Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Film Review: ‘On the Line’: Mel Gibson as a Radio Shock Jock Under the Gun

Published

on

Film Review: ‘On the Line’: Mel Gibson as a Radio Shock Jock Under the Gun

R | 1h 44min | Crime, Thriller, Thriller, Motion, Drama | 4 November 2022 (USA)

For near 1 / 4 century (1979–2002), Mel Gibson had the Midas contact. He starred in two blockbuster franchises (“Mad Max,” “Deadly Weapon”), high-end thrillers (“The Yr of Dwelling Dangerously,” “Payback,” “Ransom”), and a number of conflict dramas (“Gallipoli,” “The Patriot,” “We Have been Troopers”).

The high-water mark of Gibson’s essential recognition and trade rewards was “Braveheart” (1995), the historic epic that took in over $213 million on the international field workplace and netted him not one however two Oscars.

With “The Ardour of the Christ” (2004), the tide started to vary. Regardless of hauling in over $612 million worldwide, “Ardour” sharply divided critics and audiences and acquired accusations of pushing anti-Semitic content material. At one level, “Ardour” was each the highest-grossing international language and “R” rated film of all time.

Regardless of the unqualified recognition of “Ardour,” it was Gibson’s conservative politics and his outspoken opinions relating to the movie trade’s baby trafficking and abuse that fanned the rising anti-Gibson flames. Aside from the stinker “Daddy’s House 2” (2017), no Gibson-starring film has cracked the $100 million mark within the final 18 years.

Advertisement
Rankings for his radio call-in present have tanked for host Elvis Clooney (Mel Gibson), in “On the Line.” (Saban Movies)

Simply one of the best factor Gibson has accomplished since “Blood Father” (2016), “On the Line” is the primary English-language effort from French director Romuald Boulanger, who additionally wrote and co-produced, and it is without doubt one of the most expertly executed crime thrillers in current reminiscence.

Gibson takes the lead as Elvis Cooney, an L.A. “shock jock” radio host whose profession has been in decline for causes not (or not wanted to be) defined. It could possibly be as a result of his abrasive, confrontational fashion has begun to put on skinny and now solely appeals to conspiracy-theory insomniac sorts. Working the abysmal midnight to six:00 a.m. time slot, Elvis has clearly misplaced his mojo, and his lack of enthusiasm is past clear.

Getting It Collectively

Earlier than he begins his subsequent present (which additionally takes place on his birthday), Elvis is reminded by his program director, Sam (Nadia Farès), that his scores are within the tank and that he higher get it collectively quickly. He’s chided and taunted by the 8-to-12 host, Justin (Kevin Dillon), and barely pays consideration to the present prep being introduced to him by his producer, Mary (Alia Seror-O’Neill).

Epoch Times Photo
The radio present is produced by Mary (Alia Seror-O’Neill), in “On the Line.” (Saban Movies)

Minutes earlier than happening air, Mary tells Elvis {that a} hotly anticipated call-in visitor has canceled, inflicting Elvis to completely lose it. He begins browbeating and berating his call-screener, Dylan (William Moseley), on his first day answering the telephones. As Dylan begins to depart in frustration, Elvis says that it’s only a ritual, hazing, and ceremony of passage that each new worker receives and asks him to return again, which Dylan does.

The present’s first caller, utilizing the faux title Gary, is clearly high-strung and agitated. He tells Elvis that he’s going to homicide him for a mess of causes, none of which he instantly reveals. With Elvis about to hold up, the caller shoots a warning shot right into a wall, barely lacking Elvis’s petrified spouse and toddler daughter, indicating that he means enterprise. The caller claims he’s within the Cooneys’ house.

In Good Firm

Bearing a lot in frequent with Clint Eastwood’s “Play Misty for Me,” Oliver Stone’s “Discuss Radio,” Ron Howard’s “Ransom” (additionally starring Gibson), and perhaps even somewhat little bit of the primary “Scream,” “On the Line” exhibits that it’s a dwelling, respiration nightmare for anybody making a dwelling within the public eye. When you’re somebody like Elvis—gruff, dismissive, controversial, polarizing, well-known, and rich—recurrently attracting nut jobs virtually comes with the job description.

With the exception of the primary and final 5 minutes, the narrative is introduced in actual time, with Boulanger messing with the viewers’s heads in the identical method that “Gary” does with Elvis.

Advertisement

Because the narrative progresses, Boulanger retains upping the ante, tightening the vise grip on our psyche. We all know solely what Elvis is aware of; Boulanger has no intention of letting us off hook, a lot in the identical method because the Nineteen Fifties’ efforts of Alfred Hitchcock.

Epoch Times Photo
Justin (Kevin Dillon, L) chides Elvis (Mel Gibson) to enhance his present, in “On the Line.” (Saban Movies)

With out my giving something in any respect away, there are not less than two endings, perhaps extra, and until you’re clairvoyant, you gained’t be capable of determine any of them. Furthermore, Boulanger doesn’t supply up any time-wasting or deceptive crimson herrings, one thing this style does with numbing regularity.

Every little thing that occurs within the final quarter-hour is the fruit of clues being seeded alongside the way in which within the first 30, however you’ll solely be capable of put all of it collectively as soon as in hindsight or with a second or third watch. This film virtually begs for a number of viewings.

Is “On the Line” going to resuscitate Gibson’s waning profession? In all probability not. Will it change the minds of his many detractors? No, not even shut. It’ll, nevertheless, supply additional proof that Gibson likes to work and, every so often, recapture the spirit of his glory days.

Epoch Times Photo
“On the Line” is without doubt one of the most expertly executed crime thrillers in current reminiscence. (Saban Movies)

‘On the Line’
Director: Romuald Boulanger
Stars: Mel Gibson, William Moseley, Kevin Dillon, Alia Seror-O’Neill, Nadia Farès
Working Time: 1 hour, 44 minutes
MPAA Ranking: R
Launch Date: Nov. 4, 2022
Ranking: 4 out of 5

Michael Clark

Comply with

Initially from Washington, D.C., Michael Clark has offered movie content material to over 30 print and on-line media shops. He co-founded the Atlanta Movie Critics Circle in 2017 and is a weekly contributor to the Shannon Burke Present on FloridaManRadio.com. Since 1995, Mr. Clark has written over 4,000 film critiques and film-related articles. He favors darkish comedy, thrillers, and documentaries.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: Top 5 Movies to Watch This Father's Day June 16, 2024 –

Published

on

Movie Review: Top 5 Movies to Watch This Father's Day June 16, 2024 –

A staff report

June 16, 2024 – Happy Father’s Day! What better way to celebrate than by sitting down with your dad and enjoying some quality films together? Whether you’re looking for heartwarming classics or thought-provoking dramas, here are five movies that are sure to make this Father’s Day special:

1. To Kill a Mockingbird (1962)

Gregory Peck delivers an unforgettable performance as Atticus Finch, a principled lawyer in the American South who teaches his children valuable lessons about morality and justice. Based on Harper Lee’s novel, this timeless film is a poignant exploration of fatherhood and standing up for what is right.

Watch it: To Kill a Mockingbird on Prime Video

Advertisement

2. Moneyball (2011)  

For the baseball-loving dads out there, “Moneyball” offers a fresh take on the sport with Brad Pitt portraying Billy Beane, the innovative general manager of the Oakland A’s. This David-vs.-Goliath story, based on a true story and Michael Lewis’ book, showcases how unconventional thinking can lead to unexpected victories.

Watch it: Moneyball on NetflixPrime Video

3. National Lampoon’s Vacation (1983)

Chevy Chase stars as the well-intentioned but hapless Clark Griswold, who embarks on a disastrous cross-country road trip with his family to the elusive Walley World. Full of humor and iconic moments, this comedy is a perfect choice for a lighthearted Father’s Day movie marathon.

Advertisement

Watch it: National Lampoon’s Vacation on Prime Video

4. Minari (2020)

“Minari” tells the heartfelt story of a Korean American family striving for a better life in rural Arkansas. Steven Yeun’s portrayal of the father, Jacob, navigating the challenges of farming and family dynamics, is both tender and powerful. This critically acclaimed film offers a touching exploration of immigrant experiences and familial bonds.

Watch it: Minari on MaxPrime Video

5. Sr. (2022)

Advertisement

In this moving documentary, Robert Downey Jr. pays tribute to his father, Robert Downey Sr., a pioneering filmmaker known for his avant-garde works. Through personal interviews and archival footage, the film celebrates their unique relationship and explores themes of legacy and artistic influence.

Watch it: Sr. on Netflix

This Father’s Day, honor your dad with a cinematic journey through these diverse and enriching stories that celebrate the complexities of fatherhood, family, and the human experience. Whether you prefer classic tales of courage, inspiring underdog stories, or intimate documentaries, these films are sure to create lasting memories and meaningful conversations with your dad.

About Author

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Joel Edgerton: ‘Bright' Didn’t Deserve “Harsh” Reviews — World of Reel

Published

on

Joel Edgerton: ‘Bright' Didn’t Deserve “Harsh” Reviews — World of Reel

I’m all for audiences embracing critically reviled films, that’s why I still regularly check out user scores on IMDb and Rotten Tomatoes, just to not be totally lost in my critical bubble, which is such an easy place to get sucked into.

Knowing the world of film criticism all too well, I realize that cliques happen, waves of peer-pressured bandwagon fervor wreak havoc. If it happens that you don’t agree with the flock, then you run the risk of being chastised and mocked. I couldn’t care less, but there are some who do. The hive mind mentality is most definitely part of today’s film criticism.

In 2017, critics seemed to be in universal agreement that David Ayer’s “Bright,” starring Will Smith and Joel Edgerton, was a terrible action movie. The film, which garnered a 26% on RT and 29 on Metacritic, was widely mocked by the critical community, with many proclaiming it to be the worst film of the year.

The critical response was so bad that Ayer ended up scolding a few of the detracting critics, including IndieWire’s David Ehrlich, going as far as daring Ehrlich to try to write his own script. One might understand Ayer’s ire, a lot was riding on his film which, at the time, was the most expensive Netflix ever produced at a reported budget of $90M.

In a rather surprising twist of fate, audience reactions for the film were the polar opposite of the critical community. “Bright” ended up receiving an RT audience score of 90% —which has since lowered to 84— and on Google the film was at 90%. On Netflix, based on 1,469 user submission, the reviews were also overwhelmingly positive, with most being 4 or 5 stars.

Advertisement

Speaking to Inverse, Edgerton is now opening up about Bright’s nasty reviews. The actor praises the film’s blend of high fantasy with the police procedural genre, but acknowledges the impact of the negative reviews, stating they may have derailed plans for a sequel.

I have a lot of feelings about “Bright”. I’m fascinated by the disparity between critical and audience responses to movies. Often, the audience score is low, but critics love it, or vice versa. Occasionally, you get a double win or a double loss. My brother’s TV series, “Mr Inbetween”, is one of the rare double wins. But “Bright” was in the low 30s with critics, yet it resonated with viewers. Netflix’s algorithms would confirm that, as many people rated it highly, showing a clear appetite for more. I think critics were a bit too harsh on it.

About that sequel to “Bright,” it didn’t happen for a number of reasons, but the movie’s critical reputation wasn’t one of them. It was delayed a few times, due to co-star Will Smith’s busy schedule and due to Netflix’s inability to find a director (Ayer didn’t want to return). Eventually, Netflix canceled the whole thing after Smith’s “Oscar slap” scandal.

Ayer has never been embraced by critics, “Bright” is just one of many films he’s directed that got panned — the others include the likes of “The Tax Collector,” “Suicide Squad,” “Sabotage,” and “Street Kings.”

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Under Paris’ movie review: A shark tale lost in confusion and plausibility

Published

on

‘Under Paris’ movie review: A shark tale lost in confusion and plausibility

Under Paris begins with a pre-title sequence where a group of marine scientists are dangerously close to a man-eating shark. Unsurprisingly, all but one member of the team survives the vicious attack. The surviving scientist, Sophia (Berenice Bejo), goes on to live far away in Paris with memories of the traumatic incident where she lost her husband. The shark, named Lillith for some reason, finds her way to Sophia once again after conservation activist Mika (Léa Léviant) spots her in the Seine River with a tracker.

From this point, director Gens seems confused about whether the shark must be treated as a monster or pet. This dilemma, which persists for an hour of the film’s runtime, is rather frustrating to watch. By the time the film makes up its mind, it gets hard to root for the protagonist, especially since good old logic seems to take a hit too.

Add to the proceedings a smug mayor (Anne Marivin), who doesn’t want anything hampering the triathlon Olympics in Paris, leaving you wondering how the Parisian cops let a bunch of 20-year-old activists foil their covert operation? It’s possible, sure, but the film needs to sell it. Even as the number of underwater deaths begin mounting, the Parisians are strangely devoid of any panic. Further narrative issues come in the way of a screwball subplot involving the discovery of active World War II artillery under the Seine. The shark may be kept under wraps, but how is the mayor keeping this a secret? Again, it’s possible, but the film does not attempt whatsoever to convince the audience of the plausibility of the premise.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending