Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Movie review: American Fiction – Baltimore Magazine

Published

on

Movie review: American Fiction – Baltimore Magazine

By most measures, American Fiction shouldn’t have worked. It seems like two films jammed together—one a satirical takedown of diversity initiatives and liberal white guilt, the other a domestic dramedy about a misanthropic writer trying to connect to his well-off family. In other words, think Jordan Peele meets Nancy Meyers. And yet, somehow, newcomer Cord Jefferson’s film does work—and in fact feels thrillingly fresh and new.

Our hero is Thelonius “Monk” Ellison (Jeffrey Wright, pure perfection), a novelist of high-brow fiction who hasn’t been published in a while (his latest book is being bounced from publishing house to publishing house and has been rejected for not being “Black” enough) and a professor out of touch with his increasingly woke students. (In an early scene, he puts the N-word on the blackboard. A white student objects to it. “If I can handle it, so can you,” Monk says drily. She is unmoved.)

Because of that encounter, and others like it, Monk it forced to go on an unpaid leave of absence. His boss at the university suggests he spend some time with his family to “relax.” Monk scoffs at that notion.

But he does go home, to Boston, where we meet his recently divorced, wise-cracking sister, Lisa (Tracee Ellis Ross), his somewhat spiraling, just-out-of-the-closet younger brother, Clifford (Sterling K. Brown), and his widowed mother (Leslie Uggams), who is showing early signs of Alzheimer’s. There’s also an all-seeing housekeeper named Lorraine (Myra Lucretia Taylor), who is very much part of the family. We find out that Monk was closest to his father, who was also withholding and stern, and that after his father’s death, he drifted away from his family. They’re happy to be with him, and just wish he would open up more emotionally.

The turning point for Monk’s career comes when he attends a reading by Sintara Golden (Issa Rae), an Oberlin grad with a wildly successful new book, We’s Lives in Da Ghetto. The (largely white) crowd is delighted when she starts to read, putting on a “street” voice. Monk is disgusted that a book that reinforces the worst stereotypes is such a hit.

Advertisement

Over the phone Monk’s agent, the affable Arthur (John Ortiz) encourages Monk to write more Black. It’s what the people want, he explains.

“I don’t believe in race,” Monk says, raising his hand to hail a cab. The cab zooms past him and picks up a similarly dressed white man a few paces up the road.

So one night, in a fit of defiance (or perhaps just to troll), Monk writes a book about life in the “ghetto.” The book has drug dealers, deadbeat dads, rappers, and lots of violence. He starts to call the book My Pathology, then, chuckling, changes it to My Pafology. He even creates an alter-ego pen name: Stagg R. Leigh, a con on the run from police. When he gives the book to Arthur, they both make fun of it. But Arthur decides to send it out anyway and—you guessed it—a bidding war ensues. Much to Monk’s disgust, it’s his most lucrative and sought-after book ever. A hotshot young Hollywood producer (Adam Brody) even options it for a film.

Later, Monk finds himself on a committee with Sintara Golden to judge this year’s Literary Awards. My Pafology, now renamed F**k (spelled out in this case) is, improbably, up for the award. No one knows that Monk is its real author. Both Sintara and Monk insist that the book is bad. The three white members of the committee, which has patted itself on the back for being so “diverse,” love the book—“we must listen to Black voices!” they insist. Monk and Sintara are overruled.

The satire here may be a bit over the top, but honestly . . . it hits its mark. It is true that sometimes the noble concept of “listening to Black people” carries more weight than the voices of the actual Black people in the room. And when Monk flips to the Black Entertainment Channel on cable and sees a parade of slaves, drug dealers, and weeping mothers on welfare—miserablist entertainment, if you will—that has the ring of truth, too.

Advertisement

But the satire, trenchant as it may be, is only one portion of the film. The family dramedy—in turns warm, prickly, hilarious, and intimate—is equally absorbing. Jefferson and his brilliant cast pull of that thing that’s hardest to do—he convinces us that this is a real family, with decades of history, inside jokes, resentments, and unspoken feelings.

Heck, he manages to throw in a compelling love story between Monk and the sexy, open-hearted lawyer who lives across the street. She, like Monk’s family, just wants him to put down those carefully constructed walls and let people in. Eventually, Monk even discovers that Sintara isn’t quite as cynical in her approach to her novel as he thought she was. As the film makes clear, sometimes thinking the worst of people is the only reasonable response to a messed up world. But sometimes, just sometimes, people may surprise you.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

‘Black Rabbit, White Rabbit’ Review: Disqualified for the Oscars, Tajikistan Drama Is an Inviting, Meandering Meta-Narrative

Published

on

‘Black Rabbit, White Rabbit’ Review: Disqualified for the Oscars, Tajikistan Drama Is an Inviting, Meandering Meta-Narrative

Selected by Tajikistan but ultimately not accepted by the Academy to compete in the Oscar international feature category, “Black Rabbit, White Rabbit” begins ambitiously, with a famous quote from playwright Anton Chekhov about setups and payoffs — about how if a gun is established in a story, it must go off. Moments later, an inviting long take involving a young man selling an antique rifle ends in farcical tragedy, signaling an equally farcical series of events that grow stranger and stranger. The film, by Iranian director Shahram Mokri, folds in on itself in intriguing (albeit protracted) ways, warping its meta-fictional boundaries until they supersede its characters, or any underlying meaning.

Still, it’s a not-altogether-uninteresting exercise in exploring the contours of storytelling, told through numerous thematically interconnected vignettes. The opening Chekhov quote, though it might draw one’s attention to minor details that end up insignificant, ensures a heightened awareness of the movie’s artifice, until the film eventually pulls back and becomes a tale of its own making. But en route to this semi-successful postmodern flourish, its character drama is enticing enough on its own, with hints of magical realism. It begins with the tale of a badly injured upper-class woman, Sara (Hasti Mohammai), discovering that her car accident has left her with the ability to communicate with household objects.

Sara’s bandages need changing, and the stench of her ointment becomes a quick window into her relationships. Her distant husband rejects her; her boisterous stepdaughter is more frank, but ultimately accepting; her gardener and handyman stays as diplomatic as he can. However, the film soon turns the gunfire payoff in its prologue into a broader setup of its own, as a delivery man shows up at Sara’s gate, insisting that she accept delivery for an object “the deceased man” has paid for.

Mokri eventually returns to this story (through a slightly tilt-shifted lens), but not before swerving headfirst into a seemingly unrelated saga of extras on a film set and a superstitious prop master, Babak (Babak Karimi), working on a shot-for-shot remake of an Iranian classic. A mix of rapid-fire Tajik, Persian and Russian dialogue creates dilemma upon dilemma when Babak’s ID goes missing, preventing him from being able to thoroughly check the prop ammunition for an assassination scene.

Danger begins to loom — a recent Alec Baldwin case even warrants a mention on-screen — as the notion of faulty firearms yanks Chekhov’s wisdom front and center once more, transforming it from a writing tip into a phantasmagorical inevitability. In keeping with the previous story, the props even communicate with each other (through subtitles) and begin gossiping about what might come to pass.

Advertisement

After establishing these narrative parameters through unbroken, fluid shots filmed at a sardonic distance, Mokri soon begins playing mischievous temporal games. He finds worthwhile excuses to revisit scenes from either different angles or with a slightly altered aesthetic approach — with more proximity and intimacy — in order to highlight new elements of his mise-en-scène. What’s “real” and “fictional,” even within the movie’s visual parlance, begins to blur in surreal ways, largely pivoting around Babak simply trying to do his job. However, the more this tale engorges through melodic, snaking takes, the more it circles around a central point, rather than approaching it.

The film’s own expanse becomes philosophically limiting, even though it remains an object of curiosity. When it’s all said and done, the playfulness on display in “Black Rabbit, White Rabbit” is quite remarkable, even if the story’s contorting framework seldom amounts to much, beyond drawing attention to itself. It’s cinema about cinema in a manner that, on one hand, lives on the surface, but on the other hand, invites you to explore its texture in ways few other movies do.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Christmas Karma’ movie review: A Bollywood Carol with little cheer

Published

on

‘Christmas Karma’ movie review: A Bollywood Carol with little cheer

Kunal Nayyar in ‘Christmas Karma’
| Photo Credit: True Bit Entertainment/YouTube

Christmas jumpers are all I can remember of this film. As this reimagining of Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Carol dragged on with sickly-sweet sentimentality and song, my eyes constantly tried to work out whether those snowflakes and reindeer were printed on the jerseys or, if knitted, how complicated the patterns would have been.

Christmas Karma (English)

Director: Gurinder Chadha

Starring: Kunal Nayyar, Leo Suter, Charithra Chandran, Pixie Lott, Danny Dyer, Boy George, Hugh Bonneville, Billy Porter, Eva Longoria, Mia Lomer

Storyline: A miserly businessman learns the true meaning of Christmas when visited by ghosts of Christmas past, present and future

Advertisement

Runtime: 114 minutes

Gurinder Chadha, who gave us the gorgeous Bend it Like Beckham (who wants to make aloo gobi when you can bend the ball like Beckham indeed) has served up an unappetising Bollywood song-and-dance version of Dickens’ famous Christmas story.

A still from the film

A still from the film
| Photo Credit:
True Bit Entertainment/YouTube

A curmudgeonly Indian businessman, Ishaan Sood (Kunal Nayyar), fires his entire staff on Christmas Eve—except his accountant, Bob (Leo Suter)—after catching them partying at the office. Sood’s nephew, Raj (Shubham Saraf) invites him for a Christmas party which he refuses to attend.

He returns home after yelling at some carol singers for making a noise, the shopkeeper (Nitin Ganatra) at the corner for his business decisions and a cabbie (Danny Dyer) for being too cheerful.

His cook-housekeeper, Mrs. Joshi (Shobu Kapoor) tells him to enjoy his dinner in the dark as he has not paid for heat or electricity. He is visited by the spirit of his dead business partner, Marley (Hugh Bonneville), who is in chains with the spirits of all the people he wronged. Marley’s spirit tells Sood that he will be visited by three spirits who will reveal important life lessons.

Advertisement
A still from the film

A still from the film
| Photo Credit:
True Bit Entertainment/YouTube

The Ghost of Christmas Past (Eva Longoria), with Day of the Dead makeup and three mariachis providing musical accompaniment, shows Sood his early, happy days in Uganda as a child and the trauma of being expelled from the country by Idi Amin.

Sood comes to Britain where his father dies of heartbreak and decides the only way out is to earn a lot of money. He meets and falls in love with Bea (Charithra Chandran) but loses her when he chooses paisa over pyaar even though he tries to tell her he is being ruthless only to earn enough to keep her in luxury.

The Ghost of Christmas Present (Billy Porter) shows Bob’s twee house full of Christmas cheer, despite the roast chicken past its sell-by date, and his young son, Tim, bravely smiling despite his illness.

The Ghost of Christmas Future (Boy George, Karma is sure a chameleon!) shows Sood dying alone except for Bob and Mrs. Joshi. He sees the error of his ways and throws much money around as he makes everything alright. He even ends up meeting up with his childhood friend in Uganda.

Apart from the mixed messages (money makes everything alright, let us pray for the NHS but go to Switzerland to get well) and schmaltzy songs, Christmas Karma suffers from weak writing and wooden acting.

Advertisement

Priyanka Chopra’s Hindi rendition of George Michael’s ‘Last Christmas’ runs over the end credits featuring Chadha and the crew, bringing back fond memories of Bina Mistry’s ‘Hot Hot Hot’ from Bend it Like Beckham. Even a sitar version by Anoushka Shankar is to no avail as watching this version of A Christmas Carol ensures bad karma in spades.

Christmas Karma is currently running in theatres

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Dust Bunny

Published

on

Dust Bunny

An orphaned girl hires her hitman next-door neighbor to kill the monster under her bed. This R-rated action/horror movie mashup has lots of violence but surprisingly little gore. However, there are still many gruesome moments, even if they’re just offscreen. And some language and a strange portrayal of Christian worship come up, too.

Continue Reading

Trending