Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Ghostlight (2024) – Movie Review

Published

on

Ghostlight (2024) – Movie Review

Ghostlight, 2024.

Directed by Kelly O’Sullivan and Alex Thompson.
Starring Keith Kupferer, Dolly de Leon, Katherine Mallen Kupferer, Tara Mallen, Hanna Dworkin, Dexter Zollicoffer, H.B. Ward, Tommy Rivera-Vega, Alma Washington, Matthew C. Yee, Marlene Slaughter, Bradley Grant Smith, Lia Cubilete, Cindy Gold, Charlie Lubeck, Francis Guinan, Sarab Kamoo, Charin Alvarez, Anthony Lee Irons, Deanna Dunagan, Jaci Williamson, and Santino Craven.

SYNOPSIS:

When a construction worker unexpectedly joins a local theater’s production of Romeo and Juliet, the drama onstage starts to mirror his own life.

Advertisement

With every small revelation (each one feels like a piece to a puzzle), it feels as if filmmakers Kelly O’Sullivan and Alex Thompson are like Icarus, flying the narrative of Ghostlight too close to the sun regarding what it’s doing with its Romeo and Juliet meta-spin. The magic trick pulled off here is that it never actually feels too much or like it’s being laid on too thick, and that’s primarily because the emotions within the Shakespearean-like melodrama feel authentic. Everything stings more with each new detail we learn about the family at the center of the film, how the tragic loss of their son/brother has affected them, and the circumstances of his death.

Dan (Keith Kupferer, Vulnerable and explosive in equal measure, delivering a magnificent pained performance that would probably generate awards buzz if he were a bigger star, if the film was being released by a larger distributor, and the release date was closer to that season)) is the blue-collar Illinois construction worker trying to hold the family together, which consists of his wife Sharon (Tara Mallen) and rebellious, foul-mouthed problem child Daisy (Katherine Mallen Kupferer), both of whom are played by his real-life wife and daughter.

He hasn’t given him or the family the time and space to grieve properly yet, preparing for a lawsuit being filed against the son’s girlfriend’s family, implying that she was partially responsible for his death. More importantly, Dan is angry inside with a short fuse, just as quick to lash out as a heckling driver annoyed by his construction work as much as he is comfortable verbally blowing up on his wife and daughter, which they seem to think is a defense mechanism from dealing with reality.

Dolly De Leon’s Rita notices Dan’s on-the-job meltdown and decides to casually invite him into the local theater group she participates in, which is preparing their faithful but middle-aged take on Romeo and Juliet (the film excels at tackling the nature of storytelling and the act of putting oneself inside someone else’s shoes.) Even though his daughter has put on a few school performances, Dan is somewhat lost, doesn’t know how to project his voice, and doesn’t quite grasp what it means to play a character who says and behaves differently from oneself or how stage performance can provide catharsis. Nevertheless, he finds himself reciting lines in the car on the way home and conversing with Daisy about Romeo and Juliet without telling her what he has gotten into.

In what could have become a cringeworthy, manipulative, tasteless gimmick, aspects of Romeo and Juliet play into what this family has recently gone through. It also causes Dan to retreat or blow up once those parallels become more apparent in the rehearsal process. Once Dan discovers Romeo and Juliet die at the end (one of many odd contrivances here that don’t drag the story down too much considering how gripping and real everything feels despite that), his natural reaction is flipping out and requesting the ending be changed, condemning Shakespeare in the process.

Advertisement

Eventually, the whole family gets involved, with this scrappy production and its emotional resonance possibly able to save this family from collapsing. Dan has been arguing with Sharon frequently, who hasn’t been given a chance to grieve her son. Daisy struggles with authority and finds herself nearly expelled (rather conveniently once she enters the play and begins rehearsing), having also lost her passion for the arts before this. Katherine Mallen Kupferer is also given room to deliver a sometimes loud and brash performance, which gives her troublemaking antics the feel of a sitcom character and can sometimes feel at odds with the more serious-minded storytelling at hand, but nevertheless delivers a winning performance.

Naturally, there is strong, believable chemistry between all family members. Also tender is the dynamic between Dan and Rita, as the latter imparts wisdom on the power of the arts while also opening up about her life and what getting the chance to play Juliet means to her, even if the rationale of young love doesn’t align with two older performers in the titular roles.

Ghostlight uses this artistic exercise to build to catharsis and acceptance gradually; it’s powerful in concept and execution with terrific, lived-in performances. Kelly O’Sullivan and Alex Thompson are smartly doing something Shakespearean outside of the on-screen Romeo and Juliet performance, dialed into the right tone that the material needs to register as emotionally bruising rather than an eye-rolling melodramatic disaster. It’s a daring and audacious balancing act that doesn’t seem like it is going to work until each soul-stirring moment lands as intended.

Flickering Myth Rating – Film: ★ ★ ★ ★ / Movie: ★ ★ ★ ★

Robert Kojder is a member of the Chicago Film Critics Association and the Critics Choice Association. He is also the Flickering Myth Reviews Editor. Check here for new reviews, follow my Twitter or Letterboxd, or email me at MetalGearSolid719@gmail.com

Advertisement

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=embed/playlist

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Film reviews: ‘Marty Supreme’ and ‘Is This Thing On?’

Published

on

Film reviews: ‘Marty Supreme’ and ‘Is This Thing On?’

‘Marty Supreme’

Directed by Josh Safdie (R)

★★★★

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Not Without Hope movie review (2025) | Roger Ebert

Published

on

Not Without Hope movie review (2025) | Roger Ebert

Joe Carnahan was a sagacious choice to co-write and direct the engrossing and visceral survival thriller “Not Without Hope,” given Carnahan’s track record of delivering gripping and gritty actioners, including early, stylish crime thrillers such as “Narc” (2002) and “Smokin’ Aces” (2006), and the absolutely badass and bonkers Liam Neeson v Giant Wolves epic “The Grey” (2011).

Based on the non-fiction book of the same name, “Not Without Hope” plunges us into the stormy waters of the Gulf of Mexico for the majority of the film, and delivers a breathtaking and harrowing dramatic re-creation of the 2009 accident that left four friends, including two NFL players, clinging to their single-engine boat and fighting for their lives. The survival-at-sea story here is a familiar one, told in films such as “White Squall,” “The Perfect Storm,” and “Adrift,” and the screenplay by Carnahan and E. Nicholas Mariani leans into well-worn tropes and, at times, features cliché-ridden dialogue. Still, this is a well-paced and powerful work, thanks to the strong performances by the ensemble cast, some well-placed moments of character introspection, and the documentary-style, water-level camerawork by Juanmi Azpiroz.

Zachary Levi (the TV series “Chuck,” the “Shazam!” movies) is best known for comedy and light action roles. Still, he delivers solid, straightforward, and effective dramatic work as Nick Schuyler, a personal trainer who helps his friends Marquis Cooper (Quentin Plair) and Corey Smith (Terrence Terrell), two journeyman NFL players, get ready for another season. When their pal Will Bleakley (Marshall Cook) shows up at a barbecue and announces he has just been laid off from his financial firm, he’s invited to join the trio the next morning on a day-trip fishing trip from Clearwater, FL., into the Gulf of Mexico. (The casting is a bit curious, as the four lead actors are 10-20 years older than the ages of the real-life individuals they’re playing — but all four are in great shape, and we believe them as big, strong, physically and emotionally tough guys.)

We can see the longtime bond between these four in the early going, though we don’t learn much about their respective stories before the fishing trip. Kudos Carnahan and the studio for delivering a film that earns its R rating, primarily for language and intense action; the main characters are jocks and former jocks, and they speak with the casual, profanity-laced banter favored by many an athlete. (Will, describing the sandwiches he’s made for the group: “I got 20 f*cking PB&Js, and 20 f*cking turkey and cheese.”) There’s no sugarcoating the way these guys talk—and the horrors they wind up facing on the seas.

The boat is about 70 miles off the coast of Clearwater when the anchor gets stuck, and the plan to thrust the boat forward to dislodge it backfires, resulting in the vessel capsizing and the men being thrown overboard. Making matters worse, their cell phones were all sealed away in a plastic bag in the cabin, and a ferocious storm was approaching. With title cards ticking off the timeline (“13 Hours Lost at Sea,” “20 Hours Lost at Sea,” “42 Hours Lost at Sea”), we toggle back and forth between the men frantically trying to turn over the boat, keep warm, signal faraway ships, battling hunger and thirst, and the dramas unfolding on land. Floriana Lima as Nick’s fiancée, Paula, and Jessica Blackmore as Coop’s wife, Rebekah, do fine work in the obligatory Wait-by-the-Phone roles.

Advertisement

It’s terrific to see JoBeth Williams still lighting up the screen some 40 years after her “Big Chill” and “Poltergeist” days, delivering powerful work as Nick’s mother, Marcia, who refuses to believe her son is gone even as the odds of survival dwindle with each passing hour. Josh Duhamel also excels in the role of the real-life Captain Timothy Close, who oversaw the rescue efforts from U.S. Coast Guard Sector St. Petersburg. At one point, Close delivers a bone-chilling monologue about what happens when hypothermia sets in—“hallucinations, dementia, rage…eventually, it breaks your mind in half”—a point driven home when we see what’s happening to those men at sea. It’s savage and brutal, and heartbreaking.

Given this was such a highly publicized story that took place a decade and a half ago, it’s no spoiler to sadly note there was only one survivor of the accident, with the other three men lost to the sea. Each death is treated with unblinking honesty and with dignity, as when the natural sounds fade at one point, and we hear just the mournful score. With Malta standing in for the Gulf of Mexico and the actors giving everything they have while spending most of the movie in the water and soaked to the bone, “Not Without Hope” is a respectful and impactful dramatic interpretation that feels true to the real-life events.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Black Rabbit, White Rabbit’ Review: Disqualified for the Oscars, Tajikistan Drama Is an Inviting, Meandering Meta-Narrative

Published

on

‘Black Rabbit, White Rabbit’ Review: Disqualified for the Oscars, Tajikistan Drama Is an Inviting, Meandering Meta-Narrative

Selected by Tajikistan but ultimately not accepted by the Academy to compete in the Oscar international feature category, “Black Rabbit, White Rabbit” begins ambitiously, with a famous quote from playwright Anton Chekhov about setups and payoffs — about how if a gun is established in a story, it must go off. Moments later, an inviting long take involving a young man selling an antique rifle ends in farcical tragedy, signaling an equally farcical series of events that grow stranger and stranger. The film, by Iranian director Shahram Mokri, folds in on itself in intriguing (albeit protracted) ways, warping its meta-fictional boundaries until they supersede its characters, or any underlying meaning.

Still, it’s a not-altogether-uninteresting exercise in exploring the contours of storytelling, told through numerous thematically interconnected vignettes. The opening Chekhov quote, though it might draw one’s attention to minor details that end up insignificant, ensures a heightened awareness of the movie’s artifice, until the film eventually pulls back and becomes a tale of its own making. But en route to this semi-successful postmodern flourish, its character drama is enticing enough on its own, with hints of magical realism. It begins with the tale of a badly injured upper-class woman, Sara (Hasti Mohammai), discovering that her car accident has left her with the ability to communicate with household objects.

Sara’s bandages need changing, and the stench of her ointment becomes a quick window into her relationships. Her distant husband rejects her; her boisterous stepdaughter is more frank, but ultimately accepting; her gardener and handyman stays as diplomatic as he can. However, the film soon turns the gunfire payoff in its prologue into a broader setup of its own, as a delivery man shows up at Sara’s gate, insisting that she accept delivery for an object “the deceased man” has paid for.

Mokri eventually returns to this story (through a slightly tilt-shifted lens), but not before swerving headfirst into a seemingly unrelated saga of extras on a film set and a superstitious prop master, Babak (Babak Karimi), working on a shot-for-shot remake of an Iranian classic. A mix of rapid-fire Tajik, Persian and Russian dialogue creates dilemma upon dilemma when Babak’s ID goes missing, preventing him from being able to thoroughly check the prop ammunition for an assassination scene.

Danger begins to loom — a recent Alec Baldwin case even warrants a mention on-screen — as the notion of faulty firearms yanks Chekhov’s wisdom front and center once more, transforming it from a writing tip into a phantasmagorical inevitability. In keeping with the previous story, the props even communicate with each other (through subtitles) and begin gossiping about what might come to pass.

Advertisement

After establishing these narrative parameters through unbroken, fluid shots filmed at a sardonic distance, Mokri soon begins playing mischievous temporal games. He finds worthwhile excuses to revisit scenes from either different angles or with a slightly altered aesthetic approach — with more proximity and intimacy — in order to highlight new elements of his mise-en-scène. What’s “real” and “fictional,” even within the movie’s visual parlance, begins to blur in surreal ways, largely pivoting around Babak simply trying to do his job. However, the more this tale engorges through melodic, snaking takes, the more it circles around a central point, rather than approaching it.

The film’s own expanse becomes philosophically limiting, even though it remains an object of curiosity. When it’s all said and done, the playfulness on display in “Black Rabbit, White Rabbit” is quite remarkable, even if the story’s contorting framework seldom amounts to much, beyond drawing attention to itself. It’s cinema about cinema in a manner that, on one hand, lives on the surface, but on the other hand, invites you to explore its texture in ways few other movies do.

Continue Reading

Trending