Connect with us

Movie Reviews

‘Carry-On’ movie review: It’s fight or flight for Taron Egerton

Published

on

‘Carry-On’ movie review: It’s fight or flight for Taron Egerton

A still from ‘Carry-On’ 
| Photo Credit: Netflix

If you are one of those die-hard cinephiles who believe Die Hard is a Christmas film (along with the first two Home Alone flicks), then Netflix’s latest offering may very well make it to that coveted list of yours. Jaume Collet-Serra, the mastermind behind some simple yet efficient nail-biting action thrillers is back and while he’s not teaming up with Liam Neeson this time, he’s got an efficient Taron Egerton and a cast-against-the-grain Jason Bateman facing it off in Carry-On.

Exactly a decade after Non-Stop, Collet-Serra is back with another aviation thriller. In Carry-On, a young Transportation Security Administration (TSA) officer named Ethan Kopek (Taron Egerton) with enough emotional baggage of his own, tries to work up his ranks at the Los Angeles International Airport where his pregnant girlfriend, Nora (Sofia Carson) also works. When he finally gets approval from his supervisor, Phil Sarkowski (Dean Norris) to manage a baggage-scanning lane, hell is served on a conveyor belt to Ethan. A mysterious traveller, with an accomplice to execute his kill order, blackmails Ethan to allow a specific carry-on luggage pass through the scanner. Without knowing what the package is and the level of destruction it could bring, Ethan has to circumvent constant surveillance and stop the parcel from affecting anyone in this cat-and-mouse game.

Carry-On (English)

Director: Jaume Collet-Serra

Cast: Taron Egerton, Sofia Carson, Danielle Deadwyler, Jason Bateman

Runtime: 119 minutes

Advertisement

Storyline: A young Transportation Security Administration officer has to outsmart a mysterious traveller who blackmails him into allowing a dangerous package onboard a flight on Christmas Eve 

The film’s title itself is a wordplay — apart from meaning the piece of luggage one gets to personally take inside a flight and it also doubles as what Ethan is expected to do with his job despite the major turn of events. This simple yet effective ploy is what Collet-Serra utilises and what keeps the wafer-thin one-liner not just afloat, but flying high, is a testemant to the deft screenplay. The film wastes no time introducing its lead characters and throws us bang in the middle of the action. With some clever exposition, we learn more about them as the story progresses and the characters get to squeeze more details out of each other.

Egerton pulls off a convincing performance as a man whose life goes for a toss after answering a single phone call. Unlike the indestructible force that is Bruce Willis’ John McClane, Egerton’s Ethan is no superhero who uses his brawn to take challenges head-on. Instead, the character starts by employing simpler tricks to attract the attention of his peers — such as using his smartwatch to communicate once he loses possession of his phone — and when the odds stack up against him, he takes it upon himself to save the day.

A still from ‘Carry-On’ 

A still from ‘Carry-On’ 
| Photo Credit:
Netflix

Concurrently, there’s also Elena Cole, an LAPD detective, who connects a double homicide to Ethan’s aborted 911 call. But apart from being in a high-speed car sequence featuring the most factitious-looking CG work, the parallel track adds very little except to tie a few loose ends. It’s Bateman’s nameless mercenary character that comes as a surprise package (pun intended) and the actor pulls off the antagonist with so much suave, leaving us only wishing to see more of him in such off-beat roles.

The film has its fair share of loopholes and the creative liberties taken by the makers feel evident, but Carry-On is not a film you watch for factual accuracies. In fact, the film is packaged well enough to make us ponder its issues only after the pertaining scene is long gone and that by itself is a commendable feat. After getting sidetracked by helming films like Jungle Cruise and Black Adam, Collet-Serra is back in his zone and boy, he thrives in it. Carry-On is sure to remind its audience of the mindless actioners from the ‘90s which worked purely thanks to their value for popcorn entertainment and while it might not make you go ‘Yippee-Ki-Yay’, it’ll surely leave you on cloud nine.

Carry-On is currently streaming on Netflix

Advertisement

Movie Reviews

Marco Review: You Will Bathe in Blood

Published

on

Marco Review: You Will Bathe in Blood

BOTTOM LINE
You Will Bathe in Blood

RATING
2.75/5

CENSOR
A, 2h 24m


What Is the Film About?

When Victor, the younger brother of a powerful mafia family is killed inhumanly by a rival family, his step-brother Marco (Unni Mukundan) promises to take revenge. The movie’s basic story is the way Marco goes about the vengeance and the setbacks he faces.

Advertisement

Performances

Unni Mukundan goes for a complete makeover with Marco. The character is designed as a beast-like personality who is raw and untamed and will go to any extent to protect his loved ones. The physical transformation and the attitude on display make the part believable. But, that is only half the job done as there is a lot of action to do.

Unni Mukundan does extremely well in the action blocks. The ferocity and energy needed for the part are adequately presented in the performance. Believability is the main thing here and the effort makes it convincing from the start to the end. But once he sets the tone and mood for his character, there is hardly any variation he brings.


Analysis

Haneef Adeni writes and directs Marco. It is an out-and-out action film made for genre lovers with a very thin storyline.

Advertisement

The Raid, followed by Hollywood flick John Wick, and series like The Punisher etc. have provided a feast for action movie lovers globally in the last decade and a half. Many have tried to replicate the formula across the industries and here we are now in the same space with Marco.

The movie’s opening segment sets the basic premise neatly without much drag. The principal characters among whom the narrative takes place are given some expository dialogues to establish the world and the editing sets up the tone perfectly.

The hero doesn’t arrive immediately and comes after a lot of buildup, the kind we see in KGF and the like. It raises the expectations and meets them comfortably. The hero’s introduction makes it clear that the movie would be a no-holds-barred action romp with lots of stomach-curdling gore, violence and blood spilling.

The film’s first half is about the build-up to the intro and then to the interval. Everything else happening in between works in tandem with taking the narrative towards those blocks.

The interval block raises the stakes further after the intro in terms of the action. It does remind one of the climax sequence of a recently released Telugu flick, though.

Advertisement

Again, the small twists and turns the proceedings take to reach the interval are on expected lines, and nothing is frankly surprising. These scenes additionally contain brief emotional moments between the brothers to justify all the violence that follows.

Post the bang of an interval, the expectations only increase as to what could come next to top it. However, we don’t immediately get to the ‘action’ and there is some drama. It is typical of the genre, which again feels like a set-up to the next big bang.

We get that bang, but in an unexpected fashion during the pre-climax. It justifies the promotional tagline of the film as ‘The Most Violent Flick’ of the season. It is also emotional and most importantly not for the weak-hearted. Some moments in it might be too much to take for a normal viewer.

The climax is on expected lines after that mayhem seen previously. But, it doesn’t just go through the motions, it delivers a satisfying experience after all things are done. It’s this full contentment experience after the whole ordeal is where Marco succeeds. The joy of making it seeps through amidst all the bloodshed.

Overall, Marco is a violent action thriller with slick execution. It delivers on what it promises without holding back on anything. It is a treat, for action movie lovers who don’t mind the gore. If you like the genre, go ahead.

Advertisement

Performances by Others Actors

We have many artists playing bits and pieces roles in the movie. To those who follow Malayalam cinema, a few faces are instantly recognisable like Siddique, Jagadish etc. They fit into any character given to them effortlessly. We see the same here as they play gangsters.

The rest of the actors are relatively unknown from an outsider’s perspective. However, it doesn’t matter as when it comes to the performances, they all do an adequate job. They generate the right emotion conveying ruthlessness or disgust. Abhimanyu Thilakan and Kabir Duhan Singh impress playing the antagonists. The latter gets a short, but powerful part sure to leave an impact.

Among the female characters, only Yukti Thareja and Durva Thaker have crucial parts. The screen time is small, but they add emotional appeal in their own way.


Music and Other Departments?

Advertisement

Ravi Basrur of KGF fame composes the music. The songs are serviceable to the genre, but the background score is excellent in his typical style. It leans more on the techno side and parts of it are repeated throughout, but it doesn’t get monotonous, though. Technically the movie is slick with excellent cinematography and editing. The action choreography is top-notch and a major highlight of the flick. The writing is okay.


Highlights?

Action Blocks

Unni Mukundan

Editing

Advertisement

Drawbacks?

Thin Storyline

Too Much Gore (Not For Everyone)

Mechanical Drama


Did I Enjoy It?

Advertisement

Yes

Will You Recommend It?

Yes, to those who love action movies in all its bloody glory

Marco Telugu Movie Review by M9

Advertisement
This Week Releases on OTT – Check ‘Rating’ Filter
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Rob’s Car Movie Review: Duel (1971) – Street Muscle

Published

on

Rob’s Car Movie Review: Duel (1971) – Street Muscle

Duel began life as a short story written by Richard Matheson, one of Hollywood’s most seasoned writers. Previous work of Matheson’s included episodic writing for such TV series as Have Gun – Will Travel, Combat!, The Alfred Hitchcock Hour, and Star Trek, and movies like The Omega Man, The Pit and the Pendulum, and The Raven. He was perhaps best known though for having written 16 episodes of Rod Serling’s classic show, The Twilight Zone.

Matheson penned the story of Duel after being dangerously tailgated by a trucker while driving on a California highway on November 22, 1963, the same day that President John F. Kennedy was assassinated. Duel was ultimately published in the March, 1971 issue of Playboy magazine.

Duel author and teleplay writer, Richard Matheson. (Photo courtesy of Manor Vellum.)

The story was brought to the attention of fledgling director Spielberg by his secretary, who told him that she was aware Universal and ABC had optioned the property for a Movie of the Week and were looking for a director.

Spielberg read the short and was compelled enough by the strength of it to apply for the job. He met with producer George Ekstein and beat out a host of other directors based on an episode of Colombo Spielberg had directed and showed the producer. Matheson was meanwhile hired to adapt his story into a teleplay.

Advertisement

Director Steven Spielberg on the set of Duel. (Photo courtesy of Universal Pictures.)

During the casting process, Spielberg fought hard to have Dennis Weaver star in the project based on the director’s admiration for the actor’s performance as the hotel manager in Orson Welles’ Touch of Evil, opposite Charlton Heston, Janet Leigh, and Welles himself.

Spielberg, and Weaver, eventually won out. Additional cast members included Jacqueline Scott, Eddie Firestone, Lou Frizzell, and Lucille Benson, all in minor roles.

Dennis Weaver as the main protagonist, motorist David Mann. (Photo courtesy of Universal Pictures.)

Principal photography was completed in just 13 days, mostly on rural California stretches such as the Agua Dulce Canyon Road, Soledad Canyon Road, Angeles Forest Road, and the Sierra Highway. Equally astonishing is the fact that the film was edited in a mere 10 days by Frank Morriss.

Advertisement

Duel originally aired as the ABC Movie of the Week on November 13, 1971, and received rave reviews by critics and viewers alike. Spielberg, in particular, was lauded by film critics from Variety and The Hollywood Reporter for his directorial flourishes on the movie.

The movie opens with a montage of shots taken from the bumper of Mann’s car as it travels from Los Angeles to the high desert. (Photo courtesy of Universal Pictures.)

So universally positive were the reactions to Duel that it was theatrically released in 1972-’73 in an extended 90 minute version (14 minutes longer than the television cut) with additional scenes shot by Spielberg.

Duel’s plot is simple. David Mann (Weaver) is a Los Angeles salesman who has an appointment with a client upstate. During the course of his drive he encounters a worse-for-wear big rig truck emblazoned with “Flammable” warnings all over its exterior.

Mann’s original sin: passing the big rig. (Photo courtesy of Universal Pictures.)

Advertisement

The truck is going slowly up a grade, so Mann passes it in a responsible fashion using his turn signals, and is soon underway at a speed he figures will get him to his appointment on time.

Just a few moments later, the truck abruptly roars past him, cuts him off, and then slows down to its original speed in front of Mann. Perturbed, and now breathing the truck’s diesel exhaust, Mann passes the tanker again and is treated to a blast from its air horns.

Mann and his tormentor at the gas station. (Photo courtesy of Universal Pictures.)

Later in the day, Mann pulls into a gas station, and a few minutes later the tanker parks next to him at an adjacent pump. The truck’s driver gets out of the beast on the side opposite Mann’s field of view, but the salesman is able to see the man’s cowboy boots.

After a phone call to his quarrelsome wife in which she quips about his lack of manhood the night before when his co-worker was making advances towards her, Mann is told by the gas station attendant that he needs a new radiator hose. He declines the repair and is on his way.

Advertisement

Back on the road, Mann is once again menaced by the tanker truck, which rudely passes him and then swerves all over the road to prevent Mann from repassing. Mann finally gets past the truck, whereupon the big rig tailgates him, forcing Mann to go faster and faster. Doing in excess of 100 mph, Mann loses control of his vehicle and spins out across from a diner.

Mann spies his adversary outside the diner. (Photo courtesy of Universal Pictures.)

Shaken, he goes into the diner’s lavatory. When he comes out, he sees the offending truck parked outside, and assumes the driver is in the diner with him. He studies the diner’s patrons, and confronts one wearing similar cowboy boots to the truck’s driver.

The patron does not take well to Mann’s accusations and punches him several times. The man then leaves, gets into a pickup truck, and drives away, indicating to Mann that he had picked out the wrong man.

Out on the highway, the dangerous game of cat and mouse continues, with the tanker truck’s attacks becoming more potentially lethal.

Advertisement

The big rig tries to kill Mann by pushing his car into a freight train. (Photo courtesy of Universal Pictures.)

As the two vehicles begin to ascend a mountain road, Mann is able to put space between himself and the much slower truck. Mann starts to relax, but just as he does, his radiator hose bursts, causing his car to overheat thus making the ascent to the top of the mountain unlikely.

With the big rig now hot on his tail, Mann must take matters into his own hands to ensure his very survival.

A blown radiator hose derails Mann’s getaway. (Photo courtesy of Universal Pictures.)

In spite of Duel’s unsophisticated plot, the movie actually makes quite a few thematic comments on life-and-death, contemporary society, and masculinity. The fact that we never see the driver of the big-rig also imparts a supernatural feel to the proceedings, as if this is perhaps a fever dream in Mann’s head, or, if real, that the driver of the truck is in fact a demon or the devil himself.

Advertisement

This quasi-satanic angle is so well conceived in the movie that it was directly lifted for the less well-crafted but nonetheless entertaining 1977 film, The Car, starring James Brolin.

Glimpses of Spielberg’s future cinematic aesthetic are visible throughout the film. (Photo courtesy of Universal Pictures.)

Quick glimpses of Spielberg filmmaking hallmarks are littered throughout Duel. His use of wide angle lenses on close-up subjects to infuse a sense of shock or panic are present, as is his exceptional framing and use of the camera to convey information.

For a 25 year-old, Spielberg’s mastery of the mise-en-scene is absolutely extraordinary here, and it makes for an exciting romp despite the straightforward plot. It stands to reason that in the hands of a lesser director, Duel could have easily been a bore and a misfire.

Spielberg’s use of framing, lens choice, and depth make even mundane sequences feel artistic. Examples include this shot of Mann’s car driving through the desert, and Mann’s phone call to his wife, framed inside the door of a washing machine. (Photos courtesy of Universal Pictures.)

The use of sound and the lack thereof at times is also beautifully handled in the film, often injecting a menacing tone of impending doom. Relatively little dialogue is spoken in the movie, as per Spielberg’s desire to let the terror of the situation and the vehicles do the talking. The majority of dialogue in the film is heard as a narration of Mann’s inner thoughts.

Advertisement

The cinematography by Jack A. Marta, the aforementioned editing by Frank Morriss, and Billy Goldenberg’s exciting score should also be given a nod for their peerless efficacy.

Mann’s ride: a 1970 Plymouth Valiant. (Photo courtesy of Universal Pictures.)

Even Spielberg’s selection of vehicles is well thought through. Mann’s car, a 1970 Plymouth Valiant, is a compact with a limited powertrain. It was chosen to echo Mann’s meek personality and his wife’s suggestion to the effect that he was no Prince Valliant the night before. The car’s blinding Tor-Red exterior paint, on the other hand, was chosen by the director solely because it would stand out against the desert locales that they filmed in.

As an aside for those concerned with production minutiae, four Valiants were used during production. A 1970 and ’71 model equipped with Chrysler’s 225 cubic-inch slant six were used for beauty shots, while an older 1969 model with the manufacturer’s 318 cubic-inch V8, was dressed up to look like the 1970 model and used primarily as the stunt car.

For the extra scenes shot for the theatrical release of the movie, a 1972 Valiant with the 225 cubic-inch six was used. To Spielberg’s dismay, this car would later be used in an episode of the Universal television series, The Incredible Hulk.

Advertisement

Spielberg settled on a 1957 Peterbuilt 281 for the truck as he felt it had a menacing “face.” (Photo courtesy of Universal Pictures.)

Spielberg looked at a number of big rigs before deciding on the 1957 Peterbuilt 281 used in the film. Its older cab styling, consisting of a long hood, round headlights, and split windshield, looked like a menacing face to the director, and its decrepit condition helped to convey the dark specter motif that he was after. The addition of multiple license plates on the truck’s bumper was Spielberg’s idea, to suggest that the driver is a serial killer who has done this before to other drivers across the southwest.

The truck was powered by a 280 horsepower CAT 1673 turbocharged diesel engine with a 13-speed transmission and had a Rockwell TK-570 axle behind it. The top speed of such a setup was roughly 65 mph, so the impression of greater speed was accomplished by wise selections of camera lenses and low angles.

Spielberg’s chose of lenses and angles were able to make the tanker look like it was going faster than it was. (Photo courtesy of Universal Pictures.)

For the additional scenes filmed for the 1972-’73 theatrical release, a 1962 Peterbuilt 351 with a CAT 1673B engine was used.

Advertisement

The vehicular action in Duel is truly top-notch, as one would expect since legendary Hollywood stuntman Carey Loftin was the stunt coordinator and driver of the big rig. Loftin’s previous credits included standouts like Viva Las Vegas, Bullitt (he was the on-screen driver of the bad guys’ Dodge Charger in that film), Grand Prix, Bonnie and Clyde, Vanishing Point, and The French Connection, amongst countless others.

His vehicle control behind the wheel of that big, ungainly Peterbuilt is remarkable and must be seen to be appreciated.

Maybe Mr. Mann should have walked instead of driven. (Photo courtesy of Universal Pictures.)

In all, Duel is a very finely crafted, and thoroughly enjoyable movie. Had I been a film critic at the time of the movie’s release, I would have had no trouble singling out Steven Spielberg as a future grand auteur of the medium. His directorial stamp can be felt over every frame of the film, and his choices here are always dead on.

Spielberg turned a potentially run-of-the-mill Movie of the Week into a project worthy of theatrical distribution at a time when I believe only a handful of other directors could have done so. I highly recommend that you see Duel if you never have, and I give it 8 out of 10 pistons.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: ‘King Saud,’ Worst of Year? – TV EYE

Published

on

Movie Review: ‘King Saud,’ Worst of Year? – TV EYE

Writing at the end of the year, I can safely say I won’t see a worse film this year than “King Saud,” a clumsy, blood-soaked stumble through world problems through the cracked lens of local police corruption.

That a Saudi prince and his prostitute are shot and decapitated is tasteless enough but that’s the scene setter in what tries desperately to be a hard-bitten detective yarn about cracking the case. But all it manages to do is open the door to all kinds of stereotypes and cultural exaggerations that seem as dated as Muslim bans.

Mark Toma wrote, directed and even stars in the thing as a world-weary and oft-punched detective whose face is constantly screwed up like he’d smelt something bad. It’s a personal project he’s been working on for 14 years, so we can presume he was self-motivated when adding the awkward sex scenes for himself.

I’m not saying he doesn’t know anything about sex (maybe just his character doesn’t), but he doesn’t seem to know a thing about how the police operate either, as the film quickly turns into a tale about catching a corrupt district commander who we had only seen for a couple of minutes.

Advertisement

This after more than one flashback that initially seemed entirely incongruous to anything else going on. Bad acting is an issue all around, but at least Kate Orsini seems to know she’s stuck in a stinker, sticking with it just as her character must put up with Toma’s oafish detective (though she sleeps with him to get more info — is this good police work, bad decision making or more of Toma’s bad script?).

Mike Saad has fun playing an over-the-top Saudi personal assistant who might have the key to the beheading. But there’s so much random bloodshed (indicated by spatter) and gunplay there’s hardly room to lighten the mood in a film so desperate to be noir, a lonely muted trumpet plays between scenes, over stock shots of L.A. traffic.

The politics of “King Saud” is probably the most muddled of all and every time a Muslim slags America, Toma’s detective brings up 9/11. Meant to be contemporary, it ends up being as dated as it is dull and dumb. 

“King Saud” is available on Google Play, You Tube and Amazon Prime.  





Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending