Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Movie review: Christopher Nolan ventures out of his element in ‘Oppenheimer’

Published

on

Movie review: Christopher Nolan ventures out of his element in ‘Oppenheimer’

Florence Pugh, left, as Jean Tatlock and Cillian Murphy as J. Robert Oppenheimer in “Oppenheimer.” (Universal Pictures/TNS)

Christopher Nolan is a legendary director, with his filmography — including renowned movies such as “Inception,” “The Dark Knight” and “Interstellar” — having gained distinction because of his passion for developing visually and auditorily stunning films. The consequence of his painstaking commitment to his style is a lack of substance at times — a heavy criticism of “Tenet,” Nolan’s most recently released film prior to “Oppenheimer.”

While “Oppenheimer” fits right in with his best work at times, it occasionally falls into the exact same pitfalls that hold his other movies back from being full-on masterpieces.

“Oppenheimer,” starring Cillian Murphy as J. Robert Oppenheimer, details the life of the “father of the atomic bomb” as he races to assemble a team of scientists and develop the infamous weapon before rival scientists in enemy countries. Amid this already monumental challenge, he struggles with accusations of being a communist ally and an increasingly complicated personal life.

The story can’t reasonably be criticized, as it is a cinematic retelling of Oppenheimer’s real life, but the way Nolan chooses to tell the story is somewhat questionable.

Advertisement

Nolan is known for directing blockbusters like superhero movies, and “Oppenheimer” can sometimes feel like a superhero origin story rather than a true biopic. Cameos and name drops of famous scientists are shot like easter eggs viewers might expect to see in a Marvel film; moreover, the dialogue features quips and one-liners that seem thoroughly out of place.

“Oppenheimer” is at its best when it focuses on Murphy’s brilliant performance and the deep dive into Oppenheimer’s psychology, more akin to the individualistic character study expected of a biopic.

An issue Nolan runs into even in his most successful movies is the repeated use of female characters’ suffering to bring emotional depth to his main characters — a martyrized manic pixie dream girl of sorts.

“Oppenheimer” is based on a true story, so Nolan didn’t write these characters from scratch, but he did purposefully select what parts of their real-life story to show. While Oppenheimer’s wife Kitty (Emily Blunt) is developed well, the treatment of Jean Tatlock (Florence Pugh), his first love and on-and-off-again relationship, is shockingly disappointing for someone so important to Oppenheimer’s story.

She has very limited scenes — a shame in and of itself because of Pugh’s stage presence — and when she does appear, she acts more as a hardship for Oppenheimer to overcome rather than her own distinct person. Nolan neglects not only to pay much attention to Tatlock’s own accomplishments as a brilliant scientist but also her struggles with her sexuality, a defining characteristic of her own life as well as of her relationship with Oppenheimer.

Advertisement

In doing so, he takes a complex real-world person and makes her one-dimensional. In fact, it’s almost implied Tatlock’s struggles with mental health weren’t due to the pressure of being a non-heteronormative person in the 1940s, but rather because of her failing relationship with Oppenheimer.

While the movie is ultimately an Oppenheimer biopic and not a Jean Tatlock biopic, you’d think that a person arguably more consequential to Oppenheimer’s life than his own wife would be treated with the care she deserves, especially when failing to do so sacrifices historical accuracy.

Another common struggle of Nolan’s that is seen again in “Oppenheimer” is his approach to pacing. The movie actually moves through Oppenheimer’s life fairly quickly; however, Nolan chooses to show so much of the story that the plot still seems slow at times, especially due to the immense number of time jumps back and forth through Oppenheimer’s career.

For instance, if the ignition of the Trinity test — the first atomic bomb ever dropped and the culmination of Oppenheimer’s life’s work — was the peak of action and build-up in the movie, “Oppenheimer” might have one of the longest third acts in all of cinema.

The second half of the movie deals with a series of trials faced by Oppenheimer and adjacent scientists, soldiers and politicians. While it is extremely tense and enjoyable in a manner reminiscent of political dramas, what audiences came to see had already exploded by then, and the film’s remainder may drag for those less interested in the politics of it all.

Advertisement

Nolan urged the film community to see “Oppenheimer” in specific formats leading up to its release, saying that IMAX 70mm is the way he intended it to be seen. However, only 19 theaters with the capacity to show IMAX 70mm exist in the entire United States, so the option to see it as Nolan intended isn’t viable for most people.

While Nolan and other experts said audiences would still enjoy it in other theaters, a question must be asked when the needle is pushed from a movie being an engaging narrative to a sensory spectacle. The best movies should be able to be enjoyed anywhere, simply accentuated by the magic of a theater.

While “Oppenheimer” is without a doubt entertaining, it does feel as though the correlation between the size of the screen it is viewed on and the overall audience experience is far too intertwined.

“Oppenheimer” is simultaneously emblematic of Nolan’s greatest strengths and weaknesses, but it can never be faulted for a lack of spectacle. It should be criticized out of respect for its ambition; great works of art intrinsically invite criticism due to the boundaries they have to push. “Oppenheimer” grips the audience with its unique blend of psychological despair and American patriotism, and despite its faults, is still a spectacle worth seeing on the big screen.

Rating: 3.5/5

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Predator: Killer of Killers (2025) Movie Review | FlickDirect

Published

on

Predator: Killer of Killers (2025) Movie Review  | FlickDirect

For almost 40 years, fans of science fiction/action movies have gravitated towards the Predator franchise. Beginning in 1987, when the Jim and John Thomas (Behind Enemy Lines) penned film about an extra-terrestrial, humanoid hunter who stalked humans in the jungle first appeared in theaters, the masses have been drawn to it. The success of the original movie spawned comic books, novels, video games, and four additional films, with two more on the way this year. While the latter movie, entitled Predator: Badlands, will hit theaters in November, the first of the two films is an adult, animated, stand-alone piece coming to Hulu in the United States and internationally on Disney+ beginning on .

Predator: Killer of Killers is broken into three separate vignettes set in different locations and during different time frames. The first story deals with a female, Nordic Viking, and her army set out to find the man who murdered her father so she can get revenge. However, unbeknownst to them, a creature lurks in the shadows, watching and waiting. Once he pounces, her whole team, including her son, are dead, and she is enslaved.

Story number two involves two brothers somewhere in an ancient Asian country. As their father pits brother against brother, one lays down his sword while the other attacks, winning his father’s praise. The loser of the battle runs away from the kingdom, only to return 20 years later to confront his sibling. Little did they know they would need to team up to defeat the unknown entity trying to kill them.

Finally, the last vignette includes a young American man being drafted during World War II. His dream is to be a pilot, but he is relegated to mechanic. When he is handed a weapon from the alien being, he tries to figure out what it is, and when he does, he takes to the sky in an old fighter plane to warn the other pilots that what they are fighting against is not human. Ultimately, the three “survivors” end up on a different planet and are forced to fight each other, but when they team up, they end up fighting the predators instead.

Writer/director Dan Trachtenberg, who brought us 2022’s Prey, once again helms this feature film, and he does so beautifully. His take on the alien creatures gives audiences a unique story brought to life in a different way than any of the other Predator movies. He includes plenty of blood splatter and gore, but also presents the Predators as intelligent and scheming.

Advertisement

I will admit I’m not a huge fan of the “watercolor”-like technique used in the animation, as it blurs the lines, making the picture perhaps not as sharp and clean as it could be. While this tends to add a bit of softness to an otherwise cold and hard movie, it seems somewhat out of place with the harshness of the plot. It isn’t an anime style of animation, but it seems to be in the same family.

Predator: Killer of Killers remains solidly within the realm of the other Predator films, which makes it familiar without getting mundane. It skirts the edge of the forest while venturing down a less-traveled path, making it recognizable and different all at the same time. As an audience, we become invested in these characters, which makes the film enjoyable.

In the world of Predator, this movie stays true to the source material but gives us something we didn’t know we needed. It is a nice intermezzo between Prey and Predator: Badlands and whets our appetites for more.

Grade: A-

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Thug Life Movie Review and Release Live Updates: Kamal Haasan-STR starrer nears release as buzz builds around high-octane first half – The Times of India

Published

on

Thug Life Movie Review and Release Live Updates: Kamal Haasan-STR starrer nears release as buzz builds around high-octane first half – The Times of India

The Times Of India |
Jun 05, 2025 , 07:45:54 IST

‘Thug Life’ is the highly awaited Tamil gangster action drama film directed by the legendary Mani Ratnam, co-written with the iconic Kamal Haasan. Marking the reunion of Haasan and Ratnam after 36 years since their cult classic ‘Nayakan’, this film is set to release worldwide on June 5, 2025, in multiple formats including IMAX and EPIQ.The story is set in the ruthless underworld of mafia conflicts, centring on Rangaraaya Sakthivel Naicker, portrayed by Kamal Haasan, a formidable gang leader. Sakthivel rescues and adopts a young boy named Amaran during a violent gang war, raising him as his own which begins the plot of the film. However, when Sakthivel survives an assassination attempt, he begins to suspect that Amaran, his foster son played by Silambarasan (STR), might be behind the betrayal.The film boasts a stellar ensemble cast including Trisha Krishnan, Abhirami, Aishwarya Lekshmi, Joju George, Nassar, Ali Fazal, Rohit Saraf, Mahesh Manjrekar, and a special appearance by Sanya Malhotra. The music is composed by Oscar-winner A.R. Rahman, adding a powerful auditory dimension to the film’s intense atmosphere. With a runtime of nearly 2 hours and 46 minutes, ‘Thug Life’ has received a UA 16+ rating, indicating mature themes and intense action sequences.
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: Philippou Brothers' Horrifying 'Bring Her Back' | Seven Days

Published

on

Movie Review: Philippou Brothers' Horrifying 'Bring Her Back' | Seven Days

click to enlarge

  • Courtesy of a24
  • Sally Hawkins plays a grieving mom with sinister plans for her foster children in a truly grim horror flick.

They say there’s no force in the world like a mother’s love — for better or worse. English thespian Sally Hawkins, whose many roles have included Paddington Bear’s adopted mom in the Paddington movies, puts her zany energy to a different and more unsettling use in this psychological horror drama from directors Danny and Michael Philippou, who brought us the fan favorite Talk to Me.

The deal

Seventeen-year-old Andy (Billy Barratt) would do anything to protect his spirited younger stepsister, Piper (Sora Wong), who is blind. He shields her from bullies and tells her about the things and people she can’t see, often fudging the less pleasant details. But he can’t mute the shock of the day the siblings discover their dad dead in the shower.

Andy insists on accompanying his sister to her foster placement, planning to become her guardian once he turns 18. Their new foster mom, Laura (Hawkins), is a colorful eccentric who lives in a state of creative disorder. She welcomes Piper with open arms, and the siblings soon learn she’s grieving her own blind daughter, who drowned in the backyard pool.

Laura is so effusive and loosey-goosey that even Andy lets down his guard. But then he notices something is seriously wrong with her other foster child, the seemingly mute Oliver (Jonah Wren Phillips). And Laura doesn’t seem particularly perturbed.

Advertisement

What Andy doesn’t see, and we do, is that Laura obsessively rewatches a grainy VHS tape depicting a murderous ritual. Its purpose? To raise the dead.

Will you like it?

To people who don’t like the genre, all horror movies may seem equally nihilistic. But if you do like it, you probably recognize a vital distinction between horror that provokes screams of glee more than terror (Final Destination: Bloodlines, say) and horror that evokes existential despair.

The talented Philippou brothers, who got their start on YouTube, are purveyors of the latter. Talk to Me, a clever modern twist on “The Monkey’s Paw” with a protagonist who spirals into supernatural addiction, was unrelentingly grim even for me.

Bring Her Back shares that film’s central motifs of protective guardianship, unresolved grief and mounting delusion. But this time, the Philippous have made the savvy choice to divide those traits between two central characters, one of whom is easy to root for.

Advertisement

Once Andy discovers that their foster mom doesn’t plan to let Piper go, his conflict with Laura propels the story. As Laura’s tactics escalate — drugging, gaslighting, playing the siblings against each other — Andy’s touching and believable bond with Piper keeps us on his side, even when his grip on sanity falters.

We watch in horror, but it’s mixed with pity, because the film’s drifting point of view brings us into Laura’s secret world, too. The bizarre title character of last summer’s Longlegs was more meme than man, not real enough to be scary. By contrast, we’ve all known women like Laura, whose too-muchness teeters on the brink between endearing and appalling. And Hawkins’ unhinged performance connects us directly to her outsize emotions.

If watching this movie feels like bathing in a tub stained with decades’ worth of untraceable filth, that’s not because of anything supernatural. We never learn the details of the ritual depicted in the videotape; no paranormal “experts” pop up to offer exposition. This vagueness allows viewers to fill in the story’s gaps with their own conspiratorial theories — and many have. But the real dread sets in with the realization that it doesn’t actually matter whether the ritual works, only that Laura thinks it will.

She’s a cult of one, ruling over an airless house of madness, and the Philippous use all sorts of disorienting techniques to trap us there with the siblings. Ominous circular motifs repeat throughout the film, penning the kids inside Laura’s domain. Some shots are in extreme shallow focus, putting us in Piper’s place as she navigates a world seen only as light and shadow. Sound often deceives us, too, as voices issue from the wrong mouth.

To call Bring Her Back a downer would be an understatement. Be forewarned: The movie depicts harm to children and animals — more graphic in the former case than in the latter. Phillips, as the mysteriously afflicted Oliver, gives a harrowing performance in scenes that provoke the most primal of cringes.

Advertisement

But the siblings are likable, and Hawkins’ larger-than-life presence contributes continual jolts of energy, much like Toni Collette’s turn in Hereditary. Imagine visiting the quirky home of a creative type — a taxidermied dog! a chicken coop! — and gradually realizing their interests run deeper and darker than you ever imagined. The ritual may be demonic, but the horror here is all human.

Continue Reading

Trending