagiso Lediga), Taka (voiced by Kelvin Harrison Jr.), and Sarabi (Tiffany Boone) in “Mufasa: The Lion King.”Disney

Considering the Marvel movie bad luck that befell other well-known and respected directors like Sam Raimi and Chloe Zhao, some of that handwringing was understandable. Indeed, “Mufasa: The Lion King” occasionally looks like a battle is being waged between Jenkins’s sensibilities and Disney’s desire to make everything canned and familiar.

But more often than not, I could see the director’s trademarks, albeit in a truncated form. There are those fourth wall-breaking shots of characters looking directly at us. Several shots of the camera sweeping over the landscape lasted longer than I was expecting, also a Jenkins signature. Plus, this movie has some well-crafted action sequences and instances of peril. Some of the underwater animation is especially striking.

Lest I forget, as in the recent remake of “The Little Mermaid,” the songs here are by Lin-Manuel Miranda. They run the gamut from meh to extremely catchy. There’s also a noticeable attempt to align these songs with the ones from the original film. We’ve got a “I Just Can’t Wait to Be King” equivalent, for example. The big villain song, the best number in the film, is sung by Mikkelsen and will be as divisive as “Moana”’s crab song, “Shiny.” I have to admire that Miranda uses a very familiar phrase in the chorus just to troll his haters.

I saw this movie in IMAX and 3-D, the latter of which is useless to half-blind critics like me. The large format made “Mufasa: The Lion King” an enjoyable spectacle, and Disney gives us an old-school, flesh-and-blood villain to be defeated. The voiceover work is good and, as far as franchise entries go, it’s quite watchable.

★★★

MUFASA: THE LION KING

Advertisement

Directed by Barry Jenkins. Written by Jeff Nathanson. Starring Aaron Pierre, Kelvin Harrison, Jr., Mads Mikkelsen, John Kani, Blue Ivy Carter, Keith David, Anika Noni Rose, Billy Eichner, Seth Rogen, Lennie James, Thandiwe Newton, Donald Glover, Beyoncé Knowles-Carter. At AMC Boston Common, Landmark Kendall Square, Alamo Drafthouse Seaport, AMC Causeway, suburbs. 119 minutes. PG (intense action and peril)


Odie Henderson is the Boston Globe’s film critic.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

The Return (2024) – Movie Review

Published

on

The Return (2024) – Movie Review

The Return, 2024,

Directed by Uberto Pasolini.
Starring Ralph Fiennes, Juliette Binoche, Charlie Plummer, Marwan Kenzari, Claudio Santamaria, Ángela Molina, Amir Wilson, Jamie Andrew Cutler, Moe Bar-El, Amesh Edireweera, Jaz Hutchins, Aaron Cobham, Ayman Al Aboud, Nicolas Exequiel Retrivi Mora, Giorgio Antonini, Matthew T. Reynolds, Fabius De Vivo, Magaajyia Silberfeld, Handrinou Ileana, Kaiti Manolidaki, Francesco Dwight Bianchi, Pavlos Iordanopoulos, Roberto Serpi, Stefano Santomauro, Maxim Gallozzi, Karandish Hanie, and Cosimo Desii.

SYNOPSIS:

After 20 years away Odysseus decides to come back. The King has finally returned home but much has changed in his kingdom since he left to fight in the Trojan war.

Advertisement

The Return is certainly an accurate title. From director Uberto Pasolini, this is an intriguingly albeit sluggish character-driven story about Greek king Odysseus’s (Ralph Fiennes) return to Ithica following his disappearance during the Trojan War. Except as he washes up ashore looking like a dirty, bearded street beggar, it is gradually revealed that he doesn’t want to come home, feeling shame and regret over the ruthless and violent man he had to become to win that war, not to mention leading countless numbers of his men to death during the sacking of Troy, something that was made possible due to his creation of a gigantic wooden horse used for sneaking past the gates.

Having been absent for ten years, Odysseus’s wife Penelope (Juliette Binoche) still refuses to accept the likelihood of his death and re-marry to one of several suitors who have shown up incessantly vying for her hand. Their son Telemachus (Charlie Plummer) has a more defeated attitude, convinced the father he never really got to know died, the peace they currently have is a façade, and his mom needs to choose one of these men soon.

These three talented performers are exceptionally tapping into the psychological toll these ten years of uncertainty and pain have taken on them. For as loyal and resilient as Penelope is, Juliette Binoche effectively conveys that somewhere inside, this woman is about to break and knows she should probably choose one of these slimy lowlifes. Anyone with knowledge of Greek mythology is also probably aware of the creative bow-and-arrow game she uses for one of them to prove their worth. It also marks the film’s transition into something more explosive, action-based, and focused on mythology. Furthermore, the longer Penelope holds out, the more hostile and threatening some of these men become toward Telemachus, even if just as many of them wisely point out that killing him won’t get them what they want.

Until then, The Return is mostly all about that return, walking in circles around the same plot points even if it is admirable that the filmmakers (courtesy of a screenplay by Uberto Pasolini, Edward Bond, and John Collee) are more fascinated by the human stories behind the stories of war and creatures of Greek mythology. Ralph Fiennes is similarly excellent as a man who can’t bear the thought of looking his wife in the eyes after everything he has done in war, wandering around in his lowly disguise. Naturally, he increasingly becomes agitated by his wife’s predicament.

When watching two long-lost lovers reach a breaking point, the slow-burn approach works. However, The Return also feels underwritten and sits there for far too long, alongside some weak supporting characters and competently basic direction; for a film about Greek mythology, it’s disappointing that there isn’t anything visually striking here aside from how jacked Ralph Fiennes got for a role that has one action sequence. That climax is intense and satisfactory (even if it is strangely bloodless for a portion), but the journey there is frustratingly paced with stagnant storytelling.

Advertisement

Flickering Myth Rating – Film: ★ ★ ★ / Movie: ★ ★

Robert Kojder is a member of the Chicago Film Critics Association and the Critics Choice Association. He is also the Flickering Myth Reviews Editor. Check here for new reviews, follow my Twitter or Letterboxd, or email me at MetalGearSolid719@gmail.com

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=embed/playlist

 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending