Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Drop Review: A Slick, High-Stakes Thriller with a Beating Heart

Published

on

Drop Review: A Slick, High-Stakes Thriller with a Beating Heart

In Drop, director Christopher Landon (Happy Death Day, Freaky) trades supernatural body-swaps for a grounded, nerve-shredding thriller set in a single, sleek high-rise restaurant. Working from a taut script by Jillian Jacobs and Chris Roach, Landon crafts a tightly wound chamber piece with digital-age paranoia, emotional stakes, and escalating dread. Anchored by a commanding performance from Meghann Fahy, Drop isn’t just a thriller—it’s a ticking time bomb of psychological torment, familial love, and corporate corruption.

A Date Gone Wrong:

At its center is Violet (Fahy), a widowed mother navigating the early stages of dating after the traumatic suicide of her abusive husband, Blake. The emotional vulnerability of Violet’s character is crucial to the film’s success, and Fahy brings a compelling balance of strength, fear, and subtle optimism. Her attempt at re-entering the dating world leads her to “Palate,” an upscale rooftop restaurant where she’s arranged to meet Henry (Brandon Sklenar), a charming, soft-spoken city photographer she’s been chatting with online.

But things begin to unravel before he even arrives. Violet is plagued by mysterious “Digi-Drops”—a blend of harmless memes and progressively menacing messages that shift from unsettling to outright horrifying. While the term “drop” may sound benign, the film makes it ominous through clever pacing, ominous audio cues, and the growing realization that someone in the restaurant is watching Violet. The sleek, almost too-pristine atmosphere of Palate—complete with a smooth pianist (Jeffery Self) and a scattering of diners—starts to feel increasingly claustrophobic as Violet is ensnared in an elaborate cat-and-mouse game.

Excellent directing and cinematography:

Landon masterfully builds tension with spatial precision. Every table, glance, and corridor feels suspect. The cinematography, cool and composed, contrasts sharply with Violet’s growing internal panic, making the setting itself feel like a silent predator. When Henry finally arrives, the story shifts gears from flirtatious awkwardness to tense suspicion. Brandon Sklenar’s performance as Henry walks a careful line: is he the only ally Violet has, or is he somehow involved?

Advertisement

Rather than leaning solely on whodunnit mechanics, Drop is more interested in the how and why. The film thrives in its ability to slowly peel back the layers of Violet’s trauma and strength. As her situation worsens—eventually witnessing a home invasion through her own security cameras and being blackmailed into silence—we see a woman being pushed to the brink in real time. Fahy captures every flicker of hesitation and resolve, carrying the film through even its most implausible twists.

Supporting cast and the use of technology:

There’s a fascinating interplay between Violet and the cast of characters around her, particularly the enigmatic Richard (Reed Diamond). Meanwhile, Violett Beane as Jen provides some grounded human warmth that serves as both a red herring and an emotional tether. Jeffery Self’s Phil, too, provides an intriguing counterweight—his scenes, light on dialogue but heavy on mood, add subtle texture to the ensemble.

The film’s use of technology is notable and highly effective. Rather than relying on gimmicky visualizations of texts and apps, Landon and the writers integrate modern tech anxiety organically into the plot. The concept of “Digi-Drops”—a fictionalized but plausible evolution of digital messaging—feels right at home in a world where surveillance and data manipulation are everyday concerns. The idea that Violet can’t even trust her own phone, her date, or the people around her lends Drop a chilling, Black Mirror-like undertone.

Pacing and other issues:

Where the film truly excels is in its pacing and structure. Though confined to mostly one location for much of its runtime, the film never feels stagnant. Each new development raises the stakes, and just when the situation seems to plateau, it jolts forward again with a new revelation or threat. The tension is sometimes suffocating, particularly in the film’s second act, where Violet is forced to make increasingly difficult decisions with impossible stakes.

If there’s a drawback, it’s that Drop occasionally edges toward the melodramatic. Some twists, particularly in the final act, require a mild suspension of disbelief. A few characters are underdeveloped—specifically some of the diners and side figures whose motivations feel more like plot devices than fully fleshed-out individuals. But these are minor criticisms in a film so confident in its tone and so carefully constructed.

Advertisement

A well-rounded experience with payoff:

The emotional payoff in the third act—without getting into spoilers—is well-earned. Violet’s arc, from a cautious woman afraid to re-enter the world to someone forced to confront both internal and external threats head-on, is compelling and cathartic. The relationship between her and her young son Toby is understated but essential. The stakes are never abstract—there’s a child’s safety and a family’s future on the line—and that gives Drop a grounding, emotional anchor that’s missing from many thrillers of this kind.

Brandon Sklenar’s Henry turns out to be more than a pretty face, and the chemistry between him and Fahy adds a bittersweet layer to the escalating danger. The film doesn’t need to lean into romance, but it does, gently and effectively, never forgetting that vulnerability and connection are just as dangerous—and necessary—as deceit and power.

The technical elements—score, lighting, and editing—are all top-notch. The music subtly morphs throughout the film, moving from elegant ambiance to urgent pulses without drawing too much attention to itself. The use of camera angles and close-ups heightens Violet’s isolation without it feeling gimmicky. It’s a confident, sleek production that knows when to hold back and when to go all in.

Overall:

Drop is a smart, stylish thriller that understands the fears of the digital age but roots them in very human emotions: grief, love, and trust. It balances its high-concept tension with grounded performances, particularly from Meghann Fahy, whose turn as Violet deserves recognition. Christopher Landon once again proves he’s not just a genre director—he’s a filmmaker who knows how to use suspense as a tool to explore deeper truths. It’s a harrowing night out—and one that audiences won’t soon forget.

Drop Review: A Slick, High-Stakes Thriller with a Beating Heart
Advertisement
  • Acting – 8.5/10
  • Cinematography/Visual Effects – 8.5/10
  • Plot/Screenplay – 7.5/10
  • Setting/Theme – 7.5/10
  • Watchability – 8.5/10
  • Rewatchability – 7.5/10

User Review


0
(0 votes)

Summary

Drop is a smart, stylish thriller that understands the fears of the digital age but roots them in very human emotions: grief, love, and trust. It balances its high-concept tension with grounded performances, particularly from Meghann Fahy, whose turn as Violet deserves recognition. Christopher Landon once again proves he’s not just a genre director—he’s a filmmaker who knows how to use suspense as a tool to explore deeper truths. It’s a harrowing night out—and one that audiences won’t soon forget.

Pros

Christopher Landon continues to prove himself as a great director

Advertisement

Meghann Fahy and Brandon Sklenar deliver fantastic performances

Excellent lighting and cinematography

Tense all the way through

Cons

Some of the scenes that involve the use of memes are a bit silly

Advertisement

Slight bit of having to suspend disbelief in the third act

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: ‘Avatar: Fire and Ash’ – Catholic Review

Published

on

Movie Review: ‘Avatar: Fire and Ash’ – Catholic Review

NEW YORK (OSV News) – “Avatar: Fire and Ash” (20th Century), the third film in the always visually rich franchise that got its start in 2009, brings forward thematic elements that had previously been kept in the background and that viewers of faith will find it impossible to accept and difficult to dismiss. As a result, it requires careful evaluation by mature movie fans.

Against the recurring background of the fictional moon Pandora, the saga of the family whose fortunes were chronicled in the earlier chapters continues. The clan consists of dad Jake Sully (Sam Worthington) and his wife Neytiri (Zoe Saldaña) as well as their three surviving children, teens Lo’ak (Britain Dalton) and Kiri (Sigourney Weaver) and tyke Tuk (Trinity Jo-Li Bliss).

Rounding out the household is Jake and Neytiri’s adolescent adopted son, Spider (Jack Champion).

As veterans of the earlier outings will know, Jake was originally a human and a Marine. But, via an avatar, he eventually embraced the identity of Neytiri’s Pandoran tribe, the Na’vi. While their biological kids are to all appearances Na’vi — a towering race with blue skins and tails — Spider is human and requires a breathing mask to survive on Pandora.

Lo’ak is guilt-ridden over his role in the death of his older brother, Neteyam (Jamie Flatters), and wants to redeem himself by proving his worth as a warrior. Kiri is frustrated that, despite her evident spiritual gifts, she’s unable to connect with Eywa, the mother goddess the Na’vi worship.

Advertisement

For his part, Jake is worried about Spider’s future — Neteyam’s death has left the still-grieving Neytiri with a hatred of the “Sky people,” as Earthlings are known on Pandora. He also has to contend with the ongoing threat posed by his potentially deadly rivalry with his former Marine comrade, Col. Miles Quaritch (Stephen Lang), who is also Spider’s estranged father.

As if all that weren’t enough, a further challenge arises when the Metkayina, the sea-oriented Pandorans with whom Jake et al. have taken refuge, are attacked by the fierce fire-centric Mangkwan, led by Varang (Oona Chaplin), a malevolent sorceress. A three hour-plus running time is required to tie up these varied strands.

Along the way, the religion adhered to by the main characters becomes more prominent than in previous installments. Thus Eywa is both present on screen and active in the plot. Additionally, Kiri is revealed to have been the product of a virginal conception.

Director and co-writer (with Rick Jaffa and Amanda Silver) James Cameron’s extension of his blockbuster series, accordingly, not only includes material uncomfortable at best for Christians but also seems incongruent, overall, with monotheistic belief. Even well-catechized grown-ups, therefore, should approach this sprawling addition to Cameron’s epic with caution.

The film contains nonscriptural beliefs and practices, constant stylized but often intense combat violence with brief gore, scenes of torture, narcotics use, partial nudity, a couple of mild oaths, at least one rough term, numerous crude and a handful of crass expressions and an obscene gesture. The OSV News classification is L — limited adult audience, films whose problematic content many adults would find troubling. The Motion Picture Association rating is PG-13 — parents strongly cautioned. Some material may be inappropriate for children under 13.

Advertisement

Read More Movie & TV Reviews

Copyright © 2025 OSV News

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Gurram Paapi Reddy’ movie review: Naresh Agastya, Faria Abdullah’s con comedy is hilarious yet overcooked

Published

on

‘Gurram Paapi Reddy’ movie review: Naresh Agastya, Faria Abdullah’s con comedy is hilarious yet overcooked

If this week’s Telugu release Gurram Paapi Reddy were a human, it would most likely be a teenager. It bursts with energy, overflowing with ideas and wearing its unabashed enthusiasm like a badge of honour. The audience too might end up surrendering to its infectious energy. Yet, like a distracted teenager, the film also gets so enamoured by its very idea that it loses control and does not know where to stop.

The vibe is eerily similar to Jathi Ratnalu early on. Again, Brahmanandam (as Vaidyanathan), is a judge. Faria Abdullah, the actress in the former film, is the only female presence in the lead lineup here. The other oddball male characters — Gurram Paapi Reddy (Naresh Agastya), Chilipi (Vamshidhar Goud), Goyyi (Jeevan Kumar) and Military (Rajkumar Kasireddy) — are the not-so-smart ones who get entangled in a mess.

The similarities end there. Brahmanandam, who is in terrific form, sets the tone of the comedy, doling out harsh punishments to petty criminals, not for their crimes, but for their sheer stupidity in getting caught. Gurram, Chilipi, Goyyi and Military are the victims who reunite after their jail term. This time, they are joined by Soudamini (Faria).

Gurram Paapi Reddy (Telugu)

Director: Murali Manohar

Cast: Naresh Agastya, Faria Abdullah, Brahmanandam, Yogi Babu

Advertisement

Runtime: 160 minutes

Storyline: A gang of four ex-convicts swap dead bodies for easy money and land in a ‘royal’ mess.

While their earlier heist at a jewellery store goes terribly wrong, the new plan is strangely simple. The four men need to swap a dead body from Srisailam with another body in a graveyard in Hyderabad for a meagre sum. While they execute it, albeit with difficulty, it gets messy when the motive behind the swap comes to the fore, dating back to a royal gift from the pre-Independence era.

The key conflict is established prior to the intermission, but newer problems surface later. Though the story idea is deceptively straightforward, the director builds many layers to the fun quotient and it’s evident that he treats comedy like serious business.

The actors react to the situations without trying too hard to impress. The scenes are not only thematically funny, but also packed with outrageously hilarious one-liners. Every time one feels the film’s trajectory is sorted, there is a surprise. The screenplay is busy with backstories and subplots.

Advertisement

The second hour could have benefited from some economy in writing. Past connections are strung together, newer characters and their complexities are introduced, there are backup plans, flashbacks and a song is thrown into the mix. Thankfully, the humour quotient remains unaffected. Some breather would have been welcome.

The subplots involving Sangi Reddy, particularly the courtroom proceedings, and Markandeya Raju’s son crowd the screenplay, leaving the viewers with too many dots to connect. It’s inevitable for some restlessness to creep in towards the final 45 minutes — a stretch packed with several events and coincidences. A clever climax salvages the film.

Gurram Paapi Reddy is aware of the crucial balance between the goofiness of its characters and the seriousness of the plot. Too many characters and a packed, expansive narrative make the film exhausting, given its 160-minute runtime.

Naresh Agastya, Vamshidhar Goud, Faria Abdullah, Jeevan Kumar and Rajkumar Kasireddy share wonderful on-screen camaraderie and get ample scope to shine individually too. Yogi Babu, as a convict with night-blindness, brings the roof down even when he doesn’t dub for himself. Motta Rajendran’s antics look repetitive at times, though they land well.

This is also among Brahmanandam’s best on-screen appearances in recent times. It’s an absolute joy to see the veteran actor ever-hungry to prove his worth when he senses potential in a scene. John Vijay is in dire need of reinvention with his dialogue delivery and body language. Both songs in the film, composed by Krishna Saurabh, though well-shot, feel abrupt.

A narrative with lesser flab would have amplified the film’s impact. The makers tease the audience with a potential sequel idea, but appreciably it does not appear forced. The film is also complete in itself.

Advertisement

Gurram Paapi Reddy is a smartly written and performed con-comedy that delivers laughs aplenty, though a few segments become indulgent.

Published – December 19, 2025 08:22 pm IST

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Avatar: Fire and Ash’ Movie Review and Release Live Updates: James Cameron directorial opens to mixed audience reviews – The Times of India

Published

on

‘Avatar: Fire and Ash’ Movie Review and Release Live Updates: James Cameron directorial opens to mixed audience reviews  – The Times of India

James Cameron clarifies Matt Damon’s viral claim that he turned down 10 per cent of ‘Avatar’ profits

Filmmaker James Cameron has addressed actor Matt Damon’s long-circulating claim that he turned down the lead role in Avatar along with a lucrative share of the film’s profits, saying the version widely believed online is “not exactly true.”

For years, Damon has spoken publicly about being offered the role of Jake Sully in the 2009 blockbuster in exchange for 10 per cent of the film’s gross, a deal that would have translated into hundreds of millions of dollars given Avatar’s global earnings of USD 2.9 billion. The role eventually went to Australian actor Sam Worthington, according to The Hollywood Reporter.

“Jim Cameron called me — he offered me 10 per cent of Avatar,” Damon says in the clips. “You will never meet an actor who turned down more money than me … I was in the middle of shooting the Bourne movie and I would have to leave the movie kind of early and leave them in the lurch a little bit and I didn’t want to do that … [Cameron] was really lovely, he said: ‘If you don’t do this, this movie doesn’t really need you. It doesn’t need a movie star at all. The movie is the star, the idea is the star, and it’s going to work. But if you do it, I’ll give you 10 per cent of the movie.’”

However, speaking to The Hollywood Reporter, Cameron said Damon was never formally offered the part. “I can’t remember if I sent him the script or not. I don’t think I did? Then we wound up on a call and he said, ‘I love to explore doing a movie with you. I have a lot of respect for you as a filmmaker. [Avatar] sounds intriguing. But I really have to do this Jason Bourne movie. I’ve agreed to it, it’s a direct conflict, and so, regretfully, I have to turn it down.’ But he was never offered. There was never a deal,” according to The Hollywood Reporter.

Advertisement

The director added that discussions never progressed to character details or negotiations. “We never talked about the character. We never got to that level. It was simply an availability issue,” he said.

Addressing the widely shared belief that Damon turned down a massive payday, Cameron said the actor may have unintentionally merged separate ideas over time. “What he’s done is extrapolate ‘I get 10 percent of the gross on all my films,’” Cameron said, adding that such a deal would not have happened in this case. “So he’s off the hook and doesn’t have to beat himself up anymore.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending