Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Beyond Fest movie review: ‘Kids vs. Aliens’ is a close encounter of the awesome kind

Published

on

Beyond Fest movie review: ‘Kids vs. Aliens’ is a close encounter of the awesome kind

“Children vs. Aliens” is about children combating aliens. Photograph courtesy of RLJE Leisure

LOS ANGELES, Oct. 8 (UPI) — Children vs. Aliens, which screened at Past Fest Saturday, is a throwback to youth-friendly sci-fi movies of the ’80s. Solely, Children vs. Aliens is as gory as all the opposite ’80s horror films, so it is a throwback for followers of each genres or possibly children who by no means actually grew up.

Samantha (Phoebe Rex) is all the time caught babysitting her brother Gary (Dominic Mariche) and his pals. They make films along with some pretty elaborate costumes and props.

When teenager Billy (Calem MacDonald) makes eyes at Samantha, she shifts her focus to dressing good and searching good for him. However, Billy is simply utilizing Samantha so he can throw a celebration at her home whereas her dad and mom are touring, once more leaving her to babysit.

Author/director Jason Eisener creates the sense that these children are in it collectively, even earlier than the arrival of the aliens the title guarantees. Samantha and Gary’s dad and mom present little curiosity in both of their children’ lives, and take Samantha without any consideration as their live-in babysitter.

Advertisement

Samantha has a poignant arc, desirous to discover the curiosity of a man, even when Billy acts like the standard sulky teenager round everybody else. She sees who he actually is for herself quickly sufficient on the social gathering.

The social gathering actually escalates to the place Billy turns into so harmful one actually worries about Gary and Samantha caught with this terrorist and his legion of their home. And everybody on the social gathering is understandably distracted from the precise aliens who’ve now began roaming round.

When the aliens present up, Samantha will get to be the actual hero. The talents she makes use of in her household’s films, and the duty that is already been thrust upon her too younger, repay when she’s combating for her life and everybody else’s.

Mariche and the children enjoying Gary’s pals (Asher Grayson and Ben Tector) are pure. They embrace the awkwardness of that age in addition to the autonomy and individuality for which younger youngsters not often get credit score.

The aliens are relentless. They simply hold coming. Irrespective of how the children escape one, there are extra popping out of the ship.

Advertisement

The aliens are folks in fits sporting nice costumes that might simply grace the duvet of Fangoria Journal. When the aliens kill folks, it’s gory and slimey.

Although the extent of violence will certainly warrant an R-rating, it is outrageous sufficient that it most likely will not scare children. There’s such a selfmade really feel that Children vs. Aliens appears extra just like the film children would wish to make than one that will scare them, but it does boast the sources of extra business veterans making use of their childlike aesthetic.

Eisener’s earlier movie, Hobo with a Shotgun, was an excessive motion film with actually hardcore violence. In Children vs. Aliens, he applies his aesthetic to a extra family-oriented journey with out pulling any punches.

RLJE Leisure will launch Children vs. Aliens in 2023. A Shudder streaming launch will observe.

Fred Topel, who attended movie college at Ithaca School, is a UPI leisure author based mostly in Los Angeles. He has been knowledgeable movie critic since 1999, a Rotten Tomatoes critic since 2001 and a member of the Tv Critics Affiliation since 2012. Learn extra of his work in Leisure.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Moana 2 movie review: Disney’s sequel is visually breathtaking but fails to recreate the magic of first part

Published

on

Moana 2 movie review: Disney’s sequel is visually breathtaking but fails to recreate the magic of first part

The makers have made Moana 2 a visual spectacle but failed to add depth to the emotions of the characters as the film is marred by the unidimensional and predictable storyline

read more

Star cast (Voiceovers): Auliʻi Cravalho, Dwayne Johnson, Khaleesi Lambert-Tsuda, Rose Matafeo, David Fane, Hualālai Chung, Awhimai Fraser, and Gerald Ramsey

Directors: David Derrick Jr., Jason Hand, Dana Ledoux Miller

Well, the first part of Moana was like a breath of fresh air for me, and I still cherish it as one of my favourites thanks to its emotional depth and other amazing elements. After a gap of eight years, the second part of our beloved is set to hit the screens, and while the expectations are sky-high, with a heavy heart, I have to admit that it fails to recreate the magic of the first part.

Talking about the plot, _
Moana 2 s_tarts after 3 years from where the first part concluded. Our beloved wayfinder Moana is hunting for more islands like her own Motunui, where people reside. Amid this, she gets an unexpected call from her ancestors, who inform her about the cursed island of Motufetu, which is deserted by the power-hungry god Nalo.

Advertisement

As the world is disconnected due to Motufetu being submerged in the ocean, Moana along with her small group of unique and weird people is on a mission to find Motufetu, which will reconnect all the people. On the journey, she also finds her old friend Maui, who claims himself to be a demi-god. Well, will they be able to save the island and beat god Nalo? For that, you have to watch Moana 2 on the big screen.

Honestly, the makers have made Moana 2 a visual spectacle but failed to add depth to the emotions of the characters and are marred by the unidimensional and predictable storyline. While the sequel is ahead of its predecessor in terms of VFX but lacks the magic of the first part.

The film doesn’t have any high points or wow moments as the challenges faced by the limited and prominent characters don’t emerge as an engrossing experience. Despite these problems, I still feel Moana 2 will be a delightful experience for kids between 10-12 years, who will love the cheerfulness and larger-than-life portrayals.

On the whole, Moana 2 is not a bad film but nowhere close to its prequel.

Moana 2 is releasing on 29th November

Advertisement

Rating: 2.5 (out of 5 stars)

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

'Wicked Part One' is a movie you should go see right now

Published

on

'Wicked Part One' is a movie you should go see right now

I saw the stage play several years ago in Chicago and was lukewarm about the show. So, I was not excited about going to the screening. Wow, was I pleasantly surprised. The movie is very different from the stage play. If you are not a fan of the stage play, you owe it to yourself to try the movie.

“Wicked” is the story of Glinda, the good witch of the North, telling the troubled story of Elphaba’s life to the people of Munchkin land. Elphaba, the Wicked Witch of the West, is rejected most of her life because of her green skin. At Shiz University, she forms an unlikely friendship with a beautiful young woman named Galinda, another student who is filled with an undaunted desire to be popular. Following an encounter with the Wizard of Oz, their relationship soon reaches a crossroad as their lives begin to take different paths.

Academy Award nominee Cynthia Erivo stars as Elphaba. Ariana Grande costars as Glinda/Galinda. Academy Award nominee Jeff Goldblum is the Wonderful Wizard of Oz. Academy Award winner Michelle Yeoh is Madame Morrible. Jonathan Bailey is Fiyero, the love interest. Ethan Slater is Boq. Marissa Bode is Elphaba’s sister Nessa. Idina Menzel and Kristen Chenoweth, the original Elphaba and Glinda in the 2003 stage play hit have cameo roles in “Wicked” the movie as Wiz-O-Mania super stars.

The performances of Erivo, Grande and Bailey are outstanding. Both have gorgeous voices that is a joy to listen to even though I thought the music was beautiful but there wasn’t an outstanding song.

Jon M. Chu directed.  He also directed one of my favorite movies, “Crazy Rich Asians.” Winnie Holzman and Dana Fox wrote the screenplay based on the book “Wicked” by Gregory Maguire that was based on the L. Frank Baum classic book, “The Wonderful Wizard of Oz.” The movie was so much more detailed than the stage play and the story made more sense.

Advertisement

The Choreography by Christopher Scott was reminiscent of the Busby Berkeley movies of the 1930s.

Cinematographer Alice Brooks does a phenomenal job of emphasizing the beauty of the choreography, the sets and the costumes.

Paul Tazewell’s costumes are colorful, beautiful and add so much to the beauty of the movie.

I expect that “Wicked, Part One” will be nominated for all sorts of Academy Awards, Critics Choice Awards, and Golden Globes. It is a beautiful entertaining film for the whole family.

“Wicked Part One” rated PG is now showing in Edwardsville, Alton, Granite City, Jerseyville and Carlinville. I give it 5 stars. The sequel, “Wicked Part Two,” is scheduled for release on November 21, 2025. 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Maria movie review & film summary (2024) | Roger Ebert

Published

on

Maria movie review & film summary (2024) | Roger Ebert

Even if he doesn’t exactly go there in his cinema, Pablo Larraín often obliquely flirts with horror. The hints were there in the fanatical nature of the titular “Tony Manero” character, a dancer unnervingly obsessed with John Travolta in “Saturday Night Fever.” And they were all the more obvious in his gorgeous political satire “El Conde”—one of 2023’s boldest cinematic outings that imagined Pinochet as a 250-year-old vampire. To the careful eye, the director’s genre exploits elevated much of his ingenious, gradually heartbreaking psychodramas “Jackie” and “Spencer,” too, his pair of otherworldly films on the troubled lives of legendary 20th century women.

Now with “Maria,” about the final days of the iconic American-Greek soprano Maria Callas, Larraín turns his “historic women” movies into a near-perfect trilogy, giving us a stunning conclusion to his series. Upon seeing “Maria” for the first time months ago at the Telluride Film Festival (and revisiting it several times thereafter), this critic pondered what made “Maria” not only the gentlest, but the best of the three. And the answer was perhaps always obvious—as an opera connoisseur, Larraín is proudly (and often, sentimentally) protective of one of the artform’s most groundbreaking singers throughout “Maria,” a feature that was prominent neither in “Jackie,” nor “Spencer.”

It’s not that the psycho-dramatic dreads we feel in those former two films aren’t a part of “Maria.” For everyone who’s ever feared losing a big part of what defines them, and for everyone who’s opened their hearts to something they love so widely and unrestrictedly, only to see various forms of cruelty sneak in, this generous and beautiful picture ought to be a gut-punch. But you can often sense that Larraín, among the most intuitive filmmakers working today, almost wants to shield Callas from the harmful grip of those cruelties. While her end is inevitable in the film—Callas died in 1977 at the young age of 53—you will be disarmed, even moved to tears, experiencing Larraín’s care for her in “Maria,” which is essentially a compassionate ghost story on the beloved things we lose, as they continue to deteriorate and slip through our fingers against our will.

In a queenly performance of poise and mystique, Angelina Jolie plays Callas with an ethereal presence, grasping the intense grief of the once-in-a-generation singer who’s been losing her voice. In the beginning, Jolie—through Ed Lachman’s glorious, high-contrast black-and-white lensing—looks straight at the camera, as her defiant Callas sings “Ave Maria” from Verdi’s Otello, perhaps both as a little prayer to her past, and as a reckoning with her present. The voice we hear (both in this scene, and in the several arias we’d get to hear later on) belongs to Callas for sure. (At least for the most past, as Larraín reportedly has mixed in drips of Jolie’s voice in there, too.) But that doesn’t mean Jolie isn’t doing her own singing—she is, as evidenced in the way that she stretches her facial muscles and engages her entire body in the process. But she is subtle in those signifiers, as one has to be while embodying Callas. The famed soprano was effortless in navigating her range and hitting some impossibly high notes—music simply and silkily poured out of her, an artistic flair stylishly internalized and portrayed by Jolie. 

A perceptive performer who can sometimes be a tad cold-to-the-touch, Jolie gives her career-best performance as she steers Callas’s ups and downs during the singer’s final days, almost all of it empathetically imagined by Larraín and screenwriter Steven Knight. She floats around her grand Paris apartment, an elegant and expansive space of gothic hues that envelopes Callas in a cocoon of claustrophobia. (Production Designer Guy Hendrix Dyas miraculously marries realism with wistfulness in his work.) She seeks the acceptance of her devoted staff, particularly Bruna (Alba Rohrwacher) and Ferruccio (Pierfrancesco Favino), who bring much warmth and humor into the movie. She turns inward and has conversations with her own self when on a cocktail of medications—chiefly, Mandrax, inventively personified by Kodi Smit-McPhee. Elsewhere, she fends off nosy press and entitled fans. Meanwhile, she remembers both the glamor and the pain that she felt through a thunderous, rewarding, and sometimes heartbreaking past, one that eventually launched her into a rocky romance with the Greek-Argentine tycoon Aristotle Onassis (the terrific Turkish actor Haluk Bilginer). And she does all that sporting Massimo Cantini Parrini’s breathtaking costumes, both exact replicas of her known pieces, and custom designs made for the movie.

Advertisement

In honoring her journey, Larraín contrasts the film’s Paris scenes of gorgeous colors and locales with Maria’s black-and-white remembrances—not only trying to get to know La Callas but also hoping to infuse anyone who might be watching with the kind of affection he clearly feels for the diva. Dare to open your heart to his quest, and you might just feel that tenderness in a deep sense, even if you aren’t an opera connoisseur. And that’s perhaps the grandest miracle of this film—like Callas herself aimed to do, “Maria” brings opera to the masses, not as a gimmick or high-minded endeavor, but as an act of generosity and understanding that art belongs to everyone who wants to appreciate it. In that, as Larraín purposely and studiously braids in arias into his narrative—full songs for the most part, and not frustratingly chopped up snippets—and gives you a taste of everything from Bellini to Puccini to Donizetti, you’ll feel like you’ve had a full musical meal, with a hunger for a second helping.

Will you get to know Callas by the end of “Maria”? Or will she remain as a complete mystery? Rest assured that’s hardly the point of Larraín’s cinematic ode. The reward is the beautiful and heart-swelling two hours you’ll have the privilege of spending with La Callas, alongside a director who wants nothing more than to share his immense love for her. 

In theaters now, on Netflix December 11th.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending