Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Madame Web | Reelviews Movie Reviews

Published

on

Madame Web | Reelviews Movie Reviews

If there’s a rule to be aware of when it comes to Sony’s
so-called “Spider-Verse” movies, it’s this: If Spider-Man isn’t in it, it’s
likely to disappoint. That applies to Venom, Venom: Let There Be Carnage, Morbius, and now Madame Web. Although all these
properties have comic book sources, none has translated well to the big screen.
This is in part due to poor writing but is equally the result of a general lack
of direction on the part of Sony which, outside of its partnership with Marvel
Studios for the Tom Holland Spider-Man series, doesn’t seem to
understand the characters over which it has stewardship. Madame Web is
another example of a comic book movie no one was clamoring for.

Two things come to mind immediately when considering this
production. The first is how disjointed and haphazard the storyline is,
frequently employing sleight-of-hand to resolve conflicts. It is evidently the
first chapter of a longer story since three of the four principals never develop
their super-powers (which are hinted at in flash-forward dream sequences) and
exist predominantly to fill “damsels in distress” roles. The second is how
juvenile the dialogue is. This is especially evident at the end with a
voiceover pronouncement that would have been at home in a Saturday morning
cartoon.

Like Argylle, Madame Web makes for a better
trailer than a full movie. That’s because the central premise – a superhero
whose power is the ability to see short distances into the future and thereby
alter the timeline (if she wishes) – is ripe with possibilities. None, however,
are effectively explored. Maybe that’s the trap of the origin story nature of
the narrative. It’s so busy introducing characters and establishing situations
that there’s no time to do anything more than dispatch a feeble villain in a
perfunctory fashion. One of the reasons why Madame Web doesn’t work is
because there’s rarely any tension. For an action film, even one falling into
the superhero subgenre, the dearth of excitement is a death sentence.

Although it’s refreshing to see studios continue to uncover
female action heroes worthy of screen exposure (this one follows The Marvels
in that regard), it’s disappointing to find how shabbily treated they are.
Perhaps Madame Web might have worked better had it narrowed its focus to
a single character – in this case, Cassandra Web (Dakota Johnson). The addition
of three teenagers in need of protection – Julia Cornwall (Sydney Sweeney),
Anya Corazon (Isabela Merced), and Mattie Franklin (Celeste O’Connor) – muddies
the waters. This would-be series might have been better served by delaying
their inclusion until a potential sequel.

Speaking of elements that were not in the final cut of this
movie, it’s evident that some connective tissue with the Spider-Man movies
was sloppily edited out of Madame Web. The footprints have been left
behind – the character of Cassie’s best friend, Ben (Adam Scott), is
unquestionably a younger version of Spidey’s Uncle Ben and the baby born during
the course of the proceedings is Peter Parker. It seems likely that these
things were acknowledged in the script at some point but were elided from the
final cut. Those who watch the names scroll by at the end will learn the truth;
Adam Scott is credited as playing “Ben Parker.” (Mary Parker, Ben’s sister-in-law
and Peter’s mother, is also in the movie, played by Emma Roberts.)

Madame Web opens with a short prequel set during 1973
in the Amazon jungle. It introduces the mother of the film’s main character
(played by Kerry Bishe), a scientist studying rare spiders. After discovering
an amazing new species, she is attacked by her alleged bodyguard, Ezekiel Sims
(a dreadful Tahar Rahim), who steals the spider and leaves her for dead. She is
rescued by local tribesmen who are able to keep her alive long enough to give
birth to Cassandra.

Advertisement

Thirty years later, Cassie is a New York ambulance driver.
After being involved in a near-death experience, she begins having episodes in
which she can seemingly see into the future. After determining that she’s not
hallucinating, she begins to tinker with her abilities. Meanwhile, Ezekiel, now
possessing powers gained from the spider’s venom, is having recurring dreams of
his death at the hands of three women. He uses stolen AI to locate them and plots
their murders. When it comes time to execute his plan, however, his murderous intentions
are foiled by Cassie, who has a vision of him killing Julia, Anya, and Mattie,
and acts to save them.

Sadly, Madame Web fails to rise above its pedigree as
a lesser superhero movie. It does nothing to convince viewers that there’s
value to be found in a story not featuring a marquee comic book character.
There’s a growing sense that Sony is overreaching by plumbing the bargain bin of
the IP for which it owns the rights and trying to force-feed the public with
characters like Venom, Carnage, Morbius, and Madame Web. We’ll never know
whether a well-crafted, riveting Madame Web might have made this an
early-year box office gem because that’s not what director S.J. Clarkson has delivered.
Her vision – or at least the one Sony allowed to reach the screen – is a tired,
infantile exercise in exploring the worst tropes of origin stories.


Madame Web (United States, 2024)





Movie Reviews

Movie Review: ‘Avatar: Fire and Ash’ – Catholic Review

Published

on

Movie Review: ‘Avatar: Fire and Ash’ – Catholic Review

NEW YORK (OSV News) – “Avatar: Fire and Ash” (20th Century), the third film in the always visually rich franchise that got its start in 2009, brings forward thematic elements that had previously been kept in the background and that viewers of faith will find it impossible to accept and difficult to dismiss. As a result, it requires careful evaluation by mature movie fans.

Against the recurring background of the fictional moon Pandora, the saga of the family whose fortunes were chronicled in the earlier chapters continues. The clan consists of dad Jake Sully (Sam Worthington) and his wife Neytiri (Zoe Saldaña) as well as their three surviving children, teens Lo’ak (Britain Dalton) and Kiri (Sigourney Weaver) and tyke Tuk (Trinity Jo-Li Bliss).

Rounding out the household is Jake and Neytiri’s adolescent adopted son, Spider (Jack Champion).

As veterans of the earlier outings will know, Jake was originally a human and a Marine. But, via an avatar, he eventually embraced the identity of Neytiri’s Pandoran tribe, the Na’vi. While their biological kids are to all appearances Na’vi — a towering race with blue skins and tails — Spider is human and requires a breathing mask to survive on Pandora.

Lo’ak is guilt-ridden over his role in the death of his older brother, Neteyam (Jamie Flatters), and wants to redeem himself by proving his worth as a warrior. Kiri is frustrated that, despite her evident spiritual gifts, she’s unable to connect with Eywa, the mother goddess the Na’vi worship.

Advertisement

For his part, Jake is worried about Spider’s future — Neteyam’s death has left the still-grieving Neytiri with a hatred of the “Sky people,” as Earthlings are known on Pandora. He also has to contend with the ongoing threat posed by his potentially deadly rivalry with his former Marine comrade, Col. Miles Quaritch (Stephen Lang), who is also Spider’s estranged father.

As if all that weren’t enough, a further challenge arises when the Metkayina, the sea-oriented Pandorans with whom Jake et al. have taken refuge, are attacked by the fierce fire-centric Mangkwan, led by Varang (Oona Chaplin), a malevolent sorceress. A three hour-plus running time is required to tie up these varied strands.

Along the way, the religion adhered to by the main characters becomes more prominent than in previous installments. Thus Eywa is both present on screen and active in the plot. Additionally, Kiri is revealed to have been the product of a virginal conception.

Director and co-writer (with Rick Jaffa and Amanda Silver) James Cameron’s extension of his blockbuster series, accordingly, not only includes material uncomfortable at best for Christians but also seems incongruent, overall, with monotheistic belief. Even well-catechized grown-ups, therefore, should approach this sprawling addition to Cameron’s epic with caution.

The film contains nonscriptural beliefs and practices, constant stylized but often intense combat violence with brief gore, scenes of torture, narcotics use, partial nudity, a couple of mild oaths, at least one rough term, numerous crude and a handful of crass expressions and an obscene gesture. The OSV News classification is L — limited adult audience, films whose problematic content many adults would find troubling. The Motion Picture Association rating is PG-13 — parents strongly cautioned. Some material may be inappropriate for children under 13.

Advertisement

Read More Movie & TV Reviews

Copyright © 2025 OSV News

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Gurram Paapi Reddy’ movie review: Naresh Agastya, Faria Abdullah’s con comedy is hilarious yet overcooked

Published

on

‘Gurram Paapi Reddy’ movie review: Naresh Agastya, Faria Abdullah’s con comedy is hilarious yet overcooked

If this week’s Telugu release Gurram Paapi Reddy were a human, it would most likely be a teenager. It bursts with energy, overflowing with ideas and wearing its unabashed enthusiasm like a badge of honour. The audience too might end up surrendering to its infectious energy. Yet, like a distracted teenager, the film also gets so enamoured by its very idea that it loses control and does not know where to stop.

The vibe is eerily similar to Jathi Ratnalu early on. Again, Brahmanandam (as Vaidyanathan), is a judge. Faria Abdullah, the actress in the former film, is the only female presence in the lead lineup here. The other oddball male characters — Gurram Paapi Reddy (Naresh Agastya), Chilipi (Vamshidhar Goud), Goyyi (Jeevan Kumar) and Military (Rajkumar Kasireddy) — are the not-so-smart ones who get entangled in a mess.

The similarities end there. Brahmanandam, who is in terrific form, sets the tone of the comedy, doling out harsh punishments to petty criminals, not for their crimes, but for their sheer stupidity in getting caught. Gurram, Chilipi, Goyyi and Military are the victims who reunite after their jail term. This time, they are joined by Soudamini (Faria).

Gurram Paapi Reddy (Telugu)

Director: Murali Manohar

Cast: Naresh Agastya, Faria Abdullah, Brahmanandam, Yogi Babu

Advertisement

Runtime: 160 minutes

Storyline: A gang of four ex-convicts swap dead bodies for easy money and land in a ‘royal’ mess.

While their earlier heist at a jewellery store goes terribly wrong, the new plan is strangely simple. The four men need to swap a dead body from Srisailam with another body in a graveyard in Hyderabad for a meagre sum. While they execute it, albeit with difficulty, it gets messy when the motive behind the swap comes to the fore, dating back to a royal gift from the pre-Independence era.

The key conflict is established prior to the intermission, but newer problems surface later. Though the story idea is deceptively straightforward, the director builds many layers to the fun quotient and it’s evident that he treats comedy like serious business.

The actors react to the situations without trying too hard to impress. The scenes are not only thematically funny, but also packed with outrageously hilarious one-liners. Every time one feels the film’s trajectory is sorted, there is a surprise. The screenplay is busy with backstories and subplots.

Advertisement

The second hour could have benefited from some economy in writing. Past connections are strung together, newer characters and their complexities are introduced, there are backup plans, flashbacks and a song is thrown into the mix. Thankfully, the humour quotient remains unaffected. Some breather would have been welcome.

The subplots involving Sangi Reddy, particularly the courtroom proceedings, and Markandeya Raju’s son crowd the screenplay, leaving the viewers with too many dots to connect. It’s inevitable for some restlessness to creep in towards the final 45 minutes — a stretch packed with several events and coincidences. A clever climax salvages the film.

Gurram Paapi Reddy is aware of the crucial balance between the goofiness of its characters and the seriousness of the plot. Too many characters and a packed, expansive narrative make the film exhausting, given its 160-minute runtime.

Naresh Agastya, Vamshidhar Goud, Faria Abdullah, Jeevan Kumar and Rajkumar Kasireddy share wonderful on-screen camaraderie and get ample scope to shine individually too. Yogi Babu, as a convict with night-blindness, brings the roof down even when he doesn’t dub for himself. Motta Rajendran’s antics look repetitive at times, though they land well.

This is also among Brahmanandam’s best on-screen appearances in recent times. It’s an absolute joy to see the veteran actor ever-hungry to prove his worth when he senses potential in a scene. John Vijay is in dire need of reinvention with his dialogue delivery and body language. Both songs in the film, composed by Krishna Saurabh, though well-shot, feel abrupt.

A narrative with lesser flab would have amplified the film’s impact. The makers tease the audience with a potential sequel idea, but appreciably it does not appear forced. The film is also complete in itself.

Advertisement

Gurram Paapi Reddy is a smartly written and performed con-comedy that delivers laughs aplenty, though a few segments become indulgent.

Published – December 19, 2025 08:22 pm IST

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Avatar: Fire and Ash’ Movie Review and Release Live Updates: James Cameron directorial opens to mixed audience reviews – The Times of India

Published

on

‘Avatar: Fire and Ash’ Movie Review and Release Live Updates: James Cameron directorial opens to mixed audience reviews  – The Times of India

James Cameron clarifies Matt Damon’s viral claim that he turned down 10 per cent of ‘Avatar’ profits

Filmmaker James Cameron has addressed actor Matt Damon’s long-circulating claim that he turned down the lead role in Avatar along with a lucrative share of the film’s profits, saying the version widely believed online is “not exactly true.”

For years, Damon has spoken publicly about being offered the role of Jake Sully in the 2009 blockbuster in exchange for 10 per cent of the film’s gross, a deal that would have translated into hundreds of millions of dollars given Avatar’s global earnings of USD 2.9 billion. The role eventually went to Australian actor Sam Worthington, according to The Hollywood Reporter.

“Jim Cameron called me — he offered me 10 per cent of Avatar,” Damon says in the clips. “You will never meet an actor who turned down more money than me … I was in the middle of shooting the Bourne movie and I would have to leave the movie kind of early and leave them in the lurch a little bit and I didn’t want to do that … [Cameron] was really lovely, he said: ‘If you don’t do this, this movie doesn’t really need you. It doesn’t need a movie star at all. The movie is the star, the idea is the star, and it’s going to work. But if you do it, I’ll give you 10 per cent of the movie.’”

However, speaking to The Hollywood Reporter, Cameron said Damon was never formally offered the part. “I can’t remember if I sent him the script or not. I don’t think I did? Then we wound up on a call and he said, ‘I love to explore doing a movie with you. I have a lot of respect for you as a filmmaker. [Avatar] sounds intriguing. But I really have to do this Jason Bourne movie. I’ve agreed to it, it’s a direct conflict, and so, regretfully, I have to turn it down.’ But he was never offered. There was never a deal,” according to The Hollywood Reporter.

Advertisement

The director added that discussions never progressed to character details or negotiations. “We never talked about the character. We never got to that level. It was simply an availability issue,” he said.

Addressing the widely shared belief that Damon turned down a massive payday, Cameron said the actor may have unintentionally merged separate ideas over time. “What he’s done is extrapolate ‘I get 10 percent of the gross on all my films,’” Cameron said, adding that such a deal would not have happened in this case. “So he’s off the hook and doesn’t have to beat himself up anymore.”

Continue Reading

Trending